Thank you, Drak's Social Bio ( talk) 11:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
The following deletions you made in the
List of female film and television directors article were
disruptive and harmful to the article:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6.
As a dynamic list, it is not restricted to only names that have a Wikipedia article. As a dynamic list, it requires that missing items (i.e. names) must be added with reliable sources (as explained by the dynamic list template at the top of the page). The names of film and television directors you deleted were verified with sources and met the criteria for a
stand-alone list and the names in the list complied with verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view.
One director, Jordan Bayne, had her article deleted as a non-notable actress -- but inclusion of her name in the list regarded her role as a director (e.g.
Argo (2006 film), The Sea Is All I Know
[1]) All you needed to do was un-link the name and explain in the summary that her bio article had been deleted.
I suggest that you make an effort to read every, single line of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines before making impulsive, reckless edits. I also suggest that in the future you abide by Wikipedia's
consensus policy and reach agreement with other editors before deleting a block of material from an article. For a list, you can do it at
WP:WPLISTS or the Talk page of a list.
Pyxis Solitary
(yak). L not Q. 10:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
References
Well | |
Thank you so much, I am a travel blogger and I thought it was more relevant to have a yoga school page listing yoga programs in Delhi instead of some unrelated page publicity of a travel website, talking about a movie that is not on Yoga . Indiarajjai ( talk) 12:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, since I sourced every line that I added, I am assuming that you have an issue with one of the sources that I chose? I chose the New York Times and FLCCC Alliance. While I agree that the New York Times isn't ideal, I see it used as a source all over wikipedia... so I'm not sure what the issue is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsSMarie ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I am very surprised that you would support the use of the word "erroneously" to describe a physician opinion. That is opinion. Can you please explain your position here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsSMarie ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I did not add commentary or personal opinion to any part of my edits. Please clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsSMarie ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I feel like we're arguing semantics. Kory and other I.C.U. physicians advocated for the use of corticosteroids to treat Covid 19, and now that is standard of care. If you watch his original senate hearing he is talking generally about corticosteroids and he doesn't specify, so then my characterization is accurate. I am new to wiki and I just learned how to use the talk page, so I will use that from now on.
NO AWARD | |
Please be courteous and explain how an irrelevant TRAVEL WEBSITE mentioning EAT PRAY LOVE , has used a citation to redirect to their page when this has nothing to do with Yoga or relevance of Yoga in Delhi. I dont own any business I just searched Google and linked to what seemed more relevant.
You should list all yoga school names, and that would be a nice edit instead of promoting some random travel business page. You should delete that reference. Indiarajjai ( talk) 17:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC) |
I made an edit to the page regarding to the song "God's Gonna Cut You Down." The post, as it exists, erroneously claims that the Heavenly Gospel Singers recorded the song as "You Better Run On." While they did indeed record "You Better Run On," a casual listen will show that it is not the same as, nor a derivative of, the original song. I'm new to making changes on here, so I apologize for not going about it the correct way. Thanks! EasleyTim1977
You can listen for yourself on youtube or apple music, however, wikipedia does not allow me to include a URL link.
The Vibrio anguillarum Wikipedia page contains direct copy/pasted content from the following link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/raq.12188 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8B:4401:5AC0:357F:1216:33BF:7172 ( talk • contribs)
Who told that lingayats and kuruba will keep gowda Surname that belongs to only for vokkaligas, they are landlords and zamindars. First of all lingayat is not a caste they are mixed of all castes and they don't have any caste based profession and coming to kuruba community they are shepherds then how they will become zamindars and landlords to keep gowda Surname. Gbck ( talk) 15:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't want to refer anyones article which contains wrong information and made up story. We know who we are and those who keep our surname will not become real gowda anyways thank you bye. Gbck ( talk) 15:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Mgmtjamescarter. Hi, I wanted to let you know it's not self promotion. Please do your research on the topic. Thank you. Mgmtjamescarter ( talk) 00:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at
Kiaraakitty shows that you are currently engaged in an
edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Nick Moyes (
talk) 20:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Why are you adding the tag to JEC article?! I have already discussed this with you, your answers were unsatisfactory. You have changed the date of tag too. I will report you to an admin if you continue to do so.
Thank you, Drak's Social Bio ( talk) 11:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
The following deletions you made in the
List of female film and television directors article were
disruptive and harmful to the article:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6.
As a dynamic list, it is not restricted to only names that have a Wikipedia article. As a dynamic list, it requires that missing items (i.e. names) must be added with reliable sources (as explained by the dynamic list template at the top of the page). The names of film and television directors you deleted were verified with sources and met the criteria for a
stand-alone list and the names in the list complied with verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view.
One director, Jordan Bayne, had her article deleted as a non-notable actress -- but inclusion of her name in the list regarded her role as a director (e.g.
Argo (2006 film), The Sea Is All I Know
[1]) All you needed to do was un-link the name and explain in the summary that her bio article had been deleted.
I suggest that you make an effort to read every, single line of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines before making impulsive, reckless edits. I also suggest that in the future you abide by Wikipedia's
consensus policy and reach agreement with other editors before deleting a block of material from an article. For a list, you can do it at
WP:WPLISTS or the Talk page of a list.
Pyxis Solitary
(yak). L not Q. 10:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
References
Well | |
Thank you so much, I am a travel blogger and I thought it was more relevant to have a yoga school page listing yoga programs in Delhi instead of some unrelated page publicity of a travel website, talking about a movie that is not on Yoga . Indiarajjai ( talk) 12:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, since I sourced every line that I added, I am assuming that you have an issue with one of the sources that I chose? I chose the New York Times and FLCCC Alliance. While I agree that the New York Times isn't ideal, I see it used as a source all over wikipedia... so I'm not sure what the issue is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsSMarie ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I am very surprised that you would support the use of the word "erroneously" to describe a physician opinion. That is opinion. Can you please explain your position here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsSMarie ( talk • contribs) 16:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I did not add commentary or personal opinion to any part of my edits. Please clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MsSMarie ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
I feel like we're arguing semantics. Kory and other I.C.U. physicians advocated for the use of corticosteroids to treat Covid 19, and now that is standard of care. If you watch his original senate hearing he is talking generally about corticosteroids and he doesn't specify, so then my characterization is accurate. I am new to wiki and I just learned how to use the talk page, so I will use that from now on.
NO AWARD | |
Please be courteous and explain how an irrelevant TRAVEL WEBSITE mentioning EAT PRAY LOVE , has used a citation to redirect to their page when this has nothing to do with Yoga or relevance of Yoga in Delhi. I dont own any business I just searched Google and linked to what seemed more relevant.
You should list all yoga school names, and that would be a nice edit instead of promoting some random travel business page. You should delete that reference. Indiarajjai ( talk) 17:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC) |
I made an edit to the page regarding to the song "God's Gonna Cut You Down." The post, as it exists, erroneously claims that the Heavenly Gospel Singers recorded the song as "You Better Run On." While they did indeed record "You Better Run On," a casual listen will show that it is not the same as, nor a derivative of, the original song. I'm new to making changes on here, so I apologize for not going about it the correct way. Thanks! EasleyTim1977
You can listen for yourself on youtube or apple music, however, wikipedia does not allow me to include a URL link.
The Vibrio anguillarum Wikipedia page contains direct copy/pasted content from the following link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/raq.12188 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8B:4401:5AC0:357F:1216:33BF:7172 ( talk • contribs)
Who told that lingayats and kuruba will keep gowda Surname that belongs to only for vokkaligas, they are landlords and zamindars. First of all lingayat is not a caste they are mixed of all castes and they don't have any caste based profession and coming to kuruba community they are shepherds then how they will become zamindars and landlords to keep gowda Surname. Gbck ( talk) 15:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't want to refer anyones article which contains wrong information and made up story. We know who we are and those who keep our surname will not become real gowda anyways thank you bye. Gbck ( talk) 15:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Mgmtjamescarter. Hi, I wanted to let you know it's not self promotion. Please do your research on the topic. Thank you. Mgmtjamescarter ( talk) 00:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at
Kiaraakitty shows that you are currently engaged in an
edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Nick Moyes (
talk) 20:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Why are you adding the tag to JEC article?! I have already discussed this with you, your answers were unsatisfactory. You have changed the date of tag too. I will report you to an admin if you continue to do so.