I just noticed that he had already reverted you once, so I figured he doesn't want it. John Reaves (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop removing this from the article.-- Rambutan ( talk) 09:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
The civility policy suggests - not requires - that you respond, possibly apologising for your rudeness, and expressing your support/opposition to the new version of the note.-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Well, that would be dull and irrelevant. The sewer connection is what really makes that note (so to speak). As for the insult, you did. I was insulted, and you're not in a position to argue with my emotions, just as I can't argue with yours. Fair?-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, I won't.-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
As a matter of fact, it isn't. The Oxford English Dictionary lists a noun "nevermind", meaning a matter of interest or relevance, but your "nevermind" was a verb.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Sign your posts on talkpages. That's policy. Now, I'm not using Wikipedia as a battleground, and if you just shut up I couldn't be arguing with you. You could have stayed quiet after I pointed out that nevermind wasn't a word... you could have stayed quiet after I said that I didn't want to waste more of my (frankly very valuble) time on this absurd discussion. You continued entering into dialogue with me - and very stupid dialogue it was too! This is why I'm not going to pay attention to your warning - which you simply made, and isn't real.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'd suggest taking Rambutan's advice, even though s/he is acting like a jerk, s/he is right. John Reaves (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
No, you've slightly misunderstood something. John cannot get me in trouble, because I haven't breached any policy or guideline. I'd rather you didn't drag yourself into this as well, but I respect that you're allowed to if you so wish.-- Rambutan ( talk) 07:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've removed your note, as it must have a reliable source to be on Wikipedia.-- Rambutan ( talk) 07:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed that he had already reverted you once, so I figured he doesn't want it. John Reaves (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop removing this from the article.-- Rambutan ( talk) 09:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
The civility policy suggests - not requires - that you respond, possibly apologising for your rudeness, and expressing your support/opposition to the new version of the note.-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Well, that would be dull and irrelevant. The sewer connection is what really makes that note (so to speak). As for the insult, you did. I was insulted, and you're not in a position to argue with my emotions, just as I can't argue with yours. Fair?-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, I won't.-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
As a matter of fact, it isn't. The Oxford English Dictionary lists a noun "nevermind", meaning a matter of interest or relevance, but your "nevermind" was a verb.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Sign your posts on talkpages. That's policy. Now, I'm not using Wikipedia as a battleground, and if you just shut up I couldn't be arguing with you. You could have stayed quiet after I pointed out that nevermind wasn't a word... you could have stayed quiet after I said that I didn't want to waste more of my (frankly very valuble) time on this absurd discussion. You continued entering into dialogue with me - and very stupid dialogue it was too! This is why I'm not going to pay attention to your warning - which you simply made, and isn't real.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'd suggest taking Rambutan's advice, even though s/he is acting like a jerk, s/he is right. John Reaves (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
No, you've slightly misunderstood something. John cannot get me in trouble, because I haven't breached any policy or guideline. I'd rather you didn't drag yourself into this as well, but I respect that you're allowed to if you so wish.-- Rambutan ( talk) 07:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I've removed your note, as it must have a reliable source to be on Wikipedia.-- Rambutan ( talk) 07:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)