Hi Norma, I think this may work. Let me know if you get my response!
Just a note from your Online Ambassador - nice first edit. Formatted properly and with a citation, good stuff. The Interior (Talk) 23:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I agree - and who knew feeling nerdy was so much fun! -- Greentina ( talk) 00:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
You are invited to an edit-a-thon at the Prophouse Café on Sunday March 25, as part of Women's History Month events all over the world. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon and add your signature to the list.
Thank you! InverseHypercube ( talk) 10:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I emailed the outline to Ben for his feedback and comments about the history section yesterday. I proposed to write on WAC Bennett and high modernism, and then depending what else he thinks should be included in the history section one us will write on the Two Rivers Policy. I also emailed it to Steven for feedback. Now I am just waiting on responses. Should I post what we have so far anyways? -- Heatheralyse ( talk) 05:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey Norma, read your intro, Looks Good!!! I suggested a couple things and changed a word here or there. Nothing major as its your drop. I think it works well though. -- Tborto1 ( talk) 22:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey Norma, it's fine by me if you want to drop some info tonight. I'll be dropping some on tuesday/wednesday and probably the rest at the end of next week/weekend. -- Biredale ( talk) 21:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Did everyone read the suggestion from the wiki member at the bottom of our articles talk page? What do we think about adding a section that deals with what he suggests? Also, is there any way to do a group message or do I have to write individually in each talk page? -- Tborto1 ( talk) 00:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
These will be my parts:
Introduction and section 2
Here our outline for revised WAC Bennett Dam article
Heather's part:
1. History
1.1 WAC Bennett and high modernism 1.2 Two Rivers policy
Ben's part:
1.3 surveying the land 1.4 construction of the land (maybe including naming)
Norma's part:
2. Economic investment and opportunity - all three will mainly use Stanley and the Mitchell source
2.1. Province of British Columbia 2.2. BC Hydro 2.3. Local community and workers
Kayla's part:
3. Environmental impacts
3.1 Upstream effects 3.2 Downstream effects 3.3 Williston Lake
Travis' part:
4. Social Impacts
4.1. Aboriginal communities 4.2. Local residents 4.3. Health issues and concerns
Normaromann ( talk) 19:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I believe the outline goes onto your userpage, and not this page. -- Heatheralyse ( talk) 00:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hey Norma, I think its a great idea to meet thursday after class and discuss our presentation. I'll have part of my section in my sandbox tonight. I'll drop it tomorrow afternoon. The rest will be up by Thursday/Friday at the latest. Tborto1 ( talk) 20:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, meeting on Thrusday after class sounds good. I'll look over yours and Travis' sections now! And message Tina about what to do about the comment someone left on the article talk page :s It was quite critical. -- Heatheralyse ( talk) 22:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I'm also down for meeting after class on thursday. FYI my section should be up in my sandbox either wednesday or thursday. -- Biredale ( talk) 08:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I just re-added a couple sentences at the bottom of my Aboriginal Communities section with regards to a 2008 settlement. I'm not sure I like it but it was suggested it was put back in. See what you think, and let me know. I'm concerned that we/I didn't talk about that native group and now there is information on them.... Tborto1 ( talk) 16:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I think this may work. Let me know if you get my response!
Just a note from your Online Ambassador - nice first edit. Formatted properly and with a citation, good stuff. The Interior (Talk) 23:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I agree - and who knew feeling nerdy was so much fun! -- Greentina ( talk) 00:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
You are invited to an edit-a-thon at the Prophouse Café on Sunday March 25, as part of Women's History Month events all over the world. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon and add your signature to the list.
Thank you! InverseHypercube ( talk) 10:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I emailed the outline to Ben for his feedback and comments about the history section yesterday. I proposed to write on WAC Bennett and high modernism, and then depending what else he thinks should be included in the history section one us will write on the Two Rivers Policy. I also emailed it to Steven for feedback. Now I am just waiting on responses. Should I post what we have so far anyways? -- Heatheralyse ( talk) 05:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey Norma, read your intro, Looks Good!!! I suggested a couple things and changed a word here or there. Nothing major as its your drop. I think it works well though. -- Tborto1 ( talk) 22:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey Norma, it's fine by me if you want to drop some info tonight. I'll be dropping some on tuesday/wednesday and probably the rest at the end of next week/weekend. -- Biredale ( talk) 21:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Did everyone read the suggestion from the wiki member at the bottom of our articles talk page? What do we think about adding a section that deals with what he suggests? Also, is there any way to do a group message or do I have to write individually in each talk page? -- Tborto1 ( talk) 00:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
These will be my parts:
Introduction and section 2
Here our outline for revised WAC Bennett Dam article
Heather's part:
1. History
1.1 WAC Bennett and high modernism 1.2 Two Rivers policy
Ben's part:
1.3 surveying the land 1.4 construction of the land (maybe including naming)
Norma's part:
2. Economic investment and opportunity - all three will mainly use Stanley and the Mitchell source
2.1. Province of British Columbia 2.2. BC Hydro 2.3. Local community and workers
Kayla's part:
3. Environmental impacts
3.1 Upstream effects 3.2 Downstream effects 3.3 Williston Lake
Travis' part:
4. Social Impacts
4.1. Aboriginal communities 4.2. Local residents 4.3. Health issues and concerns
Normaromann ( talk) 19:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I believe the outline goes onto your userpage, and not this page. -- Heatheralyse ( talk) 00:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hey Norma, I think its a great idea to meet thursday after class and discuss our presentation. I'll have part of my section in my sandbox tonight. I'll drop it tomorrow afternoon. The rest will be up by Thursday/Friday at the latest. Tborto1 ( talk) 20:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, meeting on Thrusday after class sounds good. I'll look over yours and Travis' sections now! And message Tina about what to do about the comment someone left on the article talk page :s It was quite critical. -- Heatheralyse ( talk) 22:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I'm also down for meeting after class on thursday. FYI my section should be up in my sandbox either wednesday or thursday. -- Biredale ( talk) 08:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Norma, I just re-added a couple sentences at the bottom of my Aboriginal Communities section with regards to a 2008 settlement. I'm not sure I like it but it was suggested it was put back in. See what you think, and let me know. I'm concerned that we/I didn't talk about that native group and now there is information on them.... Tborto1 ( talk) 16:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)