![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your helpful copyediting. There's no need to document these edits on the articles' discussion pages, though - every Wikipedia article has a full history (behind the "history" tab), which allows editors to clearly see the differences between any two versions of the page. If you're making any particularly noteworthy changes, explaining it in the edit summary is enough. -- McGeddon 23:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Greetings from the
League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our
members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the
members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the
new requests system, which has replaced the old
/proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial
backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors. |
Melon‑ Bot ( STOP!) 18:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, as requested at the reward board I've tabulted a section for you, by my count I added 28 people from the list to the table. To make it up to the full 30 I added a couple from this section as well. Please check my work and if you're satisfied present me with my reward. Kind regards - Noosentaal( talk) 18:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
help}}
Is the edit by 79.180.141.159 on
Arabic hip hop vandalism? I wasn't sure whether to revert it or not. Cheers!
Noosentaal(
talk)
15:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind a cheeky request... You quoted "J. Jones, Amino Acid and Peptide Synthesis, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, 2002." in this page. Would you know if there is a synthesis of Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride in that book? It would save me the time of having to get a loan out of the BL, and then probably only to find that it uses bought in FMOC-Cl! Ronhjones ( talk) 23:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For laboring diligently to fulfill a challenge. Cheers! — Eustress talk 02:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for all your help. I guess I will have to wait until it does become a bit more known for me to create a page.
Just one question, how do I go about getting someone or even me to create a page for the Rev Film Festival. Would I need the runner's of the event to create a website or something of that sorts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SBeckman ( talk • contribs) 10:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Per WP:DUCK I am willing to believe that User talk:Clarkdj05 and User talk:Bardslc01 are sockpuppets.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Looking at the contributions they both seem to know a "bethany" somehow. I'll have another look to confirm it.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
And it is also quite rare for more than one account to vandalise a page at about the same time.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you think a Checkuser would be good anyway? Also, I wonder about that third account Next076.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
The more I think about it, the more I believe you could be right. I'll leave the matter alone for now, but if they continue I will reconsider taking some action. Thank you for your co-operation.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Since normally an article creator's blanking of a page would generate a {{ G7}} tagging, especially without notability being clear (though such is not acceptable if notability claims exist), the author should not have been warned. I've taken it upon myself, though to verify the notability, since so many of the artists are already apparently notable. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Noosental, I noticed that you cautioned me regarding my (arguably) unconstructive edit to the page 'Mount Barker'. I do not think that an individual such as yourself, has any authority on the subject as you have not even been there. Please refrain from making unconstructive criticisms of me in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.97.11 ( talk) 11:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
My edits are constructive. Your reverts are unconstructive. I am trying to be constructive and also follow NPOV. Essentially either Legends needs to be categorized under legends, for people trying to look up "Legends", or it needs to be linked back to the Castlevania: Legends article (which I did through the see also section). Looking up "non-canon" is quite unclear since people looking up information on "legends" won't find it by looking up "non-canon". Legends is a better categorization heading. I even left an explanation in the talk page but people seemed to have ignored it. I don't appreciate your fanatic accusations. Draculvania ( talk) 16:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
No problem, you're quite welcome. :) UntilItSleeps Public PC 16:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! -- Caltas (talk) 10:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you have a bot or a super fast computer or something? By the time my laptop loads the history page you've already reverted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yutsi ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your helpful copyediting. There's no need to document these edits on the articles' discussion pages, though - every Wikipedia article has a full history (behind the "history" tab), which allows editors to clearly see the differences between any two versions of the page. If you're making any particularly noteworthy changes, explaining it in the edit summary is enough. -- McGeddon 23:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Greetings from the
League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our
members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the
members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the
new requests system, which has replaced the old
/proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial
backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors. |
Melon‑ Bot ( STOP!) 18:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, as requested at the reward board I've tabulted a section for you, by my count I added 28 people from the list to the table. To make it up to the full 30 I added a couple from this section as well. Please check my work and if you're satisfied present me with my reward. Kind regards - Noosentaal( talk) 18:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
help}}
Is the edit by 79.180.141.159 on
Arabic hip hop vandalism? I wasn't sure whether to revert it or not. Cheers!
Noosentaal(
talk)
15:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind a cheeky request... You quoted "J. Jones, Amino Acid and Peptide Synthesis, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, 2002." in this page. Would you know if there is a synthesis of Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride in that book? It would save me the time of having to get a loan out of the BL, and then probably only to find that it uses bought in FMOC-Cl! Ronhjones ( talk) 23:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For laboring diligently to fulfill a challenge. Cheers! — Eustress talk 02:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for all your help. I guess I will have to wait until it does become a bit more known for me to create a page.
Just one question, how do I go about getting someone or even me to create a page for the Rev Film Festival. Would I need the runner's of the event to create a website or something of that sorts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SBeckman ( talk • contribs) 10:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Per WP:DUCK I am willing to believe that User talk:Clarkdj05 and User talk:Bardslc01 are sockpuppets.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Looking at the contributions they both seem to know a "bethany" somehow. I'll have another look to confirm it.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
And it is also quite rare for more than one account to vandalise a page at about the same time.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you think a Checkuser would be good anyway? Also, I wonder about that third account Next076.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
The more I think about it, the more I believe you could be right. I'll leave the matter alone for now, but if they continue I will reconsider taking some action. Thank you for your co-operation.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Since normally an article creator's blanking of a page would generate a {{ G7}} tagging, especially without notability being clear (though such is not acceptable if notability claims exist), the author should not have been warned. I've taken it upon myself, though to verify the notability, since so many of the artists are already apparently notable. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Noosental, I noticed that you cautioned me regarding my (arguably) unconstructive edit to the page 'Mount Barker'. I do not think that an individual such as yourself, has any authority on the subject as you have not even been there. Please refrain from making unconstructive criticisms of me in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.97.11 ( talk) 11:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
My edits are constructive. Your reverts are unconstructive. I am trying to be constructive and also follow NPOV. Essentially either Legends needs to be categorized under legends, for people trying to look up "Legends", or it needs to be linked back to the Castlevania: Legends article (which I did through the see also section). Looking up "non-canon" is quite unclear since people looking up information on "legends" won't find it by looking up "non-canon". Legends is a better categorization heading. I even left an explanation in the talk page but people seemed to have ignored it. I don't appreciate your fanatic accusations. Draculvania ( talk) 16:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
No problem, you're quite welcome. :) UntilItSleeps Public PC 16:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! -- Caltas (talk) 10:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you have a bot or a super fast computer or something? By the time my laptop loads the history page you've already reverted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yutsi ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)