-- 16:26, Saturday, November 11, 2023 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "NoorStores", may not meet Wikipedia's
username policy because it is the name of a company. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a
change of username by completing the form at
Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply
create a new account for editing. Thank you.
Tacyarg (
talk)
12:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Tacyarg. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Kate Clanchy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Tacyarg (
talk)
12:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Monisha Rajesh. I don't know what you think you mean when you describe someone as a being "social media controversialist", but a statement like that needs a clear source.
Belbury (
talk)
15:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Sunny Singh (writer), you may be
blocked from editing.
WP:TWITTER should never be used as a source for a claim about a third party.
Belbury (
talk)
17:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Kate Clanchy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm concerned that the coverage of the controversy in all four articles is becoming excessive, and I'm not sure that Tweets and Youtube are appropriate as references. I've asked for more eyes on the articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women writers and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red. Pam D 09:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
You say above that you once attended a creative writing course run by Clanchy, and considered her to be "exceptionally kind and sensitive". Please consider Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy when writing about a person you have a personal connection to, however remote.
You edits to remove the controversy section from her biography and then to rewrite it to be less clear about the nature of the criticism and her acceptance of it definitely seem to be in the "omitting negative information" zone of potential COI editing. Belbury ( talk) 13:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
You must be aware that Wikipedia advises care when introducing the word "claim":
To say that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying disregard for evidence.
You have restored this perspective several times now on
Kate Clanchy and other articles, in each case where the abuse is sourced as a plain fact. The Guardian says that the writers went on to receive racist abuse
, the Bookseller refers to the abuse suffered by
them; neither couches it as a questionable "claim".
Continuing to restore this framing to any of the four articles you are focused on may result in a block for Wikipedia:Edit warring. Be aware that reverting the same content more than three times in a 24 hour period will result in an immediate block under WP:3RR.
If you take issue with the reliability of the press sources, please discuss this with other editors, perhaps at Talk:Monisha Rajesh where the topic has already been raised. Belbury ( talk) 13:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Kate Clanchy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Kate Clanchy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for getting in touch about your draft article, and I'm glad to see you are still active on Wikipedia.
Hmm ... Let me give this some thought. I'm not a very experienced draft reviewer, and wouldn't want to give the wrong advice. I'm also not sure you have submitted the draft for review, so I'll have a look at the templates later today.
Having said that - a couple of quick thoughts. You have one or two pieces of unsourced info: his date of birth, and the Guardian quote. Are you able to add references for these? I also wonder if this is too soon. I'm not sure that there is a clear case for notability, unless editorship of Isis and the Eric Gregory Award would be enough. The only reference you currently have which is not a primary source is the Sunday Times, which is 404ing for me; the Guardian would add another one. If you can get it up to 3 reviews in national media, he would be more likely to meet WP:AUTHOR.
Anyway, thanks for creating the draft, it's an interesting read, and I'll come back to it later today. Tacyarg ( talk) 11:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, NoorStores!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Drmies (
talk)
18:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saga Prize, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 14:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saga Prize, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 14:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
Belbury (
talk)
16:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Drmies ( talk) 13:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Hey there! Just sending a belated congrats for your recent article, Tomiwa Owolade. If you wanna create an article together, let me know. TheTeam219 ( talk) 10:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For support in diversity issues. YellowFratello ( talk) 19:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC) |
Hallo Noor, There was a link from Bernardine Evaristo to Spread the Word, which is not the intended London organisation. Looking at the incoming links I see at least two more which look as if they are aimed at the London thing, which doesn't have a Wikipedia page but might scrape enough notability (registered charity, Arts Council National Portfolio, various mentions ...). You might like to have a look: diversity in publishing, right up your street. It's an omission, and some incorrect links, needing to be fixed. But not to be confused with this lot. The Bookseller again too, for its "Case Closed" competition. Looks interesting. Pam D 08:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Much of the content you have added to the Joanne Harris article would be suitable for the Society of Authors article which at present is VERY poorly sourced and outdated. Cheers. Theroadislong ( talk) 09:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
@ NoorStores (Just in case you're still reading this talk page) I'm sorry to see you go and sorry to read your message about your reasons for your departure. I hope that your fears about your future career are unfounded: I doubt very much that anyone to whom you apply for a job will think "ah, that's the person who got involved in a lot of Wikipedia editing coming to the defence of Kate Clanchy in 2023/4". It's a pity to be losing a literate, careful (mostly), UK-based, female, editor who obviously knows a lot about the UK literary scene and could have contributed a lot more.
Maybe take a breather and then come back, or just stay around but, as has been suggested before, step aside from Clanchy/Harris/SoA/etc: there are so many gaps in the encyclopedia that there's always something else to contribute to this infinite jigsaw puzzle.
But don't be tempted to set up a new username (as KZ did) unless you have very carefully looked at the
WP:Clean start policy and are prepared to follow its rules. If you did decide to do so, it would be wise to wait until the COIN discussion has been formally closed, per the criteria. It might also be sensible to take the optional step of notifying one of the checkuser team, as discussed in the policy, to be on the safe side. The guideline tells editors making a clean start It is best that you completely avoid articles or topics that you previously edited, especially if you were involved in a dispute with another editor(s).
I would interpret that as saying that you shouldn't edit anything connected with Clanchy/Harris/Pullman/SoA or the other authors involved in that controversy, and perhaps should avoid
WP:COIN discussions, but that you would be fine to carry on editing on the rest of the UK publishing scene. But it might be worth checking that interpretation of mine: If you are unsure in a particular situation, you can ask a member of the Arbitration committee or the functionaries team for advice.
, and it might be as well to check before launching into anything remotely connected with UK publishing.
Or you could just decide to walk away from that group of articles, make a statement on your userpage and/or talkpage to announce that you're doing so (and to remind yourself and others that it's what you've decided to do), and get back to the joy of editing but in some other areas. Is there an article about your local mosque? If not, is it notable? How accurate, well-written, and well-sourced is en.wiki's coverage of your ancestral home area? Or the area where you now live? Some literary prize articles need updating for recent winners. Have you seen the [Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/February 2024 forthcoming backlog drive] to reduce the number of totally unsourced articles in Wikipedia? (And the list, at User talk:PamD#Welcome to the drive!, of unsourced women writers!) Any of those, or anything else, might lead you off down fascinating rabbit-holes of under-represented notable topics. I had a lovely sunny, frosty, walk on Hampstead Heath on Thursday (couple of hours spare before a hospital appt), and then found that we had almost nothing about The Hill Garden and Pergola: so far it's only a section in the HH article, but I might split it out to its own article eventually.
I'm sorry you've had a bruising time here so far in en.wiki, but I hope you'll change your mind again and stick around to help build this amazing encyclopedia. Good luck for the future, whether you stay away, or continue as NoorStores, or decided to reappear under a totally new identity. (When LittleFranzl first appeared, I confess I thought it might be yourself experimenting with other editors' reactions to an apparently male, probably white (Germanic), new editor! I'm still feeling disappointed that KZ created two sockpuppets, but willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they just didn't realise how strongly prohibited it was to do so.)
Good luck in the future, anyway. Pam D 14:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Noor, I see you've made an edit to KC's page today to add a reference where there was "Citation needed" - but please have another look at that reference and fix it. You don't actually show what newspaper it was from. ... OK, I've gone and fixed it anyway, but please be more careful about adding references: don't trust any automated system to produce a good reference from a URL, but check it and fix it. (You had his surname as "Correspondent", and the date in all-numeric, as well as not mentioning The Times, and we needn't give the ISSN for a well-known newspaper).
Anyway, that said, welcome back and I hope you find some useful non-controversial editing to enjoy. I'm finding the current WP:FEB24 effort to clear the backlog of unreferenced articles quite addictive, having started by using WP:Petscan to find the intersection of Category:All articles lacking sources and Category:Mountains and hills of the United Kingdom, to several levels of subcategories, and then going off on related tangents. Pam D 00:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, NoorStores. Thank you for your work on Mukahang Limbu. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 18:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, NoorStores. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:The Complete Works, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
-- 16:26, Saturday, November 11, 2023 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "NoorStores", may not meet Wikipedia's
username policy because it is the name of a company. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a
change of username by completing the form at
Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply
create a new account for editing. Thank you.
Tacyarg (
talk)
12:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Tacyarg. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Kate Clanchy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Tacyarg (
talk)
12:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Monisha Rajesh. I don't know what you think you mean when you describe someone as a being "social media controversialist", but a statement like that needs a clear source.
Belbury (
talk)
15:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Sunny Singh (writer), you may be
blocked from editing.
WP:TWITTER should never be used as a source for a claim about a third party.
Belbury (
talk)
17:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Kate Clanchy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm concerned that the coverage of the controversy in all four articles is becoming excessive, and I'm not sure that Tweets and Youtube are appropriate as references. I've asked for more eyes on the articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women writers and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red. Pam D 09:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
You say above that you once attended a creative writing course run by Clanchy, and considered her to be "exceptionally kind and sensitive". Please consider Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy when writing about a person you have a personal connection to, however remote.
You edits to remove the controversy section from her biography and then to rewrite it to be less clear about the nature of the criticism and her acceptance of it definitely seem to be in the "omitting negative information" zone of potential COI editing. Belbury ( talk) 13:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
You must be aware that Wikipedia advises care when introducing the word "claim":
To say that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying disregard for evidence.
You have restored this perspective several times now on
Kate Clanchy and other articles, in each case where the abuse is sourced as a plain fact. The Guardian says that the writers went on to receive racist abuse
, the Bookseller refers to the abuse suffered by
them; neither couches it as a questionable "claim".
Continuing to restore this framing to any of the four articles you are focused on may result in a block for Wikipedia:Edit warring. Be aware that reverting the same content more than three times in a 24 hour period will result in an immediate block under WP:3RR.
If you take issue with the reliability of the press sources, please discuss this with other editors, perhaps at Talk:Monisha Rajesh where the topic has already been raised. Belbury ( talk) 13:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Kate Clanchy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Kate Clanchy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for getting in touch about your draft article, and I'm glad to see you are still active on Wikipedia.
Hmm ... Let me give this some thought. I'm not a very experienced draft reviewer, and wouldn't want to give the wrong advice. I'm also not sure you have submitted the draft for review, so I'll have a look at the templates later today.
Having said that - a couple of quick thoughts. You have one or two pieces of unsourced info: his date of birth, and the Guardian quote. Are you able to add references for these? I also wonder if this is too soon. I'm not sure that there is a clear case for notability, unless editorship of Isis and the Eric Gregory Award would be enough. The only reference you currently have which is not a primary source is the Sunday Times, which is 404ing for me; the Guardian would add another one. If you can get it up to 3 reviews in national media, he would be more likely to meet WP:AUTHOR.
Anyway, thanks for creating the draft, it's an interesting read, and I'll come back to it later today. Tacyarg ( talk) 11:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, NoorStores!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Drmies (
talk)
18:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saga Prize, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 14:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saga Prize, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 14:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
Belbury (
talk)
16:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Drmies ( talk) 13:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Hey there! Just sending a belated congrats for your recent article, Tomiwa Owolade. If you wanna create an article together, let me know. TheTeam219 ( talk) 10:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For support in diversity issues. YellowFratello ( talk) 19:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC) |
Hallo Noor, There was a link from Bernardine Evaristo to Spread the Word, which is not the intended London organisation. Looking at the incoming links I see at least two more which look as if they are aimed at the London thing, which doesn't have a Wikipedia page but might scrape enough notability (registered charity, Arts Council National Portfolio, various mentions ...). You might like to have a look: diversity in publishing, right up your street. It's an omission, and some incorrect links, needing to be fixed. But not to be confused with this lot. The Bookseller again too, for its "Case Closed" competition. Looks interesting. Pam D 08:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Much of the content you have added to the Joanne Harris article would be suitable for the Society of Authors article which at present is VERY poorly sourced and outdated. Cheers. Theroadislong ( talk) 09:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
@ NoorStores (Just in case you're still reading this talk page) I'm sorry to see you go and sorry to read your message about your reasons for your departure. I hope that your fears about your future career are unfounded: I doubt very much that anyone to whom you apply for a job will think "ah, that's the person who got involved in a lot of Wikipedia editing coming to the defence of Kate Clanchy in 2023/4". It's a pity to be losing a literate, careful (mostly), UK-based, female, editor who obviously knows a lot about the UK literary scene and could have contributed a lot more.
Maybe take a breather and then come back, or just stay around but, as has been suggested before, step aside from Clanchy/Harris/SoA/etc: there are so many gaps in the encyclopedia that there's always something else to contribute to this infinite jigsaw puzzle.
But don't be tempted to set up a new username (as KZ did) unless you have very carefully looked at the
WP:Clean start policy and are prepared to follow its rules. If you did decide to do so, it would be wise to wait until the COIN discussion has been formally closed, per the criteria. It might also be sensible to take the optional step of notifying one of the checkuser team, as discussed in the policy, to be on the safe side. The guideline tells editors making a clean start It is best that you completely avoid articles or topics that you previously edited, especially if you were involved in a dispute with another editor(s).
I would interpret that as saying that you shouldn't edit anything connected with Clanchy/Harris/Pullman/SoA or the other authors involved in that controversy, and perhaps should avoid
WP:COIN discussions, but that you would be fine to carry on editing on the rest of the UK publishing scene. But it might be worth checking that interpretation of mine: If you are unsure in a particular situation, you can ask a member of the Arbitration committee or the functionaries team for advice.
, and it might be as well to check before launching into anything remotely connected with UK publishing.
Or you could just decide to walk away from that group of articles, make a statement on your userpage and/or talkpage to announce that you're doing so (and to remind yourself and others that it's what you've decided to do), and get back to the joy of editing but in some other areas. Is there an article about your local mosque? If not, is it notable? How accurate, well-written, and well-sourced is en.wiki's coverage of your ancestral home area? Or the area where you now live? Some literary prize articles need updating for recent winners. Have you seen the [Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/February 2024 forthcoming backlog drive] to reduce the number of totally unsourced articles in Wikipedia? (And the list, at User talk:PamD#Welcome to the drive!, of unsourced women writers!) Any of those, or anything else, might lead you off down fascinating rabbit-holes of under-represented notable topics. I had a lovely sunny, frosty, walk on Hampstead Heath on Thursday (couple of hours spare before a hospital appt), and then found that we had almost nothing about The Hill Garden and Pergola: so far it's only a section in the HH article, but I might split it out to its own article eventually.
I'm sorry you've had a bruising time here so far in en.wiki, but I hope you'll change your mind again and stick around to help build this amazing encyclopedia. Good luck for the future, whether you stay away, or continue as NoorStores, or decided to reappear under a totally new identity. (When LittleFranzl first appeared, I confess I thought it might be yourself experimenting with other editors' reactions to an apparently male, probably white (Germanic), new editor! I'm still feeling disappointed that KZ created two sockpuppets, but willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they just didn't realise how strongly prohibited it was to do so.)
Good luck in the future, anyway. Pam D 14:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Noor, I see you've made an edit to KC's page today to add a reference where there was "Citation needed" - but please have another look at that reference and fix it. You don't actually show what newspaper it was from. ... OK, I've gone and fixed it anyway, but please be more careful about adding references: don't trust any automated system to produce a good reference from a URL, but check it and fix it. (You had his surname as "Correspondent", and the date in all-numeric, as well as not mentioning The Times, and we needn't give the ISSN for a well-known newspaper).
Anyway, that said, welcome back and I hope you find some useful non-controversial editing to enjoy. I'm finding the current WP:FEB24 effort to clear the backlog of unreferenced articles quite addictive, having started by using WP:Petscan to find the intersection of Category:All articles lacking sources and Category:Mountains and hills of the United Kingdom, to several levels of subcategories, and then going off on related tangents. Pam D 00:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, NoorStores. Thank you for your work on Mukahang Limbu. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 18:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, NoorStores. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:The Complete Works, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)