Hello, Noa Shoham
Thank you for creating Ludwig Wörl.
User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Can you please try to add a source, such as a reliable German newspaper archive to help improve the notability of the article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
JW 1961 Talk 14:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Ludwig Wörl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While heroic, not enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to show they pass notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Onel5969
TT me
14:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ludwig Wörl for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludwig Wörl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello, Noa Shoham
Thank you for creating Ludwig Wörl.
User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Can you please try to add a source, such as a reliable German newspaper archive to help improve the notability of the article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
JW 1961 Talk 14:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Ludwig Wörl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While heroic, not enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to show they pass notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Onel5969
TT me
14:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ludwig Wörl for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludwig Wörl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.