RE: [1]
you should never have had that user blocked with the vandalism policy. Amazing that the admins did not realize it was an edit war. You were lucky. Travb ( talk) 05:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes. See [2] Cheers. Vera, Chuck & Dave ( talk) 20:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
It has become clear you are operating as a sock puppet account of PockyGirl-2002 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and I have blocked you indefinitely. This has become clear at the Rosa Blasi article, where you both inserted deliberately incorrect information in an attempt to circumvent scrutiny. Please edit from a single account in future, unless you are willing to edit in a non-disruptive style from the additional accounts.
Anthøny 22:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, NoHenry. I can see that you warned a user, Rosathebest. Do remember that you should put {{subst}} before the actual warning. It says so here. Schfifty Three 00:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
RE: [1]
you should never have had that user blocked with the vandalism policy. Amazing that the admins did not realize it was an edit war. You were lucky. Travb ( talk) 05:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes. See [2] Cheers. Vera, Chuck & Dave ( talk) 20:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
It has become clear you are operating as a sock puppet account of PockyGirl-2002 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and I have blocked you indefinitely. This has become clear at the Rosa Blasi article, where you both inserted deliberately incorrect information in an attempt to circumvent scrutiny. Please edit from a single account in future, unless you are willing to edit in a non-disruptive style from the additional accounts.
Anthøny 22:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, NoHenry. I can see that you warned a user, Rosathebest. Do remember that you should put {{subst}} before the actual warning. It says so here. Schfifty Three 00:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)