Hello, Nnp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —
TheKMan
talk
08:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi !! Hope this is better then the standard welcome you got that you didn't like. -- Scott Grayban 16:46, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
No reputable references from normal sexology authors. I browsed several thousand webpages to find a minimal derefence to something remotely serious about such kind of paraphilia. Please see my comment in talk:dendrophilia. `' mikka (t) 22:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Please actually go to http www agratek dot biz before making decisions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.166.48.219 ( talk • contribs • username • real talk page) 20:20, 21 April 2006 UTC.
Hi, I'm the guy who censored the word in that article. IP: 68.83.165.247. I'm sorry if I broke the rules or anything. However, I would like to say that students of young ages, such as myself, use wikipedia for projects and such. Should Wikipedia be censored? Why not? What is the deteriorating effects? I don't mean to yell at you, but, I dunno, just saying, I guess. No one wants to see curses on a great site like Wikipedia. Actually, just curious, who does? Again, just expelling anger, not really. Anyway, thanx for fixing my mistake. Hope we talk again. - Wolfie001 20:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Just an FYI, 69.115.23.71 ( talk · contribs) can be a tricky editor to deal with... ([ [1]]). You might want to tread lightly. Paul C/ T + 02:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
hi , Can I know why you are removing the links ? Can you provide the members with easier explanation of the tutorials ? Alhoori 21:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
why'd you revert my stuff?
Hello! If you would like to join in a discussion that I noticed you were previously a part of, please head over to here to give us your opinion on the proposed change to the article. I'd appreciate it, thanks! Bagginator 10:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Laura DiDio. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura DiDio. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Nnp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —
TheKMan
talk
08:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi !! Hope this is better then the standard welcome you got that you didn't like. -- Scott Grayban 16:46, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
No reputable references from normal sexology authors. I browsed several thousand webpages to find a minimal derefence to something remotely serious about such kind of paraphilia. Please see my comment in talk:dendrophilia. `' mikka (t) 22:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Please actually go to http www agratek dot biz before making decisions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.166.48.219 ( talk • contribs • username • real talk page) 20:20, 21 April 2006 UTC.
Hi, I'm the guy who censored the word in that article. IP: 68.83.165.247. I'm sorry if I broke the rules or anything. However, I would like to say that students of young ages, such as myself, use wikipedia for projects and such. Should Wikipedia be censored? Why not? What is the deteriorating effects? I don't mean to yell at you, but, I dunno, just saying, I guess. No one wants to see curses on a great site like Wikipedia. Actually, just curious, who does? Again, just expelling anger, not really. Anyway, thanx for fixing my mistake. Hope we talk again. - Wolfie001 20:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Just an FYI, 69.115.23.71 ( talk · contribs) can be a tricky editor to deal with... ([ [1]]). You might want to tread lightly. Paul C/ T + 02:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
hi , Can I know why you are removing the links ? Can you provide the members with easier explanation of the tutorials ? Alhoori 21:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
why'd you revert my stuff?
Hello! If you would like to join in a discussion that I noticed you were previously a part of, please head over to here to give us your opinion on the proposed change to the article. I'd appreciate it, thanks! Bagginator 10:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Laura DiDio. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura DiDio. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)