This is Nmwalsh's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/BACtrack".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/Inwall Tech".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/Peter Fogel 2".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/National Society 2".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Teddy Bear Band 2".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
This user engaged in extensive block evasion as Gibmul, from November 2017 to May 2019. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would request that my block be removed on that basis that I have been a compliant Paid Contributor for the past 18 months and if I am allowed to continue as a paid contributor then I have absolutely no intention of using sockpuppetry. I wish to contribute positively and constructively to Wikipedia. I admit to sockpuppetry but I have never been a page vandal in the sense of destructive and malicious editing. I am a professional journalist [4] who just wishes to get on with the work of a paid contributor. I feel that my record of the past 18 months illustrates my cause and I would request that you give me a second chance to make further valuable contributions to Wikipedia. In my work as Gibmul [5] you will see that every article I worked on was listed on my Userpage. Every individual article contained a Paid notice on its Talk Page as required. I am committed to continuing this practice and I am prepared to give a link to my Upwork site [6] on my Userpage. If you require further compliance I will be happy to oblige.
Decline reason:
After being blocked for abusing multiple accounts, you continued doing so for two years to line your own pockets. It is very clear that Wikipedia and its policies come a distant second to making a quick buck as far as you're concerned; I see no reason to allow you to continue abusing this site for your own ends. Yunshui 雲 水 14:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Strong (non-admin) stance though it may be, I oppose any return of the editor in question to the site. Nmwalsh, you have engaged in a number of unsavory and block worthy offenses. I feel the need to compile a list;
So concludes my comment. To offer a final comment, the editor in question has disrupted the encyclopedia, and the community's assumption of faith should only go so far. SamHolt6 ( talk) 17:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #25649 was submitted on Jun 19, 2019 10:55:57. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 10:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have served my sentence
Decline reason:
Untrue. Your block is indefinite. You will not be unblocked until you account for your sockpuppetry, convince us you understand why that was inappropriate, explain why you violated WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE despite manifestly being aware of these policies in the past (that is, why did you deliberately and maliciously violate them) and convince us we can trust you'll never do so again. Yamla ( talk) 11:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I would like to appeal to have my block lifted because I feel that I have served my sentence. I have been blocked for sockpuppetry since June 19, 2019 and I have not attempted sockpuppetry since. It is not my intention to do so again and I have ceased paid editing.
I have been keeping my hand in by editing on Wiki Simple English where there is lots of scope for any editor. See https://simple.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions/Nmwalsh&offset=&limit=500&target=Nmwalsh
Hopefully you will see that now my intentions are the betterment of Wikipedia and that I have no interest in further sockpuppetry. Nmwalsh ( talk) 10:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I would like my unblock request to be considered. I have been blocked since June 2019 and have not attempted sockpuppetry in any way since that time. Nmwalsh ( talk) 10:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Can some reasonably sane person please explain to me what exactly I am supposed to do to have the block lifted? I have been blocked now for more than eleven months and have not violated it in any way
Decline reason:
You are supposed to follow the unblock instructions at WP:GAB. Given the amount of problems I see in your history (extensive sockpuppetry and paid editing problems), you're going to need to be very convincing, and I would expect to hear a thorough explanation of why you did what you did, your understanding of why you were blocked, and whether or not you plan to return to paid editing. creffett ( talk) 20:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
And please no derision just sanity Nmwalsh ( talk) 09:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
This is Nmwalsh's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/BACtrack".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/Inwall Tech".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/Peter Fogel 2".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " sandbox/National Society 2".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nmwalsh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Teddy Bear Band 2".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Widefox; talk 09:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
This user engaged in extensive block evasion as Gibmul, from November 2017 to May 2019. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would request that my block be removed on that basis that I have been a compliant Paid Contributor for the past 18 months and if I am allowed to continue as a paid contributor then I have absolutely no intention of using sockpuppetry. I wish to contribute positively and constructively to Wikipedia. I admit to sockpuppetry but I have never been a page vandal in the sense of destructive and malicious editing. I am a professional journalist [4] who just wishes to get on with the work of a paid contributor. I feel that my record of the past 18 months illustrates my cause and I would request that you give me a second chance to make further valuable contributions to Wikipedia. In my work as Gibmul [5] you will see that every article I worked on was listed on my Userpage. Every individual article contained a Paid notice on its Talk Page as required. I am committed to continuing this practice and I am prepared to give a link to my Upwork site [6] on my Userpage. If you require further compliance I will be happy to oblige.
Decline reason:
After being blocked for abusing multiple accounts, you continued doing so for two years to line your own pockets. It is very clear that Wikipedia and its policies come a distant second to making a quick buck as far as you're concerned; I see no reason to allow you to continue abusing this site for your own ends. Yunshui 雲 水 14:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Strong (non-admin) stance though it may be, I oppose any return of the editor in question to the site. Nmwalsh, you have engaged in a number of unsavory and block worthy offenses. I feel the need to compile a list;
So concludes my comment. To offer a final comment, the editor in question has disrupted the encyclopedia, and the community's assumption of faith should only go so far. SamHolt6 ( talk) 17:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #25649 was submitted on Jun 19, 2019 10:55:57. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 10:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have served my sentence
Decline reason:
Untrue. Your block is indefinite. You will not be unblocked until you account for your sockpuppetry, convince us you understand why that was inappropriate, explain why you violated WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE despite manifestly being aware of these policies in the past (that is, why did you deliberately and maliciously violate them) and convince us we can trust you'll never do so again. Yamla ( talk) 11:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I would like to appeal to have my block lifted because I feel that I have served my sentence. I have been blocked for sockpuppetry since June 19, 2019 and I have not attempted sockpuppetry since. It is not my intention to do so again and I have ceased paid editing.
I have been keeping my hand in by editing on Wiki Simple English where there is lots of scope for any editor. See https://simple.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions/Nmwalsh&offset=&limit=500&target=Nmwalsh
Hopefully you will see that now my intentions are the betterment of Wikipedia and that I have no interest in further sockpuppetry. Nmwalsh ( talk) 10:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I would like my unblock request to be considered. I have been blocked since June 2019 and have not attempted sockpuppetry in any way since that time. Nmwalsh ( talk) 10:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Nmwalsh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Can some reasonably sane person please explain to me what exactly I am supposed to do to have the block lifted? I have been blocked now for more than eleven months and have not violated it in any way
Decline reason:
You are supposed to follow the unblock instructions at WP:GAB. Given the amount of problems I see in your history (extensive sockpuppetry and paid editing problems), you're going to need to be very convincing, and I would expect to hear a thorough explanation of why you did what you did, your understanding of why you were blocked, and whether or not you plan to return to paid editing. creffett ( talk) 20:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
And please no derision just sanity Nmwalsh ( talk) 09:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)