![]() |
Hi Nml25! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC) |
An article you recently created,
Harry Blyth, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
JW 1961
Talk
20:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Draft:Harry Blyth a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into
Harry Blyth. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. JW 1961 Talk 17:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Francis Addington Symonds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Muder of me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Nelson Lee (detective), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
22:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Category:Publications of Nelson Lee has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich ( talk) 19:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexton Blake bibliography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
FishandChipper 🐟 🍟 13:41, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sexton Blake bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Mann. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
FishandChipper
🐟
🍟
06:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sexton Blake Detective cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography part 2: 1912-1945, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.
Onel5969
TT me
14:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography part 4: 1979-present, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.
Onel5969
TT me
14:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography part 3: 1946-1978, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.
Onel5969
TT me
14:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
It's been two months since the AfD ended with no consensus, but there was a clear consensus that sourcing was needed. During that time you have worked on the article, but only in expanding it with more unsourced material. Now, I've taken the time to remove all the unsourced material. Yet you keep re-adding it without proper sourcing. If you continue to do so, I'll have no other recourse but to report you at ANI. Please take a look at WP:BURDEN, and WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. Onel5969 TT me 17:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Onetwothreeip: "If you have it in front of you, I can't verify its title." Huh, I don't get it, would you care to explain what you mean? It sounds a bit like you are saying that you can't verify this because you don't currently own that book. So I'd like to explain my position based on WP:Verifiability again: "verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. [...] Its content is determined by previously published information" So in our example the Wikipedia article says: In 1986 there was book with Sexton Blake stories published, titled Sexton Blake Wins. Now if you buy/borrow/organize that book, so that you have it in front of you, then you look at the front page, you can see that the title is correct. That and reading through the book tells that its topic is Sexton Blake. Checking the page with the copyright will tell you if it was indeed published in 1986. Done. You've verified everything stated by the Wikipedia article for our example. Therefore WP:Verifiability is fullfilled. Daranios ( talk) 11:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Sexton Blake bibliography part 2: 1912-1945, is not suitable as written to remain published. It does not even come close to having enough citations to pass WP:VERIFY. At this point, you need to consider using the AfC process, rather than moving your poorly sourced articles into mainspace. Onel5969 TT me 11:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Sexton Blake bibliography, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. //
Timothy ::
talk
10:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Sexton Blake Bibliography, you may be
blocked from editing. The material you restored is not sourced and fails V. Revert yourself, you are edit warring. This material has been removed by multiple editors for the same reason. //
Timothy ::
talk
11:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. //
Timothy ::
talk
12:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
18:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)To me, it is you who are not getting this. I am worrying that it might be necessary to extend the block if you give every suggestion that you intend to resume the same behavior once that block expires. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
You have clearly continued edit warring. I expect you to revert yourself. // Timothy :: talk 14:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. //
Timothy ::
talk
15:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello
Nml25! I've stumbled over a small thing at the
Sexton Blake bibliography, maybe you can shed light on that: Pedro's first appearance is listed within
1905. But the general note for
1904 says that's the year where Blake, Tinker and Pedro first appear as a trio. Maybe that has slipped up by one year?
In the citation discussion I have also
individually marked the few sentences which I think are not yet covered as plot summary by the primary source within the respective line. Maybe you have a source handy here or there?
Daranios (
talk)
15:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Dixon Hawke, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
13:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Your edit to
Parliamentary privilege has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
16:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sexton Blake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Murray.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Nml25! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC) |
An article you recently created,
Harry Blyth, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
JW 1961
Talk
20:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Draft:Harry Blyth a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into
Harry Blyth. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. JW 1961 Talk 17:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Francis Addington Symonds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Muder of me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Nelson Lee (detective), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
22:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Category:Publications of Nelson Lee has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich ( talk) 19:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexton Blake bibliography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
FishandChipper 🐟 🍟 13:41, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sexton Blake bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Mann. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
FishandChipper
🐟
🍟
06:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sexton Blake Detective cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography part 2: 1912-1945, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.
Onel5969
TT me
14:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography part 4: 1979-present, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.
Onel5969
TT me
14:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Sexton Blake bibliography part 3: 1946-1978, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.
Onel5969
TT me
14:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
It's been two months since the AfD ended with no consensus, but there was a clear consensus that sourcing was needed. During that time you have worked on the article, but only in expanding it with more unsourced material. Now, I've taken the time to remove all the unsourced material. Yet you keep re-adding it without proper sourcing. If you continue to do so, I'll have no other recourse but to report you at ANI. Please take a look at WP:BURDEN, and WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. Onel5969 TT me 17:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Onetwothreeip: "If you have it in front of you, I can't verify its title." Huh, I don't get it, would you care to explain what you mean? It sounds a bit like you are saying that you can't verify this because you don't currently own that book. So I'd like to explain my position based on WP:Verifiability again: "verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. [...] Its content is determined by previously published information" So in our example the Wikipedia article says: In 1986 there was book with Sexton Blake stories published, titled Sexton Blake Wins. Now if you buy/borrow/organize that book, so that you have it in front of you, then you look at the front page, you can see that the title is correct. That and reading through the book tells that its topic is Sexton Blake. Checking the page with the copyright will tell you if it was indeed published in 1986. Done. You've verified everything stated by the Wikipedia article for our example. Therefore WP:Verifiability is fullfilled. Daranios ( talk) 11:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Sexton Blake bibliography part 2: 1912-1945, is not suitable as written to remain published. It does not even come close to having enough citations to pass WP:VERIFY. At this point, you need to consider using the AfC process, rather than moving your poorly sourced articles into mainspace. Onel5969 TT me 11:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Sexton Blake bibliography, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. //
Timothy ::
talk
10:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Sexton Blake Bibliography, you may be
blocked from editing. The material you restored is not sourced and fails V. Revert yourself, you are edit warring. This material has been removed by multiple editors for the same reason. //
Timothy ::
talk
11:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. //
Timothy ::
talk
12:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
18:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)To me, it is you who are not getting this. I am worrying that it might be necessary to extend the block if you give every suggestion that you intend to resume the same behavior once that block expires. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
You have clearly continued edit warring. I expect you to revert yourself. // Timothy :: talk 14:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. //
Timothy ::
talk
15:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello
Nml25! I've stumbled over a small thing at the
Sexton Blake bibliography, maybe you can shed light on that: Pedro's first appearance is listed within
1905. But the general note for
1904 says that's the year where Blake, Tinker and Pedro first appear as a trio. Maybe that has slipped up by one year?
In the citation discussion I have also
individually marked the few sentences which I think are not yet covered as plot summary by the primary source within the respective line. Maybe you have a source handy here or there?
Daranios (
talk)
15:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Dixon Hawke, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
13:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Your edit to
Parliamentary privilege has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
16:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sexton Blake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Murray.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)