Hey Nlu, it's nice to see you pop up on my watchlist, and I know I haven't stopped by in while, I hope all is well? Stopping by your talk page makes me remember all the times you helped me, when I was still new to Wikipedia, so thank you again for it! (Even though it's been like what 2 years?) It feels good to reminiscence on old times. So please have a cup of refreshing tea, enjoy the rest of your day, and continue to kick vandal butt! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 15:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Nlu! There is a map that appears on the Nanyue article created by User:Talessman; it has recently been uploaded, and the entity Nanyue has the name (Vietnam) attach to it (at where Canton is). What do you think? Since I know your knowledge of Chinese history is pretty extensive, I hope you gave comments. If you feel any inaccuracy, you can talk to the creator of the map at his talk page or at the map's talk page. I commented to the editor since I feel applying modern political names to ancient states is probably inappropriate, however he feels that since it is a kingdom in Vietnamese history, it should have the name attached to it.-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 21:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC) This is the map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:East-Hem_200bc_web-sm.jpg
Hi Nlu, I noticed you removed the shared IP template, saying ComCast addresses are rarely, if ever, shared. I'm just wondering if you know much about IPs. Sometimes when I run a whois search, I get an error saying "IP Range Reserved" (try 77.116.72.82 for example). Is there a reason this occurs? I'm asking because I've encountered many IPs with that error and they're likely to be the same person. Thanks. Spellcast ( talk) 19:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I've been having a discussion with user:GRBerry about this page and Grandique Ferry, Nova Scotia, a similar page. It seems like a conspiracy theorist bringing their own information to Wikipedia. Since the information on the page is based on the sources he provided, what do you think should be done? Andrew 6 47 22:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Just curious, why the indef block? Sure, he is a bit of a low-level vandal, but maybe a shorter block would be more appropriate, at least as a warning to fly straight. Burzmali ( talk) 00:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I swear I didn't even read this, I just apologized cuss the new and improved me will stop all vandalism, I'm gonna be on your guys's side, that is if its ok with you. Thanks for the unban, and thanks Burzmali.-- Xgmx ( talk) 16:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Let me think about it. Thanks for bringing your concerns to me. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
He's back to his old tricks [4]. He has been warned about this before [5], [6] and [7]. Burzmali 22:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. First, it's just a matter of time that the PRC politician Gao Yan, a high official at the governor level, is created. Second, even if the PRC Gao Yan will never be created, there are still two articles for persons named Gao Yan. Although the title of article Emperor Xiaozhao of Northern Qi does not mention his personal name, Gao Yan is the Emperor's name. Many users searching for Gao Yan may want to find the Northern Qi emperor, not the prince. They may be more familiar with the emperor's personal name, not his posthumous name. The title of the Chinese Wikipedia article is simply zh:高演. It's good to keep Gao Yan as a disambiguation page since Gao Yan (Northern Qi prince) is not so famous to be the main article. -- Neo-Jay ( talk) 04:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you have nominated this article for deletion. I have cleaned up the article now and have provided reliable third party sources. Please have a look. I would request you to withdraw the nom if you feel that the article is now in a good condition. Thanks -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me/ My edits 06:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
What I think I'm looking for is whether this is a "religious place" that is of substantially more significance than any other "religious place." If it is, that part needs to be asserted. -- Nlu ( talk) 10:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Sure would appreciate it if you'd monitor this exchange (watch both the talk pages). I know this is not your area of expertise, but it IS mine, and I know what I am talking about. The other user seems to have some agenda. Thank you. -- Elaich talk 08:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
This user was requesting unblocking, but I see you have already unblocked. Anyway, they wanted some feedback, so I just figured I should make sure you were aware of it. Mango juice talk 18:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Nlu. You recently reverted an edit to this article. I can see an argument for the CDC external link not being appropriate, but the link you restored is to a 404 page and doesn't seem appropriate either. Could you clarify what you were attempting here? Thanks. -- SiobhanHansa 18:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
As you may know, I have been assailed by Swimm1 ( talk · contribs) and Swimm11 ( talk · contribs), with attacks on my talk page, etc. Add to that list Swimm333 ( talk · contribs) and Spongeboy1 ( talk · contribs). All demonstrate the same pattern, and I highly suspect they are actually Claymort ( talk · contribs), as I have seen numerous similarities to Claymort in all of them. I looked for the sockpuppet case against Swimm1 to add these new accounts, but apparently it has been closed with the indefinite blocking of both Swimm1 and Swimm11. What do you suggest as a course of action? This person needs to be identified, and permanently blocked from Wikipedia. Any help is appreciated. -- Elaich talk 02:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I watched you removing the external links in John G. Kennedy and Chitranjan Singh Ranawat pages. My opinion is if given links of their respective web sites, people who search for those physicians may find it helpful. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.62.93.196 ( talk) 07:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
For reverting the nonsense on my talk page! :) Peace, delldot talk 02:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, is there anyway you can use <ref> reference syntax more often? It would make it that much easier for other editors if you reference it the first time using whatever source you are looking at. Many of the articles are marked as "no references" by other editors, which is a shame because the contents always check out fine using 3rd party sources. Benjwong ( talk) 06:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I usually do use previous levels first but I issued the 4th level immediately because it had already spammed some four articles and it seemed intentionally malicious since it spammed the link multiple times on the same article, on diverse articles, so I'd be surprised if it thought that the link might be useful. -- Menti fisto 07:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about putting Test5's (block templates). I put them on the WP:AIV, and I hope that an admin will ban them. Thanks for telling me about it, and sorry. Weirdy Talk 08:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
he went to lincoln high school at ryan and rowland in mayfair. He lived in a twin home in the holme cirle section of NE Philly —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.105.179.130 ( talk • contribs)
you left me this message: Thank you for experimenting with the page East Asian calligraphy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia but i never went on that page OR edited it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.97.158 ( talk • contribs)
Would you object to some discussion with Meleniumshane90 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) with a view toward lifting his indef block? There is a discussion at ANI about him. I won't lift it or do anything without your consent but would you be open to me talking with him and possibly lifting the block? JodyB talk 14:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
He comes back nearly every day to make the same edit. I can't even track all the puppets, here is a short list, make sure they all get blocked:
Can you clear out WP:AIAV please? It is getting backlogged pretty bad. 74.133.9.95 05:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)`
I hadn't realized I had gotten 'hit' until i saw you had corrected it. Your efforts are appreciated! -- LeyteWolfer 17:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the personal attacks on Bender, but he is out of line reverting this. Osborne was officially an interim head coach, and as such should be noted here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.213.39 ( talk) 17:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
It's not logical to edit on Wikipedia if you are annoyed by Wikipedians. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I request that you remove your block on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:HuskersCoach Bender325 is no longer making logical arguments, and is starting to be insulting and demeaning. Meanwhile, another person has come out to agree with me that it is just common sense that Osborne be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gohuskersosborne ( talk • contribs)
I felt that I gave him a chance yesterday already (see exchange above) by blocking the IP only 24 hours and not preventing signing up for an account (which he promptly did). During this time, he edit warred some more, harassed Bender, and generally made arguments that cannot possibly be good faith arguments. I don't think he's worth the time to talk to any more. -- Nlu ( talk) 01:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I emailed the Nebraska athletic department about their coaches' official status and received a response, which I posted on the talk page. I'd like to see the page unprotected; hopefully cooler heads will prevail this time around. – Swid ( talk · edits) 01:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Why am I being blocked for blanking my own user page? That ridiculous "New Messages" wouldn't get off of my screen, and so I deleted it. I want to be unblocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whateverhappenedtojesus ( talk • contribs) 09:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Since you seem to be such an authority on Chinese history you should know Sun Pin had other names IE. Sun Bin, Sun the mutilated and Sun Tzu II. Why did you revert those edits? 206.125.176.3 ( talk) 16:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Not true there is a whole book with his work and the author is Sun Tzu II. Ref: Sun Tzu II translated by Thomas Cleary (1996). The Lost Art of War. Harper Collins Publisher (Under HarperSanFrancisco. ISBN 0-06-251361-3. This book by Thomas Cleary is a translation of the sequel to Sun Tzu's classic strategic manual. I think a publishing firm knows a little more then you do; and as I stated this is referenced and factual so please stop deleting these additions based on your limited knowledge. Thanks 14:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.125.176.3 ( talk)
Hi. Just a note that I have softened the block you implemented on User:216.190.22.200 as it is a shared ip registered to Sacramento Public Library. If you have any queries please contact me either on my talk page or by email. Thanks. Tbo 157 (talk) 12:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Is there any way to view the history/content of a deleted article? Alex 202.10.89.28 ( talk) 09:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed frequent vandalism directed towards Wu Zetian. Personally, I don't like her either, but the lady deserves some dignity at the least. Is it possible for you to semi-protect the article? Thanks. Odst ( talk) 07:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I honestly was wondering why you took out "great father" from the article on Arnold Johnson. He is my grandfather and he was an incredible father too my father.
Hey Nlu, it's nice to see you pop up on my watchlist, and I know I haven't stopped by in while, I hope all is well? Stopping by your talk page makes me remember all the times you helped me, when I was still new to Wikipedia, so thank you again for it! (Even though it's been like what 2 years?) It feels good to reminiscence on old times. So please have a cup of refreshing tea, enjoy the rest of your day, and continue to kick vandal butt! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 15:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Nlu! There is a map that appears on the Nanyue article created by User:Talessman; it has recently been uploaded, and the entity Nanyue has the name (Vietnam) attach to it (at where Canton is). What do you think? Since I know your knowledge of Chinese history is pretty extensive, I hope you gave comments. If you feel any inaccuracy, you can talk to the creator of the map at his talk page or at the map's talk page. I commented to the editor since I feel applying modern political names to ancient states is probably inappropriate, however he feels that since it is a kingdom in Vietnamese history, it should have the name attached to it.-- Balthazarduju ( talk) 21:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC) This is the map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:East-Hem_200bc_web-sm.jpg
Hi Nlu, I noticed you removed the shared IP template, saying ComCast addresses are rarely, if ever, shared. I'm just wondering if you know much about IPs. Sometimes when I run a whois search, I get an error saying "IP Range Reserved" (try 77.116.72.82 for example). Is there a reason this occurs? I'm asking because I've encountered many IPs with that error and they're likely to be the same person. Thanks. Spellcast ( talk) 19:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I've been having a discussion with user:GRBerry about this page and Grandique Ferry, Nova Scotia, a similar page. It seems like a conspiracy theorist bringing their own information to Wikipedia. Since the information on the page is based on the sources he provided, what do you think should be done? Andrew 6 47 22:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Just curious, why the indef block? Sure, he is a bit of a low-level vandal, but maybe a shorter block would be more appropriate, at least as a warning to fly straight. Burzmali ( talk) 00:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I swear I didn't even read this, I just apologized cuss the new and improved me will stop all vandalism, I'm gonna be on your guys's side, that is if its ok with you. Thanks for the unban, and thanks Burzmali.-- Xgmx ( talk) 16:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Let me think about it. Thanks for bringing your concerns to me. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
He's back to his old tricks [4]. He has been warned about this before [5], [6] and [7]. Burzmali 22:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. First, it's just a matter of time that the PRC politician Gao Yan, a high official at the governor level, is created. Second, even if the PRC Gao Yan will never be created, there are still two articles for persons named Gao Yan. Although the title of article Emperor Xiaozhao of Northern Qi does not mention his personal name, Gao Yan is the Emperor's name. Many users searching for Gao Yan may want to find the Northern Qi emperor, not the prince. They may be more familiar with the emperor's personal name, not his posthumous name. The title of the Chinese Wikipedia article is simply zh:高演. It's good to keep Gao Yan as a disambiguation page since Gao Yan (Northern Qi prince) is not so famous to be the main article. -- Neo-Jay ( talk) 04:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you have nominated this article for deletion. I have cleaned up the article now and have provided reliable third party sources. Please have a look. I would request you to withdraw the nom if you feel that the article is now in a good condition. Thanks -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me/ My edits 06:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
What I think I'm looking for is whether this is a "religious place" that is of substantially more significance than any other "religious place." If it is, that part needs to be asserted. -- Nlu ( talk) 10:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Sure would appreciate it if you'd monitor this exchange (watch both the talk pages). I know this is not your area of expertise, but it IS mine, and I know what I am talking about. The other user seems to have some agenda. Thank you. -- Elaich talk 08:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
This user was requesting unblocking, but I see you have already unblocked. Anyway, they wanted some feedback, so I just figured I should make sure you were aware of it. Mango juice talk 18:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Nlu. You recently reverted an edit to this article. I can see an argument for the CDC external link not being appropriate, but the link you restored is to a 404 page and doesn't seem appropriate either. Could you clarify what you were attempting here? Thanks. -- SiobhanHansa 18:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
As you may know, I have been assailed by Swimm1 ( talk · contribs) and Swimm11 ( talk · contribs), with attacks on my talk page, etc. Add to that list Swimm333 ( talk · contribs) and Spongeboy1 ( talk · contribs). All demonstrate the same pattern, and I highly suspect they are actually Claymort ( talk · contribs), as I have seen numerous similarities to Claymort in all of them. I looked for the sockpuppet case against Swimm1 to add these new accounts, but apparently it has been closed with the indefinite blocking of both Swimm1 and Swimm11. What do you suggest as a course of action? This person needs to be identified, and permanently blocked from Wikipedia. Any help is appreciated. -- Elaich talk 02:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I watched you removing the external links in John G. Kennedy and Chitranjan Singh Ranawat pages. My opinion is if given links of their respective web sites, people who search for those physicians may find it helpful. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.62.93.196 ( talk) 07:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
For reverting the nonsense on my talk page! :) Peace, delldot talk 02:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, is there anyway you can use <ref> reference syntax more often? It would make it that much easier for other editors if you reference it the first time using whatever source you are looking at. Many of the articles are marked as "no references" by other editors, which is a shame because the contents always check out fine using 3rd party sources. Benjwong ( talk) 06:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I usually do use previous levels first but I issued the 4th level immediately because it had already spammed some four articles and it seemed intentionally malicious since it spammed the link multiple times on the same article, on diverse articles, so I'd be surprised if it thought that the link might be useful. -- Menti fisto 07:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about putting Test5's (block templates). I put them on the WP:AIV, and I hope that an admin will ban them. Thanks for telling me about it, and sorry. Weirdy Talk 08:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
he went to lincoln high school at ryan and rowland in mayfair. He lived in a twin home in the holme cirle section of NE Philly —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.105.179.130 ( talk • contribs)
you left me this message: Thank you for experimenting with the page East Asian calligraphy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia but i never went on that page OR edited it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.97.158 ( talk • contribs)
Would you object to some discussion with Meleniumshane90 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) with a view toward lifting his indef block? There is a discussion at ANI about him. I won't lift it or do anything without your consent but would you be open to me talking with him and possibly lifting the block? JodyB talk 14:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
He comes back nearly every day to make the same edit. I can't even track all the puppets, here is a short list, make sure they all get blocked:
Can you clear out WP:AIAV please? It is getting backlogged pretty bad. 74.133.9.95 05:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)`
I hadn't realized I had gotten 'hit' until i saw you had corrected it. Your efforts are appreciated! -- LeyteWolfer 17:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the personal attacks on Bender, but he is out of line reverting this. Osborne was officially an interim head coach, and as such should be noted here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.93.213.39 ( talk) 17:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
It's not logical to edit on Wikipedia if you are annoyed by Wikipedians. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I request that you remove your block on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:HuskersCoach Bender325 is no longer making logical arguments, and is starting to be insulting and demeaning. Meanwhile, another person has come out to agree with me that it is just common sense that Osborne be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gohuskersosborne ( talk • contribs)
I felt that I gave him a chance yesterday already (see exchange above) by blocking the IP only 24 hours and not preventing signing up for an account (which he promptly did). During this time, he edit warred some more, harassed Bender, and generally made arguments that cannot possibly be good faith arguments. I don't think he's worth the time to talk to any more. -- Nlu ( talk) 01:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I emailed the Nebraska athletic department about their coaches' official status and received a response, which I posted on the talk page. I'd like to see the page unprotected; hopefully cooler heads will prevail this time around. – Swid ( talk · edits) 01:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Why am I being blocked for blanking my own user page? That ridiculous "New Messages" wouldn't get off of my screen, and so I deleted it. I want to be unblocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whateverhappenedtojesus ( talk • contribs) 09:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Since you seem to be such an authority on Chinese history you should know Sun Pin had other names IE. Sun Bin, Sun the mutilated and Sun Tzu II. Why did you revert those edits? 206.125.176.3 ( talk) 16:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Not true there is a whole book with his work and the author is Sun Tzu II. Ref: Sun Tzu II translated by Thomas Cleary (1996). The Lost Art of War. Harper Collins Publisher (Under HarperSanFrancisco. ISBN 0-06-251361-3. This book by Thomas Cleary is a translation of the sequel to Sun Tzu's classic strategic manual. I think a publishing firm knows a little more then you do; and as I stated this is referenced and factual so please stop deleting these additions based on your limited knowledge. Thanks 14:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.125.176.3 ( talk)
Hi. Just a note that I have softened the block you implemented on User:216.190.22.200 as it is a shared ip registered to Sacramento Public Library. If you have any queries please contact me either on my talk page or by email. Thanks. Tbo 157 (talk) 12:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Is there any way to view the history/content of a deleted article? Alex 202.10.89.28 ( talk) 09:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed frequent vandalism directed towards Wu Zetian. Personally, I don't like her either, but the lady deserves some dignity at the least. Is it possible for you to semi-protect the article? Thanks. Odst ( talk) 07:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I honestly was wondering why you took out "great father" from the article on Arnold Johnson. He is my grandfather and he was an incredible father too my father.