![]() | NipokNek is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Yes, I believe that's okay as long as you put in the edit summary why you are doing so :) JoshHolloway 15:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Yeah, it did look like a bad edit. :-) However, Cerveza preparada is currently a very weak stub, as is Chavela, and I am merging the two articles together for now. Hopefully, they can be expanded in the future, and then split the article apart in the future. It seems better to consolidate the two for now, rather than nominate both for deletion. Michelada is a very well developed article by comparison. -- Willscrlt ( Talk· Cntrb) 09:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. -- Nlu ( talk) 23:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Why do you have a problem with me making NCIS episode pages? Lizzie Harrison 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying your opinion but each episode page has quotes, cast notes and extra info and trivia that would make the list of episode page no longer a list but an indiscrimante list of information. Lizzie Harrison 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't think so. If the editor is interested in working on the article, I think it's only fair to give him or her notice that there are other issues that need to be addressed. It would be a shame if he or she spent a lot of time to weed out the spam and make it encyclopedic only to have it deleted for WP:CORP or copyvio. IMHO. -- Butseriouslyfolks 19:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm not trying to accuse you of anything here, but it seems to me like you think that I made up my own religion. Since my entire family are Nepacs and I have several books on the religion, I think I know what I'm talking about. You're just the sort of person I'm trying to educate about my religion. Thank-you for proposing your edit anyway, I'm sure you only meant well.
Moo kau
19:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Reacted at User_talk:Shawnborgia#Franchise_Circle.com-- BozMo talk 11:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh. I reverted it because the user had replaced the warning with "wow". Looked like plain vandalism. Regards, Hús ö nd 21:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm making just a redirecting out of the micro-article, so the fast deleting tag has no point. -- Damifb 08:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
-- Damifb 08:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry It didn't cross my mind. I was reviewing his activity and just didn't see it in contribs. So I thought it was placed there by mistake. I'm sorry about that.-- Pethr 22:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I thought you'd missed leaving the warning! You'll appreciate that not every new pages patroller is anything like as thorough as you are, and many don't leaving warnings. My apologies! Keep up the great work. Best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I seem to be stepping on your toes again. I saw your note at WP:AN about Latina Aragon, and, like you, found that it was a copyvio. Anyway, I've put things back the way they were, so now there's only one {{ db-copyvio}} tag, etc. One option is to add {{ copyvio}} as well, and blank the page, apart from the tags. I've never bothered doing this for blatant copies [but I think we've already agreed that I'm lazy], but there seems no reason why you couldn't do that if you wanted to be thorough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello NipokNek. I was about to put a speedy tag on this page, but then I saw that you had removed yours. Can you tell me what it was that made you hesitate? Currently there does not seem to be any claim of notability, and the article itself is hopeless. (Says nothing, basically). EdJohnston 01:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
The article was NOT complete! I clicked on "show preview" and Wikipedia saved the page instead. Now I must start from scratch because you were so hasty to remove it. Next time please check an editor's history before assuming the worst and acting rashly. Thank you. SFTVLGUY2 15:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I creation of Strange World(Computer network),But Speedy Delete.My best regards because I will hold out in the future when it was understood that you were severe. Thank you.I will express my gratitude for your having deleted it. -- Gikoneko 17:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
No...I thought that your judgment was adequate. I felt that it was too early to contribute this article, and, therefore, I wish to express my gratitude for your goodwill. Please watch it as it is warm might because I am not accustomed either seeming as unpleasant. I hope. Please as it is my best regards in the future. It will make an effort so that I may become wonderful wikipedian like you, too.(Machine Translated sorry).-- Gikoneko 19:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I think you may have made a mistake when you removed a users comments in Talk:Diabetes mellitus.
Please see Wikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken; thank you. -- NE2 10:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I had no idea of your warning about the speedy deletion tags because till then I never opened my User talk page. Sorry for any inconvenience caused in adding the warnings again and again. Miltonzs 13:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, NipokNek. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, NipokNek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | NipokNek is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Yes, I believe that's okay as long as you put in the edit summary why you are doing so :) JoshHolloway 15:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Yeah, it did look like a bad edit. :-) However, Cerveza preparada is currently a very weak stub, as is Chavela, and I am merging the two articles together for now. Hopefully, they can be expanded in the future, and then split the article apart in the future. It seems better to consolidate the two for now, rather than nominate both for deletion. Michelada is a very well developed article by comparison. -- Willscrlt ( Talk· Cntrb) 09:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. -- Nlu ( talk) 23:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Why do you have a problem with me making NCIS episode pages? Lizzie Harrison 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying your opinion but each episode page has quotes, cast notes and extra info and trivia that would make the list of episode page no longer a list but an indiscrimante list of information. Lizzie Harrison 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't think so. If the editor is interested in working on the article, I think it's only fair to give him or her notice that there are other issues that need to be addressed. It would be a shame if he or she spent a lot of time to weed out the spam and make it encyclopedic only to have it deleted for WP:CORP or copyvio. IMHO. -- Butseriouslyfolks 19:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm not trying to accuse you of anything here, but it seems to me like you think that I made up my own religion. Since my entire family are Nepacs and I have several books on the religion, I think I know what I'm talking about. You're just the sort of person I'm trying to educate about my religion. Thank-you for proposing your edit anyway, I'm sure you only meant well.
Moo kau
19:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Reacted at User_talk:Shawnborgia#Franchise_Circle.com-- BozMo talk 11:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh. I reverted it because the user had replaced the warning with "wow". Looked like plain vandalism. Regards, Hús ö nd 21:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm making just a redirecting out of the micro-article, so the fast deleting tag has no point. -- Damifb 08:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
-- Damifb 08:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry It didn't cross my mind. I was reviewing his activity and just didn't see it in contribs. So I thought it was placed there by mistake. I'm sorry about that.-- Pethr 22:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I thought you'd missed leaving the warning! You'll appreciate that not every new pages patroller is anything like as thorough as you are, and many don't leaving warnings. My apologies! Keep up the great work. Best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I seem to be stepping on your toes again. I saw your note at WP:AN about Latina Aragon, and, like you, found that it was a copyvio. Anyway, I've put things back the way they were, so now there's only one {{ db-copyvio}} tag, etc. One option is to add {{ copyvio}} as well, and blank the page, apart from the tags. I've never bothered doing this for blatant copies [but I think we've already agreed that I'm lazy], but there seems no reason why you couldn't do that if you wanted to be thorough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello NipokNek. I was about to put a speedy tag on this page, but then I saw that you had removed yours. Can you tell me what it was that made you hesitate? Currently there does not seem to be any claim of notability, and the article itself is hopeless. (Says nothing, basically). EdJohnston 01:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
The article was NOT complete! I clicked on "show preview" and Wikipedia saved the page instead. Now I must start from scratch because you were so hasty to remove it. Next time please check an editor's history before assuming the worst and acting rashly. Thank you. SFTVLGUY2 15:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I creation of Strange World(Computer network),But Speedy Delete.My best regards because I will hold out in the future when it was understood that you were severe. Thank you.I will express my gratitude for your having deleted it. -- Gikoneko 17:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
No...I thought that your judgment was adequate. I felt that it was too early to contribute this article, and, therefore, I wish to express my gratitude for your goodwill. Please watch it as it is warm might because I am not accustomed either seeming as unpleasant. I hope. Please as it is my best regards in the future. It will make an effort so that I may become wonderful wikipedian like you, too.(Machine Translated sorry).-- Gikoneko 19:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I think you may have made a mistake when you removed a users comments in Talk:Diabetes mellitus.
Please see Wikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken; thank you. -- NE2 10:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I had no idea of your warning about the speedy deletion tags because till then I never opened my User talk page. Sorry for any inconvenience caused in adding the warnings again and again. Miltonzs 13:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello, NipokNek. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, NipokNek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)