This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This time he struck from 202.133.6.134 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). NeoChaosX ( talk, edits) 13:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Struck again at 120.29.156.230 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). NeoChaosX ( talk, edits) 20:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
I know you are a very good editor, that's why i would like to ask you a question: what do I have to do to publish changes/comments which I made (so that they will appear on the internet). Thanks for helping! RoboRay-- RoboRay ( talk) 22:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Pucci Statement from March 4, 2009 I would like to cite a Pucci Statement from March 4, 2009 addressed to New York Times (Quote New York Times): "We finally heard back from Pucci representatives who in fact agree that Pucci is NOT credited with the capri pants." Sonja de Lennart, the most influential European designer after WWII, created the Capri Collection (Capri skirt, Capri blouse, Capri hat, Capri belt, Capri pants) 1945 - 1948.--Roboray (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thank you, Nihonjoe!-- RoboRay ( talk) 15:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just a quick thanks for fixing up the disambiguation page for Gag :-)
Have an e-cookie on me! Thanks! Captain n00dle T/ C 22:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Nihonjoe. Just one line to tell you I didn't mean to offend or attack you yesterday, and I apologize wholeheartedly if I did. The last thing I want in life is to sound aggressive, but, being Italian, I often do. BTW, thanks for the help, the issue of Shitamachi being a false friend of downtown is one I care about. urashimataro ( talk) 01:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
If possible can you delete the Diamond Wave page so I may move Diamond Wave (Mai Kuraki album) to the former. Since Diamond Wave (Mai Kuraki song) doesn't exist there is no reason for it to disambiguated. Also the album is the primary topic so if an article was ever to be made for the song it should be disambiguated as Diamond Wave (song). MS (Talk| Contributions) 21:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you think there's some way you can histmerge at least Talk:Yamanote into Talk:Yamanote and Shitamachi? Most of the discussion there concerns the new page location.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 05:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nihonjoe, Genki-desuka?
The English Wikipedia's definition of Ryukyu Islands (in English) and the Japanese Wikipedia's definition of ja:南西諸島 (in Japanese) are equivalent.... not ja:琉球諸島 (in Japanese) which exclude the Amami Islands in Kagoshima.
However, user m:User:ChongDae and his User:Chobot changed the inter-wiki links across various language Wikipedias, which I believe was incorrect. Perhaps you should get a second opinion from somebody in the Japanese Wiki. But if you agree with me that the previous links were correct, please ask ChongDae to revert his Ryukyu edits. (Don't forget to sign in to the "meta Wiki" when you communicate with him). I already fixed the link in Ryukyu Islands, but the Japanese (and other) wiki still need to be fixed. I'm sorry, I really don't have time to follow up right now. Thank you.-- Endroit ( talk) 15:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey Nihonjoe, just an FYI, while I opposed you during your RfB, I wanted to let you know that your RfB was the type that I have no doubt that should you run again (after gaining some experience in the crat related areas) that you should pass. The reasons for the opposes were not the type that dooms all future noms, it just says "not yet." If you want to see an RfB that essentially says, "screw you, you'll never become a 'crat" take a look at mine. Yours basically said, "Get some experience that people can see" in areas where 'crats work and you should have no problem.--- I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, they reason the article is a hoax is because: 1) he doesn't exist, as shown by a google search (at least not as a mixed martial artist), 2) if you look at his "record" it's claiming he's fought top competition every few days for major streches of time, which is impossible and 3) Strikeforce is an established MMA organization and he's certainly not their light-heavyweight, middleweight and "world" champion (a title which doesn't exist). As such, would it be possible for you to reconsider a G3? I'm not sure what else to tell you if a simple Google search doesn't convince you it's a hoax (or does doing research even factor in for G3s? How blatant does it have to be? I'd claim even the casual fan would realise this is not an actual person, but does it have to be so blatant everyone would immediatly realise it's a hoax? I'm asking to avoid bad nominations in the future). Cheers, -- aktsu ( t / c) 04:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Nihonjoe, - why speedy deletion for G7? Agnitum produces rather popular and PC security (anti-virus and firewall) software Outpost. It is reviewed since version 3.0 in 2006 year in PC Magazine, it is included into Virus Bulletin Security product vendors. Describing rather popular software company history in a few words for improving it by next contributors is not a G7 violation, I believe? Apologies if so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vit-ali-yan ( talk • contribs) 05:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC) Vit-ali-yan ( talk) 17:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nihonjoe, can you clarify the closing of the a/m debate. Besides the creator the template, there was only one conditional "keep". As the template was not modified, can you take this in account? There is a short discussion of the result on my talk page. -- User:Docu —Preceding unsigned comment added by Docu ( talk • contribs) 18:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I notice you're becoming more active on RFAs and RFA talk, perhaps a response to your latest RFB? This is good - it shows you are listening to the community, at least those who showed up to your RFB. Keep it up, and you will have my support for certain next time round. Beware though, don't overdo it (like I said in my original oppose, people may look at your posts as simply a way of "gearing up" for your next attempt). And also, be aware your fourth attempt will always look bad to some people, regardless of your merit. So I would wait even longer than the usual required time. It's ridiculously difficult for sure, but if you really want the job, I'm sure you'll be patient enough. All the best, Majorly talk 22:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you had not yet notified the users you mentioned at the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct that they are mentioned in this WP:RFC/U. I have placed a brief, neutrally worded notice at their user talk pages, informing them that they have been mentioned at this page. I hope that is alright with you. Do you know of any other users that should be notified? Cirt ( talk) 22:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I would like for you to revisit the deletion of this particular page. The person starting it gave ample reason for it to be here as well as documentation of the claims he made. Wikipedia does indeed host pages for smaller websites with just as much reason for their existence. It doesn't appear that there was much actual "discussion"before deletion.
(A7: Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
The above was cited for the deletion but the response was ignored and deletion was the result.
"Perspectives.com, as the article states, is the largest multi-party US political debate forum on the net. Source: http://www.big-boards.com/kw/politics/ As you see, we're ranked #14, however, sites such as Democratic Underground (which is on wiki) is only 5 slots higher than Pespectives.com. Most political messageboards are right-wing, left-wing, or some other slant. Perspectives, after years of fine tuning how to moderate effectively, a place full of people of dislike for one another, have become something rarely seen on the web. All sides are welcomed. Because of that perspectives.com is #1 in this category.
Also, I wanted to include perspectives.com in wikipedia's Political Forums categorty here: [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_forums] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_forums[/url]
There is a site listed there (and accepted on wikipedia), "FreeDominion". They have about 1/4 of the posts perspectives.com does, their Google page rank is lower than perspectives.com as well.
Perspectives.com # of posts: 4,181,827. Source: http://www.big-boards.com/kw/politics/ FreeDominion.ca # of posts: 1,135,387. Source: http://www.big-boards.com/highlight/1755/
I hope deletion does not occur, as I've shown, it deserves to be here, especially when other sites, with web traffic not even close to perspectives.com gets to stay."
The above was the response of the original page author. It was not responded to at all. Perhaps if you were to view it again and offer direction or clarification as to what we need to have the page listed here we could resolve this issue. Thanks in advance for your further consideration. Jeffronomicon ( talk) 22:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification. Jeffronomicon ( talk) 20:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hiya. I see you refused the speedy on this article. The reason I nominated it as A7 was because it had been deleted as that most recently. It has also been deleted as advertising. Obviously I cannot see what the deleted pages looked like, so cannot tell if there has been more of an effort to make it more notable, but it did seem like advertising and failing to show notability. Anyway, I'll leave it in your capable hands. Quantpole ( talk) 00:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Ahem, I think you might've failed to carry out due dilligence on this one? Flowerparty☀ 02:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi there Joe, would you mind if I restored this article you deleted? The article made several claims of importance and significance and thus was not eligible for A7. Regards So Why 17:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Just FYI your signature is not legible on my 12" notebook, the part that says "Talk to Nihonjoe". It's just too small at normal resolution and I had to increase font size like people with vision deficits do. (The Japanese characters are legible but meaningless to most English speakers.) My guess is you use a large monitor. Drawn Some ( talk) 20:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
You deleted Unity University on a G12 claim which was incorrectly applied. I found that only a very small portion of the article contained COPYVIO and removed the offending section when I rejected the CSD:G12. I believe it was improprietous for the article to be re-tagged for G8 afterward, as it was for the article to be deleted without confirming the COPYVIO, checking for the previous G8 rejection, or recognizing my related discussion challenging the G8 on the article's talk page. — X S G 08:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Except for abusefilter-editor, you have automatically those rights since you're an admin. You needn't to assign them to yourself, it's redundant for Special:Listusers and statistics. Cheers, Cenarium ( talk) 18:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
why did you close the article the debate is not closed -- Netquantum ( talk) 22:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
please restore the veritee article the debate is not close and the article is not suitable for deletes please give comments -- Netquantum ( talk) 22:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kaze no Naka no Shoujo Kinpatsu no Jeanie. Since you had some involvement with the Kaze no Naka no Shoujo Kinpatsu no Jeanie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). HarlandQPitt ( talk) 03:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I am the creator of the recently deleted page: Bank Associate Merchant Services. I would like to know what kind of information is needed for a company to be regarded as wikipedia worthy? Would proof of registration be good enough? Thank You. DrewBams ( talk) 19:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:When Agnes Lum Was Here cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 20:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:When Agnes Lum Was Here cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 21:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:When Agnes Lum Was Here cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 17:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
A heads up that I declined the speedy deletion tag on this article, as the subject was a Arizona state senator. It's enough to get it past the speedy criteria, but you could still consider a PROD or AfD. TN X Man 23:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature.-- Jeremy ( blah blah) 07:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
There's a related thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sanity check; as you'll see I originally blocked mostly per WP:USERNAME but had reblocked as a sock before I noticed they'd got an unblock request in. The puppetmaster account is Saikano ( talk · contribs), and the socks caught so far are listed at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano. Hope this helps. EyeSerene talk 19:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the visit and noble peace offering. Whilst editing music articles, I got to know that the article of Diapason (magazine) was deleted by you perhaps due to a failure of sourcing unable to meet the notability criteria. I was considering asking you to undelete since the French classical music magazine has archived its notability comparable to the British Gramophone (magazine). Given the acclaimed classical award, Diapason d'Or and some sources [3] [4], I think you easily can be persuaded to undelete it. However, well I was very hesitant to do so for the reason that you came to me. So I highly appreciate your amicable approach to me for reconciliation. I hope we can agree that "past is just past" and someday we can work together. Thanks.-- Caspian blue 21:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Just a note without specific names mentioned. I made a report to WP:UAA regarding a new username. It only came to my attention because the user made immediate, and in one case, extensive edits to specific pages that I watch now because of issues related to a persistent and determined sock master who was finally outed and blocked. I felt the username was possibly a problem, and I'm not certain that it still isn't. It isn't always because a name implies a connection to a company, although I understood that such commercial name references still aren't permitted even if there is no evidence of editing on behalf of the company. Perhaps in this case, it could mean that it is a company that provides public internet access. In any case, I'm not asserting this new user is the same person, but it is suspicious and I have added the name to my watchlist because of the myriad of problems from the sock. I'm not telling you this for any reason other than to notify you regarding the possibility. Thanks. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 21:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Regarding your message, please consider these edits [6] [7] [8] and compare the related contribs. Also, this quick reaction may be explained with experience. Maybe you can understand my lack of patience towards this new user now? -- Matthead Discuß 11:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi. In regards to deletion of IDModeling I had made suggested changes per Wikipedia editors and it has been deleted with no notation other than what was previously noted. Can you please clarify reasons for deletion? Jeb69 ( talk) 18:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you look in Newtype USA Issue 2 (DEC 2002) page 47 for info on Monkey Typhoon aka Asobotto Senki Goku? Thanks. Extremepro ( talk) 10:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Last week you raised a concern about my username. [13] The reason I want this username is because the IP it refers to is often blocked, and sometimes I'd like to edit from there. My username reflects that. I looked at the username policy and I didn't see anything about usernames resembling IP addresses, so would there be an easier way to solve this? - 38.116.202.144 temp 17:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I think you need to be nicer to me. Pzrmd ( talk) 19:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This time he struck from 202.133.6.134 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). NeoChaosX ( talk, edits) 13:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Struck again at 120.29.156.230 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). NeoChaosX ( talk, edits) 20:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
I know you are a very good editor, that's why i would like to ask you a question: what do I have to do to publish changes/comments which I made (so that they will appear on the internet). Thanks for helping! RoboRay-- RoboRay ( talk) 22:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Pucci Statement from March 4, 2009 I would like to cite a Pucci Statement from March 4, 2009 addressed to New York Times (Quote New York Times): "We finally heard back from Pucci representatives who in fact agree that Pucci is NOT credited with the capri pants." Sonja de Lennart, the most influential European designer after WWII, created the Capri Collection (Capri skirt, Capri blouse, Capri hat, Capri belt, Capri pants) 1945 - 1948.--Roboray (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thank you, Nihonjoe!-- RoboRay ( talk) 15:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just a quick thanks for fixing up the disambiguation page for Gag :-)
Have an e-cookie on me! Thanks! Captain n00dle T/ C 22:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Nihonjoe. Just one line to tell you I didn't mean to offend or attack you yesterday, and I apologize wholeheartedly if I did. The last thing I want in life is to sound aggressive, but, being Italian, I often do. BTW, thanks for the help, the issue of Shitamachi being a false friend of downtown is one I care about. urashimataro ( talk) 01:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
If possible can you delete the Diamond Wave page so I may move Diamond Wave (Mai Kuraki album) to the former. Since Diamond Wave (Mai Kuraki song) doesn't exist there is no reason for it to disambiguated. Also the album is the primary topic so if an article was ever to be made for the song it should be disambiguated as Diamond Wave (song). MS (Talk| Contributions) 21:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you think there's some way you can histmerge at least Talk:Yamanote into Talk:Yamanote and Shitamachi? Most of the discussion there concerns the new page location.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 05:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nihonjoe, Genki-desuka?
The English Wikipedia's definition of Ryukyu Islands (in English) and the Japanese Wikipedia's definition of ja:南西諸島 (in Japanese) are equivalent.... not ja:琉球諸島 (in Japanese) which exclude the Amami Islands in Kagoshima.
However, user m:User:ChongDae and his User:Chobot changed the inter-wiki links across various language Wikipedias, which I believe was incorrect. Perhaps you should get a second opinion from somebody in the Japanese Wiki. But if you agree with me that the previous links were correct, please ask ChongDae to revert his Ryukyu edits. (Don't forget to sign in to the "meta Wiki" when you communicate with him). I already fixed the link in Ryukyu Islands, but the Japanese (and other) wiki still need to be fixed. I'm sorry, I really don't have time to follow up right now. Thank you.-- Endroit ( talk) 15:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey Nihonjoe, just an FYI, while I opposed you during your RfB, I wanted to let you know that your RfB was the type that I have no doubt that should you run again (after gaining some experience in the crat related areas) that you should pass. The reasons for the opposes were not the type that dooms all future noms, it just says "not yet." If you want to see an RfB that essentially says, "screw you, you'll never become a 'crat" take a look at mine. Yours basically said, "Get some experience that people can see" in areas where 'crats work and you should have no problem.--- I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, they reason the article is a hoax is because: 1) he doesn't exist, as shown by a google search (at least not as a mixed martial artist), 2) if you look at his "record" it's claiming he's fought top competition every few days for major streches of time, which is impossible and 3) Strikeforce is an established MMA organization and he's certainly not their light-heavyweight, middleweight and "world" champion (a title which doesn't exist). As such, would it be possible for you to reconsider a G3? I'm not sure what else to tell you if a simple Google search doesn't convince you it's a hoax (or does doing research even factor in for G3s? How blatant does it have to be? I'd claim even the casual fan would realise this is not an actual person, but does it have to be so blatant everyone would immediatly realise it's a hoax? I'm asking to avoid bad nominations in the future). Cheers, -- aktsu ( t / c) 04:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Nihonjoe, - why speedy deletion for G7? Agnitum produces rather popular and PC security (anti-virus and firewall) software Outpost. It is reviewed since version 3.0 in 2006 year in PC Magazine, it is included into Virus Bulletin Security product vendors. Describing rather popular software company history in a few words for improving it by next contributors is not a G7 violation, I believe? Apologies if so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vit-ali-yan ( talk • contribs) 05:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC) Vit-ali-yan ( talk) 17:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nihonjoe, can you clarify the closing of the a/m debate. Besides the creator the template, there was only one conditional "keep". As the template was not modified, can you take this in account? There is a short discussion of the result on my talk page. -- User:Docu —Preceding unsigned comment added by Docu ( talk • contribs) 18:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I notice you're becoming more active on RFAs and RFA talk, perhaps a response to your latest RFB? This is good - it shows you are listening to the community, at least those who showed up to your RFB. Keep it up, and you will have my support for certain next time round. Beware though, don't overdo it (like I said in my original oppose, people may look at your posts as simply a way of "gearing up" for your next attempt). And also, be aware your fourth attempt will always look bad to some people, regardless of your merit. So I would wait even longer than the usual required time. It's ridiculously difficult for sure, but if you really want the job, I'm sure you'll be patient enough. All the best, Majorly talk 22:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you had not yet notified the users you mentioned at the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct that they are mentioned in this WP:RFC/U. I have placed a brief, neutrally worded notice at their user talk pages, informing them that they have been mentioned at this page. I hope that is alright with you. Do you know of any other users that should be notified? Cirt ( talk) 22:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I would like for you to revisit the deletion of this particular page. The person starting it gave ample reason for it to be here as well as documentation of the claims he made. Wikipedia does indeed host pages for smaller websites with just as much reason for their existence. It doesn't appear that there was much actual "discussion"before deletion.
(A7: Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
The above was cited for the deletion but the response was ignored and deletion was the result.
"Perspectives.com, as the article states, is the largest multi-party US political debate forum on the net. Source: http://www.big-boards.com/kw/politics/ As you see, we're ranked #14, however, sites such as Democratic Underground (which is on wiki) is only 5 slots higher than Pespectives.com. Most political messageboards are right-wing, left-wing, or some other slant. Perspectives, after years of fine tuning how to moderate effectively, a place full of people of dislike for one another, have become something rarely seen on the web. All sides are welcomed. Because of that perspectives.com is #1 in this category.
Also, I wanted to include perspectives.com in wikipedia's Political Forums categorty here: [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_forums] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_forums[/url]
There is a site listed there (and accepted on wikipedia), "FreeDominion". They have about 1/4 of the posts perspectives.com does, their Google page rank is lower than perspectives.com as well.
Perspectives.com # of posts: 4,181,827. Source: http://www.big-boards.com/kw/politics/ FreeDominion.ca # of posts: 1,135,387. Source: http://www.big-boards.com/highlight/1755/
I hope deletion does not occur, as I've shown, it deserves to be here, especially when other sites, with web traffic not even close to perspectives.com gets to stay."
The above was the response of the original page author. It was not responded to at all. Perhaps if you were to view it again and offer direction or clarification as to what we need to have the page listed here we could resolve this issue. Thanks in advance for your further consideration. Jeffronomicon ( talk) 22:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification. Jeffronomicon ( talk) 20:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hiya. I see you refused the speedy on this article. The reason I nominated it as A7 was because it had been deleted as that most recently. It has also been deleted as advertising. Obviously I cannot see what the deleted pages looked like, so cannot tell if there has been more of an effort to make it more notable, but it did seem like advertising and failing to show notability. Anyway, I'll leave it in your capable hands. Quantpole ( talk) 00:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Ahem, I think you might've failed to carry out due dilligence on this one? Flowerparty☀ 02:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi there Joe, would you mind if I restored this article you deleted? The article made several claims of importance and significance and thus was not eligible for A7. Regards So Why 17:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Just FYI your signature is not legible on my 12" notebook, the part that says "Talk to Nihonjoe". It's just too small at normal resolution and I had to increase font size like people with vision deficits do. (The Japanese characters are legible but meaningless to most English speakers.) My guess is you use a large monitor. Drawn Some ( talk) 20:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
You deleted Unity University on a G12 claim which was incorrectly applied. I found that only a very small portion of the article contained COPYVIO and removed the offending section when I rejected the CSD:G12. I believe it was improprietous for the article to be re-tagged for G8 afterward, as it was for the article to be deleted without confirming the COPYVIO, checking for the previous G8 rejection, or recognizing my related discussion challenging the G8 on the article's talk page. — X S G 08:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Except for abusefilter-editor, you have automatically those rights since you're an admin. You needn't to assign them to yourself, it's redundant for Special:Listusers and statistics. Cheers, Cenarium ( talk) 18:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
why did you close the article the debate is not closed -- Netquantum ( talk) 22:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
please restore the veritee article the debate is not close and the article is not suitable for deletes please give comments -- Netquantum ( talk) 22:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kaze no Naka no Shoujo Kinpatsu no Jeanie. Since you had some involvement with the Kaze no Naka no Shoujo Kinpatsu no Jeanie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). HarlandQPitt ( talk) 03:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I am the creator of the recently deleted page: Bank Associate Merchant Services. I would like to know what kind of information is needed for a company to be regarded as wikipedia worthy? Would proof of registration be good enough? Thank You. DrewBams ( talk) 19:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:When Agnes Lum Was Here cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 20:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:When Agnes Lum Was Here cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 21:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:When Agnes Lum Was Here cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Aspects ( talk) 17:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
A heads up that I declined the speedy deletion tag on this article, as the subject was a Arizona state senator. It's enough to get it past the speedy criteria, but you could still consider a PROD or AfD. TN X Man 23:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature.-- Jeremy ( blah blah) 07:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
There's a related thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sanity check; as you'll see I originally blocked mostly per WP:USERNAME but had reblocked as a sock before I noticed they'd got an unblock request in. The puppetmaster account is Saikano ( talk · contribs), and the socks caught so far are listed at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano. Hope this helps. EyeSerene talk 19:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the visit and noble peace offering. Whilst editing music articles, I got to know that the article of Diapason (magazine) was deleted by you perhaps due to a failure of sourcing unable to meet the notability criteria. I was considering asking you to undelete since the French classical music magazine has archived its notability comparable to the British Gramophone (magazine). Given the acclaimed classical award, Diapason d'Or and some sources [3] [4], I think you easily can be persuaded to undelete it. However, well I was very hesitant to do so for the reason that you came to me. So I highly appreciate your amicable approach to me for reconciliation. I hope we can agree that "past is just past" and someday we can work together. Thanks.-- Caspian blue 21:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Just a note without specific names mentioned. I made a report to WP:UAA regarding a new username. It only came to my attention because the user made immediate, and in one case, extensive edits to specific pages that I watch now because of issues related to a persistent and determined sock master who was finally outed and blocked. I felt the username was possibly a problem, and I'm not certain that it still isn't. It isn't always because a name implies a connection to a company, although I understood that such commercial name references still aren't permitted even if there is no evidence of editing on behalf of the company. Perhaps in this case, it could mean that it is a company that provides public internet access. In any case, I'm not asserting this new user is the same person, but it is suspicious and I have added the name to my watchlist because of the myriad of problems from the sock. I'm not telling you this for any reason other than to notify you regarding the possibility. Thanks. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 21:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Regarding your message, please consider these edits [6] [7] [8] and compare the related contribs. Also, this quick reaction may be explained with experience. Maybe you can understand my lack of patience towards this new user now? -- Matthead Discuß 11:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi. In regards to deletion of IDModeling I had made suggested changes per Wikipedia editors and it has been deleted with no notation other than what was previously noted. Can you please clarify reasons for deletion? Jeb69 ( talk) 18:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you look in Newtype USA Issue 2 (DEC 2002) page 47 for info on Monkey Typhoon aka Asobotto Senki Goku? Thanks. Extremepro ( talk) 10:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Last week you raised a concern about my username. [13] The reason I want this username is because the IP it refers to is often blocked, and sometimes I'd like to edit from there. My username reflects that. I looked at the username policy and I didn't see anything about usernames resembling IP addresses, so would there be an easier way to solve this? - 38.116.202.144 temp 17:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I think you need to be nicer to me. Pzrmd ( talk) 19:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)