![]() |
This is an archive of past discussions on Nihiltres' user talk page, as archived on October 10, 2007. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I am other user of the Wikipedia project, from Los Pancakes team, and I want to know your opinion about what subject we would talk about in our final article...Thanks a lot.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.254.101.49 ( talk) 21:57, September 13, 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm planning to put quite a large bunches of metamodels or uml diagrams on wikipedia for various systems, languages, etc. This is a very valuable technique to grasp easily the concepts of a domain. I've saw the your recent comment "Undid ... pedantic, and partial selfref"
As far as I understand this comment is related to the line "For more information on reading class diagrams of the UML standard see here".
I'm trying to figure out what does your action mean.
I read the "Undid" text. ok.
I think I understand the "pedantic" style (in fact I was wondering if one can put such diagram without explaination, so if a reference to class diagram is enough, that's simply fine).
I do not understand however the "partial selfref" statment. I can live with it, but since I want to contribute with many of such diagrams I would like to understand what is wrong here. Do a reference to class diagram which is a international standard is "partial selfref"? Since there is no link I don't know what "self" means here.
Thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-Marie Favre ( talk • contribs) 15:26, September 18, 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your changes to the goddamned article, because it hasn't been discussed yet.-- Daanschr 17:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
You guys don't rock!-- Daanschr 20:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I see that you deleted an edit I made regarding external links. I'm curious to know why they can't be there? They don't involve anything inappropriate and let users try what they are reading about without selling anything? It's another way to educate on Microsoft Office.
Not clear on what this violates?
Thanks for explaining this to me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vand0487 ( talk • contribs) 18:25, September 18, 2007 (UTC)
You Autoblocked me today, I am quite annoyed and kindly request some kind of explanation for your actions, if it was a mistake, please let me know for future reference, cheers. Meateater 12:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Ya i didnt realise i could do that...make article backbone in userpage before making a real one. Thanks for it. Goldoman 03:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there I deleted this as re-created advert/spam and was going to protect it and added what I now see is a deleted tag of "deletedpage" - if we are going to protect against re-creation - what do we use on the page now? Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 15:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you come on IRC now if possible? Thanks, --( Review Me) R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's Go Yankees!) 03:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
You speedied this article under CSD A7, I was just about to remove the tag because of an assertion of notability, an appearance on television. I found a reliable source for this, [1]. The article should be restored as it doesn't qualify for A7. Darksun 14:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
You may be interested in addressing this comment by Becks3uk ( talk · contribs) as the person who redirected the page after it was PROD'd.-- Isotope23 talk 16:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I've commented on Template talk:Pp-semi-protected and Wikipedia talk:Article message boxes, but you have not replied, I wonder why. → Aza Toth 17:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
This is an archive of past discussions on Nihiltres' user talk page, as archived on October 10, 2007. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I am other user of the Wikipedia project, from Los Pancakes team, and I want to know your opinion about what subject we would talk about in our final article...Thanks a lot.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.254.101.49 ( talk) 21:57, September 13, 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm planning to put quite a large bunches of metamodels or uml diagrams on wikipedia for various systems, languages, etc. This is a very valuable technique to grasp easily the concepts of a domain. I've saw the your recent comment "Undid ... pedantic, and partial selfref"
As far as I understand this comment is related to the line "For more information on reading class diagrams of the UML standard see here".
I'm trying to figure out what does your action mean.
I read the "Undid" text. ok.
I think I understand the "pedantic" style (in fact I was wondering if one can put such diagram without explaination, so if a reference to class diagram is enough, that's simply fine).
I do not understand however the "partial selfref" statment. I can live with it, but since I want to contribute with many of such diagrams I would like to understand what is wrong here. Do a reference to class diagram which is a international standard is "partial selfref"? Since there is no link I don't know what "self" means here.
Thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-Marie Favre ( talk • contribs) 15:26, September 18, 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted your changes to the goddamned article, because it hasn't been discussed yet.-- Daanschr 17:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
You guys don't rock!-- Daanschr 20:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I see that you deleted an edit I made regarding external links. I'm curious to know why they can't be there? They don't involve anything inappropriate and let users try what they are reading about without selling anything? It's another way to educate on Microsoft Office.
Not clear on what this violates?
Thanks for explaining this to me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vand0487 ( talk • contribs) 18:25, September 18, 2007 (UTC)
You Autoblocked me today, I am quite annoyed and kindly request some kind of explanation for your actions, if it was a mistake, please let me know for future reference, cheers. Meateater 12:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Ya i didnt realise i could do that...make article backbone in userpage before making a real one. Thanks for it. Goldoman 03:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there I deleted this as re-created advert/spam and was going to protect it and added what I now see is a deleted tag of "deletedpage" - if we are going to protect against re-creation - what do we use on the page now? Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 15:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you come on IRC now if possible? Thanks, --( Review Me) R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's Go Yankees!) 03:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
You speedied this article under CSD A7, I was just about to remove the tag because of an assertion of notability, an appearance on television. I found a reliable source for this, [1]. The article should be restored as it doesn't qualify for A7. Darksun 14:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
You may be interested in addressing this comment by Becks3uk ( talk · contribs) as the person who redirected the page after it was PROD'd.-- Isotope23 talk 16:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I've commented on Template talk:Pp-semi-protected and Wikipedia talk:Article message boxes, but you have not replied, I wonder why. → Aza Toth 17:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)