From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: TechEditor (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
gobonobo + c 20:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nick Wikimaster! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! gobonobo + c 20:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Concern regarding Draft:TechEditor

Information icon Hello, Nick Wikimaster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TechEditor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 05:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Your draft article, Draft:TechEditor

Hello, Nick Wikimaster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " TechEditor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

December 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Cabayi ( talk) 19:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nick Wikimaster ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

The request to rename the account on 03.12.2023 from me is due to the desire to be more understandable. I agree that this may be ambiguously interpreted by Wikipedia users, so I ask you to reverse these changes. I do NOT intend to promote or advertise products or services for a fee in the planned articles. My sole purpose for publishing on Wikipedia is to support the engineering community around the world and provide them with the most useful information possible. Therefore, I ask you to unblock my account for further work. Thank you! Nick Wikimaster ( talk) 07:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a place to merely provide information. This is an encyclopedia with criteria for inclusion, which is termed notability(the Ukrainian Wikipedia may have different policies). You seem to be employed by Dystlab- if so, that is considered paid editing, you do not need to be specifically paid to make edits. You will need to review conflict of interest and tell us what will be different about your editing going forward. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 08:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Cabayi and 331dot,
Thank you for your response and for bringing up these concerns. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining Wikipedia's standards. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies, and I apologize if my previous edits did not align with these guidelines. I am committed to complying with Wikipedia's notability criteria and addressing any potential conflicts of interest. To ensure transparency, I will review and update my editing practices, taking into account the guidelines on paid editing and conflict of interest. I am here to contribute valuable information to Wikipedia while respecting the community's standards.
If there are specific steps or additional information you recommend for me to provide, please let me know. I am open to any guidance you can offer.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Nick Wikimaster ( talk) 09:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The first advice I have is that you place your new posts at the bottom for proper flow(you may need to open the edit window directly to do it by clicking "edit" at the top- the Reply feature does not always work well). The second is that you do not use a bot to write your posts. You are blocked, not the bot, so we want to hear from you. We don't need a gramatically and stylistically perfect statement from you. Just tell us what you did wrong, what you will do differently, and what productive edits you will make. Please follow my advice above. 331dot ( talk) 09:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Dear 331dot, I used a bot to translate the text because, as a Ukrainian, I think and write in Ukrainian. I'm trying to be clear to you. But in essence, I just want to write a neutral and informative article about my product. Without emotions and attempts to impose something on anyone. In fact, this was my goal from the very beginning. I did not plan to publish my draft yet, as I planned to correct and supplement it. But if you think that this article should be written by someone else (or that this content is unacceptable or unimportant for Wikipedia), then I will not convince you and you can do as you see fit.

Your draft article, Draft:TechEditor

Hello, Nick Wikimaster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " TechEditor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: TechEditor (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
gobonobo + c 20:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nick Wikimaster! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! gobonobo + c 20:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Concern regarding Draft:TechEditor

Information icon Hello, Nick Wikimaster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TechEditor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 05:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Your draft article, Draft:TechEditor

Hello, Nick Wikimaster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " TechEditor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

December 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Cabayi ( talk) 19:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nick Wikimaster ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

The request to rename the account on 03.12.2023 from me is due to the desire to be more understandable. I agree that this may be ambiguously interpreted by Wikipedia users, so I ask you to reverse these changes. I do NOT intend to promote or advertise products or services for a fee in the planned articles. My sole purpose for publishing on Wikipedia is to support the engineering community around the world and provide them with the most useful information possible. Therefore, I ask you to unblock my account for further work. Thank you! Nick Wikimaster ( talk) 07:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a place to merely provide information. This is an encyclopedia with criteria for inclusion, which is termed notability(the Ukrainian Wikipedia may have different policies). You seem to be employed by Dystlab- if so, that is considered paid editing, you do not need to be specifically paid to make edits. You will need to review conflict of interest and tell us what will be different about your editing going forward. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 08:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Cabayi and 331dot,
Thank you for your response and for bringing up these concerns. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining Wikipedia's standards. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies, and I apologize if my previous edits did not align with these guidelines. I am committed to complying with Wikipedia's notability criteria and addressing any potential conflicts of interest. To ensure transparency, I will review and update my editing practices, taking into account the guidelines on paid editing and conflict of interest. I am here to contribute valuable information to Wikipedia while respecting the community's standards.
If there are specific steps or additional information you recommend for me to provide, please let me know. I am open to any guidance you can offer.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Nick Wikimaster ( talk) 09:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply
The first advice I have is that you place your new posts at the bottom for proper flow(you may need to open the edit window directly to do it by clicking "edit" at the top- the Reply feature does not always work well). The second is that you do not use a bot to write your posts. You are blocked, not the bot, so we want to hear from you. We don't need a gramatically and stylistically perfect statement from you. Just tell us what you did wrong, what you will do differently, and what productive edits you will make. Please follow my advice above. 331dot ( talk) 09:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Dear 331dot, I used a bot to translate the text because, as a Ukrainian, I think and write in Ukrainian. I'm trying to be clear to you. But in essence, I just want to write a neutral and informative article about my product. Without emotions and attempts to impose something on anyone. In fact, this was my goal from the very beginning. I did not plan to publish my draft yet, as I planned to correct and supplement it. But if you think that this article should be written by someone else (or that this content is unacceptable or unimportant for Wikipedia), then I will not convince you and you can do as you see fit.

Your draft article, Draft:TechEditor

Hello, Nick Wikimaster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " TechEditor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook