You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Gamaliel (
talk) 18:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the thoughtful editing you are doing on Wikipedia. Do not be deterred by those with narrow agendae. Your work is appreciated by more people than you can imagine. Sincere regards. Plumpurple ( talk) 03:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
I see you've placed a POV tag on the Mark Lloyd article, but you haven't raised any concerns on the talk page since early November. This is backwards from the intent of the tag. If you notice, the tag directs visitors to the talk page to see recent disputes. If you don't specify what your concerns are, the tag is useless, and I or someone else will most likely remove it within a day or two. Sχeptomaniac χαιρετε 19:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Gamaliel (
talk) 18:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the thoughtful editing you are doing on Wikipedia. Do not be deterred by those with narrow agendae. Your work is appreciated by more people than you can imagine. Sincere regards. Plumpurple ( talk) 03:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
I see you've placed a POV tag on the Mark Lloyd article, but you haven't raised any concerns on the talk page since early November. This is backwards from the intent of the tag. If you notice, the tag directs visitors to the talk page to see recent disputes. If you don't specify what your concerns are, the tag is useless, and I or someone else will most likely remove it within a day or two. Sχeptomaniac χαιρετε 19:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)