|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Nicole Prause has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Nicole Prause was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epeBwd_R7pk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy, as well as other parts of our
external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
23:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
See WP:NOT#OR. I believe you about Is Internet Pornography Causing Sexual Dysfunctions? A Review with Clinical Reports. However, that's not the way Wikipedia works. If you cannot produce a WP:RS for verifying your claim, it will get deleted. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 09:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Your editing so far has been very problematic, and you have violated several of our editing policies, including, most importantly, our policy about editing about living people. That is extremely serious and if you try to restore that content you are very likely to be blocked.
Please use the article talk page ( Talk:MDPI) and talk slowly about what kind of content you want to add, and what the sources are. Do not write anything, anywhere in Wikipedia about a living person, that is not supported by what Wikipedia considers to be a reliable source.
Please take this very seriously. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 05:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.-- Jytdog ( talk) 05:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NeuroSex. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
01:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC) |
NeuroSex ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21647 was submitted on May 26, 2018 22:52:25. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 22:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
This user has engaged in block evasion as of May, 2019. They are nearing an indefinite ban under WP:3X. -- Yamla ( talk) 22:43, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Nicole Prause has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Nicole Prause was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epeBwd_R7pk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
media file (e.g. a
sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's
copyright policy, as well as other parts of our
external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our
upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
23:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
See WP:NOT#OR. I believe you about Is Internet Pornography Causing Sexual Dysfunctions? A Review with Clinical Reports. However, that's not the way Wikipedia works. If you cannot produce a WP:RS for verifying your claim, it will get deleted. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 09:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Your editing so far has been very problematic, and you have violated several of our editing policies, including, most importantly, our policy about editing about living people. That is extremely serious and if you try to restore that content you are very likely to be blocked.
Please use the article talk page ( Talk:MDPI) and talk slowly about what kind of content you want to add, and what the sources are. Do not write anything, anywhere in Wikipedia about a living person, that is not supported by what Wikipedia considers to be a reliable source.
Please take this very seriously. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 05:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.-- Jytdog ( talk) 05:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NeuroSex. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
01:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC) |
NeuroSex ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #21647 was submitted on May 26, 2018 22:52:25. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 22:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
This user has engaged in block evasion as of May, 2019. They are nearing an indefinite ban under WP:3X. -- Yamla ( talk) 22:43, 5 May 2019 (UTC)