Your gif is great but runs too fast. Could you slow it down? Refer to discussion here: Talk:Byzantine_Empire#The_gif_should_be_slowed_down,_right? Elias ( talk) 05:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Recently, you've posted this map File:1919.5.1REGAT.png on the Hungarian–Romanian War article, and I wanted to ask: why is Henri Berthelot written over the Banat? Alin2808 ( talk) 07:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
OrionNimrod ( talk) 21:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I've noticed a conflict arose around your maps which depict Wallachia and Moldavia in the Middle Ages. In order to avoid a predictable unnecessary, unproductive and nationalist dispute, I recommend that you distinguish between country borders and personal fiefdoms on your maps. Those lands were granted by the kings of Hungary to certain Wallachian (and/or Moldavian) rulers as personal assets. I.e. these territories did not belong to Wallachia nor Moldavia, consequently there were no Wallachian enclaves within the territory of Hungary. Let's see Fagaras (Fogaras), some Romanian rulers possessed it, but not continuously, as the kings also gave them to Hungarian landholders, mostly the voivodes of Transylvania (for instance, John Geréb was granted Fagaras from Matthias in the 1460s). So, I suggest, you should use a different color to present the personal fiefdoms of Ștefan cel Mare and Vlad, in addition to a legend with color code. Norden1990 ( talk) 21:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
OrionNimrod ( talk) 14:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I would like to respond your arguments above. There was no such "Duchy of Fogaras", it is an OR on your part. It is similar to the Duke of Cambridge, it's a hereditary title but there is no "Duchy of Cambridge". "Duke of Fagaras" is nothing more than a noble title in Hungary (whether self-style or not). Before the 16th century, there were no hereditary noble titles in Hungary. It is irrelevant that the territory belonged to the privileges of local Vlach communities. It was under Hungarian suzerainty and jurisdiction, Wallachia as a sovereign state has nothing to do with it. So, yes, Fagaras and Amlas were not political entities. There were royal properties, which were granted to some Wallachian (and later Moldavian) rulers occasionally.
Yes, I check the two archontological works above (used by international historiography too), and the position of Ban of Severin were held by Hungarian lords in the 14–16th centuries. The title usage of the Wallachian monarcha is not authoritative. The kings of Hungary also bore the title King of Jerusalem since the 13th century, but they never governed the Holy Land. Anyway, the Ban of Severin is merely a political position, similarly to e.g. the Palatine of Hungary or the Master of the treasury. Its office-holder was a member of the Hungarian royal council. I can repeat myself, it was not a hereditary, royal or noble title, but it was a political dignity. Consequently, we cannot speak about a "personal union" between the Banate of Severin (or the non-existing "Duchy of Fagaras") and the Principality of Wallachia. This is a completely nonsensical attitude, it seems that you need to supplement your knowledge of medieval law. I do not understand your resistance against the facts. For instance, the image File:Tara Rumaneasca map.png is an absolutely acceptable image: it uses different colors, contains a legend which states the orange parts are fiefdoms held by Mircea personally (and not Wallachia). -- Norden1990 ( talk) 21:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Stop this kind of POV-pushing, or I will report your activity to the administrators. Your maps contain obvious POV, factual errors and unsourced claims. You were unable to answer the previous objections by several editors. Use talkpage and discuss the problem before making such disruptive edits. Norden1990 ( talk) 19:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Zsigmond, Isten kegyelméből Magyarország, Dalmácia, Horvátország, Ráma, Szerbia, Galícia, Lodoméria, Kunország és Bulgária királya, brandenburgi őrgróf, a Szent Római Birodalomnak főkamarása Csehország és Luxemburg örököse.
Your gif is great but runs too fast. Could you slow it down? Refer to discussion here: Talk:Byzantine_Empire#The_gif_should_be_slowed_down,_right? Elias ( talk) 05:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Recently, you've posted this map File:1919.5.1REGAT.png on the Hungarian–Romanian War article, and I wanted to ask: why is Henri Berthelot written over the Banat? Alin2808 ( talk) 07:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
OrionNimrod ( talk) 21:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I've noticed a conflict arose around your maps which depict Wallachia and Moldavia in the Middle Ages. In order to avoid a predictable unnecessary, unproductive and nationalist dispute, I recommend that you distinguish between country borders and personal fiefdoms on your maps. Those lands were granted by the kings of Hungary to certain Wallachian (and/or Moldavian) rulers as personal assets. I.e. these territories did not belong to Wallachia nor Moldavia, consequently there were no Wallachian enclaves within the territory of Hungary. Let's see Fagaras (Fogaras), some Romanian rulers possessed it, but not continuously, as the kings also gave them to Hungarian landholders, mostly the voivodes of Transylvania (for instance, John Geréb was granted Fagaras from Matthias in the 1460s). So, I suggest, you should use a different color to present the personal fiefdoms of Ștefan cel Mare and Vlad, in addition to a legend with color code. Norden1990 ( talk) 21:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
OrionNimrod ( talk) 14:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I would like to respond your arguments above. There was no such "Duchy of Fogaras", it is an OR on your part. It is similar to the Duke of Cambridge, it's a hereditary title but there is no "Duchy of Cambridge". "Duke of Fagaras" is nothing more than a noble title in Hungary (whether self-style or not). Before the 16th century, there were no hereditary noble titles in Hungary. It is irrelevant that the territory belonged to the privileges of local Vlach communities. It was under Hungarian suzerainty and jurisdiction, Wallachia as a sovereign state has nothing to do with it. So, yes, Fagaras and Amlas were not political entities. There were royal properties, which were granted to some Wallachian (and later Moldavian) rulers occasionally.
Yes, I check the two archontological works above (used by international historiography too), and the position of Ban of Severin were held by Hungarian lords in the 14–16th centuries. The title usage of the Wallachian monarcha is not authoritative. The kings of Hungary also bore the title King of Jerusalem since the 13th century, but they never governed the Holy Land. Anyway, the Ban of Severin is merely a political position, similarly to e.g. the Palatine of Hungary or the Master of the treasury. Its office-holder was a member of the Hungarian royal council. I can repeat myself, it was not a hereditary, royal or noble title, but it was a political dignity. Consequently, we cannot speak about a "personal union" between the Banate of Severin (or the non-existing "Duchy of Fagaras") and the Principality of Wallachia. This is a completely nonsensical attitude, it seems that you need to supplement your knowledge of medieval law. I do not understand your resistance against the facts. For instance, the image File:Tara Rumaneasca map.png is an absolutely acceptable image: it uses different colors, contains a legend which states the orange parts are fiefdoms held by Mircea personally (and not Wallachia). -- Norden1990 ( talk) 21:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Stop this kind of POV-pushing, or I will report your activity to the administrators. Your maps contain obvious POV, factual errors and unsourced claims. You were unable to answer the previous objections by several editors. Use talkpage and discuss the problem before making such disruptive edits. Norden1990 ( talk) 19:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Zsigmond, Isten kegyelméből Magyarország, Dalmácia, Horvátország, Ráma, Szerbia, Galícia, Lodoméria, Kunország és Bulgária királya, brandenburgi őrgróf, a Szent Római Birodalomnak főkamarása Csehország és Luxemburg örököse.