![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Neatsfoot has not edited Wikipedia since 18 November 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome to Wikipedia, Neatsfoot! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Green Giant and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Green Giant ( talk) 22:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
[1] Removed your comment, you must have got it wrong, because supporter of Aam Aadmi Party or Anna Hazare are not any religious activists. Bladesmulti ( talk) 16:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
I edited your user page so it would redirect to your talkpage because there is nothing on it! Sorry if it offended you! Luxure ( talk) 03:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Could you stop posting at User talk:Lukejordan02? You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. PhilKnight ( talk) 12:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
“ | It's good to let your ego be punctured once in a while. Most of us, after several years and tens of thousands of edits, start to put a lot of our egos into our work here, more than we originally either intended or anticipated. While it's natural for this to happen, the unintended consequences include feelings of ownership over one's contributions and a quickness to react in poor faith, and even with arrogance. Someone reverted your edits with a sarcastic edit summary? Let it go. Someone called you a bad name somewhere? Don't retaliate. Let it go. While it hurts at first to let these things go, being able to do so is the true test of strength and maturity. You only gain in the long run. Retaliating not only brings you discredit, but it increases your anger, and corresponding risk of over-reaction, as the number of related provocations rises. ( Antandrus, January 2007) | ” |
You're the first editor since the ones on Roy Halladay ( Talk:Roy_Halladay#Reverting_edits_by_banned_user) to vouch for the quality of my edits, as oppose to pushing to have me blocked and reverted my contributions over sockpuppetry while ignoring the content of my edits. Its really touching and greatly appreciated. Could you also have a look at the Apple Store article and see if that is an okay edit ? BenefactorDubsta ( talk) 04:02, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
De728631 ( talk) 12:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit at Derren Brown. Your edit was quite appropriate but I just though I'd let you know that it's not a matter of British punctuation. MOS:LQ applies regardless of the variety of English. Anyway, keep up the good work. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 09:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
While I often feel tempted to say something like that, we do prefer a bit more restraint... Anyway, you got it the wrong way round. They should go away and grow up rather than cause here all the problems that growing up entails and then go away. Peridon ( talk) 11:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
enough
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you for reverting all the countless vandalism on the Reflection (Fifth Harmony album) article! This encyclopedia wouldn't be the same without you! IPadPerson ( talk) 21:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for catching the problem with my reversion which did not consider prior edits. Although no excuse, the program I was using shows only the most recent change (and not the entire article) unless a special effort is made to see the previous change or one goes off to the actual page. It happens infrequently, but I have been misled by this. Thanks, again. Donner60 ( talk) 22:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
My apologies on what I posted. I thought it would be of interest to the local people Bob Kinney ( talk) 01:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
To answer your question at WP:ANI, the Nyiregyháza-Záhony railway article is not a hoax: that railway line is very much in existence, and it is part of an important connection between Hungary and Ukraine/Russia, especially for cargo traffic. As far as I can tell, the facts in the article are correct as well. The problem is that the article is not about the thing named in the title.
If you hop on a train in Budapest and start riding towards Ukraine, you will go through Cegléd, Szolnok, Debrecen and Nyíregyháza in this order before you reach the border at Záhony, so Nyíregyháza-Záhony is just a short stretch of a much longer railway line (line 100) between Budapest and Záhony. And most of the article is either about the entire line or parts of the railway line outside the Nyíregyháza-Záhony stretch. I recommend renaming the article to Budapest-Szolnok-Debrecen-Nyíregyháza-Záhony railway line.
-- Malatinszky ( talk) 13:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Neatsfoot has not edited Wikipedia since 18 November 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome to Wikipedia, Neatsfoot! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Green Giant and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Green Giant ( talk) 22:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
[1] Removed your comment, you must have got it wrong, because supporter of Aam Aadmi Party or Anna Hazare are not any religious activists. Bladesmulti ( talk) 16:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
I edited your user page so it would redirect to your talkpage because there is nothing on it! Sorry if it offended you! Luxure ( talk) 03:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Could you stop posting at User talk:Lukejordan02? You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. PhilKnight ( talk) 12:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
“ | It's good to let your ego be punctured once in a while. Most of us, after several years and tens of thousands of edits, start to put a lot of our egos into our work here, more than we originally either intended or anticipated. While it's natural for this to happen, the unintended consequences include feelings of ownership over one's contributions and a quickness to react in poor faith, and even with arrogance. Someone reverted your edits with a sarcastic edit summary? Let it go. Someone called you a bad name somewhere? Don't retaliate. Let it go. While it hurts at first to let these things go, being able to do so is the true test of strength and maturity. You only gain in the long run. Retaliating not only brings you discredit, but it increases your anger, and corresponding risk of over-reaction, as the number of related provocations rises. ( Antandrus, January 2007) | ” |
You're the first editor since the ones on Roy Halladay ( Talk:Roy_Halladay#Reverting_edits_by_banned_user) to vouch for the quality of my edits, as oppose to pushing to have me blocked and reverted my contributions over sockpuppetry while ignoring the content of my edits. Its really touching and greatly appreciated. Could you also have a look at the Apple Store article and see if that is an okay edit ? BenefactorDubsta ( talk) 04:02, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
De728631 ( talk) 12:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit at Derren Brown. Your edit was quite appropriate but I just though I'd let you know that it's not a matter of British punctuation. MOS:LQ applies regardless of the variety of English. Anyway, keep up the good work. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 09:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
While I often feel tempted to say something like that, we do prefer a bit more restraint... Anyway, you got it the wrong way round. They should go away and grow up rather than cause here all the problems that growing up entails and then go away. Peridon ( talk) 11:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
enough
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you for reverting all the countless vandalism on the Reflection (Fifth Harmony album) article! This encyclopedia wouldn't be the same without you! IPadPerson ( talk) 21:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for catching the problem with my reversion which did not consider prior edits. Although no excuse, the program I was using shows only the most recent change (and not the entire article) unless a special effort is made to see the previous change or one goes off to the actual page. It happens infrequently, but I have been misled by this. Thanks, again. Donner60 ( talk) 22:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
My apologies on what I posted. I thought it would be of interest to the local people Bob Kinney ( talk) 01:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
To answer your question at WP:ANI, the Nyiregyháza-Záhony railway article is not a hoax: that railway line is very much in existence, and it is part of an important connection between Hungary and Ukraine/Russia, especially for cargo traffic. As far as I can tell, the facts in the article are correct as well. The problem is that the article is not about the thing named in the title.
If you hop on a train in Budapest and start riding towards Ukraine, you will go through Cegléd, Szolnok, Debrecen and Nyíregyháza in this order before you reach the border at Záhony, so Nyíregyháza-Záhony is just a short stretch of a much longer railway line (line 100) between Budapest and Záhony. And most of the article is either about the entire line or parts of the railway line outside the Nyíregyháza-Záhony stretch. I recommend renaming the article to Budapest-Szolnok-Debrecen-Nyíregyháza-Záhony railway line.
-- Malatinszky ( talk) 13:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)