![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
I'm not but the person who did the block User:Luna Santin forgot to add that to the page or was going to... I originally reported him at WP:AIV. − ₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 23:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Your extra paragraph in the article has been reverted - you included in the edit summary: im sure someones gonna disagree - so why add this edit in the first place? Why not use the talk page first? Didn't have enough space in my edit summary, but please see section Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball, this may apply to some other articles you contributed to as well. Thanks, -- Danteferno ( talk) 12:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello; sorry about the lateness of reply. I noticed your message just now; notification didn't engage for some reason. Anyway, I was thinking about raising this whole logo question at the Template talk:Non-free logo. The ensued discussion should attract a wider range of editors compared to the previous "consensus". Hopefully, the folly of considering the band logos as being somehow different from all other types of logos will thus be evident. I just need to conjure up enough courage and energy to proceed with something that will likely result in an excruciatingly long and boring debate. Hope you've backuped the stuff you uploaded. Who knows, maybe we'll have a chance to use it again. And yeah, I definitely share you frustration. Every time I see some bot leaving deletion messages on my talk pages... Well, let's just say, if this continues, I'll be soon diagnosed with bruxism :-) Óðinn ( talk) 07:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
It's great to see you've cleaned up your user talk page ;-) - Thank you for the kind words on my RfA and for the note afterwards. As a side note, I've always been a metal head ;-) - I just leave my music at the door... Long live metal, eh? Scarian Call me Pat 23:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
how were they vandalism?
142.162.199.43 ( talk) 01:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Beaker. If you have an extra few minutes, I wonder if you could revisit this debate, as I believe notability has been established and the article cleaned up a bit. Thanks for your time. ♫ Cricket02 ( talk) 03:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts in a 24-hour period. Your recent 3RR report was therefore misplaced. Stifle ( talk) 10:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Navnløs ( talk · contribs) and Twsx ( talk · contribs) are banned from editing this article for 30 days, or until they settle their differences in the lamest edit war ever. Violations of the editing ban will be met with blocking (24 hours per violation). The ban may be lifted by the two editors posting to my talk page or WP:ANI that they have reached an agreement over their dispute. If there is no agreement, the ban ends in 30 days and any editor may remove this notice at that time. However, expect resumption of the edit war to be dealt with severely. For more information see [1]. Thatcher 19:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
They were custom made. You don't need to be an admin to have them. Scarian Call me Pat 19:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
You may want to see whats been going on lately at Wintersun. We have genre troubles yet again... and I DO NOT want to go through that again. − ₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 04:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Massacre (band) logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 23:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
No logos? Which rules, oh nameless one? Wikipedia rules are getting lamer by the minute... ( User talk:Username-2008-02-19) 00:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Of course you can call me a friend :-) - Okay, I took a quick look and it's a pretty WP:NN subject. Unfortunately, I cannot undo another admin's decision otherwise I'd be breaking WP:WHEEL and that'd get me into a lot of trouble. I'll AfD it for you if you'd like? There's no panic about getting rid of it... it's not hurting anyone just yet. But yeah, I agree, it's a pretty pants article. Take care. Scarian Call me Pat 10:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, and yeah, I'd appreciate the AfD thing. I understand about the WHEEL deal. Didn't know the rule existed, but it makes sense. That article is hurting me. It's a total eyesore and when I see it, it makes me wanna gag. Pure inane ridiculousness. I just wonder if enough idiots not-quite-intelligent-people will argue that
crow face is a real thing. It has no sources and is an orphaned article, so I don't understand why the other administrator would deny my speedy deletion, especially when I cited
WP:OR. It's obviously an imaginary term, used by those who have no idea what
corpsepaint is and shouldn't because they are obviously not cool/smart enough to live (WP:CIVIL!!OMG! ROFLCOPTER,LOLZ,StOptHaTgUY1) w/e, I hate people and I'm not ashamed to admit it. I can't stand for such superciliousness. Idiots need to go (and should definitely not be allowed on wikipedia).
This is MY fuckin source! Bullshit stand aside. All hail the god, Maddox.
Blizzard Beast
$ODIN$
21:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I really like how everyone piles on me after I reported the edit war... really encourages people to use dispute resolution. -- Saber Excalibur! 23:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm fine, I was very busy moving to a new home, so I didn't have much time to waste on WP. Since then, I noticed being away from copyright paranoid formatting nazis not knowledgeable of usability made me a better man.
To answer your question: If you have some programming/scripting experience you should be able to figure out this code User:Kameejl/Exp ( ), it's the code used for my custom infobox. If you need any help, please contact me. Kameejl ( Talk) 09:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you recently changed glam, speed and black metal back to comma breaks. I would ask you to stop. Those articles were recently changed to comma breaks so I changed them back. Also if you look at the heavy metal article. Check ALL the subgenres and fusion genres. They all have line breaks. So since the 20 or so of them have line breaks why would we make 3 of them have comma breaks? Just letting you know. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 22:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I was going to reply in length but I remembered that you are a metal-archives member... you have a long climb to shake that kind of damage off. You say you don't want to ignore copyright rules and yet earlier, on another talk page you wrote: "I also think that the fair use/unfair use issue is ridiculous! I think we should just use what we want." Hmmm??? You just won the hypocrite of the day award with that "revelation of true colours. I ask again.... why are you here??? 156.34.226.160 ( talk) 23:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Only Southern Ontario and Southern BC would tend to use the 'is'-isms. The rest of us still speak Auld English. I had lengthy comments about your earlier soapboxing but chose to edit and rv vandals instead. In the end Wikipedia was better for my choice. Plus I got another Barnstar added to my collection and a user has created several userboxes in my honour. I prefer to focus on editing so that these tokens of appreciation won't go unearned. My auld user account page was riddled with Barnstars... too many to count. And a year ago I promised several editors that if my IP contributions earned me 25 Barnstars I would use an account again and let my name stand as an administrator. I have always rejected the mop. My preference is to edit. But I can see some uses to having the tool box so.... back to work/hobby/work/hobby. 156.34.226.160 ( talk) 23:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I am not a vandal of the Cannibal Corpse page. I'm a huge fan of theirs and i love to spread knowledge about them so that people can understand controversial and misunderstood people like them, it's just that i don't like doing everything at once when it comes to editing, so that's why i've made about 20 edits to their page.
I'm being as careful as i can. And which post should i remove? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumanji656 ( talk • contribs) 23:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I explained the edits of the talk page. the flagicons were misused. read the manual of style at WP:FLAG. Flags are not used to emphasize nationality without good reason. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for nationalistic pride. Therefore they need to be removed to bring the page into proper encycopedic style. --neonwhite user page talk 00:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I win. Lol. Flagicons are here to stay. The vote came out in the falgicons' favor. W00T. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
I'm not but the person who did the block User:Luna Santin forgot to add that to the page or was going to... I originally reported him at WP:AIV. − ₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 23:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Your extra paragraph in the article has been reverted - you included in the edit summary: im sure someones gonna disagree - so why add this edit in the first place? Why not use the talk page first? Didn't have enough space in my edit summary, but please see section Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball, this may apply to some other articles you contributed to as well. Thanks, -- Danteferno ( talk) 12:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello; sorry about the lateness of reply. I noticed your message just now; notification didn't engage for some reason. Anyway, I was thinking about raising this whole logo question at the Template talk:Non-free logo. The ensued discussion should attract a wider range of editors compared to the previous "consensus". Hopefully, the folly of considering the band logos as being somehow different from all other types of logos will thus be evident. I just need to conjure up enough courage and energy to proceed with something that will likely result in an excruciatingly long and boring debate. Hope you've backuped the stuff you uploaded. Who knows, maybe we'll have a chance to use it again. And yeah, I definitely share you frustration. Every time I see some bot leaving deletion messages on my talk pages... Well, let's just say, if this continues, I'll be soon diagnosed with bruxism :-) Óðinn ( talk) 07:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
It's great to see you've cleaned up your user talk page ;-) - Thank you for the kind words on my RfA and for the note afterwards. As a side note, I've always been a metal head ;-) - I just leave my music at the door... Long live metal, eh? Scarian Call me Pat 23:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
how were they vandalism?
142.162.199.43 ( talk) 01:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Beaker. If you have an extra few minutes, I wonder if you could revisit this debate, as I believe notability has been established and the article cleaned up a bit. Thanks for your time. ♫ Cricket02 ( talk) 03:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts in a 24-hour period. Your recent 3RR report was therefore misplaced. Stifle ( talk) 10:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Navnløs ( talk · contribs) and Twsx ( talk · contribs) are banned from editing this article for 30 days, or until they settle their differences in the lamest edit war ever. Violations of the editing ban will be met with blocking (24 hours per violation). The ban may be lifted by the two editors posting to my talk page or WP:ANI that they have reached an agreement over their dispute. If there is no agreement, the ban ends in 30 days and any editor may remove this notice at that time. However, expect resumption of the edit war to be dealt with severely. For more information see [1]. Thatcher 19:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
They were custom made. You don't need to be an admin to have them. Scarian Call me Pat 19:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
You may want to see whats been going on lately at Wintersun. We have genre troubles yet again... and I DO NOT want to go through that again. − ₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 04:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Massacre (band) logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 23:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
No logos? Which rules, oh nameless one? Wikipedia rules are getting lamer by the minute... ( User talk:Username-2008-02-19) 00:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Of course you can call me a friend :-) - Okay, I took a quick look and it's a pretty WP:NN subject. Unfortunately, I cannot undo another admin's decision otherwise I'd be breaking WP:WHEEL and that'd get me into a lot of trouble. I'll AfD it for you if you'd like? There's no panic about getting rid of it... it's not hurting anyone just yet. But yeah, I agree, it's a pretty pants article. Take care. Scarian Call me Pat 10:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, and yeah, I'd appreciate the AfD thing. I understand about the WHEEL deal. Didn't know the rule existed, but it makes sense. That article is hurting me. It's a total eyesore and when I see it, it makes me wanna gag. Pure inane ridiculousness. I just wonder if enough idiots not-quite-intelligent-people will argue that
crow face is a real thing. It has no sources and is an orphaned article, so I don't understand why the other administrator would deny my speedy deletion, especially when I cited
WP:OR. It's obviously an imaginary term, used by those who have no idea what
corpsepaint is and shouldn't because they are obviously not cool/smart enough to live (WP:CIVIL!!OMG! ROFLCOPTER,LOLZ,StOptHaTgUY1) w/e, I hate people and I'm not ashamed to admit it. I can't stand for such superciliousness. Idiots need to go (and should definitely not be allowed on wikipedia).
This is MY fuckin source! Bullshit stand aside. All hail the god, Maddox.
Blizzard Beast
$ODIN$
21:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I really like how everyone piles on me after I reported the edit war... really encourages people to use dispute resolution. -- Saber Excalibur! 23:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm fine, I was very busy moving to a new home, so I didn't have much time to waste on WP. Since then, I noticed being away from copyright paranoid formatting nazis not knowledgeable of usability made me a better man.
To answer your question: If you have some programming/scripting experience you should be able to figure out this code User:Kameejl/Exp ( ), it's the code used for my custom infobox. If you need any help, please contact me. Kameejl ( Talk) 09:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you recently changed glam, speed and black metal back to comma breaks. I would ask you to stop. Those articles were recently changed to comma breaks so I changed them back. Also if you look at the heavy metal article. Check ALL the subgenres and fusion genres. They all have line breaks. So since the 20 or so of them have line breaks why would we make 3 of them have comma breaks? Just letting you know. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 22:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I was going to reply in length but I remembered that you are a metal-archives member... you have a long climb to shake that kind of damage off. You say you don't want to ignore copyright rules and yet earlier, on another talk page you wrote: "I also think that the fair use/unfair use issue is ridiculous! I think we should just use what we want." Hmmm??? You just won the hypocrite of the day award with that "revelation of true colours. I ask again.... why are you here??? 156.34.226.160 ( talk) 23:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Only Southern Ontario and Southern BC would tend to use the 'is'-isms. The rest of us still speak Auld English. I had lengthy comments about your earlier soapboxing but chose to edit and rv vandals instead. In the end Wikipedia was better for my choice. Plus I got another Barnstar added to my collection and a user has created several userboxes in my honour. I prefer to focus on editing so that these tokens of appreciation won't go unearned. My auld user account page was riddled with Barnstars... too many to count. And a year ago I promised several editors that if my IP contributions earned me 25 Barnstars I would use an account again and let my name stand as an administrator. I have always rejected the mop. My preference is to edit. But I can see some uses to having the tool box so.... back to work/hobby/work/hobby. 156.34.226.160 ( talk) 23:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I am not a vandal of the Cannibal Corpse page. I'm a huge fan of theirs and i love to spread knowledge about them so that people can understand controversial and misunderstood people like them, it's just that i don't like doing everything at once when it comes to editing, so that's why i've made about 20 edits to their page.
I'm being as careful as i can. And which post should i remove? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumanji656 ( talk • contribs) 23:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I explained the edits of the talk page. the flagicons were misused. read the manual of style at WP:FLAG. Flags are not used to emphasize nationality without good reason. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for nationalistic pride. Therefore they need to be removed to bring the page into proper encycopedic style. --neonwhite user page talk 00:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I win. Lol. Flagicons are here to stay. The vote came out in the falgicons' favor. W00T. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)