![]() |
Hi Nathanael Hahn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Praxidicae. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Classical education movement seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
PRAXIDICAEđ
16:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Classical education movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editingâespecially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workâwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeâcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringâeven if you do not violate the three-revert ruleâshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Since you don't appear to read your talk page, read my previous warning and do not restore the content.
PRAXIDICAEđ
16:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Nathanael Hahn! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "
Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipediaâit refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.
glman (
talk)
19:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Nathanael Hahn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Praxidicae. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Classical education movement seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
PRAXIDICAEđ
16:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Classical education movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editingâespecially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workâwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeâcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringâeven if you do not violate the three-revert ruleâshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Since you don't appear to read your talk page, read my previous warning and do not restore the content.
PRAXIDICAEđ
16:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Nathanael Hahn! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "
Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipediaâit refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.
glman (
talk)
19:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)