|
I've read the talk page behind that article. My opinion is left in that talk page. Although I can't write the story now, maybe there's still a way around it. If you can simplfy the story without being too stringent with every little detail, it would still work. I understand that the page requires web references and cites to avoid original research but that doesn't mean it's a must when it comes to the story, especially on a video game. Anyway, I can't help now since I'm taking a break. Maybe February would be a good time. For now, I would like you to think it over. That's all. Johnnyauau2000 ( talk) 04:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey NathanWubs. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
-- 12:20, Monday, July 8, 2024 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
I would like your constructive opinion on how to demonstrate on the talk page for this article that a WP:POV tag is necessary for several sections that are currently being discussed. TBSchemer ( talk) 18:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in Barbados, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bajan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello NathanWubs; Your consensus for section blanking at the "Obama" page for Legacy section blanking is being stated there, could you glance at this. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
p.s. Just noticed that the same user is again leaving templates on the president's page, did you see this? FelixRosch ( talk) 15:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
They sounded funny! Somchai Sun ( talk) 18:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
Supernerd11 has eaten your {{ cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{ cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 02:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belt wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IBWA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, just a friendly reminder read Wikipedia:General sanctions/Obama article probation, if you've not done so already. Your most recent edit [1] to Barack_Obama leads me to suggest that you follow the advice therein:
Happy editing! JoeSperrazza ( talk) 19:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes I can see why it might be considered vandalism, the fact that before he became a super villain he called himself Sammy. But it is a (referenced) fact. Dunno why you cannot find the article. I'm added further info from it at the moment. I'll post your comment to the talk page. Tommy Pinball ( talk) 21:42, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I've re-removed Category:Science fiction video games from Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2. There's none/very little scientific content/innovations in those games (apart from the pseudo-spaceships) and just because they contain the aforementioned spacecraft and are set in space does not mean they automatically qualifies as science fiction. I didn't add back Category:Fantasy video games though, as none of the other Mario video game articles I checked have that category. Thanks, Satellizer (´ ・ ω ・ `) 01:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
It was really troubling finding references to the cheating online, but a lot of complaints were mostly on forums and I figure that is probably refutable here on Wikipedia, so the closest reference I could find of someone talking about the cheating online is in an article that was posted half a year ago about someone talking about it. The cheat codes were simply self-reference from my experiences, which I unfortunately have no proof of so if you want me to remove the cheat code talk I can shorten the paragraph to simply talk about the cheating in general. I put up the reference I found in the first line, and I can shorten the three lines that follow it to one line if that is what you want. And cheating isn't too common anymore ever since the eighth generation of video games, or at least anything other than Nintendo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medachod ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I let you know, Foreman Pig as Super Mario as reference something like RPG game. I know that. Bryancyriel ( talk) 09:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Frustrating, isn't he? Joshua has been here for several years. Discussion has repeatedly proven to be pointless. He seems to be the case WP:RBI was written for. - SummerPhD ( talk) 15:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nathan, thanks for helping out at the teahouse. Please remember that we try to avoid using acronym links like "please read WP:COI". They are very convenient and I do this a lot myself, but at the teahouse the plan is (I'm told!) that we should avoid them because they are not very welcoming to newcomers. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 20:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
"Which maybe besides AGF cannot reflect on Zero at all" I've read this sentence a few times. I'm having a hard time making sense of it. Try me again? Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 17:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
I dunno! I even mention that nobody's gone to comment on it yet... Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 20:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Nathan. Did you restore the protection template (which actually won't show up on an unprotected page) at Intelligent design because you think the article ought to be semiprotected? I think I agree, and in fact it has often been under either semi or pending changes. I've semi'd it for another three months. For another time, if you notice problems from non-autoconfirmed users, the WP:RFPP board is the place. Thanks for your vigilance! (And for your thanks. :-)) Bishonen | talk 15:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC).
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 02:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam ( talk)
When I am logging in a heading is appearing that "vote for the best image of the year " . I am able to view those images in various categories but I am not able to vote . I am clicking the vote icons below those images but nothing is happening .
Frost The World (
talk)
17:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Where do I post my "rant" to be considered by Wikipedia/Wikipedians? Or is everyone here intolerant of discussing the validity of using erroneous reasoning, in favor of "being authoritative" by means of mainstream consensus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyguy76767 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I tend to leave some user talk pages on watch until I get bored of them. This guy just...didn't seem to completely understand things. And how was dinner? Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 21:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I stay too tight to some BLPs that it almost became a "Let me throw my hat at it." I figure they would be easier to get than rollback. Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 21:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I believe you may not have carefully examined what was written - please do so next time. The FRC article did not cite those studies, and was merely used as an example of where a source making such criticism can be found. 24.252.141.175 ( talk) 13:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, it's been 11 days since you reviewed Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children, saying you wanted to get a second opinion; are you still planning on concluding the review? -- Pres N 19:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
I've read the talk page behind that article. My opinion is left in that talk page. Although I can't write the story now, maybe there's still a way around it. If you can simplfy the story without being too stringent with every little detail, it would still work. I understand that the page requires web references and cites to avoid original research but that doesn't mean it's a must when it comes to the story, especially on a video game. Anyway, I can't help now since I'm taking a break. Maybe February would be a good time. For now, I would like you to think it over. That's all. Johnnyauau2000 ( talk) 04:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey NathanWubs. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
-- 12:20, Monday, July 8, 2024 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
I would like your constructive opinion on how to demonstrate on the talk page for this article that a WP:POV tag is necessary for several sections that are currently being discussed. TBSchemer ( talk) 18:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in Barbados, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bajan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello NathanWubs; Your consensus for section blanking at the "Obama" page for Legacy section blanking is being stated there, could you glance at this. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
p.s. Just noticed that the same user is again leaving templates on the president's page, did you see this? FelixRosch ( talk) 15:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
They sounded funny! Somchai Sun ( talk) 18:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC) |
Supernerd11 has eaten your {{ cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{ cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 02:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belt wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IBWA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, just a friendly reminder read Wikipedia:General sanctions/Obama article probation, if you've not done so already. Your most recent edit [1] to Barack_Obama leads me to suggest that you follow the advice therein:
Happy editing! JoeSperrazza ( talk) 19:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes I can see why it might be considered vandalism, the fact that before he became a super villain he called himself Sammy. But it is a (referenced) fact. Dunno why you cannot find the article. I'm added further info from it at the moment. I'll post your comment to the talk page. Tommy Pinball ( talk) 21:42, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I've re-removed Category:Science fiction video games from Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2. There's none/very little scientific content/innovations in those games (apart from the pseudo-spaceships) and just because they contain the aforementioned spacecraft and are set in space does not mean they automatically qualifies as science fiction. I didn't add back Category:Fantasy video games though, as none of the other Mario video game articles I checked have that category. Thanks, Satellizer (´ ・ ω ・ `) 01:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
It was really troubling finding references to the cheating online, but a lot of complaints were mostly on forums and I figure that is probably refutable here on Wikipedia, so the closest reference I could find of someone talking about the cheating online is in an article that was posted half a year ago about someone talking about it. The cheat codes were simply self-reference from my experiences, which I unfortunately have no proof of so if you want me to remove the cheat code talk I can shorten the paragraph to simply talk about the cheating in general. I put up the reference I found in the first line, and I can shorten the three lines that follow it to one line if that is what you want. And cheating isn't too common anymore ever since the eighth generation of video games, or at least anything other than Nintendo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medachod ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I let you know, Foreman Pig as Super Mario as reference something like RPG game. I know that. Bryancyriel ( talk) 09:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Frustrating, isn't he? Joshua has been here for several years. Discussion has repeatedly proven to be pointless. He seems to be the case WP:RBI was written for. - SummerPhD ( talk) 15:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nathan, thanks for helping out at the teahouse. Please remember that we try to avoid using acronym links like "please read WP:COI". They are very convenient and I do this a lot myself, but at the teahouse the plan is (I'm told!) that we should avoid them because they are not very welcoming to newcomers. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 20:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
"Which maybe besides AGF cannot reflect on Zero at all" I've read this sentence a few times. I'm having a hard time making sense of it. Try me again? Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 17:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
I dunno! I even mention that nobody's gone to comment on it yet... Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 20:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Nathan. Did you restore the protection template (which actually won't show up on an unprotected page) at Intelligent design because you think the article ought to be semiprotected? I think I agree, and in fact it has often been under either semi or pending changes. I've semi'd it for another three months. For another time, if you notice problems from non-autoconfirmed users, the WP:RFPP board is the place. Thanks for your vigilance! (And for your thanks. :-)) Bishonen | talk 15:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC).
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 02:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam ( talk)
When I am logging in a heading is appearing that "vote for the best image of the year " . I am able to view those images in various categories but I am not able to vote . I am clicking the vote icons below those images but nothing is happening .
Frost The World (
talk)
17:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Where do I post my "rant" to be considered by Wikipedia/Wikipedians? Or is everyone here intolerant of discussing the validity of using erroneous reasoning, in favor of "being authoritative" by means of mainstream consensus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyguy76767 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I tend to leave some user talk pages on watch until I get bored of them. This guy just...didn't seem to completely understand things. And how was dinner? Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 21:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I stay too tight to some BLPs that it almost became a "Let me throw my hat at it." I figure they would be easier to get than rollback. Zero Serenity ( talk - contributions) 21:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
I believe you may not have carefully examined what was written - please do so next time. The FRC article did not cite those studies, and was merely used as an example of where a source making such criticism can be found. 24.252.141.175 ( talk) 13:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, it's been 11 days since you reviewed Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children, saying you wanted to get a second opinion; are you still planning on concluding the review? -- Pres N 19:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)