Hello, I'm
SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Rebel Heart (Madonna album), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Living for Love, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
i have added the source.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia.
This is a fansite, and therefore not a
reliable source.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
You're really annoying, because this song is a single and eventually you'll find out and you're just going to have been that annoying person who put up a fight for nothing
fine. but so I'm going to keep the ghosttown article but not call it a single.
An article without citations cannot stand on its own per WP:Verifiability. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 03:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
look at the article "devil pray" this is the type of article i have created on ghosttown. i am adding sources as we speak
Can you please GIVE ME A CHANCE TO ADD SOURCES???
please also delete then, the page "Devil Pray"
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Swarm
X
21:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Ghosttown (Madonna song), you may be
blocked from editing. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
05:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
–==Israeli legislative election, 2015== Hello Narbit. Please stop adding Livni to the party leader field in the infobox. Herzog was the Zionist Union leader, as you can see here. Cheers, Number 5 7 21:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
As you have continued edit warring, I have reported you again. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Narbit reported by User:Number 57 (Result: ). Number 5 7 13:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
You must have no time on your hands that all you do is spend time on Wikipedia and fight people over edits. You want to feel powerful in some sense so you bully and report anyone who disagrees with you. It's disgusting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't use wikipedia. This and like two other things have I ever edited. Unlike you all, I don't waste my time with this utter nonsense. As ℅-leader of the party, on equal footing with Herzog, Livni's name belongs in the infobox. I mean since it's an equal partnership why not just put her name there? Because then Herzog would be missing. Both leaders must be there. And I recall that u said "the starting point must be with two leaders." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
My point about "using only Livni and not Herzog's name" was a hypothetical, and I said so because I wanted to impress that it's just as absurd to omit Herzog as it is to omit Livni, since both lead the party, both speak at faction meetings, both were PM candidates, etc. The point being that it doesn't matter which leader you exclude, it's just as absurd. Livni may be a close friend of mine but it doesn't matter and shouldn't matter. The duality of the leadership should be expressed in the infobox, just as the user opens the page. -Narbit
The media portrayed it as renouncing of the rotation but that's actually not true. She merely said "rotation will not be a roadblock to us forming a government." But that point aside, it's not to do so much with prime ministerial candidates as it does with party leaders. The infobox doesn't say "PM candidate" it says "leader." And in this case, Livni, while maybe in the final reckoning, wasn't a PM candidate, still shared the leadership of the ZU party. What is the substantive reason for denying her the representation of a leader equal to that of Herzog, and she had been a PM candidate for the majority of the election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 18:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Please respond to my other points, which I explicitly said comprised my argument.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 03:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Ghosttown (Madonna song). —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
07:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Rebel Heart (Madonna album), you may be
blocked from editing. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
07:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 12:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. slakr\ talk / 03:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Rebel Heart Tour, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
09:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Rebel Heart Tour. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
08:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tzipi Livni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and French. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Narbit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you reverted my edit without giving explanation. You should know that the current style of the template is usually reserved only for Presidents' pages. I know it's probably not enshrined in Wikipedia guidelines or anything, but there is an observable precedent of using that design only for POTUS pages. So unless I'm missing something, please give a good reason why this design should remain so. Otherwise I will go back and revert the edit. Bokmanrocks01 ( talk) 23:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Israeli legislative election, 2015.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked over this issue. Do you really want to be blocked again? StevenJ81 ( talk) 18:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:StevenJ81. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
18:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Benazir Bhutto. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ominictionary ( talk)
Your addition to
Benazir Bhutto has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ominictionary (
talk •
contribs)
19:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
If you make that edit (you know which one I'm talking about) one more time, I will block you from editing indefinitely. Please get the message. Thanks, Number 5 7 19:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Seriously, Narbit, it's been two years. You've been warned a dozen times. Why are you so desperate to make this change? Kimpire ( talk) 04:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Number
5
7
07:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Rebel Heart (Madonna album), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Living for Love, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
i have added the source.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia.
This is a fansite, and therefore not a
reliable source.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
03:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
You're really annoying, because this song is a single and eventually you'll find out and you're just going to have been that annoying person who put up a fight for nothing
fine. but so I'm going to keep the ghosttown article but not call it a single.
An article without citations cannot stand on its own per WP:Verifiability. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 03:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
look at the article "devil pray" this is the type of article i have created on ghosttown. i am adding sources as we speak
Can you please GIVE ME A CHANCE TO ADD SOURCES???
please also delete then, the page "Devil Pray"
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Swarm
X
21:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Ghosttown (Madonna song), you may be
blocked from editing. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
05:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
–==Israeli legislative election, 2015== Hello Narbit. Please stop adding Livni to the party leader field in the infobox. Herzog was the Zionist Union leader, as you can see here. Cheers, Number 5 7 21:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
As you have continued edit warring, I have reported you again. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Narbit reported by User:Number 57 (Result: ). Number 5 7 13:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
You must have no time on your hands that all you do is spend time on Wikipedia and fight people over edits. You want to feel powerful in some sense so you bully and report anyone who disagrees with you. It's disgusting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't use wikipedia. This and like two other things have I ever edited. Unlike you all, I don't waste my time with this utter nonsense. As ℅-leader of the party, on equal footing with Herzog, Livni's name belongs in the infobox. I mean since it's an equal partnership why not just put her name there? Because then Herzog would be missing. Both leaders must be there. And I recall that u said "the starting point must be with two leaders." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
My point about "using only Livni and not Herzog's name" was a hypothetical, and I said so because I wanted to impress that it's just as absurd to omit Herzog as it is to omit Livni, since both lead the party, both speak at faction meetings, both were PM candidates, etc. The point being that it doesn't matter which leader you exclude, it's just as absurd. Livni may be a close friend of mine but it doesn't matter and shouldn't matter. The duality of the leadership should be expressed in the infobox, just as the user opens the page. -Narbit
The media portrayed it as renouncing of the rotation but that's actually not true. She merely said "rotation will not be a roadblock to us forming a government." But that point aside, it's not to do so much with prime ministerial candidates as it does with party leaders. The infobox doesn't say "PM candidate" it says "leader." And in this case, Livni, while maybe in the final reckoning, wasn't a PM candidate, still shared the leadership of the ZU party. What is the substantive reason for denying her the representation of a leader equal to that of Herzog, and she had been a PM candidate for the majority of the election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 18:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Please respond to my other points, which I explicitly said comprised my argument.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 03:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Ghosttown (Madonna song). —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
07:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Rebel Heart (Madonna album), you may be
blocked from editing. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
07:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 12:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. slakr\ talk / 03:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Rebel Heart Tour, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
09:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Rebel Heart Tour. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
08:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tzipi Livni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and French. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Narbit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you reverted my edit without giving explanation. You should know that the current style of the template is usually reserved only for Presidents' pages. I know it's probably not enshrined in Wikipedia guidelines or anything, but there is an observable precedent of using that design only for POTUS pages. So unless I'm missing something, please give a good reason why this design should remain so. Otherwise I will go back and revert the edit. Bokmanrocks01 ( talk) 23:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Israeli legislative election, 2015.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked over this issue. Do you really want to be blocked again? StevenJ81 ( talk) 18:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:StevenJ81. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
18:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Benazir Bhutto. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ominictionary ( talk)
Your addition to
Benazir Bhutto has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ominictionary (
talk •
contribs)
19:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
If you make that edit (you know which one I'm talking about) one more time, I will block you from editing indefinitely. Please get the message. Thanks, Number 5 7 19:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Seriously, Narbit, it's been two years. You've been warned a dozen times. Why are you so desperate to make this change? Kimpire ( talk) 04:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Number
5
7
07:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)