I would like to request that you please reactivate the article "Z Games." It has been edited so it is no longer an advertisement, but rather and informative article about the Z Games company and its games. If anything needs to be changed, please let me know. I can't do any editing since you seem to have had it "protected."
I appreciate your help. Zgames
I left you a message just before you archived. Petros471 18:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page? I see you noted it as CSD G3; it may have been vandalized at the time (I don't know) but it had a long history and was not eligible for CSD (if it was vandalized, it should have been reverted). BoojiBoy 19:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Colorado Rockies (NHL). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.
![]() |
Thanks for contributing to my successful RfA! | |
To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations! To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well! ♥! ~Kylu ( u| t) 02:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) |
[1] Why did you create the new account named "I'm the best wiki admin"? — The King of Kings 03:31 July 19 '06
I've noticed your reversion of vandalism and I'd like to take the time to say that I've reported it to AIV as it (the vandalism) appears to be a constant issue (check the history). — Natha n ( talk) / 04:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi there Naconkantari. Does a7 extend to businesses? Or does a7 groups of people only refer to bands, sports teams, music groups? I know that bands, sports teams, also make money etc, but their raison d'etre is to "win competitions" rather than to make money irrespective of "quality" if you know what I mean. Regards, Blnguyen | rant-line 05:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Who is Jacqui Remington that you're concerned this user is impersonating? I've never heard of that name, and a google search turned up 1 hit. Mango juice talk 14:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
The portal uses inclusion. The vandalized article was Portal:Dance/Featured article. Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Please re-protect Opie and Anthony to semi-protection at your convenience.
Attention whore and Payneos are both successfully seeking consensus at my suggestion at this time, however, there are several IP address users adding the disputed material back to the page without reviewing the talk page discussion, hence my request for semi-protection. It's my fear that if we don't lock it down to semi that this will descend into another edit war. Thanks. CQJ 17:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports gathered on
my RfA, which passed with a final tally of
0x0104/0x01/0x00. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on
my talk page. Misza 13, the rouge-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing! NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated
ROT-26 algorithm. |
![]() |
This may be of interest to you: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Ste4k-- Who123 04:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Would you be willing to sprotect the article for maybe 24 hours? User:Jackman69 has a lengthy ban, and I think he's using AOL to subvert the blocks. -- ChrisB 02:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
This user is actually a doppelganger account I created! -- Bigtop ( tk| |cb| em| ea) 03:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Thankyou for that user talk revert...and blocking the IP. Isaac Ling seems to be adding vanity nonsense to a lot of articles on and off for a while yet. Blnguyen | rant-line 04:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC).
Please block his talk page as well -- thanks! NawlinWiki 12:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Hate to tell you, but you've got an imposter: User:Railer 893 and User Talk:Railer 893. Nationalparks 17:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity, does this sort of thing happen often? I've no idea why someone decided to waste his time repeatedly vandalizing my RfA, but it strikes me as mildly amusing that it got sprotected. - CheNuevara 17:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 30 | 24 July 2006 | |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. -- Michael Snow 04:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Aloha. Could you please take a look at my comments to User talk:Bunchofgrapes, in the section towards the bottom entitled "Shenanigans"? I would like to compare notes with you. I believe I've discovered the identity of the AOL RfA vandal, although I need your informed opinion to be sure. — Viriditas | Talk 09:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you so much! RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 03:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Naconkantari, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I appreciate you making the second support of the RFA. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page.
|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 31 | 31 July 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Collateral damage, yet again-- 205.188.116.10 00:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I was about to report 71.115.109.28 and Cymru81 for vandalizing Houston, Texas. Those two are the same user who keeps deleting information on the Houston page because I did not let him/her insert incorrect information to the Dallas, Texas article in the past. I was only reverting his vandalism of deletion without explanation. — RJN 01:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm the warez dude that you just banned like 5 times in a row. What's your problem?
I've just restored the above text which you blanked. May I have an answer to my question now please? Why exactly was I blocked from editing?
Please unblock User:Iamheredude -- check his talk page to see what happened; he made a single accidental edit to Loxodonta, after which you blocked him. CalebNoble 05:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, it's alright, we all make mistakes. Thanks for cleaning up my Loxodonta mess. How are we doing with the Colbert issue. By the way, can I remove the Block Tag from my talk page? Iamheredude 05:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering what you meant when you said "Not Done" here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist#w4t3r.com_2 By the way, please unblock the site! Kaabi 23:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Welcome back to Wikipedia! -- Big top 19:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Naconkantari. The above user has requested to be unblocked and I think the request has some merit. He was arguing (albeit inappropriately) with User:Raven Symone who was purporting to be the actress. I think he shows some remorse on his talk page, and I've indef blocked User:Raven Symone. I defer to your judgment as you placed the block, but I'd be tempted to let the guy go on this one. I do agree that the "screw you" was superfluous. Many thanks -- Samir धर्म 04:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Is xyzzy n a moderator / administrator or does he just play one on Wikipedia? 205.188.116.10 04:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Sam Blanning says I should thank you for this. Was really starting to get nasty. S B H arris 23:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Why ban someone if you don't know what kind of vandal he or she is? Bearly541 22:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 32 | 7 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Nice job on catching vandalism on user pages
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For reverting several Userpages. Great Job! Æon Insane Ward 02:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. I added a note about about Need For Speed Carbon to the Wii games section. It's not vandalism. I invite you please check it out instead of removing it for no reason like you did about an hour ago. Thanks.
Oh yea, sorry I couldn't get this article to show up in your messages section. New to Wikipedia and still figuring it out.
Thanks -- please don't forget the two albums (listed in one of the comments in the AFD). NawlinWiki 21:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Could you please give reasons for deleting the article on Larry Walther? The free textbook created by him is already very popular and shows every sign of becoming even more important with time. Thanks, Jayanta Sen 01:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Going through unblock templates... what was the reason for the block of User:Balloonguy? The reason you gave was "please contact an administrator for verification, as described on this page", but that still leaves it unclear (at least to me). Thanks. Tijuana Brass ¡Épa! 03:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
In that case, since it's currently full protected, would you mind inserting the 'autoblock' feature from the template you just deleted, you can pretty much recycle the code from the deleted revisions-- 205.188.116.10 03:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Could someone change See block log. to See ( current autoblocks block log) or something like that?-- 205.188.116.10 03:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Could I ask you why you aren't putting test5 templates on talk pages? It's confusing for me because sometimes I'm hunting the same vandals as you, and I find that you've blocked but I have no way of knowing that until I've reinvented the wheel. - Richardcavell 00:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, an IP vandalized Adolf Hitler, introducing \\\ at the same time, so I blocked for a week, to give time for an investigation at WP:OP I see that you extended it to indefinite. I have now been told that it is not an open proxy. I don't have any knowledge on the subject, but I don't understand how it was introducing all the \\\ throughout the article. Anyway, with some reluctance, I'm going to unblock. It's now been more than 24 hours. Cheers, AnnH ♫ 23:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I'm always amazed when people revert my own user page faster than I do. :) Have a great weekend. -- Yamla 02:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I believe you completed one of my block URL requests over on Meta for thesexlane.com and its related links. Any thoughts on this discussion? -- Fan-1967 17:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
This is a null edit. Naconkantari 21:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I saw you test-edited Eurythmics, probably in response to my (anonymous) request for eurythmics.com to be taken off the spam list. I removed eurythmics.com in order to remove some external links that needed to be removed, which would be why your test edits worked, but I'd still like to restore the official site. Thanks. -- JHunterJ 00:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
You seem to be a bit more familiar with this case than me, could you weigh in at WP:AN/I#YaR GnitS? -- Rosicrucian 01:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Hiya, are you available to give an opinion on something? I'm choosing you kind of at random as an uninvolved admin. Could you please take a look at the recent edits at DragonRealms? Someone (evidently a disgruntled ex-player or contractor) keeps inserting highly negative POV information there. I've been removing it, but it's been turning into an edit war and the individual is escalating personal attacks, and I don't want to have to push it to the edge of 3RR. Could you please take a look and let me know your opinion on the information in question? Thanks. :) -- Elonka 04:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 33 | 14 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Could you be kind enough to explain how you determined that the "consensus" on Norman Technologies was for a Delete? I thought that the default when a consensus is not reached, is to "Keep". The final tally, as far as I could see was: 26 Delete, versus 18 Keep. That is, 59% vs. 41%. Does that constitute consensus? -- MyWikiBiz 21:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Would you mind visiting MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice and explaining in more detail the reason you posted the site-wide election notice at MediaWiki:Sitenotice. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 22:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't know what the procedure is for adding sites to the spam blacklist, but I saw that you're active with the file so I'm presenting tihs here. Jason Bennett, an acting teacher, became notorious this spring for the self-promotion by him or his followers [4], principally Sgactorny ( talk · contribs) and recently 66.98.131.107 ( talk · contribs) but also 69.86.190.204 ( talk · contribs). They have repeatedly added links to http://www.jbactors.com to about eleven articles on acting and acting coaches, have used misleading labels for the links, and have deleted the links of other acting schools. I propose that the site be added to the blacklist due to the repetive spam problem. - Will Beback 23:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Where are you right now? I still live in Bothell, Washington. Big top 22:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
The source is, I think, this one [5]: Is this viable? It's only available through the Google cache so it may be that the Jennings campaign has already contacted the American Reporter and asked them to retract their article. Can we still use it as a source? -- Jim ( Talk) 23:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to send you the same response that was sent to other post authors concerning accreditation, namely the information related to Trinity School of Theology and Apologetics and ICAATS (the agensy which accredits them). The post below is a verbatim of the information I sent to the other authors. If you still feel that you are valid in your information please provide the information that would contradict the information I am sending to you. If not, then please allow the changes to stand as valid and correct information. thanks...
The Post
Hello CaliEd, Thanks for the reply and I will try to be brief with my response. I did some investigating as you suggested and found the following information from the Internet...The information to which I referred in the edits was related to the National Consitution of India and certain Acts that were established for the purposes of minority-community populations within the country. I pulled this information is the Ministry of Human Resource Development http://www.education.nic.in/minority.asp under the Higher Education section of the website. The Act in question is The National Commission for Minority Educational Institution (Amendment) Act, 2004
The Act states that minority-communities within the country are entitled to be supervised by agencies outside the scope of the Education Department and the UGC so that all people will have the same opportunity to have access to higher education. The Act allows for the creation and operation of entities that will basically function as accreditation agents under the strict supervision of the State and Central Government.
In addition I went to several websites listing the institutions which were considered blacklisted by several U.S. State Education Agencies that were listed in several of the articles posted in Wikipedia and the Trinity School of Theology and Apologetics nor ICAATS are not on their lists. I have no personal vendetta against you or others who have posted this information. I am only asking for fair representation of the information that is in the entry. I will seek to secure other documentation to further verify the information, however, it will be hard for you to argue against the Act of the National Constitution of India which in fact does support the existence of organizations like Trinity School and the organization which accredits them, namely, ICAATS...Thanks Tob55 03:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 11:55, 21 August, 2006
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 34 | 21 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
Thanks for your message and many apologies. I completely respect Wikipedia and the work that you're doing and am sorry for acting so frivolously in regards to it. To be honest (and this is very naive of me) I didn't realize quite what a large and important endeavour it is and am very impressed by the constant research that goes on. I can now see how much work you have to do to keep on top of people making inappropriate changes and how annoying it must be to discover deliberate fallacies.
I can assure you that we won't be bothering you again with our little project. Apologies again and good luck,
VG Farmer
Thanks for deleting that article, but could you also take a look at The danks? It has the exact same content, and you can also close the AfD that is being plagued by anons and socks. Thanks! -- Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 17:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for closing the AFD on The danks. It looks like the pages need to be protected -- The Danks has been recreated twice already, and an anon removed the db-repost tag on the last one. Thanks, NawlinWiki 17:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
this is no a7, why did you delet it? -- Striver 18:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
I wish you a great birthday and all the best! -- Bhadani 16:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I hope your day goes really well! enjoy it Adamcobb 17:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.-- User:Ucanlookitup ( talk) 18:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday!!! Hope you had a wonderful day! -- Underneath-it-All 22:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Michael 06:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for helping fend off the vandals while Gregorian chant was on the main page. I wasn't prepared for the level of vandalism. It's heartening to know how efficient and diligent you WP admins and editors are to revert it! Peirigill 07:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
You recently blocked Biatchbiatch ( talk · contribs) for having an inappropriate username. However, Biatchbiatch wanted to change his/her username, so I've unblocked him/her for now. -- Ixfd64 18:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Do you mind expanding on how you came to the conclusion regarding the close, please? -- badlydrawnjeff talk 02:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
May I ask why you closed this as a no consensus? Taking out the clear puppets and similar problems, it seems to be a delete or a merge. JoshuaZ 02:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Naconkantari, why do you feel this account is in violation of WP:USERNAME? — xaosflux Talk 12:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 35 | 28 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I would like to request that you please reactivate the article "Z Games." It has been edited so it is no longer an advertisement, but rather and informative article about the Z Games company and its games. If anything needs to be changed, please let me know. I can't do any editing since you seem to have had it "protected."
I appreciate your help. Zgames
I left you a message just before you archived. Petros471 18:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page? I see you noted it as CSD G3; it may have been vandalized at the time (I don't know) but it had a long history and was not eligible for CSD (if it was vandalized, it should have been reverted). BoojiBoy 19:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Colorado Rockies (NHL). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.
![]() |
Thanks for contributing to my successful RfA! | |
To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations! To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well! ♥! ~Kylu ( u| t) 02:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC) |
[1] Why did you create the new account named "I'm the best wiki admin"? — The King of Kings 03:31 July 19 '06
I've noticed your reversion of vandalism and I'd like to take the time to say that I've reported it to AIV as it (the vandalism) appears to be a constant issue (check the history). — Natha n ( talk) / 04:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi there Naconkantari. Does a7 extend to businesses? Or does a7 groups of people only refer to bands, sports teams, music groups? I know that bands, sports teams, also make money etc, but their raison d'etre is to "win competitions" rather than to make money irrespective of "quality" if you know what I mean. Regards, Blnguyen | rant-line 05:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Who is Jacqui Remington that you're concerned this user is impersonating? I've never heard of that name, and a google search turned up 1 hit. Mango juice talk 14:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
The portal uses inclusion. The vandalized article was Portal:Dance/Featured article. Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Please re-protect Opie and Anthony to semi-protection at your convenience.
Attention whore and Payneos are both successfully seeking consensus at my suggestion at this time, however, there are several IP address users adding the disputed material back to the page without reviewing the talk page discussion, hence my request for semi-protection. It's my fear that if we don't lock it down to semi that this will descend into another edit war. Thanks. CQJ 17:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports gathered on
my RfA, which passed with a final tally of
0x0104/0x01/0x00. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on
my talk page. Misza 13, the rouge-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing! NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated
ROT-26 algorithm. |
![]() |
This may be of interest to you: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Ste4k-- Who123 04:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Would you be willing to sprotect the article for maybe 24 hours? User:Jackman69 has a lengthy ban, and I think he's using AOL to subvert the blocks. -- ChrisB 02:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
This user is actually a doppelganger account I created! -- Bigtop ( tk| |cb| em| ea) 03:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Thankyou for that user talk revert...and blocking the IP. Isaac Ling seems to be adding vanity nonsense to a lot of articles on and off for a while yet. Blnguyen | rant-line 04:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC).
Please block his talk page as well -- thanks! NawlinWiki 12:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Hate to tell you, but you've got an imposter: User:Railer 893 and User Talk:Railer 893. Nationalparks 17:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity, does this sort of thing happen often? I've no idea why someone decided to waste his time repeatedly vandalizing my RfA, but it strikes me as mildly amusing that it got sprotected. - CheNuevara 17:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 30 | 24 July 2006 | |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. -- Michael Snow 04:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Aloha. Could you please take a look at my comments to User talk:Bunchofgrapes, in the section towards the bottom entitled "Shenanigans"? I would like to compare notes with you. I believe I've discovered the identity of the AOL RfA vandal, although I need your informed opinion to be sure. — Viriditas | Talk 09:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you so much! RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 03:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Naconkantari, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I appreciate you making the second support of the RFA. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page.
|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 31 | 31 July 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Collateral damage, yet again-- 205.188.116.10 00:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I was about to report 71.115.109.28 and Cymru81 for vandalizing Houston, Texas. Those two are the same user who keeps deleting information on the Houston page because I did not let him/her insert incorrect information to the Dallas, Texas article in the past. I was only reverting his vandalism of deletion without explanation. — RJN 01:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm the warez dude that you just banned like 5 times in a row. What's your problem?
I've just restored the above text which you blanked. May I have an answer to my question now please? Why exactly was I blocked from editing?
Please unblock User:Iamheredude -- check his talk page to see what happened; he made a single accidental edit to Loxodonta, after which you blocked him. CalebNoble 05:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, it's alright, we all make mistakes. Thanks for cleaning up my Loxodonta mess. How are we doing with the Colbert issue. By the way, can I remove the Block Tag from my talk page? Iamheredude 05:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering what you meant when you said "Not Done" here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist#w4t3r.com_2 By the way, please unblock the site! Kaabi 23:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Welcome back to Wikipedia! -- Big top 19:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Naconkantari. The above user has requested to be unblocked and I think the request has some merit. He was arguing (albeit inappropriately) with User:Raven Symone who was purporting to be the actress. I think he shows some remorse on his talk page, and I've indef blocked User:Raven Symone. I defer to your judgment as you placed the block, but I'd be tempted to let the guy go on this one. I do agree that the "screw you" was superfluous. Many thanks -- Samir धर्म 04:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Is xyzzy n a moderator / administrator or does he just play one on Wikipedia? 205.188.116.10 04:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Sam Blanning says I should thank you for this. Was really starting to get nasty. S B H arris 23:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Why ban someone if you don't know what kind of vandal he or she is? Bearly541 22:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 32 | 7 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Nice job on catching vandalism on user pages
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For reverting several Userpages. Great Job! Æon Insane Ward 02:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. I added a note about about Need For Speed Carbon to the Wii games section. It's not vandalism. I invite you please check it out instead of removing it for no reason like you did about an hour ago. Thanks.
Oh yea, sorry I couldn't get this article to show up in your messages section. New to Wikipedia and still figuring it out.
Thanks -- please don't forget the two albums (listed in one of the comments in the AFD). NawlinWiki 21:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Could you please give reasons for deleting the article on Larry Walther? The free textbook created by him is already very popular and shows every sign of becoming even more important with time. Thanks, Jayanta Sen 01:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Going through unblock templates... what was the reason for the block of User:Balloonguy? The reason you gave was "please contact an administrator for verification, as described on this page", but that still leaves it unclear (at least to me). Thanks. Tijuana Brass ¡Épa! 03:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
In that case, since it's currently full protected, would you mind inserting the 'autoblock' feature from the template you just deleted, you can pretty much recycle the code from the deleted revisions-- 205.188.116.10 03:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Could someone change See block log. to See ( current autoblocks block log) or something like that?-- 205.188.116.10 03:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Could I ask you why you aren't putting test5 templates on talk pages? It's confusing for me because sometimes I'm hunting the same vandals as you, and I find that you've blocked but I have no way of knowing that until I've reinvented the wheel. - Richardcavell 00:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, an IP vandalized Adolf Hitler, introducing \\\ at the same time, so I blocked for a week, to give time for an investigation at WP:OP I see that you extended it to indefinite. I have now been told that it is not an open proxy. I don't have any knowledge on the subject, but I don't understand how it was introducing all the \\\ throughout the article. Anyway, with some reluctance, I'm going to unblock. It's now been more than 24 hours. Cheers, AnnH ♫ 23:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I'm always amazed when people revert my own user page faster than I do. :) Have a great weekend. -- Yamla 02:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I believe you completed one of my block URL requests over on Meta for thesexlane.com and its related links. Any thoughts on this discussion? -- Fan-1967 17:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
This is a null edit. Naconkantari 21:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I saw you test-edited Eurythmics, probably in response to my (anonymous) request for eurythmics.com to be taken off the spam list. I removed eurythmics.com in order to remove some external links that needed to be removed, which would be why your test edits worked, but I'd still like to restore the official site. Thanks. -- JHunterJ 00:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
You seem to be a bit more familiar with this case than me, could you weigh in at WP:AN/I#YaR GnitS? -- Rosicrucian 01:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Hiya, are you available to give an opinion on something? I'm choosing you kind of at random as an uninvolved admin. Could you please take a look at the recent edits at DragonRealms? Someone (evidently a disgruntled ex-player or contractor) keeps inserting highly negative POV information there. I've been removing it, but it's been turning into an edit war and the individual is escalating personal attacks, and I don't want to have to push it to the edge of 3RR. Could you please take a look and let me know your opinion on the information in question? Thanks. :) -- Elonka 04:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 33 | 14 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Could you be kind enough to explain how you determined that the "consensus" on Norman Technologies was for a Delete? I thought that the default when a consensus is not reached, is to "Keep". The final tally, as far as I could see was: 26 Delete, versus 18 Keep. That is, 59% vs. 41%. Does that constitute consensus? -- MyWikiBiz 21:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Would you mind visiting MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice and explaining in more detail the reason you posted the site-wide election notice at MediaWiki:Sitenotice. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 22:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't know what the procedure is for adding sites to the spam blacklist, but I saw that you're active with the file so I'm presenting tihs here. Jason Bennett, an acting teacher, became notorious this spring for the self-promotion by him or his followers [4], principally Sgactorny ( talk · contribs) and recently 66.98.131.107 ( talk · contribs) but also 69.86.190.204 ( talk · contribs). They have repeatedly added links to http://www.jbactors.com to about eleven articles on acting and acting coaches, have used misleading labels for the links, and have deleted the links of other acting schools. I propose that the site be added to the blacklist due to the repetive spam problem. - Will Beback 23:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Where are you right now? I still live in Bothell, Washington. Big top 22:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
The source is, I think, this one [5]: Is this viable? It's only available through the Google cache so it may be that the Jennings campaign has already contacted the American Reporter and asked them to retract their article. Can we still use it as a source? -- Jim ( Talk) 23:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to send you the same response that was sent to other post authors concerning accreditation, namely the information related to Trinity School of Theology and Apologetics and ICAATS (the agensy which accredits them). The post below is a verbatim of the information I sent to the other authors. If you still feel that you are valid in your information please provide the information that would contradict the information I am sending to you. If not, then please allow the changes to stand as valid and correct information. thanks...
The Post
Hello CaliEd, Thanks for the reply and I will try to be brief with my response. I did some investigating as you suggested and found the following information from the Internet...The information to which I referred in the edits was related to the National Consitution of India and certain Acts that were established for the purposes of minority-community populations within the country. I pulled this information is the Ministry of Human Resource Development http://www.education.nic.in/minority.asp under the Higher Education section of the website. The Act in question is The National Commission for Minority Educational Institution (Amendment) Act, 2004
The Act states that minority-communities within the country are entitled to be supervised by agencies outside the scope of the Education Department and the UGC so that all people will have the same opportunity to have access to higher education. The Act allows for the creation and operation of entities that will basically function as accreditation agents under the strict supervision of the State and Central Government.
In addition I went to several websites listing the institutions which were considered blacklisted by several U.S. State Education Agencies that were listed in several of the articles posted in Wikipedia and the Trinity School of Theology and Apologetics nor ICAATS are not on their lists. I have no personal vendetta against you or others who have posted this information. I am only asking for fair representation of the information that is in the entry. I will seek to secure other documentation to further verify the information, however, it will be hard for you to argue against the Act of the National Constitution of India which in fact does support the existence of organizations like Trinity School and the organization which accredits them, namely, ICAATS...Thanks Tob55 03:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 11:55, 21 August, 2006
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 34 | 21 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
Thanks for your message and many apologies. I completely respect Wikipedia and the work that you're doing and am sorry for acting so frivolously in regards to it. To be honest (and this is very naive of me) I didn't realize quite what a large and important endeavour it is and am very impressed by the constant research that goes on. I can now see how much work you have to do to keep on top of people making inappropriate changes and how annoying it must be to discover deliberate fallacies.
I can assure you that we won't be bothering you again with our little project. Apologies again and good luck,
VG Farmer
Thanks for deleting that article, but could you also take a look at The danks? It has the exact same content, and you can also close the AfD that is being plagued by anons and socks. Thanks! -- Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 17:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for closing the AFD on The danks. It looks like the pages need to be protected -- The Danks has been recreated twice already, and an anon removed the db-repost tag on the last one. Thanks, NawlinWiki 17:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
this is no a7, why did you delet it? -- Striver 18:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
I wish you a great birthday and all the best! -- Bhadani 16:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I hope your day goes really well! enjoy it Adamcobb 17:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.-- User:Ucanlookitup ( talk) 18:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday!!! Hope you had a wonderful day! -- Underneath-it-All 22:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Michael 06:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for helping fend off the vandals while Gregorian chant was on the main page. I wasn't prepared for the level of vandalism. It's heartening to know how efficient and diligent you WP admins and editors are to revert it! Peirigill 07:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
You recently blocked Biatchbiatch ( talk · contribs) for having an inappropriate username. However, Biatchbiatch wanted to change his/her username, so I've unblocked him/her for now. -- Ixfd64 18:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Do you mind expanding on how you came to the conclusion regarding the close, please? -- badlydrawnjeff talk 02:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
May I ask why you closed this as a no consensus? Taking out the clear puppets and similar problems, it seems to be a delete or a merge. JoshuaZ 02:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Naconkantari, why do you feel this account is in violation of WP:USERNAME? — xaosflux Talk 12:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 35 | 28 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)