Hello, Naawada2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly Neigh 22:46, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits to Crow Indian Reservation. I noticed in one of your edits that you cited "Linderman, Frank B.: Plenty Coups. Chief of the Crows. Lincoln/London, 1962, pp. 239-240." I found a later addition of the book here, and it is just 194 pages long. Did you get your pages wrong? Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
I see you are editing articles on Native peoples of the American west --I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a gathering place for Wikipedia editors who work on articles in this topic. Montanabw (talk) 03:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
((reply to|Montanabw)) Hi. Thanks for the invitation to join the project about Indigenous peoples. Now I have thought about it - it is silly not to join, of course. So, now I am in. Yours Naawada2016 ( talk) 08:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
{{ Naawada2016 ( talk) 11:47, 3 June 2017 (UTC) WikiProject Indigenous people of North America 2}}
Check out this link for how to cite a source multiple times in the same article. You give the ref a name, and then the additional refs use the abbreviated form show here: Wikipedia:Citing sources#Repeated citations, rather than having to fill out the whole thing again. If it's the same book but found on different pages, go ahead and do a new ref for it. But if all the data is the same, just use the shortened format for repeats shown at that link. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC) ((reply to|CorbieVreccan))Hi and thanks for the information. I have spent my time improving articles but I try to learn more about how to edit in line with the standards. I will try to remember your fine advise. Naawada2016 ( talk) 08:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Naawada2016! You created a thread called Delivered by
Tigraan-testbot, an
automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
![]() |
Hello! Naawada2016,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DrStrauss
talk
10:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
TheSandDoctor ( talk) 07:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
North America 1000 03:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Hello, Naawada2016. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Nation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
@ SeraphWiki: Hi SeraphWiki and thanks for your view and objection to my draft about the capture of the Sacred Arrows of the Cheyennes.
Of course, I have not spent hours on finding sources, making a map and also the little picture with drawings from two Lakota winter counts if I thought the subject was out of the Wikipedia range.
My reasoning is as follows: The Sacred Arrows are mentioned in the text about the Cheyenne.
We have existing articles about both the Cheyenne tribe and the Pawnee tribe. Since this is one of the major battles in the history of both tribes, it is all right to write about it; Sacred Arrows captured or not. This intertribal battle deserves to be mentioned no matter what.
We have an article about the Sand Creek Massacre. It is strange not to have an article about an even worse disaster according to the Cheyennes living 200 years ago. We may think, that the Sand Creek Massacre was the worst blow to the Cheyennes, but the old Cheyennes may have seen thinks differently and clearly did so according to George Bent. Regardless of our own view, I think we owe the old Cheyennes so much respect, that we accept their view on events experienced by them.
The battle had far reaching "links". The recapture of one of the Sacred Arrows by the Lakotas in 1843 was such an extraordinary event, that it was found worthy to be mentioned in at least three of the Lakota winter counts. (I show the drawings from two of them in the draft). Again - if a number of Lakotas living in 1843 considered this event to be the most memorable of the year, it is strange that we can't hear about it. The event fits nicely in exactly at the place where it is mentioned in my draft.
The article has a link to another of the Sacred Arrows battles. That is the massacre on the Crow camp at Tongue River in 1820 (also written by me). If a reader wants to read more about these rare Sacred Arrows battles, an article is just a link away.
I think, we have only discussed this from a view focused on the Cheyenne and the Sacred Arrows. I think it is all right to look at this event from the Indian point of view of a Pawnee, too. The Pawnee still have the two original arrows, no matter what the Cheyennes have done to get them back. Clearly, the capture of arrows is one of the great moments in the history of the Pawnee.
If Wikipedia lacks an article about the Sacred Arrows, I can easily write one. I hesitate, because I do not know how detailed such an article is supposed to be? My draft about the capture of the Sacred Arrows actually lists some sources of use for readers interested in the ceremony performed before a battle and also about the renewing of the arrows. Thus, readers who want to know about the Sacred Arrows are not left without any clues to where to find more about the subject.
A lot written; I hope to get a reply from you - no matter what. You see, I am not an eagle on Wikipedia, and I am still not sure that my answers to fellow-Wikipedians reach their destinations. I hope, I have this one right!
Yours Naawada2016 ( talk) 10:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 00:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of war deities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morning Star ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Spotted Horse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Pratt ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhegihan History and Separation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dakota ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 14:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 18:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Just a note. Heard a story on NPR about this, and wrote the article today. Seems like a book you might like. It's pretty damn good as far into it as I am, and I don't really read that much fiction. GMG talk 21:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)I'm sorry, but It's not ready. I've moved it back to draft. See draft talk. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Please consider getting input from the Indigenous wikiproject on the Native articles, not just AfC, before asking they be moved to mainspace. Indigenous topics often need more specialized review than most editors here are experienced with, and people in the project may also be able to help out. Best, - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Arikara scouts, Naawada2016!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Very nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, would you be able to supply me with scans of the most important pages you've referenced in this draft? I'd like to verify them before I accept the page. Pages 36, 127, and 98 of reference 1 would be nice, as would page 67 and 68 of ref 2. The rest I'm willing to assume good faith with. Additionally, the history section is unreferenced. Cheers, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
"A number of the Hidatsas terminated their life as tillers of the soil and joined their remote relatives, the nomadic River Crow, around Yellowstone River."is that your original writing? The articles are full of weird inaccuracies particular to the era of the books you are using, like calling normal Native people "commoners", and so many unecyclopedic phrasings like
"Grasshoppers and hailstorms shattered the villagers' hope of fine crops", that I cut because they sound plagiarized. Every single article you've created is packed with this stuff. Add this to your refusal to simply provide a scan of your sources and I am strongly suggesting you send an admin these sources or we delete all your contribs as probable plagiarism. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
I only just found this: The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne's Sacred Arrows. You need to stop writing these articles. This is awful. You are using horrible sources to write offensive, inaccurate content about living cultures. You need to be topic-banned from Native articles. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Naawada2016, you are creating these articles without any understanding of, or context with, the Native articles or community on the 'pedia. Every thing I find just makes this situation worse. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
@ Anarchyte: Indigenous girl has gone on record at the AfD for the Sacred Arrows article that she has hard copies of some of these books at home, and has confirmed that there are copyvios. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 21:41, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne Sacred Arrows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne Sacred Arrows until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Naawada2016. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Naawada2016. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Larocque's expedition to Yellowstone River".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 12:37, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Naawada2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly Neigh 22:46, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits to Crow Indian Reservation. I noticed in one of your edits that you cited "Linderman, Frank B.: Plenty Coups. Chief of the Crows. Lincoln/London, 1962, pp. 239-240." I found a later addition of the book here, and it is just 194 pages long. Did you get your pages wrong? Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
I see you are editing articles on Native peoples of the American west --I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a gathering place for Wikipedia editors who work on articles in this topic. Montanabw (talk) 03:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
((reply to|Montanabw)) Hi. Thanks for the invitation to join the project about Indigenous peoples. Now I have thought about it - it is silly not to join, of course. So, now I am in. Yours Naawada2016 ( talk) 08:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
{{ Naawada2016 ( talk) 11:47, 3 June 2017 (UTC) WikiProject Indigenous people of North America 2}}
Check out this link for how to cite a source multiple times in the same article. You give the ref a name, and then the additional refs use the abbreviated form show here: Wikipedia:Citing sources#Repeated citations, rather than having to fill out the whole thing again. If it's the same book but found on different pages, go ahead and do a new ref for it. But if all the data is the same, just use the shortened format for repeats shown at that link. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC) ((reply to|CorbieVreccan))Hi and thanks for the information. I have spent my time improving articles but I try to learn more about how to edit in line with the standards. I will try to remember your fine advise. Naawada2016 ( talk) 08:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Naawada2016! You created a thread called Delivered by
Tigraan-testbot, an
automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
![]() |
Hello! Naawada2016,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DrStrauss
talk
10:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
TheSandDoctor ( talk) 07:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
North America 1000 03:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Hello, Naawada2016. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Nation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
@ SeraphWiki: Hi SeraphWiki and thanks for your view and objection to my draft about the capture of the Sacred Arrows of the Cheyennes.
Of course, I have not spent hours on finding sources, making a map and also the little picture with drawings from two Lakota winter counts if I thought the subject was out of the Wikipedia range.
My reasoning is as follows: The Sacred Arrows are mentioned in the text about the Cheyenne.
We have existing articles about both the Cheyenne tribe and the Pawnee tribe. Since this is one of the major battles in the history of both tribes, it is all right to write about it; Sacred Arrows captured or not. This intertribal battle deserves to be mentioned no matter what.
We have an article about the Sand Creek Massacre. It is strange not to have an article about an even worse disaster according to the Cheyennes living 200 years ago. We may think, that the Sand Creek Massacre was the worst blow to the Cheyennes, but the old Cheyennes may have seen thinks differently and clearly did so according to George Bent. Regardless of our own view, I think we owe the old Cheyennes so much respect, that we accept their view on events experienced by them.
The battle had far reaching "links". The recapture of one of the Sacred Arrows by the Lakotas in 1843 was such an extraordinary event, that it was found worthy to be mentioned in at least three of the Lakota winter counts. (I show the drawings from two of them in the draft). Again - if a number of Lakotas living in 1843 considered this event to be the most memorable of the year, it is strange that we can't hear about it. The event fits nicely in exactly at the place where it is mentioned in my draft.
The article has a link to another of the Sacred Arrows battles. That is the massacre on the Crow camp at Tongue River in 1820 (also written by me). If a reader wants to read more about these rare Sacred Arrows battles, an article is just a link away.
I think, we have only discussed this from a view focused on the Cheyenne and the Sacred Arrows. I think it is all right to look at this event from the Indian point of view of a Pawnee, too. The Pawnee still have the two original arrows, no matter what the Cheyennes have done to get them back. Clearly, the capture of arrows is one of the great moments in the history of the Pawnee.
If Wikipedia lacks an article about the Sacred Arrows, I can easily write one. I hesitate, because I do not know how detailed such an article is supposed to be? My draft about the capture of the Sacred Arrows actually lists some sources of use for readers interested in the ceremony performed before a battle and also about the renewing of the arrows. Thus, readers who want to know about the Sacred Arrows are not left without any clues to where to find more about the subject.
A lot written; I hope to get a reply from you - no matter what. You see, I am not an eagle on Wikipedia, and I am still not sure that my answers to fellow-Wikipedians reach their destinations. I hope, I have this one right!
Yours Naawada2016 ( talk) 10:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 00:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of war deities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morning Star ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Spotted Horse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Pratt ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhegihan History and Separation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dakota ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 14:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 18:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Just a note. Heard a story on NPR about this, and wrote the article today. Seems like a book you might like. It's pretty damn good as far into it as I am, and I don't really read that much fiction. GMG talk 21:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)I'm sorry, but It's not ready. I've moved it back to draft. See draft talk. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Please consider getting input from the Indigenous wikiproject on the Native articles, not just AfC, before asking they be moved to mainspace. Indigenous topics often need more specialized review than most editors here are experienced with, and people in the project may also be able to help out. Best, - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Arikara scouts, Naawada2016!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Very nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, would you be able to supply me with scans of the most important pages you've referenced in this draft? I'd like to verify them before I accept the page. Pages 36, 127, and 98 of reference 1 would be nice, as would page 67 and 68 of ref 2. The rest I'm willing to assume good faith with. Additionally, the history section is unreferenced. Cheers, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
"A number of the Hidatsas terminated their life as tillers of the soil and joined their remote relatives, the nomadic River Crow, around Yellowstone River."is that your original writing? The articles are full of weird inaccuracies particular to the era of the books you are using, like calling normal Native people "commoners", and so many unecyclopedic phrasings like
"Grasshoppers and hailstorms shattered the villagers' hope of fine crops", that I cut because they sound plagiarized. Every single article you've created is packed with this stuff. Add this to your refusal to simply provide a scan of your sources and I am strongly suggesting you send an admin these sources or we delete all your contribs as probable plagiarism. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
I only just found this: The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne's Sacred Arrows. You need to stop writing these articles. This is awful. You are using horrible sources to write offensive, inaccurate content about living cultures. You need to be topic-banned from Native articles. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Naawada2016, you are creating these articles without any understanding of, or context with, the Native articles or community on the 'pedia. Every thing I find just makes this situation worse. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
@ Anarchyte: Indigenous girl has gone on record at the AfD for the Sacred Arrows article that she has hard copies of some of these books at home, and has confirmed that there are copyvios. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 21:41, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne Sacred Arrows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne Sacred Arrows until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Naawada2016. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Naawada2016. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Larocque's expedition to Yellowstone River".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 12:37, 21 May 2019 (UTC)