I noticed you voted to keep the article. At least your definition makes sense. Are you sure it's right? What the article actually says is:
Axial pen force is the force component which is the result of the normal pen force exerted on the writing surface.
I still maintain that this doesn't make sense. If it said "... is the component of the normal pen force in the direction of the pen axis..." I would be happier. But I don't even know if this is what it's trying to say. Rracecarr 19:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Im sorry about that edit I made I just wanted to help. So I downloaded the python pkbt 2.5 version. If you can tell me how to use it properly I think I can really help. {{hangon}} Lava159 20:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
...it's only because, for my sins, I'm hovering over CAT:CSD at the moment. Deleting images at the moment, so yours will be the last "thank you" message I will get for a few hours! :o) 〈 RED VEЯS〉 20:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind, I added more information to AIM Ad Hack and removed the prod template. If you still have concerns over the article, please let me know. Thank you! -- Nevhood 01:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I want you to know that I side-splittingly laughed for 5 minutes over your comment on the Afd for Fast Track Down. The funniest part for me was that everything you said was 100% correct. Thanks. Jerry lavoie 00:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
If someone meant WP:SALT they could have said so, instead they said "salt" and where is WP:FIRE? You underanalyzed the situation; these comments are bigoted and abusive, shame on those who defend them. Carlossuarez46 21:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, NShar! Thanks for working on numerical digit. You definitely made it better.
I made a few small changes, mostly in the "Overview" section, which seemed a bit too repetitious. I also changed one reference to "rational numbers" to say "fractions". Anyway, you might want to take a look to be sure I improved it. ;^> DavidCBryant 23:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, N Shar! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 04:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I actually didn't protect the page as I'm not an admin. I simply noticed that the page is protected against edits by IP addresses, so I added the appropriate template to the page. Thank you, -- NMChico24 09:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I am 70.231.138.93 and I am voting for number 2 in the Commons Picture of the Year competition. -- N Shar 00:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Nah, we had some changes to Wikipedia, and it broke the bot, and well, time is @ a bit of a premium at the moment -- Tawker 06:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi thanks for the heads up on this - a later edit trashed my vote so I have left the trashed one and simply put a new vote in. Springnuts 22:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful comments. Because of school and work commitments, I will be unable to get to this article before March 11, at which time I will give it some attention. I would just like to note the following:
Thanks for looking the article over. I just need some time. Denni talk 05:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
We should try WP:GRAPHLAB, they may be able to help us out. If not we can always ask them to make a new one for us. 74.116.113.241 21:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
You stated: "If reliable sources are provided, this article could be kept." I think there are more than enough sources (and some notable ones, at that) listed on that AfD page for one to digest. - Pandacomics 16:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I was impressed by the elegance and thoughtfulness of your argument on the Brandt AfD discussion. Well done - and thank you! SheffieldSteel 21:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I wonder if you could answer the question I posted at Talk:combinatorial game theory. ---- CharlesGillingham ( talk) 11:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you voted to keep the article. At least your definition makes sense. Are you sure it's right? What the article actually says is:
Axial pen force is the force component which is the result of the normal pen force exerted on the writing surface.
I still maintain that this doesn't make sense. If it said "... is the component of the normal pen force in the direction of the pen axis..." I would be happier. But I don't even know if this is what it's trying to say. Rracecarr 19:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Im sorry about that edit I made I just wanted to help. So I downloaded the python pkbt 2.5 version. If you can tell me how to use it properly I think I can really help. {{hangon}} Lava159 20:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
...it's only because, for my sins, I'm hovering over CAT:CSD at the moment. Deleting images at the moment, so yours will be the last "thank you" message I will get for a few hours! :o) 〈 RED VEЯS〉 20:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind, I added more information to AIM Ad Hack and removed the prod template. If you still have concerns over the article, please let me know. Thank you! -- Nevhood 01:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I want you to know that I side-splittingly laughed for 5 minutes over your comment on the Afd for Fast Track Down. The funniest part for me was that everything you said was 100% correct. Thanks. Jerry lavoie 00:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
If someone meant WP:SALT they could have said so, instead they said "salt" and where is WP:FIRE? You underanalyzed the situation; these comments are bigoted and abusive, shame on those who defend them. Carlossuarez46 21:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, NShar! Thanks for working on numerical digit. You definitely made it better.
I made a few small changes, mostly in the "Overview" section, which seemed a bit too repetitious. I also changed one reference to "rational numbers" to say "fractions". Anyway, you might want to take a look to be sure I improved it. ;^> DavidCBryant 23:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, N Shar! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 04:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I actually didn't protect the page as I'm not an admin. I simply noticed that the page is protected against edits by IP addresses, so I added the appropriate template to the page. Thank you, -- NMChico24 09:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I am 70.231.138.93 and I am voting for number 2 in the Commons Picture of the Year competition. -- N Shar 00:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Nah, we had some changes to Wikipedia, and it broke the bot, and well, time is @ a bit of a premium at the moment -- Tawker 06:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi thanks for the heads up on this - a later edit trashed my vote so I have left the trashed one and simply put a new vote in. Springnuts 22:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful comments. Because of school and work commitments, I will be unable to get to this article before March 11, at which time I will give it some attention. I would just like to note the following:
Thanks for looking the article over. I just need some time. Denni talk 05:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
We should try WP:GRAPHLAB, they may be able to help us out. If not we can always ask them to make a new one for us. 74.116.113.241 21:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
You stated: "If reliable sources are provided, this article could be kept." I think there are more than enough sources (and some notable ones, at that) listed on that AfD page for one to digest. - Pandacomics 16:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I was impressed by the elegance and thoughtfulness of your argument on the Brandt AfD discussion. Well done - and thank you! SheffieldSteel 21:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I wonder if you could answer the question I posted at Talk:combinatorial game theory. ---- CharlesGillingham ( talk) 11:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)