|
((Help me))
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Community NYC, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Yworo ( talk) 21:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Community NYC, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community NYC. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Yworo ( talk) 21:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Community NYC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Rankiri ( talk) 22:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 18:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
NYCCommunity ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The article I created, Community NYC, was strictly informative about the company Community NYC. There was no opinions or untrue facts stated. Chill.
Decline reason:
See below. Your username violates our policies, and you clearly have a conflict of interest in this matter. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 00:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Even if your evaluation of the "article" were correct (encyclopedia articles don't end, "For more information visit..."), you've got a conflict of interest and shouldn't be creating such articles. You've also been spreading links to this same company all over Wikipedia, a prohibited act we call "spamming." -- Orange Mike | Talk 19:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
That is what I read to do on Wikipedia to get my article to appear on google. It is not scamming if I put it with other related pages and I took off for more information vist... because I realized that maybe you people were having a problem with that. NYCCommunity ( talk) 19:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
And since when does a user get blocked right away without anyone warning them that they are "scamming". Because your definition of scamming is different than what scamming really is. NYCCommunity ( talk) 19:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
|
((Help me))
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Community NYC, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Yworo ( talk) 21:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Community NYC, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community NYC. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Yworo ( talk) 21:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Community NYC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Rankiri ( talk) 22:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike | Talk 18:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
NYCCommunity ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The article I created, Community NYC, was strictly informative about the company Community NYC. There was no opinions or untrue facts stated. Chill.
Decline reason:
See below. Your username violates our policies, and you clearly have a conflict of interest in this matter. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 00:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Even if your evaluation of the "article" were correct (encyclopedia articles don't end, "For more information visit..."), you've got a conflict of interest and shouldn't be creating such articles. You've also been spreading links to this same company all over Wikipedia, a prohibited act we call "spamming." -- Orange Mike | Talk 19:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
That is what I read to do on Wikipedia to get my article to appear on google. It is not scamming if I put it with other related pages and I took off for more information vist... because I realized that maybe you people were having a problem with that. NYCCommunity ( talk) 19:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
And since when does a user get blocked right away without anyone warning them that they are "scamming". Because your definition of scamming is different than what scamming really is. NYCCommunity ( talk) 19:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)