Your recent editing history at Animal Rights shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. See
BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Please consult the other editors before adding this material to the page's external links. Your repeated addition of this material over the objections of other editors constitutes a violation of Wikipedia guidelines, including prohibitions on
edit warring,
book spam, and an apparent
conflict of interest. If you continue this disruptive behavior, the matter will be referred to the administrative noticeboards for further action. Thank you,
JohnDopp (
talk)
21:02, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Animal Rights shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. See
BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Please consult the other editors before adding this material to the page's external links. Your repeated addition of this material over the objections of other editors constitutes a violation of Wikipedia guidelines, including prohibitions on
edit warring,
book spam, and an apparent
conflict of interest. If you continue this disruptive behavior, the matter will be referred to the administrative noticeboards for further action. Thank you,
JohnDopp (
talk)
21:02, 7 December 2012 (UTC)