Leave a message.
Welcome!
Hello, NAccount, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
El
on
ka
18:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
To increase trust all around, I would recommend that you create a userpage which says a bit about you, and your interests? It's not a requirement, but I genuinely think that it would help. Some Babelboxes to indicate language would be useful too. Thanks, El on ka 18:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
As another note of advice, please try to avoid edit summaries like this one. [1] Instead, keep your summaries very neutral and civil. Especially avoid naming other editors, or using the words "you" or "your" in an edit summary. If you can keep your own behavior very very civil and article-focused, it will be very helpful in untangling things here. Thanks, El on ka 18:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Klaksonn for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 05:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Your edit at Ghaleb Awwali is okay, because I agree that there is no source for that particular category. But at Imad Mughniyah, you appear to be removing a category that is thoroughly sourced within the text of the article. At 'Amr ibn al-'As, I have no opinion on the content, but I must ask you to (1) Stop referring to other edits as vandalism; and (2) You must engage in discussion at the talkpage there. Thanks, El on ka 11:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello. FayssalF, please tell me what I did wrong. Apart from my temper and my comments, which were provoked by MezzoMezzo and Causteau's incivility as you might have seen in the edit summaries, I didn't vandalize nor did I impose my POV. I did, earlier, in the Al-Azhar University article, mention that Saladin converted Egyptians by force because I thought this was the case, then I found that they converted without any uproar and I added a direct quote from Encyclopedia Britannica which Costeau repeatedly removed. I also added a sourced passage to Amr ibn al As which was removed sometime ago and was repeatedly reverted by MezzoMezzo until he was told to cease, and I removed the terrorist categories in the articles of Hezbollah members, some of whom had never carried a gun. Tell me if I did anything wrong that MezzoMezzo and Causteau didn't do. I haven't been causing disruption, unlike the two users who are imposing their opinions on the articles. NAccount ( talk) 23:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Leave a message.
Welcome!
Hello, NAccount, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
El
on
ka
18:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
To increase trust all around, I would recommend that you create a userpage which says a bit about you, and your interests? It's not a requirement, but I genuinely think that it would help. Some Babelboxes to indicate language would be useful too. Thanks, El on ka 18:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
As another note of advice, please try to avoid edit summaries like this one. [1] Instead, keep your summaries very neutral and civil. Especially avoid naming other editors, or using the words "you" or "your" in an edit summary. If you can keep your own behavior very very civil and article-focused, it will be very helpful in untangling things here. Thanks, El on ka 18:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Klaksonn for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. MezzoMezzo ( talk) 05:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Your edit at Ghaleb Awwali is okay, because I agree that there is no source for that particular category. But at Imad Mughniyah, you appear to be removing a category that is thoroughly sourced within the text of the article. At 'Amr ibn al-'As, I have no opinion on the content, but I must ask you to (1) Stop referring to other edits as vandalism; and (2) You must engage in discussion at the talkpage there. Thanks, El on ka 11:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello. FayssalF, please tell me what I did wrong. Apart from my temper and my comments, which were provoked by MezzoMezzo and Causteau's incivility as you might have seen in the edit summaries, I didn't vandalize nor did I impose my POV. I did, earlier, in the Al-Azhar University article, mention that Saladin converted Egyptians by force because I thought this was the case, then I found that they converted without any uproar and I added a direct quote from Encyclopedia Britannica which Costeau repeatedly removed. I also added a sourced passage to Amr ibn al As which was removed sometime ago and was repeatedly reverted by MezzoMezzo until he was told to cease, and I removed the terrorist categories in the articles of Hezbollah members, some of whom had never carried a gun. Tell me if I did anything wrong that MezzoMezzo and Causteau didn't do. I haven't been causing disruption, unlike the two users who are imposing their opinions on the articles. NAccount ( talk) 23:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)