This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you! (I'm not even going to ask how you noticed that so quickly, or at all.) I just thought it was odd; having made innumerable IP edits, when I finally broke down and got an account, it had seemed logical that my first actions would be to create my user and talk pages. For the record, I liked the essay, and I agree with most of the points of which I am knowledgeable enough to have any opinion. (And I'm a firm believer in #12 and #17, among others.) Oh, and: "Welcome Back" - Mysterious Whisper (SHOUT) 06:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I hope this response will help answer the question you proposed in your edit summary for the article The Black Album/Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols. Your edit summary was, "three notability/deletion discussions, and noboby threw up a template?". I'm sure that perhaps this was just a rhetorical question, but hopefully this will shed a little light on the subject. First, please allow me to add a little background of my activities regarding the article. I saw this article was on the " stub" articles list for albums and thought I would see if there was any editing that could be done to help expand it. (Side note: There really isn't anymore that can be done to help this article). After acquainting myself with the AfDs and DR, it appears that it was the same user who nominated the article for deletion twice within just a few months and then sent it to a deletion review as he apparently didn't care for the outcome of those two unanimous judgments in favor of keeping the article. It passed at the DR and that user seems to just be grinding an axe now regarding the deletion of the article. That same user did add a "notability" tag on the article back in May, but it was removed as he was the one who added it and his actions were construed as possible disruptive editing and keep listing til it gets deleted. Soooo...long story short: There was at one time a "notability" tag attached to this article. The user who initially added it though, apparently did so in a " bad faith" edit and so the tag was removed. The article does deserve to have a "notability" tag on it though as there really are no reliable, secondary sources. I guess that user wasn't allowed to be the person to place one though, due to his prior activity and attitude towards the page. Anyways, I hope that answers your question. And Happy Wiki-ing! Agent Orange 77 ( talk) 22:46, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Electronics engineering technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defective ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Since you and Blueboar seem to be the most active responders on the Notability Noticeboard, I was just wondering if you could quickly look over this? Since I want to create it before anyone else does. :3 Silver seren C 00:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kearny Fallout Meter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roentgen ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Nice article at Civil defense by nation. Bearian ( talk) 21:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rubus allegheniensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thorn ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mysterious Whisper! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 03:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there. Thanks for the info. Obviously, I'm a newbie, but with a passion to make sure people actually use their references correctly. You removed my edits about toxicity on the sambucus page, but I want to argue that. What I was attempting to do was correctly reference the information in the original citation (11) from the Nova Scotia museum. Ref 11 and the one I added (12), reference SPECIFIC varieties of elderberry (three different North American ones) which are poisonous. The problem with the existing article's section on toxicity is that it is too vague and therefore misleading and consequently there are loads of pages on the web telling people that elderberries are dangerous with a photo of the common sambucus nigra. I have not been able to find any online references that cite sambucus nigra as dangerous. Even the info on the Sambucus_nigra page that says its unripe berries are mildy poisonous is pretty thin on references. Many plants from this genus are poisonous, but not the common black elderberry. It's a good point that I need to reference something that confirms its safety (I have plenty of books), but my main point is that the references provided are being incorrectly used. The specific varieties mentioned in the references should be mentioned in the article, which is what I was trying to do. As it is, the article promotes misinformation. I'll try another edit and hopefully, it will meet the criteria. Urbanhuntress ( talk) 01:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doomsday Preppers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evacuation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Maybe you get this notice automatically, but in any case I replied to your post on the talk page. Will9194 ( talk) 22:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Salaburu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Mysterious Whisper (SHOUT) 13:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey man, would love to collaborate with you on fleshing out some of the CD & Nuclear war survival pages. I essentially wrote the accuracy section of - Duck and Cover (film) a while ago but feel it could do with more pictures and graphics, what do you think? Boundarylayer ( talk) 18:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for removing that OR at Influenza A virus subtype H7N9. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The Cover Your Cough Barnstar | |
For your efforts to cover and improve the H7N9 flu article. Geraldshields11 ( talk) 21:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Powdery mildew, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Papilla and Roses ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Mysterious Whisper 16:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turban squash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C. maxima ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed your creation of many new squash articles (which is great!) Please feel free to add new articles about squash that are used as foods to WikiProject Food and Drink's New articles section! Northamerica1000 (talk) 23:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks for your contributions in creating the new squash articles Turban squash, Cucurbita ecuadorensis and Tromboncino (squash). Your efforts to improve Wikipedia are appreciated. Northamerica1000 (talk) 23:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Survivalism in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Marsden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. I have used wikipedia for ages but have never edited it before, so I am still learning the ropes. Yes, I am the author of said work. I did not, however, originally add the entry for my book The Lightcap. I noticed it was removed and re-added it. If it is required to have a wikipedia page for myself personally, I am happy to provide whatever information is needed in order for that page to be created. However, I notice that there are several entries on the List of cyberpunk works article that do not have links to pages for authors and/or their works. Examples of this being Jason Blair and Dani Cavallaro on the same page. Iamdanmarshall ( talk) 00:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I think the consensus was that you were the only person who gives half a **** as to what happens to the Wikipedia:Notability/Noticeboard...
Seriously though, before this issue vanishes into complete achieved oblivion, do you have any thoughts on how to proceed (if at all) on this issue? Do you think the noticeboard should be nominated for deletion? Or perhaps I should bring my concern about this noticeboard to some other venue? I'm sure you're quite busy and I'm interested in doing all the legwork here, I just would like to defer to your experience for a particular direction. Thanks in advance for any ideas! :) Buddy23Lee ( talk) 18:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I too wish there were a better option, but if there is, I can't think of it. With WP:Wikiproject Notability being inactive, the admin's indifference at AN/I, etc; I don't think it would be possible generate the long-term interest that would be needed to make the noticeboard worthwhile. The worst scenario I can think of at this point is that it doesn't get deleted and participation remains low (although, even if the proposal doesn't pass, it should generate some interest, however fleeting). I wouldn't know how to proceed after that. I also considered helping out there (and I will, if there's a need, until posting my proposal), but I know from the last time I tried that I would loose interest quickly, and, as you said, one editor does not a noticeboard make. Oh well.
As for "onerous tasks", just let me know if there's anything you'd change about my proposed proposal, and maybe help maintain the Notability noticeboard until I post it. Thanks.
Mysterious Whisper 01:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Well, it's been a month. More posts are being answered, but you can still count on one hand the number editors actively responding there, and there still aren't any admins actively participating there. I'll probably start the Village Pump proposal within the next few days. Do you have any new thoughts on the matter? ʍ w 13:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rubus caesius may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
I've replied to your comment on the copy/paste on a couple of AfDs. In fact I went ahead and added a comment to explain why I had used the same statement for each. I may have been better served having written one that didn't look specific to one of the subjects. However the issue was the same for each. Non-notable, no RS, and seems like the author seems to think that every person who's held the office of County Executive deserves to have their own article. Sorry but still learning as can be seen by the fact I'm just starting to use the actual WP, NOT, etc terms more and more in each successive post. Caffeyw ( talk) 04:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boulder City High School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Heights and The Bachelor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Good catches. Can we agree on a better photo for C. pepo? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cucurbita_pepo I think the one at the top is not very good. HalfGig ( talk) 01:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
That doesn't look like most zucchini I've seen. How about this one? ʍ w 21:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
I started my first article, a little know curcubit species. If you have tips, just let me know on my talk. If you want to edit it yourself, feel free. Thanks for all you help so far. HalfGig ( talk) 21:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
I've done a bit of rearranging and copyediting. The only real problem is the few technical terms that don't have explanatory articles to link to (such as compilospecies). But, even so, it's quite good. ʍ w 01:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Now created. See Mgiganteus1's page about the photo, my first with photos. Lots of material on this one to peruse. It should be bigger than fraterna. HalfGig ( talk) 02:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for posting your proposal to the Village Pump. Biosthmors ( talk) 11:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
If you want to add an RFC tag, just add {{rfc|prop}}
at the very top of the section.
equazcion
(talk) 00:46, 14 Sep 2013 (UTC)
The Helping Hand Barnstar | ||
For great performance in helping people learn wiki ways, especially myself. HalfGig ( talk) 21:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for the barnstar, and congrats on the GA! ʍ w 13:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I just listed Cucurbita at Wikipedia:Peer review/Cucurbita/archive1. If you have time, would you be so kind as to look at this article, especially the medical/pharmacological issues, which are in Cucurbita#Chemical_constituents? I'd greatly appreciate it. I appreicate any assistance you can provide. HalfGig ( talk) 01:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Mysterious Whisper!
Since you provided comments on this discussion, I invite you to look at the discussion for a system of automating article requests I have been working on independently.
Thanks much! ~ Matthewrbowker Make a comment! 18:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
I've decided to try again to make Cucurbita as good as we can. I'll start by going back over the peer review. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you again for your long support and superb guidance. Best wishes to you on the New Year. HalfGig talk 13:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
"Apparently a mistag" |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Thanks for uploading File:Chemical chameleon reaction (permanganate).ogg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nuclear warfare may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nuclear warfare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dead Hand ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marrow (vegetable), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Squash blossom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Just in case you missed my edit summary on zucchini, I returned my correct change to the article. Just as you stated in your own edit summary, the zucchini is botanically (officially) a fruit, while treated like a vegetable only in the culinary sense. Also, while zucchinis (and all squashes) are thought to be vegetables by many, I do not argumentum ad populum. As an expert in both botany and the culinary arts/sciences, I think I know when it should be called a fruit or vegetable. The paragraph in which I changed the term "vegetables" to "fruits" was clearly pertaining to cultivation and gardening; botany is closely related to these subjects, while cooking is not at all related. I encourage you to continue being bold and brazen, as I have succeeded in gaining permissions and silencing conflicts, both others and my own, with those characteristics many times in my Wikipedian career. I politely ask that you not revert my edits again, for I desire not a conflict or edit war with you. My only recommendation (and concluding comment) for you is to more carefully consider context when reverting others' edits, even when the edit appears to be blatantly incorrect to you. Examination and prudence make a good editor great! ~Lord Laitinen~ ( talk) 03:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ANFO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Marsden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Notifying all named accounts who have edited this article this year. There is a discussion of whether this article should contain foreign language palindromes. If you would like to comment the thread is Talk:Palindrome#Non-English_palindromes_2 Meters ( talk) 21:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry to see your good faith proposal at the idea lab went down in flames. I see the discussion as close so I'm not going to add anything there, but I did want to add a point that may make you feel better about the conclusion. TenOfAllTrades identified a situation which could lead to a problem. You felt the situation was hypothetical and unlikely. I can assure you that it is much more common than you might have realized. I spend a fair amount of time looking into copyright issues. On occasion, I have run across an article which has a CSD tag and has a copyright issue as yet unidentified. In some cases, I've taken the time to add the CSD for copyright issues. This may seem like overkill as one can only delete an article once, but my concern was that someone might disagree with the other rationale or cure it, which would result in an article existing with a copyright problem. It turns out to be easy to add a CSD for copyright 20 article that has been prodded, but not quite so easy to do so in other situations. If uncomfortable that the article is highly likely to be deleted I don't go through the extra effort of adding the copyright violation tag but if I think it might survive the other rationale, I'll go ahead and add the copyright tag specifically to help make sure that it does get deleted. I can safely say I've seen over 100 of these examples in the past few weeks so my main point is that this is not as rare as you might have assumed. On a related point, I think we can be a little deletion happy at times (slightly ironic, as I have carried out a significant number of deletions) and would be supportive of a more inclusionist philosophy.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 16:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you like squashes too. Would you mind helping me with Aehobak? Regards 143.176.56.102 ( talk) 10:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you! (I'm not even going to ask how you noticed that so quickly, or at all.) I just thought it was odd; having made innumerable IP edits, when I finally broke down and got an account, it had seemed logical that my first actions would be to create my user and talk pages. For the record, I liked the essay, and I agree with most of the points of which I am knowledgeable enough to have any opinion. (And I'm a firm believer in #12 and #17, among others.) Oh, and: "Welcome Back" - Mysterious Whisper (SHOUT) 06:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I hope this response will help answer the question you proposed in your edit summary for the article The Black Album/Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols. Your edit summary was, "three notability/deletion discussions, and noboby threw up a template?". I'm sure that perhaps this was just a rhetorical question, but hopefully this will shed a little light on the subject. First, please allow me to add a little background of my activities regarding the article. I saw this article was on the " stub" articles list for albums and thought I would see if there was any editing that could be done to help expand it. (Side note: There really isn't anymore that can be done to help this article). After acquainting myself with the AfDs and DR, it appears that it was the same user who nominated the article for deletion twice within just a few months and then sent it to a deletion review as he apparently didn't care for the outcome of those two unanimous judgments in favor of keeping the article. It passed at the DR and that user seems to just be grinding an axe now regarding the deletion of the article. That same user did add a "notability" tag on the article back in May, but it was removed as he was the one who added it and his actions were construed as possible disruptive editing and keep listing til it gets deleted. Soooo...long story short: There was at one time a "notability" tag attached to this article. The user who initially added it though, apparently did so in a " bad faith" edit and so the tag was removed. The article does deserve to have a "notability" tag on it though as there really are no reliable, secondary sources. I guess that user wasn't allowed to be the person to place one though, due to his prior activity and attitude towards the page. Anyways, I hope that answers your question. And Happy Wiki-ing! Agent Orange 77 ( talk) 22:46, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Electronics engineering technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defective ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Since you and Blueboar seem to be the most active responders on the Notability Noticeboard, I was just wondering if you could quickly look over this? Since I want to create it before anyone else does. :3 Silver seren C 00:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kearny Fallout Meter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roentgen ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Nice article at Civil defense by nation. Bearian ( talk) 21:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rubus allegheniensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thorn ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Mysterious Whisper! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 03:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there. Thanks for the info. Obviously, I'm a newbie, but with a passion to make sure people actually use their references correctly. You removed my edits about toxicity on the sambucus page, but I want to argue that. What I was attempting to do was correctly reference the information in the original citation (11) from the Nova Scotia museum. Ref 11 and the one I added (12), reference SPECIFIC varieties of elderberry (three different North American ones) which are poisonous. The problem with the existing article's section on toxicity is that it is too vague and therefore misleading and consequently there are loads of pages on the web telling people that elderberries are dangerous with a photo of the common sambucus nigra. I have not been able to find any online references that cite sambucus nigra as dangerous. Even the info on the Sambucus_nigra page that says its unripe berries are mildy poisonous is pretty thin on references. Many plants from this genus are poisonous, but not the common black elderberry. It's a good point that I need to reference something that confirms its safety (I have plenty of books), but my main point is that the references provided are being incorrectly used. The specific varieties mentioned in the references should be mentioned in the article, which is what I was trying to do. As it is, the article promotes misinformation. I'll try another edit and hopefully, it will meet the criteria. Urbanhuntress ( talk) 01:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doomsday Preppers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evacuation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Maybe you get this notice automatically, but in any case I replied to your post on the talk page. Will9194 ( talk) 22:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Salaburu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Mysterious Whisper (SHOUT) 13:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey man, would love to collaborate with you on fleshing out some of the CD & Nuclear war survival pages. I essentially wrote the accuracy section of - Duck and Cover (film) a while ago but feel it could do with more pictures and graphics, what do you think? Boundarylayer ( talk) 18:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for removing that OR at Influenza A virus subtype H7N9. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The Cover Your Cough Barnstar | |
For your efforts to cover and improve the H7N9 flu article. Geraldshields11 ( talk) 21:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Powdery mildew, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Papilla and Roses ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Mysterious Whisper 16:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turban squash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C. maxima ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed your creation of many new squash articles (which is great!) Please feel free to add new articles about squash that are used as foods to WikiProject Food and Drink's New articles section! Northamerica1000 (talk) 23:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks for your contributions in creating the new squash articles Turban squash, Cucurbita ecuadorensis and Tromboncino (squash). Your efforts to improve Wikipedia are appreciated. Northamerica1000 (talk) 23:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Survivalism in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Marsden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. I have used wikipedia for ages but have never edited it before, so I am still learning the ropes. Yes, I am the author of said work. I did not, however, originally add the entry for my book The Lightcap. I noticed it was removed and re-added it. If it is required to have a wikipedia page for myself personally, I am happy to provide whatever information is needed in order for that page to be created. However, I notice that there are several entries on the List of cyberpunk works article that do not have links to pages for authors and/or their works. Examples of this being Jason Blair and Dani Cavallaro on the same page. Iamdanmarshall ( talk) 00:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I think the consensus was that you were the only person who gives half a **** as to what happens to the Wikipedia:Notability/Noticeboard...
Seriously though, before this issue vanishes into complete achieved oblivion, do you have any thoughts on how to proceed (if at all) on this issue? Do you think the noticeboard should be nominated for deletion? Or perhaps I should bring my concern about this noticeboard to some other venue? I'm sure you're quite busy and I'm interested in doing all the legwork here, I just would like to defer to your experience for a particular direction. Thanks in advance for any ideas! :) Buddy23Lee ( talk) 18:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I too wish there were a better option, but if there is, I can't think of it. With WP:Wikiproject Notability being inactive, the admin's indifference at AN/I, etc; I don't think it would be possible generate the long-term interest that would be needed to make the noticeboard worthwhile. The worst scenario I can think of at this point is that it doesn't get deleted and participation remains low (although, even if the proposal doesn't pass, it should generate some interest, however fleeting). I wouldn't know how to proceed after that. I also considered helping out there (and I will, if there's a need, until posting my proposal), but I know from the last time I tried that I would loose interest quickly, and, as you said, one editor does not a noticeboard make. Oh well.
As for "onerous tasks", just let me know if there's anything you'd change about my proposed proposal, and maybe help maintain the Notability noticeboard until I post it. Thanks.
Mysterious Whisper 01:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Well, it's been a month. More posts are being answered, but you can still count on one hand the number editors actively responding there, and there still aren't any admins actively participating there. I'll probably start the Village Pump proposal within the next few days. Do you have any new thoughts on the matter? ʍ w 13:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rubus caesius may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
I've replied to your comment on the copy/paste on a couple of AfDs. In fact I went ahead and added a comment to explain why I had used the same statement for each. I may have been better served having written one that didn't look specific to one of the subjects. However the issue was the same for each. Non-notable, no RS, and seems like the author seems to think that every person who's held the office of County Executive deserves to have their own article. Sorry but still learning as can be seen by the fact I'm just starting to use the actual WP, NOT, etc terms more and more in each successive post. Caffeyw ( talk) 04:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boulder City High School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Heights and The Bachelor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Good catches. Can we agree on a better photo for C. pepo? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cucurbita_pepo I think the one at the top is not very good. HalfGig ( talk) 01:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
That doesn't look like most zucchini I've seen. How about this one? ʍ w 21:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
I started my first article, a little know curcubit species. If you have tips, just let me know on my talk. If you want to edit it yourself, feel free. Thanks for all you help so far. HalfGig ( talk) 21:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
I've done a bit of rearranging and copyediting. The only real problem is the few technical terms that don't have explanatory articles to link to (such as compilospecies). But, even so, it's quite good. ʍ w 01:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Now created. See Mgiganteus1's page about the photo, my first with photos. Lots of material on this one to peruse. It should be bigger than fraterna. HalfGig ( talk) 02:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for posting your proposal to the Village Pump. Biosthmors ( talk) 11:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
If you want to add an RFC tag, just add {{rfc|prop}}
at the very top of the section.
equazcion
(talk) 00:46, 14 Sep 2013 (UTC)
The Helping Hand Barnstar | ||
For great performance in helping people learn wiki ways, especially myself. HalfGig ( talk) 21:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for the barnstar, and congrats on the GA! ʍ w 13:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I just listed Cucurbita at Wikipedia:Peer review/Cucurbita/archive1. If you have time, would you be so kind as to look at this article, especially the medical/pharmacological issues, which are in Cucurbita#Chemical_constituents? I'd greatly appreciate it. I appreicate any assistance you can provide. HalfGig ( talk) 01:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Mysterious Whisper!
Since you provided comments on this discussion, I invite you to look at the discussion for a system of automating article requests I have been working on independently.
Thanks much! ~ Matthewrbowker Make a comment! 18:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
I've decided to try again to make Cucurbita as good as we can. I'll start by going back over the peer review. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you again for your long support and superb guidance. Best wishes to you on the New Year. HalfGig talk 13:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
"Apparently a mistag" |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Thanks for uploading File:Chemical chameleon reaction (permanganate).ogg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nuclear warfare may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nuclear warfare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dead Hand ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marrow (vegetable), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Squash blossom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Just in case you missed my edit summary on zucchini, I returned my correct change to the article. Just as you stated in your own edit summary, the zucchini is botanically (officially) a fruit, while treated like a vegetable only in the culinary sense. Also, while zucchinis (and all squashes) are thought to be vegetables by many, I do not argumentum ad populum. As an expert in both botany and the culinary arts/sciences, I think I know when it should be called a fruit or vegetable. The paragraph in which I changed the term "vegetables" to "fruits" was clearly pertaining to cultivation and gardening; botany is closely related to these subjects, while cooking is not at all related. I encourage you to continue being bold and brazen, as I have succeeded in gaining permissions and silencing conflicts, both others and my own, with those characteristics many times in my Wikipedian career. I politely ask that you not revert my edits again, for I desire not a conflict or edit war with you. My only recommendation (and concluding comment) for you is to more carefully consider context when reverting others' edits, even when the edit appears to be blatantly incorrect to you. Examination and prudence make a good editor great! ~Lord Laitinen~ ( talk) 03:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ANFO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Marsden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Notifying all named accounts who have edited this article this year. There is a discussion of whether this article should contain foreign language palindromes. If you would like to comment the thread is Talk:Palindrome#Non-English_palindromes_2 Meters ( talk) 21:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry to see your good faith proposal at the idea lab went down in flames. I see the discussion as close so I'm not going to add anything there, but I did want to add a point that may make you feel better about the conclusion. TenOfAllTrades identified a situation which could lead to a problem. You felt the situation was hypothetical and unlikely. I can assure you that it is much more common than you might have realized. I spend a fair amount of time looking into copyright issues. On occasion, I have run across an article which has a CSD tag and has a copyright issue as yet unidentified. In some cases, I've taken the time to add the CSD for copyright issues. This may seem like overkill as one can only delete an article once, but my concern was that someone might disagree with the other rationale or cure it, which would result in an article existing with a copyright problem. It turns out to be easy to add a CSD for copyright 20 article that has been prodded, but not quite so easy to do so in other situations. If uncomfortable that the article is highly likely to be deleted I don't go through the extra effort of adding the copyright violation tag but if I think it might survive the other rationale, I'll go ahead and add the copyright tag specifically to help make sure that it does get deleted. I can safely say I've seen over 100 of these examples in the past few weeks so my main point is that this is not as rare as you might have assumed. On a related point, I think we can be a little deletion happy at times (slightly ironic, as I have carried out a significant number of deletions) and would be supportive of a more inclusionist philosophy.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 16:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you like squashes too. Would you mind helping me with Aehobak? Regards 143.176.56.102 ( talk) 10:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mysterious Whisper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)