![]() |
This user has been
blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
Welcome!
Hello, Myownusername, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
![]() |
Hello {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}, You have been invited to
join the
Article Rescue Squadron WikiProject, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing! Please visit the
project page to learn more about improving Wikipedia articles considered by other editors as based upon notable topics. ~~~~
|
You seem interested in deletion and rescue issues. - moritheil Talk 21:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Please do not make rapid fire copy and paste WP:JNN to multiple AfDs in under a minute. Please consider each article individually. Thank you. Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 01:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed that you have just started using this account, but it is clear that you are not a new user. Could you please tell us the name of your prior account, so that we know who you are? Many of your actions are raising eyebrows, and if we knew what your prior account was, and why you chose to abandon it and start this account, it would set a lot of people's minds at ease... -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 01:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
There's no need to report a user as "vandalism only" when they've been warned once for creating a non-notable entry. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Can someone please explain what i did wrong???? Myownusername ( talk) 02:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I actually considered every one of those, I just did them rapidly after considering them to save time. Myownusername ( talk) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes well how is what i did amount to "trolling" Myownusername ( talk) 02:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I have filed a checkuser request against you concerning your recent participation in an RfA at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DougsTech. — Mythdon t/ c 02:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Myownusername ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I really didn't know that my actions would have been taken so seriously. Please allow me a second chance
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why not? did you actually look at my request? Myownusername ( talk) 02:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Myownusername ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear administrators, I feel that this block was excessive. I would like the request to be considered seriously. I really didn't know that my actions would have been taken so seriously. #I promise not to oppose any administrators in the future #I promise not to put more descriptive votes in AfDs in the future If there are any more criteria I must fulfill, I would be happy to do so.
Decline reason:
It's clear that you're not a new user. Socks aren't allowed here. X clamation point 03:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Let's not cloud the issue. You appear to be an established user or an anon who recently registered an account. As both an anon and under this user name, you made bad faith deletion taggings and nominations, bad faith reports to WP:AN/I, and engaged overall in disruption. Your use of this account has been purely disruptive and this account has been blocked rightly. Dloh cierekim 18:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This user has been
blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
Welcome!
Hello, Myownusername, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
![]() |
Hello {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}, You have been invited to
join the
Article Rescue Squadron WikiProject, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing! Please visit the
project page to learn more about improving Wikipedia articles considered by other editors as based upon notable topics. ~~~~
|
You seem interested in deletion and rescue issues. - moritheil Talk 21:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Please do not make rapid fire copy and paste WP:JNN to multiple AfDs in under a minute. Please consider each article individually. Thank you. Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 01:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed that you have just started using this account, but it is clear that you are not a new user. Could you please tell us the name of your prior account, so that we know who you are? Many of your actions are raising eyebrows, and if we knew what your prior account was, and why you chose to abandon it and start this account, it would set a lot of people's minds at ease... -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 01:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
There's no need to report a user as "vandalism only" when they've been warned once for creating a non-notable entry. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Can someone please explain what i did wrong???? Myownusername ( talk) 02:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I actually considered every one of those, I just did them rapidly after considering them to save time. Myownusername ( talk) 02:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes well how is what i did amount to "trolling" Myownusername ( talk) 02:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I have filed a checkuser request against you concerning your recent participation in an RfA at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DougsTech. — Mythdon t/ c 02:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Myownusername ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I really didn't know that my actions would have been taken so seriously. Please allow me a second chance
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why not? did you actually look at my request? Myownusername ( talk) 02:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Myownusername ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear administrators, I feel that this block was excessive. I would like the request to be considered seriously. I really didn't know that my actions would have been taken so seriously. #I promise not to oppose any administrators in the future #I promise not to put more descriptive votes in AfDs in the future If there are any more criteria I must fulfill, I would be happy to do so.
Decline reason:
It's clear that you're not a new user. Socks aren't allowed here. X clamation point 03:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Let's not cloud the issue. You appear to be an established user or an anon who recently registered an account. As both an anon and under this user name, you made bad faith deletion taggings and nominations, bad faith reports to WP:AN/I, and engaged overall in disruption. Your use of this account has been purely disruptive and this account has been blocked rightly. Dloh cierekim 18:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)