This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MusicforthePeople/Talk_archive/2013. |
Most of the time I'll message you on your talk. I will reply here, on my talk, sometimes.
Hey, yeepsi. Forgot to say a big thank you for sorting out that Hari's On Tour > Hari's on Tour article title for me – you're a star. I'm gradually getting closer to that long-promised George–Ravi 1974 tour article, what with new Hari's on Tour (Express) and a rewrite I'm doing on the Dark Horse piece (loads of info I've got from new GH/Beatle books, also at least 3 highly favourable album reviews I've come across. Wo-ho!). Hope you're doing well. JG66 ( talk) 06:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm going to change the ref formatting in Syd Barrett to sfn, in order for the article to comply with other Pink Floyd article. Plant's Strider ( talk) 12:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:FiremanStrawberriesOceans.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, I have put your GAN for "Jugband Blues" on hold so some outstanding issues can be addressed. See the GAN review page for details, and feel free to ask questions. WesleyDodds ( talk) 04:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The article has been passed now. Good work. I suggest having some experienced copyeditors look over that article and any other current/potential GA noms to help you clean up the prose even further. WesleyDodds ( talk) 12:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 02:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mind Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insecurity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that's the third time an IP from that range has done the same unsourced edits on this article - I left it because two reverts is a slippery slope towards WP:EW. Cheers for picking up the baton. If it happens again, I can just revert with "see talk page" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Good work on the Lennon articles. However, don't base the majority of your changes on Blaney, he gets alot of things wrong. There are 3,000 books written about Lennon; in order for a "new" one to sell they need new info, which is fine, as long as it's correct and not author's subjectiveness. Hotcop2 ( talk) 01:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. If you've got a minute, my "Dark Horse" GAR requires an okay on images' copyright status and fair use in the article. There's only the one image, the US pic sleeve. PaulMacDermott's kindly done the review, but his text-to-speech program means he needs second opinions regarding images and punctuation (the last of which Wizardman has just taken care of). Would you mind? No probs if not, of course. Cheers, JG66 ( talk) 12:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Ram Archive Collection.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ram (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Your input would be appreciated here. GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 21:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bring the Light (Beady Eye song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated both of these categories for deletion. Cheers. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 20:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
...for keeping an eye on the Floyd album articles. Sometimes I feel as though all I do now is hit the undo button. Parrot of Doom 15:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Regarding the "consensus" I agree that it falls short of that mark, but I wasn't the only one who held this belief. I was responding to another IP user's post, so there are at least two of us. Assuming Freebullets was also convinced based upon his undoing of his own edit, that makes three of us.
I didn't undo your edit- I felt that would not be a tasteful gesture on my part. However, I know that the information on the page is utterly fallacious. How do I convince the community to allow it to be removed permanently? 74.197.35.71 ( talk) 20:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
74.197.35.71 ( talk) 21:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. Thanks mucho for giving that new "Grey Cloudy Lies" article a B, and ditto for "Beautiful Girl" and "Learning How ..." a while back. (I actually get a bigger kick out of moments like this – starting a new article and landing a B!! – than I do when helping expand an existing article and getting it through GAN.) Don't think the song article I'm currently working on, for "Maya Love", is quite worthy of a B somehow, but who knows – early days. Oh, and talking about GAs – congrats on getting those Lennon and [Shallow]Mac album articles promoted. Way to go, Yeepsi! Cheers, JG66 ( talk) 14:13, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Wanted to thank you for all the hard work you've done keeping the Beach Boys articles all nice and tidy. Trying to get such a mess of a topic in order is an uphill battle and your contributions have definitely aided a heap. Hopefully we'll be able to start up that Beach Boys Wikiproject you proposed someday and really get the ball moving in the right direction. Jamekae ( talk) 17:29, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi there Yeepsi. I've got a few Harrison song articles up as GANs, a couple going back to December that I'd really like to get cleared (hopefully promoted). I was thinking of contacting PaulMacDermott to see if he could do the honours again. Knowing he uses a speech/text program, I was wondering, would you be able to step in, as and when, to look at the things his program misses – images and punctuation? Of course, he might be otherwise engaged, but if I could offer someone upfront to provide an opinion on those two issues (i.e. to spare him the rather drawn-out FAC-ish situation that occurred with the " Give Me Love" GAR), that would be great. There are no images in the first/oldest of the articles, " Hari's on Tour (Express)", so that rather cuts down on the workload there! No problems if you can't of course. Best, JG66 ( talk) 02:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Category:The Fireman (music), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I just saw that you were expanding the article for GA, and saw that it needed the section. I might add to his other albums' articles if you plan on expanding those as well? Dan56 ( talk) 00:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For protecting the quality of our project by reverting so many unhelpful edits. Thanks for all you do around here! GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 21:24, 21 March 2013 (UTC) |
Nice one, thanks Yeepsi! JG66 ( talk) 14:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be interested in reviewing my GAN for Song of Innocence? It's been sitting around for a month, and I'd like to nominate it for FA when it passes. If not, no need to reply back. Dan56 ( talk) 06:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
I began the review at Talk:Instant Karma!/GA1, and there are a few points I'd like your thoughts on. Thanks for all your work on this and other music articles! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 14:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi, was just putting "You" up for GAN and noticed this. Thanks – as always. BTW, what's happened to your User page? (Not that it's any big deal of course.) Best, JG66 ( talk) 02:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Can't help but notice you undid my change to the Newton quote, despite the version you show being wrong - why so? You could check the page on Isaac Newton to see the reference for his original statement if you'd like. F./ Fizzackerly ( talk) 12:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand why you would undo all my track listings on A Day To Remember, it looked a lot better plus showed total length. Now it just looks like a mess. Nice going .... Dylarooo ( talk) 13:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Well alright then. I just see pretty much every other band having that and I personally think it looks nicer. Anyways good day. Dylarooo ( talk) 18:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Just letting you know that your talk page got signed by Sinebot. Seqqis ( talk) 15:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wedding Album, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbeat ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 01:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. Hope you're well. Thanks for the recent B ratings on new GH articles; it's great to know you're usually first-on-the-scene with Beatles-related articles, because that means there's an element of consistency over all new articles created. (You're dead right, for instance, that I Am Missing You only deserves a Start on the quality rating.) Can I tap into you for another point of consistency – on another thing that I think you're pretty clued up on? (Way more than me, that's for sure.) I'm in the middle of uploading images for some George song articles but I'm a bit worried that resolution might be a bit high, even though I've scanned at pretty low res and then exported from iPhoto as lowest-quality JPGs. Do you think these face labels are okay, not too large on the page ... World of Stone, Hari's on Tour (Express), I Don't Care Anymore (George Harrison song)? (Haven't always done the best job of minor touch-ups on the scans, you'll notice; eg, smudge effect on white surrounds, particularly top left in the World of Stone image.) I've also uploaded scans of US pic sleeves for " You" and " Isn't It a Pity" – I think they're okay though. Also, I thought I'd uploaded a better version of the Bangla Desh pic sleeve ... but it doesn't seem to have come across in the article. I'm all right with writing and editing articles; just completely useless with the image side of things! As always, no sweat if you're busy elsewhere, but any help/advice would be much appreciated. Thanks Yeepsi, JG66 ( talk) 05:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chowkatsun9? I am wondering whether you think all of the indicated accounts are from the same sockmaster, or did I include one too many? Thank you for your continued vigilance at music articles. Binksternet ( talk) 20:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. I was just checking on the GA noms page to see if anyone had picked up any of my nominated articles yet – alas, no, "Behind That Locked Door" continues to gather dust – but I saw you've got a few album GARs under way. Quick point I noticed with Mind Games: there's a 29 October 1973 release date in the article's infobox, but sources I have here give November (as, in fact, per the article's lead section currently). From books that are close to hand, Keith Badman's Beatles Diary Volume 2 gives 2 November for US release and 16 Nov in the UK; as does Castleman & Podrazik's All Together Now, an old, old book I tracked down, but one I trust implicitly. On the other hand, in Bruce Spizer's more recent The Beatles on Apple Records, 31 October (but not 29 October) is given for the US release date ... Perhaps you've got alternative info, but from what I can see, Apple issued Yoko's Feeling the Space, Ringo and Mind Games all on the same day in America, 2 Nov 1973. Just thought I'd raise it with you here, instead of complicating the GAR.
Also – and this is just my opinion – the Ram article seems very light on background/context for what was an extremely fraught (and intriguing) period in Mac's career. (It's sort of George's Dark Horse and Extra Texture periods rolled into one, I'd say.) I'm thinking of Paul's massive bust-up with George in New York in December 1970, John's vicious Rolling Stone interview that same month, Paul launching the suit to dissolve the Beatles partnership on 31 December and his appearance in court in Jan '71, Paul & Ringo attending Mick Jagger's wedding in St Tropez and ignoring each other. Also, the war of words between J & P in the UK press is touched on under "Feud" (I think I added the mention, actually, sometime last year), but it was under way all through 1971 following publication of the Lennon interview in January, and it fed directly into songs like "Too Many People". I don't want to interfere with the GAN – and, hey, perhaps I'm suggesting too much in the way of background details(!). But might be an idea to add these points (or some of them), do you think? Happy to help if you need it. Best, JG66 ( talk) 07:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
No, all fine for me – sounds weird, though. Careful with that axe (Eugene), when it comes to "taking your computer apart"! JG66 ( talk) 14:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:This guitar us.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McCartney (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Eastman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. I finally got around to taking a closer look at the Ram article, and I can't help thinking it needs a lot more work before it's approaching GA quality. It's not just the Feud section seeming out of place and those missing points about background we discussed. The structure seems out elsewhere – eg the rather inconsequential Content section (where text about "Ram On (reprise)" and the composite nature of "Uncle Albert" appears to belong in the previous Recording & Structure section, but mention of the music videos should go under Release, surely, as part of the album's promotion). Also, going by discussions in Madinger & Easter, Spizer and Sounes, pretty much all the basic tracks were taped at Columbia Studios in November and December 1970 – not January 1971, and not at A&R Studios. (Looking at Badman's book, he's inconsistent about this start date: under November 1970, he says sessions began that month and went through to December, but then he later gives January '71 as the start). According to those other books I mentioned, overdubs were carried out in NYC in January 1971, at Columbia and A&R; then, in March–April more work took place at Sound Recorders in LA. Apparently, "Dear Boy" was recorded in LA in its entirety. Sorry to have to say it, but the more I see of the article, the more I think it might be an idea to pull the nom. My thinking is that this is an important album and there's a lot missing regarding background and context on release; also, with so many music articles up for nomination, it seems a bit unproductive to be asking any potential reviewer to take on this GAN when s/he might be able to handle two other reviews where the articles are closer to meeting the standard. What do you think, yeepsi – pull the nom and then let's work on it pretty leisurely, but make sure the job gets done? Best, JG66 ( talk) 10:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biker Like an Icon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Look ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you care to comment here regarding an original research dispute at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy? Dan56 ( talk) 10:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe that the album should have it's own page. Millions of people use Wikipedia to find information on albums that they have or purchase, myself included. Yes the album is one of a billion other compilations, but for people seeking information on the album, it is perfect. Alex weiner ( talk) 20:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
To answer your question What was the point in that? about my c/e and your revert to Y Not ...
There are two (2) conventions that are generally followed with infoboxes in Wikipedia, which assist with maintainability of the articles:
Since the infobox in the Y Not article was already close to the second style, I edited it for consistency with that style. Truthanado ( talk) 15:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. WikiProject banners serve a variety of uses - the main one is to let folks know there is group of people who are interested in a topic, that they have drawn up guidelines on how to structure articles, that they will be able to offer advice on sources and deal with queries, etc. They also simply advertise the project, drawing in new members. WikiProject article assessment in general will usually be the same - though can at times differ. An album, for example, may be highly important to WikiProject Albums because it was the first stereo album, first coloured vinyl, etc; but less important to WikiProject The Beatles because it wasn't one of the band's more significant or popular albums. The WikiProject Council regards keeping WikiProject banners visible as quite important. See WP:WikiProject coordination. SilkTork ✔Tea time 23:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
It's very odd, because changes of this nature usually come with even a "Hey, doing this per Template:Infobox album#Chronology." would of saved you from being reverted. Mlpearc ( powwow) 01:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello yeepsi, I would like to know why Five By Five which is an (EP) by The Rolling Stones cannot be stated as such. Am I missing something? The other 2 EPs are followed by (EP) so what is different. I would like to know? ( Shelgold ( talk) 21:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC))
What ‘millions for the other albums’? As far as i know, there are very few alternate covers for ‘With the Beatles’ or other Beatles albums. In any case, this is a major alternate cover that is completely different from the standard cover and that was released in its stead in an entire market. The alternate should therefore be included in the article. Esszet ( talk) 23:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Pigs on the Wing - French promo single (320).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 09:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Made in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compilation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Regarding "Eclipse"
the source reference that was ALREADY there where you removed my edit supports what I wrote.
"At the very end of “Eclipse,” in the right channel, there is the faint sound of a Muzak version of the Beatles’ “Ticket to Ride.” This was apparently playing in the background when they recorded the closing snippet of chatter. So far as we know, the Fab Four never demanded any royalties over this."
Since this closing snippet of conversation was the bit recorded with Gerry Driscoll at Abbey Roads. 2 + 2
Also Lennon was a fan of Muzak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.76.83 ( talk) 20:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I've begun the review for Flaming Pie, and it looks close to passing; just a few points I'd like your thoughts on. Thanks for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 17:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your contributions to bring Flaming Pie to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 22:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC) |
Best if you make your request on its talk page, that way other editors will know why it was failed/withdrawn. Best of luck on its future development. shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 23:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stop and Smell the Roses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WBEN ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Why did you remove the personnel section for this song? You did not leave any comments explaining it. Or at least I didn't see the comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.76.83 ( talk) 15:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey yeepsi. Thanks for the Bs on those two new Ringo song articles. (I enjoyed writing them as well – there's so little information to wade through, compared with a George song!) I noticed your comment about "You and Me (Babe)" being "a good song to boot", so I just wanted to say, have you listened to it through headphones? What struck me when writing the piece over the last day or two (with the song playing in me 'phones) was how amazing the whole arrangement is on the recording – it sort of flatters the actual composition, I think. In best George Martin/mid-period Beatles fashion, it's all in the details: the horns used in certain places, marimba arriving on the middle-eights, Ringo's overdubbed percussion (floor tom at the start, then extra hi-hats on the middle eight), George's beautiful jangly guitar fills, then the way his solo corresponds with the orchestral strings and horns, and best of all, the way the strings launch straight after Ringo's final line in the monologue ... Amazing – but perhaps none of this is news to you! JG66 ( talk) 10:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shine On You Crazy Diamond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LP ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
The article
Live Peace in Toronto 1969 you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Live Peace in Toronto 1969 for comments about the article. Well done!
Mdann52 (
talk)
13:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by A Day to Remember, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe King ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, I came here to thank you for the work you just did on Pure McCartney, and when I saw that you helped several articles reach GA status, I additionally want to add a small word of admiration. I'm currently working on trying to get a few articles about albums and musicians to reach that level as well. The highest I've gotten is B, so I'm definitely looking up to someone with 13 "tilted pluses". Wow! -- Eddyspeeder ( talk) 16:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Howdy- I wanted to let you know that I am taking on your GA nom for Memory Almost Full. I have done a few reviews already, although (admittedly), albums are a little out of my comfort zone. I still think I will be able to match up the criteria, and will look into it a little more to make sure it meets Focus and covers everything necessary. Thank you for the work you already put in. Sorry it took so long (around 3 months) for someone to review it. I should be able to start my review with initial thoughts later today. Have a good one. PrairieKid ( talk) 18:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated for merging lyrics and music categories here. Cheers. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 19:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Through this way, I inform there is a discussion about partially disambiguated titles, known as " PDABs". This subguide of WP:D was approved at VPP. I notify you about this because you has participated in at least one RM discussion in which PDAB is cited (in any form). You are welcome to give ideas about the future of this guideline at WT:D or to ignore this message. Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
Unfinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
19:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
You are really taking that numbered list thing out of context. The whole reason the templated track listing exist is because it looks better, and this track listing is complicated info. Koala15 ( talk) 16:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
But where is the rule that says we are not allowed to use templated track listings. Koala15 ( talk) 16:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
That does still does not make any sense, your argument is basically "because it looks better" too. Koala15 ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
It still does not say we aren't allowed to use templated track listings. Koala15 ( talk) 18:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Would it make sense to start a discussion on this to get other users opinions? Koala15 ( talk) 18:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Did you know ... that since you expressed an opinion on the GA/DYK proposal last year, we invite you to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the matter? Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Regards, Gilderien Chat| What I've done 23:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC) |
The article
Memory Almost Full you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Memory Almost Full for comments about the article. Well done! Thank you very much for the patience.
PrairieKid (
talk)
15:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
The article
Unfinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Unfinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
18:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warped Tour 2013 Tour Compilation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your edit, I don't see how Floydian Slip qualifies as a fan site. It's a radio show that has been running for nearly 20 years and is aired on, by my count, 45 stations all over the world. But at least you didn't remove the info that I posted as well. So there's that. Dismas| (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
Unfinished Music No. 2: Life with the Lions you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
LazyBastardGuy --
LazyBastardGuy (
talk)
05:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
The article
Unfinished Music No. 2: Life with the Lions you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Unfinished Music No. 2: Life with the Lions for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
LazyBastardGuy --
LazyBastardGuy (
talk)
05:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Denney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardcore ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I edited the Oasis pages since I was listening to "Stop the clocks" album and read about the tracks while listening to them. In some pages, the link to the next/previous track wasn't available, so I decided to contribute and fix them.
Its a shame you just removed my work without even leaving me a comment about this, and only writing "Not needed". I thought you guys at wikipedia appreciate help. I guess I won't contribute to wikipedia ever again, its just a waste of time, some Yeepsi dude just comes and erases your whole work without even giving you a reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkL88 ( talk • contribs) 23:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Just a heads-up. I've reported him here. freshacconci talk to me 14:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit in "Stand By Me" by Oasis? -- Soren84 ( talk) 19:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Insulam Simia ( talk · contribs) 20:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, I need your help, genre need source for Gary Barlow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.179.205 ( talk) 10:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
How's going it, bud. I just want to suggest to you that next time, before nominating an article to be GA, you take another look through it to see if any cleanup needs to be done to it. I did that with an article you nominated, but great work expanding the article and good luck! 和DITOR E tails 03:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Why do you keep undoing the "Rock" tag from this album?It is NOT ONLY a "folk rock" album.Some of the tracks are ,some of the tracks aren't.Nothing is one-dimentional if we're talking about The Beatles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drummerkamil ( talk • contribs) 10:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beaucoups of Blues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fontana ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:ATMP 2001.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth ( talk) 18:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 |
![]() |
The Return of Bruno (film) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
231 |
![]() |
The Point! ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
244 |
![]() |
Back in the U.S.S.R. ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
24 |
![]() |
Live at the Greek Theatre 2008 ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
33 |
![]() |
Born to Boogie ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
164 |
![]() |
Minimoog ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
519 |
![]() |
Peter Kay ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup | |||
302 |
![]() |
Love Me Do ( talk) |
![]() |
Cleanup | ||||
285 |
![]() |
Dawes (band) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup |
13 |
![]() |
Gips ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand |
11 |
![]() |
Soy Rebelde ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand | |
170 |
![]() |
Interiors ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand | |
230 |
![]() |
Free as a Bird ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |||||
209 |
![]() |
Concert for George ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | |
46 |
![]() |
Porque te vas ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic |
875 |
![]() |
Hallelujah ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge |
7,784 |
![]() |
Shooting of Trayvon Martin ( talk) | Merge | |||||
249 |
![]() |
Bridge (music) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge | ||
5 |
![]() |
The Rest ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify |
2,774 |
![]() |
Yoko Ono ( talk) | Wikify | |||||
47 |
![]() |
Trapped Under Ice (band) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify |
1 |
![]() |
Urbi Et Orbi (EP) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan |
24 |
![]() |
Im Tae Kyung ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | |
8 |
![]() |
Ahmadiyya in Bangladesh ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | ||
6 |
![]() |
Commonwealth (song) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
21 |
![]() |
Watching Rainbows ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
5 |
![]() |
Get Back – Together ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
16 |
![]() |
Ringo (TV movie) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | |
2 |
![]() |
Zé Ramalho Canta Beatles ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
17 |
![]() |
Blindman ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lennon Bermuda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roy Young and Chewstick ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
It's no secret that Alternative Press just did a massive 3-page interview with Jeremy McKinnon about Common Courtesy. [1] But I was wondering if you were in the process of doing a wiki article for it in some sandbox? because I also have a printed source or two for you. (I think for the structure of the article if it were to a bibliography source like Death Is Birth it would help, GA articles do better with bibliography structure). But also I have a printed source and it's citation to give you. [1] Jonjonjohny ( talk) 07:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:A Day to Remember singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
18:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Homesick (A Day to Remember album) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Moswento --
Moswento (
talk)
08:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
What Separates Me from You you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ScoobyHugh --
ScoobyHugh (
talk)
21:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you for staying on top of Hjfcool's genre war in Nirvana singles. I've bumped him/her up to a level 4 user warning, so any further disruption should be met with submission to AIV. Thanks, and happy editing! DK qwerty 03:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
WHAT? Are you kidding me? -- Zack Tartufo ( talk) 18:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revrse my correction about peter brown?-- Inon ( talk) 00:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
The article
What Separates Me from You you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:What Separates Me from You for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ScoobyHugh --
ScoobyHugh (
talk)
07:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Ringo Starr filmography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
17:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
The article
What Separates Me from You you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:What Separates Me from You for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ScoobyHugh --
ScoobyHugh (
talk)
12:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. It's been a while – hope you're doing well. Good luck with "Instant Karma!", by the way, I just noticed you'd nom'ed it a while back. Also hope you don't mind that I've just replaced the image in the second "My Sweet Lord" infobox, with a European pic sleeve (I figured there had to have been one available somewhere in the world). Reason is, I think those close-ups of face labels don't look so great. It's not so bad when it's from 12" vinyl, but when it's 7", with everything magnified ... I don't know, I just think it looks pretty terrible. Are you okay with that? I quite like the pic sleeve image, personally.
Oh, and sorry ... I know I said I'd help get Ram knocked into shape sometime soon. I will, I will! Best, JG66 ( talk) 05:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
for your work on ELO's song list S.G.(GH) ping! 14:49, 11 October 2013 (UTC) |
Category:A Day to Remember webisodes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The link to the book is for the benefit of other readers - it helps verify the information, and verifies it in context. As the book has been digitised, it is useful to link to the page. This saves a reader having to track down a physical copy. Such are the benefits of the digital age! I will restore the link (such links are standard). If you continue to feel that because you have a hardcopy, nobody else should be able to check the book online, then drop me a note on my talkpage so we can chat further. Peartork ( talk) 00:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The article
Homesick (A Day to Remember album) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Homesick (A Day to Remember album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Moswento --
Moswento (
talk)
13:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Driving Rain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tampura ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ringo 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Category:Jeremy McKinnon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
For Those Who Have Heart you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adabow --
Adabow (
talk)
20:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
And Their Name Was Treason you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Вик Ретлхед --
Вик Ретлхед (
talk)
00:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Wade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wonderwall ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
And Their Name Was Treason you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:And Their Name Was Treason for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Вик Ретлхед --
Вик Ретлхед (
talk)
01:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Greetings... this album was an "unofficial" release (actually a bootleg) by an independant record label and received great fanfare because of the 'historical nature" but I'm not certain it should be credited as the next album after "Rock N Roll Music" Hotcop2 ( talk) 13:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. If you get a chance, it would be great if you could take a look at three articles I've been working on over the last three weeks: Material World Charitable Foundation, Raga and In Concert 1972. The first two are lowly Starts right now (the horror!) – I'm hoping they might be due an upgrade? A couple more points to add to Raga (end notes) but it's pretty much there; bit more to come with In Concert. See what you think.
Btw, this should now free me up to go back to Dark Horse Records again and provide the long-promised text there. (Having said that, my travels via Material World CF, Ravi etc, have been steering me towards getting " It Is 'He' (Jai Sri Krishna)" up at GAN. Then " Try Some, Buy Some" came into the picture … I don't know, so much to do ...) As I say, would be fab if you could look at those three articles; my plan is to get Shankar Fam & Friends and Music Festival up to B as well. No rush, of course, I can see you're pretty busy as it is. Best, JG66 ( talk) 12:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 19:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Blue Sky Noise may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:51, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
For Those Who Have Heart you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:For Those Who Have Heart for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adabow --
Adabow (
talk)
21:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your contributions to bring And Their Name Was Treason to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work!-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC) |
Have you thought about bringing their newest album to GA status? It definitely has the potential to reach that level.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
And Their Name Was Treason you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:And Their Name Was Treason for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Вик Ретлхед --
Вик Ретлхед (
talk)
07:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to the Egg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New wave, Yellow Submarine and Promotional video ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. Hey, you're on a roll – congrats on all the above!
Me, I've been a bit distracted … Would you be able to look in at User talk:Quadell#mirror images? Mighty strange situation, regarding a new Harrison biography. If you felt like hitting "helpful" on the Amazon review linked from there, that would be fab. I'd just like to ensure that the review is helpful/popular enough to register in the book listing's main space. Thanks, Yeepsi. Best, JG66 ( talk) 16:59, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
PS. You'll find my review on the Amazon page as "HariG", by the way. JG66 ( talk) 17:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, thanks for the vote of confidence there! Added a few things under Composition today.
Just wanted to return to that issue of citation style … Are you really wedded to the idea of full pub details appearing in the first cite from each book, rather than having just a very brief cite in all cases (Blaney, p. …) followed by a separate Sources list? I can't help thinking it makes sense to go with the latter option. That way, it's so straightforward for readers – because rather than them having to search up in a list, not knowing where full details for "Blaney" might appear, they're diverted to a logical, alphabetical list. As a for-instance, just now I was rephrasing some of the article text and wanting to name the authors ("Urish; Bielen") who make the point about Lennon chiding his listeners; I looked for the full entry above, no joy, so I started looking for it later in the list, with the same result. Then I noticed that what I was searching for was actually in the cite immediately above the Urish; Bielen one – I'd completely missed it, probably because the multiple cites (a, b, c, d etc) indent the text, taking it out of the line of sight as one's running an eye up or down the surnames, along the left-hand of the list. What do you think? JG66 ( talk) 11:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. I hope I haven't gone over the top with detail – the article's grown enormously ... I had been planning to cut a couple of things, but after reorganising Release section, I actually think it all works now. What do you think – okay as is? There's a couple of things I might try to rephrase and an end note to add, saying that some sources give JL on piano not elec piano; otherwise, it's pretty close to finished.
Just a note on those new charts peaks you've added. When I said, "I removed US Cashbox chart placing; b/c if that *is* included, then surely NME and MM charts for UK also, and Record Week in US?", what I meant was, Cash Box should not be added, imo, because otherwise there's a whole host of other charts that could be included (RW, MM, NME, and more). I'm sure I've read somewhere on an MoS page that only Billboard should be included for US (even though Cash Box was more influential for many years). I can't find the page now (typical!) – but maybe you know something about this that I don't. Do you think those extra UK and US chart peaks need including? It's not as if they offer anything new: they're exactly the same peaks in each case as on the main (UK national and Billboard) charts, so it's sort of bordering on the trivial. I should have a couple more international charts to add, but you know, I'd say delete RW etc. What do you think? JG66 ( talk) 11:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liverpool 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Instant Karma! you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
SilkTork --
SilkTork (
talk)
19:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Good call and good solution. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to the Egg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Category:Song recordings produced by Tom Denney, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho ( talk) 14:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This is regarding your reverts to my changes. A couple things:
I will not revert the article back to the changes I made, but I want to straighten this out. If you disagree with the point I made, please reply. TheSickBehemoth ( talk) 15:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Please stop reverting 86.168.205.226 without discussion. If you both continue to revert each other, you both could get blocked from editing. I will tell Yeepsi the same thing. Sportsguy17 ( Chat with me!) 23:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
It says: For though they may be parted "PAUL IS DEAD" / (You can't remove this from the song!) Böri ( talk) 07:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
No.1 editor |
Well done for all your GREAT editing. Jbow12 ( talk) 17:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
No.1 editor |
Well done for all your GREAT editing. Jbow12 ( talk) 17:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
No.1 editor |
Well done for all your GREAT editing. Jbow12 ( talk) 17:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Yeepsi, I want to first apologize for reverting your edits to " My Chemical Romance discography". I understand the need for uniformity among discography articles and I welcome your efforts to update this article. My revert of your edits was unwarranted as, in retrospect, I only have two minor objections that I would like to discuss with you:
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to finish the review, but my time available for Wikipedia has shortened considerably since I took on a batch of reviews, including Instant Karma!, last month. I'm hoping the time issue should resolve itself shortly; though I've been hoping that for a little while now, so it's fairer to put the review back in the pot. I'll clear the review page, though keep it watchlisted, and if I do find I have the spare time before someone else picks up the nomination, I'll be able to finish the review (hopefully before Christmas). Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
In a way, you're both right with regards to this. However, the information should be removed. This is not because the link isn't active any more, but because it is sourced to the Daily Mail, which should never be used as a source in a BLP. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Wouldn't the opening sentence read "Nirvana were" rather than "Nirvana was" because Nirvana is plural (referring to the bandmates)? teratogen ( talk) 17:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
there is no need for the cats on Redirect since cats on redirect duplicated on About You (Paul McCartney song) redirect which now exists. Please see Talk:About You. Cheers In ictu oculi ( talk) 00:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. Blimey, who's that guy above asking you to archive your own talk page?! What a nerve …
Hey, thanks for producing this, by the way. I see a certain user got involved there, weaving his usual pedantic madness – maybe the archive was best left buried after all! Best, JG66 ( talk) 12:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Selfish Machines you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MusikAnimal --
MusikAnimal (
talk)
17:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The article
Selfish Machines you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Selfish Machines for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MusikAnimal --
MusikAnimal (
talk)
02:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MusicforthePeople/Talk_archive/2013. |
Most of the time I'll message you on your talk. I will reply here, on my talk, sometimes.
Hey, yeepsi. Forgot to say a big thank you for sorting out that Hari's On Tour > Hari's on Tour article title for me – you're a star. I'm gradually getting closer to that long-promised George–Ravi 1974 tour article, what with new Hari's on Tour (Express) and a rewrite I'm doing on the Dark Horse piece (loads of info I've got from new GH/Beatle books, also at least 3 highly favourable album reviews I've come across. Wo-ho!). Hope you're doing well. JG66 ( talk) 06:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm going to change the ref formatting in Syd Barrett to sfn, in order for the article to comply with other Pink Floyd article. Plant's Strider ( talk) 12:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:FiremanStrawberriesOceans.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, I have put your GAN for "Jugband Blues" on hold so some outstanding issues can be addressed. See the GAN review page for details, and feel free to ask questions. WesleyDodds ( talk) 04:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The article has been passed now. Good work. I suggest having some experienced copyeditors look over that article and any other current/potential GA noms to help you clean up the prose even further. WesleyDodds ( talk) 12:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 02:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mind Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insecurity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that's the third time an IP from that range has done the same unsourced edits on this article - I left it because two reverts is a slippery slope towards WP:EW. Cheers for picking up the baton. If it happens again, I can just revert with "see talk page" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Good work on the Lennon articles. However, don't base the majority of your changes on Blaney, he gets alot of things wrong. There are 3,000 books written about Lennon; in order for a "new" one to sell they need new info, which is fine, as long as it's correct and not author's subjectiveness. Hotcop2 ( talk) 01:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. If you've got a minute, my "Dark Horse" GAR requires an okay on images' copyright status and fair use in the article. There's only the one image, the US pic sleeve. PaulMacDermott's kindly done the review, but his text-to-speech program means he needs second opinions regarding images and punctuation (the last of which Wizardman has just taken care of). Would you mind? No probs if not, of course. Cheers, JG66 ( talk) 12:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Ram Archive Collection.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ram (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATV ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Your input would be appreciated here. GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 21:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bring the Light (Beady Eye song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated both of these categories for deletion. Cheers. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 20:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
...for keeping an eye on the Floyd album articles. Sometimes I feel as though all I do now is hit the undo button. Parrot of Doom 15:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Regarding the "consensus" I agree that it falls short of that mark, but I wasn't the only one who held this belief. I was responding to another IP user's post, so there are at least two of us. Assuming Freebullets was also convinced based upon his undoing of his own edit, that makes three of us.
I didn't undo your edit- I felt that would not be a tasteful gesture on my part. However, I know that the information on the page is utterly fallacious. How do I convince the community to allow it to be removed permanently? 74.197.35.71 ( talk) 20:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
74.197.35.71 ( talk) 21:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. Thanks mucho for giving that new "Grey Cloudy Lies" article a B, and ditto for "Beautiful Girl" and "Learning How ..." a while back. (I actually get a bigger kick out of moments like this – starting a new article and landing a B!! – than I do when helping expand an existing article and getting it through GAN.) Don't think the song article I'm currently working on, for "Maya Love", is quite worthy of a B somehow, but who knows – early days. Oh, and talking about GAs – congrats on getting those Lennon and [Shallow]Mac album articles promoted. Way to go, Yeepsi! Cheers, JG66 ( talk) 14:13, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Wanted to thank you for all the hard work you've done keeping the Beach Boys articles all nice and tidy. Trying to get such a mess of a topic in order is an uphill battle and your contributions have definitely aided a heap. Hopefully we'll be able to start up that Beach Boys Wikiproject you proposed someday and really get the ball moving in the right direction. Jamekae ( talk) 17:29, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi there Yeepsi. I've got a few Harrison song articles up as GANs, a couple going back to December that I'd really like to get cleared (hopefully promoted). I was thinking of contacting PaulMacDermott to see if he could do the honours again. Knowing he uses a speech/text program, I was wondering, would you be able to step in, as and when, to look at the things his program misses – images and punctuation? Of course, he might be otherwise engaged, but if I could offer someone upfront to provide an opinion on those two issues (i.e. to spare him the rather drawn-out FAC-ish situation that occurred with the " Give Me Love" GAR), that would be great. There are no images in the first/oldest of the articles, " Hari's on Tour (Express)", so that rather cuts down on the workload there! No problems if you can't of course. Best, JG66 ( talk) 02:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Category:The Fireman (music), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
I just saw that you were expanding the article for GA, and saw that it needed the section. I might add to his other albums' articles if you plan on expanding those as well? Dan56 ( talk) 00:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For protecting the quality of our project by reverting so many unhelpful edits. Thanks for all you do around here! GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 21:24, 21 March 2013 (UTC) |
Nice one, thanks Yeepsi! JG66 ( talk) 14:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be interested in reviewing my GAN for Song of Innocence? It's been sitting around for a month, and I'd like to nominate it for FA when it passes. If not, no need to reply back. Dan56 ( talk) 06:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
I began the review at Talk:Instant Karma!/GA1, and there are a few points I'd like your thoughts on. Thanks for all your work on this and other music articles! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 14:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi, was just putting "You" up for GAN and noticed this. Thanks – as always. BTW, what's happened to your User page? (Not that it's any big deal of course.) Best, JG66 ( talk) 02:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Can't help but notice you undid my change to the Newton quote, despite the version you show being wrong - why so? You could check the page on Isaac Newton to see the reference for his original statement if you'd like. F./ Fizzackerly ( talk) 12:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand why you would undo all my track listings on A Day To Remember, it looked a lot better plus showed total length. Now it just looks like a mess. Nice going .... Dylarooo ( talk) 13:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Well alright then. I just see pretty much every other band having that and I personally think it looks nicer. Anyways good day. Dylarooo ( talk) 18:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Just letting you know that your talk page got signed by Sinebot. Seqqis ( talk) 15:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wedding Album, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbeat ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 01:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. Hope you're well. Thanks for the recent B ratings on new GH articles; it's great to know you're usually first-on-the-scene with Beatles-related articles, because that means there's an element of consistency over all new articles created. (You're dead right, for instance, that I Am Missing You only deserves a Start on the quality rating.) Can I tap into you for another point of consistency – on another thing that I think you're pretty clued up on? (Way more than me, that's for sure.) I'm in the middle of uploading images for some George song articles but I'm a bit worried that resolution might be a bit high, even though I've scanned at pretty low res and then exported from iPhoto as lowest-quality JPGs. Do you think these face labels are okay, not too large on the page ... World of Stone, Hari's on Tour (Express), I Don't Care Anymore (George Harrison song)? (Haven't always done the best job of minor touch-ups on the scans, you'll notice; eg, smudge effect on white surrounds, particularly top left in the World of Stone image.) I've also uploaded scans of US pic sleeves for " You" and " Isn't It a Pity" – I think they're okay though. Also, I thought I'd uploaded a better version of the Bangla Desh pic sleeve ... but it doesn't seem to have come across in the article. I'm all right with writing and editing articles; just completely useless with the image side of things! As always, no sweat if you're busy elsewhere, but any help/advice would be much appreciated. Thanks Yeepsi, JG66 ( talk) 05:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chowkatsun9? I am wondering whether you think all of the indicated accounts are from the same sockmaster, or did I include one too many? Thank you for your continued vigilance at music articles. Binksternet ( talk) 20:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. I was just checking on the GA noms page to see if anyone had picked up any of my nominated articles yet – alas, no, "Behind That Locked Door" continues to gather dust – but I saw you've got a few album GARs under way. Quick point I noticed with Mind Games: there's a 29 October 1973 release date in the article's infobox, but sources I have here give November (as, in fact, per the article's lead section currently). From books that are close to hand, Keith Badman's Beatles Diary Volume 2 gives 2 November for US release and 16 Nov in the UK; as does Castleman & Podrazik's All Together Now, an old, old book I tracked down, but one I trust implicitly. On the other hand, in Bruce Spizer's more recent The Beatles on Apple Records, 31 October (but not 29 October) is given for the US release date ... Perhaps you've got alternative info, but from what I can see, Apple issued Yoko's Feeling the Space, Ringo and Mind Games all on the same day in America, 2 Nov 1973. Just thought I'd raise it with you here, instead of complicating the GAR.
Also – and this is just my opinion – the Ram article seems very light on background/context for what was an extremely fraught (and intriguing) period in Mac's career. (It's sort of George's Dark Horse and Extra Texture periods rolled into one, I'd say.) I'm thinking of Paul's massive bust-up with George in New York in December 1970, John's vicious Rolling Stone interview that same month, Paul launching the suit to dissolve the Beatles partnership on 31 December and his appearance in court in Jan '71, Paul & Ringo attending Mick Jagger's wedding in St Tropez and ignoring each other. Also, the war of words between J & P in the UK press is touched on under "Feud" (I think I added the mention, actually, sometime last year), but it was under way all through 1971 following publication of the Lennon interview in January, and it fed directly into songs like "Too Many People". I don't want to interfere with the GAN – and, hey, perhaps I'm suggesting too much in the way of background details(!). But might be an idea to add these points (or some of them), do you think? Happy to help if you need it. Best, JG66 ( talk) 07:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
No, all fine for me – sounds weird, though. Careful with that axe (Eugene), when it comes to "taking your computer apart"! JG66 ( talk) 14:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:This guitar us.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McCartney (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Eastman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. I finally got around to taking a closer look at the Ram article, and I can't help thinking it needs a lot more work before it's approaching GA quality. It's not just the Feud section seeming out of place and those missing points about background we discussed. The structure seems out elsewhere – eg the rather inconsequential Content section (where text about "Ram On (reprise)" and the composite nature of "Uncle Albert" appears to belong in the previous Recording & Structure section, but mention of the music videos should go under Release, surely, as part of the album's promotion). Also, going by discussions in Madinger & Easter, Spizer and Sounes, pretty much all the basic tracks were taped at Columbia Studios in November and December 1970 – not January 1971, and not at A&R Studios. (Looking at Badman's book, he's inconsistent about this start date: under November 1970, he says sessions began that month and went through to December, but then he later gives January '71 as the start). According to those other books I mentioned, overdubs were carried out in NYC in January 1971, at Columbia and A&R; then, in March–April more work took place at Sound Recorders in LA. Apparently, "Dear Boy" was recorded in LA in its entirety. Sorry to have to say it, but the more I see of the article, the more I think it might be an idea to pull the nom. My thinking is that this is an important album and there's a lot missing regarding background and context on release; also, with so many music articles up for nomination, it seems a bit unproductive to be asking any potential reviewer to take on this GAN when s/he might be able to handle two other reviews where the articles are closer to meeting the standard. What do you think, yeepsi – pull the nom and then let's work on it pretty leisurely, but make sure the job gets done? Best, JG66 ( talk) 10:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low
to High
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biker Like an Icon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Look ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you care to comment here regarding an original research dispute at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy? Dan56 ( talk) 10:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe that the album should have it's own page. Millions of people use Wikipedia to find information on albums that they have or purchase, myself included. Yes the album is one of a billion other compilations, but for people seeking information on the album, it is perfect. Alex weiner ( talk) 20:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
To answer your question What was the point in that? about my c/e and your revert to Y Not ...
There are two (2) conventions that are generally followed with infoboxes in Wikipedia, which assist with maintainability of the articles:
Since the infobox in the Y Not article was already close to the second style, I edited it for consistency with that style. Truthanado ( talk) 15:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. WikiProject banners serve a variety of uses - the main one is to let folks know there is group of people who are interested in a topic, that they have drawn up guidelines on how to structure articles, that they will be able to offer advice on sources and deal with queries, etc. They also simply advertise the project, drawing in new members. WikiProject article assessment in general will usually be the same - though can at times differ. An album, for example, may be highly important to WikiProject Albums because it was the first stereo album, first coloured vinyl, etc; but less important to WikiProject The Beatles because it wasn't one of the band's more significant or popular albums. The WikiProject Council regards keeping WikiProject banners visible as quite important. See WP:WikiProject coordination. SilkTork ✔Tea time 23:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
It's very odd, because changes of this nature usually come with even a "Hey, doing this per Template:Infobox album#Chronology." would of saved you from being reverted. Mlpearc ( powwow) 01:34, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello yeepsi, I would like to know why Five By Five which is an (EP) by The Rolling Stones cannot be stated as such. Am I missing something? The other 2 EPs are followed by (EP) so what is different. I would like to know? ( Shelgold ( talk) 21:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC))
What ‘millions for the other albums’? As far as i know, there are very few alternate covers for ‘With the Beatles’ or other Beatles albums. In any case, this is a major alternate cover that is completely different from the standard cover and that was released in its stead in an entire market. The alternate should therefore be included in the article. Esszet ( talk) 23:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Pigs on the Wing - French promo single (320).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 09:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Made in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compilation ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Regarding "Eclipse"
the source reference that was ALREADY there where you removed my edit supports what I wrote.
"At the very end of “Eclipse,” in the right channel, there is the faint sound of a Muzak version of the Beatles’ “Ticket to Ride.” This was apparently playing in the background when they recorded the closing snippet of chatter. So far as we know, the Fab Four never demanded any royalties over this."
Since this closing snippet of conversation was the bit recorded with Gerry Driscoll at Abbey Roads. 2 + 2
Also Lennon was a fan of Muzak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.76.83 ( talk) 20:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I've begun the review for Flaming Pie, and it looks close to passing; just a few points I'd like your thoughts on. Thanks for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 17:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your contributions to bring Flaming Pie to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 22:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC) |
Best if you make your request on its talk page, that way other editors will know why it was failed/withdrawn. Best of luck on its future development. shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 23:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stop and Smell the Roses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WBEN ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Why did you remove the personnel section for this song? You did not leave any comments explaining it. Or at least I didn't see the comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.76.83 ( talk) 15:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey yeepsi. Thanks for the Bs on those two new Ringo song articles. (I enjoyed writing them as well – there's so little information to wade through, compared with a George song!) I noticed your comment about "You and Me (Babe)" being "a good song to boot", so I just wanted to say, have you listened to it through headphones? What struck me when writing the piece over the last day or two (with the song playing in me 'phones) was how amazing the whole arrangement is on the recording – it sort of flatters the actual composition, I think. In best George Martin/mid-period Beatles fashion, it's all in the details: the horns used in certain places, marimba arriving on the middle-eights, Ringo's overdubbed percussion (floor tom at the start, then extra hi-hats on the middle eight), George's beautiful jangly guitar fills, then the way his solo corresponds with the orchestral strings and horns, and best of all, the way the strings launch straight after Ringo's final line in the monologue ... Amazing – but perhaps none of this is news to you! JG66 ( talk) 10:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shine On You Crazy Diamond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LP ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
The article
Live Peace in Toronto 1969 you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Live Peace in Toronto 1969 for comments about the article. Well done!
Mdann52 (
talk)
13:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by A Day to Remember, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe King ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, I came here to thank you for the work you just did on Pure McCartney, and when I saw that you helped several articles reach GA status, I additionally want to add a small word of admiration. I'm currently working on trying to get a few articles about albums and musicians to reach that level as well. The highest I've gotten is B, so I'm definitely looking up to someone with 13 "tilted pluses". Wow! -- Eddyspeeder ( talk) 16:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Howdy- I wanted to let you know that I am taking on your GA nom for Memory Almost Full. I have done a few reviews already, although (admittedly), albums are a little out of my comfort zone. I still think I will be able to match up the criteria, and will look into it a little more to make sure it meets Focus and covers everything necessary. Thank you for the work you already put in. Sorry it took so long (around 3 months) for someone to review it. I should be able to start my review with initial thoughts later today. Have a good one. PrairieKid ( talk) 18:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated for merging lyrics and music categories here. Cheers. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 19:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Through this way, I inform there is a discussion about partially disambiguated titles, known as " PDABs". This subguide of WP:D was approved at VPP. I notify you about this because you has participated in at least one RM discussion in which PDAB is cited (in any form). You are welcome to give ideas about the future of this guideline at WT:D or to ignore this message. Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
Unfinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
19:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
You are really taking that numbered list thing out of context. The whole reason the templated track listing exist is because it looks better, and this track listing is complicated info. Koala15 ( talk) 16:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
But where is the rule that says we are not allowed to use templated track listings. Koala15 ( talk) 16:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
That does still does not make any sense, your argument is basically "because it looks better" too. Koala15 ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
It still does not say we aren't allowed to use templated track listings. Koala15 ( talk) 18:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Would it make sense to start a discussion on this to get other users opinions? Koala15 ( talk) 18:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Did you know ... that since you expressed an opinion on the GA/DYK proposal last year, we invite you to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the matter? Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Regards, Gilderien Chat| What I've done 23:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC) |
The article
Memory Almost Full you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Memory Almost Full for comments about the article. Well done! Thank you very much for the patience.
PrairieKid (
talk)
15:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
The article
Unfinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Unfinished Music No. 1: Two Virgins for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk)
18:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warped Tour 2013 Tour Compilation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your edit, I don't see how Floydian Slip qualifies as a fan site. It's a radio show that has been running for nearly 20 years and is aired on, by my count, 45 stations all over the world. But at least you didn't remove the info that I posted as well. So there's that. Dismas| (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
Unfinished Music No. 2: Life with the Lions you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
LazyBastardGuy --
LazyBastardGuy (
talk)
05:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
The article
Unfinished Music No. 2: Life with the Lions you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Unfinished Music No. 2: Life with the Lions for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
LazyBastardGuy --
LazyBastardGuy (
talk)
05:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Denney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardcore ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I edited the Oasis pages since I was listening to "Stop the clocks" album and read about the tracks while listening to them. In some pages, the link to the next/previous track wasn't available, so I decided to contribute and fix them.
Its a shame you just removed my work without even leaving me a comment about this, and only writing "Not needed". I thought you guys at wikipedia appreciate help. I guess I won't contribute to wikipedia ever again, its just a waste of time, some Yeepsi dude just comes and erases your whole work without even giving you a reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkL88 ( talk • contribs) 23:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Just a heads-up. I've reported him here. freshacconci talk to me 14:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit in "Stand By Me" by Oasis? -- Soren84 ( talk) 19:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Insulam Simia ( talk · contribs) 20:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, I need your help, genre need source for Gary Barlow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.179.205 ( talk) 10:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
How's going it, bud. I just want to suggest to you that next time, before nominating an article to be GA, you take another look through it to see if any cleanup needs to be done to it. I did that with an article you nominated, but great work expanding the article and good luck! 和DITOR E tails 03:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Why do you keep undoing the "Rock" tag from this album?It is NOT ONLY a "folk rock" album.Some of the tracks are ,some of the tracks aren't.Nothing is one-dimentional if we're talking about The Beatles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drummerkamil ( talk • contribs) 10:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beaucoups of Blues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fontana ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:ATMP 2001.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth ( talk) 18:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12 |
![]() |
The Return of Bruno (film) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
231 |
![]() |
The Point! ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
244 |
![]() |
Back in the U.S.S.R. ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
24 |
![]() |
Live at the Greek Theatre 2008 ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
33 |
![]() |
Born to Boogie ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |
164 |
![]() |
Minimoog ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Add sources | |||
519 |
![]() |
Peter Kay ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup | |||
302 |
![]() |
Love Me Do ( talk) |
![]() |
Cleanup | ||||
285 |
![]() |
Dawes (band) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleanup |
13 |
![]() |
Gips ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand |
11 |
![]() |
Soy Rebelde ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand | |
170 |
![]() |
Interiors ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expand | |
230 |
![]() |
Free as a Bird ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |||||
209 |
![]() |
Concert for George ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic | |
46 |
![]() |
Porque te vas ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Unencyclopaedic |
875 |
![]() |
Hallelujah ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge |
7,784 |
![]() |
Shooting of Trayvon Martin ( talk) | Merge | |||||
249 |
![]() |
Bridge (music) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Merge | ||
5 |
![]() |
The Rest ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify |
2,774 |
![]() |
Yoko Ono ( talk) | Wikify | |||||
47 |
![]() |
Trapped Under Ice (band) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wikify |
1 |
![]() |
Urbi Et Orbi (EP) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan |
24 |
![]() |
Im Tae Kyung ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | |
8 |
![]() |
Ahmadiyya in Bangladesh ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Orphan | ||
6 |
![]() |
Commonwealth (song) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
21 |
![]() |
Watching Rainbows ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | ||
5 |
![]() |
Get Back – Together ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
16 |
![]() |
Ringo (TV movie) ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub | |
2 |
![]() |
Zé Ramalho Canta Beatles ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
17 |
![]() |
Blindman ( talk) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Stub |
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lennon Bermuda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roy Young and Chewstick ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
It's no secret that Alternative Press just did a massive 3-page interview with Jeremy McKinnon about Common Courtesy. [1] But I was wondering if you were in the process of doing a wiki article for it in some sandbox? because I also have a printed source or two for you. (I think for the structure of the article if it were to a bibliography source like Death Is Birth it would help, GA articles do better with bibliography structure). But also I have a printed source and it's citation to give you. [1] Jonjonjohny ( talk) 07:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:A Day to Remember singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
18:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Homesick (A Day to Remember album) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Moswento --
Moswento (
talk)
08:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
What Separates Me from You you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ScoobyHugh --
ScoobyHugh (
talk)
21:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you for staying on top of Hjfcool's genre war in Nirvana singles. I've bumped him/her up to a level 4 user warning, so any further disruption should be met with submission to AIV. Thanks, and happy editing! DK qwerty 03:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
WHAT? Are you kidding me? -- Zack Tartufo ( talk) 18:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revrse my correction about peter brown?-- Inon ( talk) 00:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
The article
What Separates Me from You you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:What Separates Me from You for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ScoobyHugh --
ScoobyHugh (
talk)
07:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Ringo Starr filmography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
17:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
The article
What Separates Me from You you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:What Separates Me from You for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
ScoobyHugh --
ScoobyHugh (
talk)
12:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. It's been a while – hope you're doing well. Good luck with "Instant Karma!", by the way, I just noticed you'd nom'ed it a while back. Also hope you don't mind that I've just replaced the image in the second "My Sweet Lord" infobox, with a European pic sleeve (I figured there had to have been one available somewhere in the world). Reason is, I think those close-ups of face labels don't look so great. It's not so bad when it's from 12" vinyl, but when it's 7", with everything magnified ... I don't know, I just think it looks pretty terrible. Are you okay with that? I quite like the pic sleeve image, personally.
Oh, and sorry ... I know I said I'd help get Ram knocked into shape sometime soon. I will, I will! Best, JG66 ( talk) 05:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
for your work on ELO's song list S.G.(GH) ping! 14:49, 11 October 2013 (UTC) |
Category:A Day to Remember webisodes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The link to the book is for the benefit of other readers - it helps verify the information, and verifies it in context. As the book has been digitised, it is useful to link to the page. This saves a reader having to track down a physical copy. Such are the benefits of the digital age! I will restore the link (such links are standard). If you continue to feel that because you have a hardcopy, nobody else should be able to check the book online, then drop me a note on my talkpage so we can chat further. Peartork ( talk) 00:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
The article
Homesick (A Day to Remember album) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Homesick (A Day to Remember album) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Moswento --
Moswento (
talk)
13:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Driving Rain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tampura ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ringo 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Category:Jeremy McKinnon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
For Those Who Have Heart you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adabow --
Adabow (
talk)
20:41, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
And Their Name Was Treason you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Вик Ретлхед --
Вик Ретлхед (
talk)
00:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Wade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wonderwall ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
And Their Name Was Treason you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:And Their Name Was Treason for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Вик Ретлхед --
Вик Ретлхед (
talk)
01:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Greetings... this album was an "unofficial" release (actually a bootleg) by an independant record label and received great fanfare because of the 'historical nature" but I'm not certain it should be credited as the next album after "Rock N Roll Music" Hotcop2 ( talk) 13:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. If you get a chance, it would be great if you could take a look at three articles I've been working on over the last three weeks: Material World Charitable Foundation, Raga and In Concert 1972. The first two are lowly Starts right now (the horror!) – I'm hoping they might be due an upgrade? A couple more points to add to Raga (end notes) but it's pretty much there; bit more to come with In Concert. See what you think.
Btw, this should now free me up to go back to Dark Horse Records again and provide the long-promised text there. (Having said that, my travels via Material World CF, Ravi etc, have been steering me towards getting " It Is 'He' (Jai Sri Krishna)" up at GAN. Then " Try Some, Buy Some" came into the picture … I don't know, so much to do ...) As I say, would be fab if you could look at those three articles; my plan is to get Shankar Fam & Friends and Music Festival up to B as well. No rush, of course, I can see you're pretty busy as it is. Best, JG66 ( talk) 12:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 19:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Blue Sky Noise may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:51, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
For Those Who Have Heart you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:For Those Who Have Heart for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adabow --
Adabow (
talk)
21:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
For your contributions to bring And Their Name Was Treason to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work!-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC) |
Have you thought about bringing their newest album to GA status? It definitely has the potential to reach that level.-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The article
And Their Name Was Treason you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:And Their Name Was Treason for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Вик Ретлхед --
Вик Ретлхед (
talk)
07:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to the Egg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New wave, Yellow Submarine and Promotional video ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. Hey, you're on a roll – congrats on all the above!
Me, I've been a bit distracted … Would you be able to look in at User talk:Quadell#mirror images? Mighty strange situation, regarding a new Harrison biography. If you felt like hitting "helpful" on the Amazon review linked from there, that would be fab. I'd just like to ensure that the review is helpful/popular enough to register in the book listing's main space. Thanks, Yeepsi. Best, JG66 ( talk) 16:59, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
PS. You'll find my review on the Amazon page as "HariG", by the way. JG66 ( talk) 17:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi, thanks for the vote of confidence there! Added a few things under Composition today.
Just wanted to return to that issue of citation style … Are you really wedded to the idea of full pub details appearing in the first cite from each book, rather than having just a very brief cite in all cases (Blaney, p. …) followed by a separate Sources list? I can't help thinking it makes sense to go with the latter option. That way, it's so straightforward for readers – because rather than them having to search up in a list, not knowing where full details for "Blaney" might appear, they're diverted to a logical, alphabetical list. As a for-instance, just now I was rephrasing some of the article text and wanting to name the authors ("Urish; Bielen") who make the point about Lennon chiding his listeners; I looked for the full entry above, no joy, so I started looking for it later in the list, with the same result. Then I noticed that what I was searching for was actually in the cite immediately above the Urish; Bielen one – I'd completely missed it, probably because the multiple cites (a, b, c, d etc) indent the text, taking it out of the line of sight as one's running an eye up or down the surnames, along the left-hand of the list. What do you think? JG66 ( talk) 11:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey Yeepsi. I hope I haven't gone over the top with detail – the article's grown enormously ... I had been planning to cut a couple of things, but after reorganising Release section, I actually think it all works now. What do you think – okay as is? There's a couple of things I might try to rephrase and an end note to add, saying that some sources give JL on piano not elec piano; otherwise, it's pretty close to finished.
Just a note on those new charts peaks you've added. When I said, "I removed US Cashbox chart placing; b/c if that *is* included, then surely NME and MM charts for UK also, and Record Week in US?", what I meant was, Cash Box should not be added, imo, because otherwise there's a whole host of other charts that could be included (RW, MM, NME, and more). I'm sure I've read somewhere on an MoS page that only Billboard should be included for US (even though Cash Box was more influential for many years). I can't find the page now (typical!) – but maybe you know something about this that I don't. Do you think those extra UK and US chart peaks need including? It's not as if they offer anything new: they're exactly the same peaks in each case as on the main (UK national and Billboard) charts, so it's sort of bordering on the trivial. I should have a couple more international charts to add, but you know, I'd say delete RW etc. What do you think? JG66 ( talk) 11:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liverpool 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Instant Karma! you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
SilkTork --
SilkTork (
talk)
19:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Good call and good solution. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to the Egg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Category:Song recordings produced by Tom Denney, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho ( talk) 14:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This is regarding your reverts to my changes. A couple things:
I will not revert the article back to the changes I made, but I want to straighten this out. If you disagree with the point I made, please reply. TheSickBehemoth ( talk) 15:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Please stop reverting 86.168.205.226 without discussion. If you both continue to revert each other, you both could get blocked from editing. I will tell Yeepsi the same thing. Sportsguy17 ( Chat with me!) 23:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
It says: For though they may be parted "PAUL IS DEAD" / (You can't remove this from the song!) Böri ( talk) 07:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
No.1 editor |
Well done for all your GREAT editing. Jbow12 ( talk) 17:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
No.1 editor |
Well done for all your GREAT editing. Jbow12 ( talk) 17:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
No.1 editor |
Well done for all your GREAT editing. Jbow12 ( talk) 17:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Yeepsi, I want to first apologize for reverting your edits to " My Chemical Romance discography". I understand the need for uniformity among discography articles and I welcome your efforts to update this article. My revert of your edits was unwarranted as, in retrospect, I only have two minor objections that I would like to discuss with you:
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 01:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to finish the review, but my time available for Wikipedia has shortened considerably since I took on a batch of reviews, including Instant Karma!, last month. I'm hoping the time issue should resolve itself shortly; though I've been hoping that for a little while now, so it's fairer to put the review back in the pot. I'll clear the review page, though keep it watchlisted, and if I do find I have the spare time before someone else picks up the nomination, I'll be able to finish the review (hopefully before Christmas). Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
In a way, you're both right with regards to this. However, the information should be removed. This is not because the link isn't active any more, but because it is sourced to the Daily Mail, which should never be used as a source in a BLP. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Wouldn't the opening sentence read "Nirvana were" rather than "Nirvana was" because Nirvana is plural (referring to the bandmates)? teratogen ( talk) 17:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
there is no need for the cats on Redirect since cats on redirect duplicated on About You (Paul McCartney song) redirect which now exists. Please see Talk:About You. Cheers In ictu oculi ( talk) 00:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Yeepsi. Blimey, who's that guy above asking you to archive your own talk page?! What a nerve …
Hey, thanks for producing this, by the way. I see a certain user got involved there, weaving his usual pedantic madness – maybe the archive was best left buried after all! Best, JG66 ( talk) 12:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Selfish Machines you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MusikAnimal --
MusikAnimal (
talk)
17:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The article
Selfish Machines you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Selfish Machines for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MusikAnimal --
MusikAnimal (
talk)
02:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)