![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Hi, your page is appearing on the Wikipedia Style Guidelines category because of some of the embedded content. I don't know how to fix it!
wikitheo ( talk) 16:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
How did you get that user box where they drop down like that? Melbrooksfan101 ( talk) 11:09, 3 January 2008
...but you should go over and take a look at User:Melbrooksfan101's page. He/She doesn't have much coding experience so I doubt the user page will ever look good, but more importantly, your name is still all over his user and talk page. Not sure what to do about it, but I thought you should know. -- omtay 38 02:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I created this article today after running across a redlink. It still needs a lot, such as info on his growing up in Hawai'i and on his writing a children's novel, as well as screenplays and books for the musicals with which he's been involved. I saved some newspaper articles today that I found online; if you opt to work on the article, I certainly could send them. Lawikitejana ( talk) 10:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Please s<script type="text/javascript" src=" http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Omegatron/monobook.js/addlink.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>ee comments at Talk:Wicked_(musical)#Chicago_Template.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 00:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure out how to edit my left-hand menus. Is there a page anywhere that says how? — Music Maker 5376 19:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I'd be happy to help. Give me a list of what you want to be in your menu and i'll whittle out the code for you. I'll get in trouble if I post to your monobook (it's a big no-no) and you'll only know if it works anyway, but I sure can customize the code for you. -- omtay 38 20:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I had this:
// [[User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js]] document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js' + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>'); function shortcutsInit () { shortcutsStartSection ( 'Navigation Box' ); shortcutsAddLink ('My Desktop', 'User:MusicMaker5376/desk); shortcutsAddLink ('My Toolbox', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Tools'); shortcutsAddLink ('WikiProject Musical Theatre', 'Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre'); shortcutsAddLink ('Articles for Deletion', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Articles for deletion'); shortcutsAddLink ('Table Help', 'Help:Table'); }
Which didn't seem to work. — Music Maker 5376 20:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Tried the following on my own monobook (started from scratch). I didn't test twinkie, but popups and the sidebar worked.
// [[User:Lupin/popups.js]] document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Lupin/popups.js' + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>'); importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js'); // [[User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js]] document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js' + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>'); function shortcutsInit () { shortcutsStartSection ( 'Navigation Box' ); shortcutsAddLink ('My Desktop', 'User:MusicMaker5376/desk'); shortcutsAddLink ('My Toolbox', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Tools'); shortcutsAddLink ('WikiProject Musical Theatre', 'Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre'); shortcutsAddLink ('Articles for Deletion', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Articles for celetion'); shortcutsAddLink ('Help:Table', 'Help:Table'); }
-- omtay 38 21:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not allow the bot to re-tag the article for Wicked with the WPChi tag. I understand that, while the article is in
Category:Chicago musicals, the bot will tag the article. Several editors at the article object to this action. Editors shouldn't have to do anything to counteract the actions of a bot. It is the bot owner's responsibility to ensure that the bot edits along the lines of consensus. Consensus has shown that the article does not belong under that particular WikiProject's purview.
I've seen your responses to some of the editors at
Jon Corzine: basically, "Talk to the WikiProject and have them remove the category from the bot's run." The WikiProject can, in turn, say, "We want to tag the articles in this category; talk to the guy who runs the bot," passing the buck ad infinitum.
It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that the bot no longer tags either of these articles. I'm STUNNED that the WPChi tag is still on Corzine's article -- four months later! Strong objections to the tag have been raised at both articles.
I think the bot does a lot of good for the project, but if the bot can't edit with consensus, I'll have it blocked. —
Music
Maker
5376
02:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Go right ahead and enlighten me as to how The Drowsy Chaperone, Billy Bishop Goes to War, Anne of Green Gables - The Musical and Starmania can be in any way considered not essential topics within Category:Theatre in Canada. Bearcat ( talk) 06:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Good catch. Howzzat? Also, there is a bunch of redlinked stuff in his article under "major works". Is all of it "major"? Does the narrative in his article cover pretty much everything? I'm not a Schwartz person, but the article obviously needed attention, so I gave it some, but it seems to need more research - there are hardly any refs, and it seems to rely very heavily on Schwartz's own site or fan sites. But I bet there is quite a bit out there about his career so far. Oh well, there's only so much we can do, and I've got a big list of stuff I can't even get to. Best regards, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 04:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Over 75 percent of its population lives within the New York metropolitan area.
Good idea, I brought it up. Cheers! -- omtay 38 20:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Baker's Wife.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Done. Let me know if they come back, and I'll give them {{
uw-spam3}}
or {{
uw-spam4}}
.
Happy‑
melon
16:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Going back to theatres, this one's in for FAC. I think it's largely there, but I'd appreciate your comments. cheers. Kbthompson ( talk) 15:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, The Man Who Stepped into Yesterday, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man Who Stepped into Yesterday. Thank you. Mdsummermsw ( talk) 20:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Guys_and_dolls.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF ( talk) 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
On Jesus Christ Superstar, I made a good faith, non-vandal edit with a detailed edit summary, and you reverted it without an edit summary. I restored my edit, requesting an explanation in the edit summary, you reverted again without an edit summary. The way I see it, you are refusing to discuss and intentionally being arrogant (presumably you think that's OK because I'm an IP). I just wanted to make sure I interpret your position correctly before posting on the WP:ANI. -- 91.148.159.4 ( talk) 14:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Thought I'd better explain the reason for changing the flag on Cunningham. Dante has always had dual GB/US citizenship. It seems reasonable that if he's elected to play for the British national basketball team we should put the British flag there. He hasn't suddenly become British, he's always had this option. I can't think of a better way to decide a person's nationality than the country he plays for. Regards - Topcardi ( talk) 17:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Template:ProseTimeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 17:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
could you please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Les_Mis%C3%A9rables_%28musical%29#Why_deleted.3F_if_its_becouse_of_wrong_enlish.2C_please_make_it_good.2C_and_not_delete.3F about a change you have made undone?
Thanks for the message, but I have no idea what you mean. Could you please give me a step-by-step "how to" on what you want me to do? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 15:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
It's TAMS "Copyright 1966, 1969". If anyone has the most recent TAMS version it should list the various years that it was revised (the latest is 1994 i think). This is the first copyright version after it opened on Bway in 1968 and is the version for all the regional prods and the basis for international translations. I got it from a friend who is very close to the show. Can't get too specific .. just that I know a lot of people who were involved in the orig Bway run and other early regional prods and asked around, etc -- Mblaxill ( talk) 17:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Rereading my reponse to you, I think I did come off a little sarcastic and I didn't mean to. I appreciate your input in trying to clarify the need (or lack of need) for a name to describe a unique type of concept album. Because it is so unique, it's hard to find written sources but I will continue to look. It seems to me the value of a reference work like Wiki is to point out the similarities between related items. Anyway, thanks again for trying to keep me on the right path. Rarmin ( talk) 15:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Music Maker. I will try to keep with that policy for now on. The link was bad too on the earlier comment which was really the main reason why I wanted it gone. I don't like changing other people's comments (i.e. fix link) And I didn't want to have people confused by the bad link. Broadweighbabe ( talk) 16:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Somebody moved the article to Drood. Is that right? I'll rely on your article naming expertise. What a crazy couple of days here on Wikipedia. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 22:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
You da boss, but the guy that moved it is new to the article.
The guy that did the work on the article was User:ChrisStansfield, with help, of course, from Jean (Throw a party for Jean if you want to fete someone who is really in the trenches improving the whole project), me, you and a smattering of other folks.
So whether you want to undo the move should be purely up to your notion of what is the right way to do it, which I have never known you to be shy about expressing! :)
Cool. I had forgotten that it was discussed on the talk page, sorry! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, this is great, but let's wait until we finally get an article into FA to celebrate. It is about time that a project with almost 2,000 pages get a real FA. I don't count "Pageant", which sneaked in somehow - Sandy Georgia must have been sleepy that day. -- Ssilvers
Don't get me wrong: I like the article OK. I helped the Pageant guy with a lot of copy editing and pushed him to add references. Hell, I'll even take credit for it finally having a synopsis that wasn't a disjointed list of plot points. But I don't think that the article is a structural gem. -- Ssilvers
Plus, as I said before, Hair is an important musical, and it will be very, very helpful if we can get a major, well-known musical improved to the FA level to serve as a model. Here we have a great chance because Mblaxill is so cooperative and knowledgeable about it, you are knowledgeable, Maria is willing to help out, and, since the musical is fairly old, there is a good amount published on it, and we don't have to contend with too much fancruft. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 22:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the bull by the horn on referencing. I find it very tedious that the FA people concentrate on the formatting of references rather than on whether they are likely to be accurate as to the information cited. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
What do you think of the Hair "Media" section? Please take a look and see if you are satisfied with the organization and flow of the prose. Best regards, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 15:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Good - I think your cleanup/streamlining helped its readability quite a bit. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I saw your note in your edit summary re: the links in "History" to Rado and Ragni; typically interwiki links are used both when something/someone is mentioned in the lead and also when it first appears in the body of the article. Besides, Rado and Ragni are so intregal, they deserve to be linked twice! This article is looking great, btw. You guys are doing an awesome job. Will this be the first musical FA? María ( habla con migo) 18:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Mockingbirdfoundation.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast ( talk) 14:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I would like your opinion as to the debate going on here: [ [1]] at the Wiki Project Theatre. Smatprt ( talk) 01:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya Musicmaker. We're doing category cleanup, and your userpage was showing up as (among other things) a Wikipedia editing guide because you templated-in WP:WIAFA. I changed that and two other style guidelines to links instead of templates. Hope that's okay. - Dan Dank55 ( talk)( mistakes) 18:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Was the Red Bank photo taken in 2008? It made me smile when I realized that you share your name with a certain NYC opera producer. DYK that you are the first person "acknowledged" in the 40th reunion program? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 15:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The Red Bank production is featured prominently in the documentary that we got at the 40th aniv. reunion, showing some rehearsals from it, and scenes of the cast singing some of the songs while walking in, I think, Wash. Square Park. Can you add the 2006 date to the Image summary to clarify that, although the photo was uploaded in 2008, it was taken in 2006? BTW, the reunion was a surprisingly low key affair, just some singing along with the cast recording, a few nice welcoming/thanking speeches, including a good speech by Rado, who was in good spirits, and a plea by Ben Vereen for people to write to the Tony Awards folks to urge them to recognize O'Horgan for his work. O'Horgan got a big 84th birthday cake, but he didn't seem to be very mobile any more. He didn't speak at all. Broadwaygal got invited to sing into the microphone surrounded by lots of the orig. B'way cast members, who complimented her on her voice (she's got an awesome contemporary musicals sound and is thinking about doing her own cabaret this winter) and sorta got invited to play Sheila again. She was in "Be-In heaven". LOL. MB knew everyone and sang into the microphone too. He's got a really good rock sound - he has a band. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Good day MusicMaker5376. First, my apologies for disturbing anything at the Phish article with my recent edits. I was not aware that the particular words I attempted to correct had any nation-specific spelling. I do however, maintain a rather lengthily list of words that fall into such a category, and normally make every attempt possible to avoid changing them unless there is obvious reasons to do so. The specific words you've questioned, are not on my list... but I'll take your word for it nonetheless. My edit was in no way an attempt to vandalise or disrupt, in fact, I thought it was a rather productive contribution at the time. Have a nice day -- WikHead ( talk) 20:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Hi, your page is appearing on the Wikipedia Style Guidelines category because of some of the embedded content. I don't know how to fix it!
wikitheo ( talk) 16:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
How did you get that user box where they drop down like that? Melbrooksfan101 ( talk) 11:09, 3 January 2008
...but you should go over and take a look at User:Melbrooksfan101's page. He/She doesn't have much coding experience so I doubt the user page will ever look good, but more importantly, your name is still all over his user and talk page. Not sure what to do about it, but I thought you should know. -- omtay 38 02:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I created this article today after running across a redlink. It still needs a lot, such as info on his growing up in Hawai'i and on his writing a children's novel, as well as screenplays and books for the musicals with which he's been involved. I saved some newspaper articles today that I found online; if you opt to work on the article, I certainly could send them. Lawikitejana ( talk) 10:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Please s<script type="text/javascript" src=" http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Omegatron/monobook.js/addlink.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>ee comments at Talk:Wicked_(musical)#Chicago_Template.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTD) 00:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure out how to edit my left-hand menus. Is there a page anywhere that says how? — Music Maker 5376 19:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I'd be happy to help. Give me a list of what you want to be in your menu and i'll whittle out the code for you. I'll get in trouble if I post to your monobook (it's a big no-no) and you'll only know if it works anyway, but I sure can customize the code for you. -- omtay 38 20:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I had this:
// [[User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js]] document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js' + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>'); function shortcutsInit () { shortcutsStartSection ( 'Navigation Box' ); shortcutsAddLink ('My Desktop', 'User:MusicMaker5376/desk); shortcutsAddLink ('My Toolbox', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Tools'); shortcutsAddLink ('WikiProject Musical Theatre', 'Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre'); shortcutsAddLink ('Articles for Deletion', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Articles for deletion'); shortcutsAddLink ('Table Help', 'Help:Table'); }
Which didn't seem to work. — Music Maker 5376 20:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Tried the following on my own monobook (started from scratch). I didn't test twinkie, but popups and the sidebar worked.
// [[User:Lupin/popups.js]] document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Lupin/popups.js' + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>'); importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js'); // [[User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js]] document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Jsimlo/shortcuts.js' + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>'); function shortcutsInit () { shortcutsStartSection ( 'Navigation Box' ); shortcutsAddLink ('My Desktop', 'User:MusicMaker5376/desk'); shortcutsAddLink ('My Toolbox', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Tools'); shortcutsAddLink ('WikiProject Musical Theatre', 'Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre'); shortcutsAddLink ('Articles for Deletion', 'User:MusicMaker5376/Articles for celetion'); shortcutsAddLink ('Help:Table', 'Help:Table'); }
-- omtay 38 21:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not allow the bot to re-tag the article for Wicked with the WPChi tag. I understand that, while the article is in
Category:Chicago musicals, the bot will tag the article. Several editors at the article object to this action. Editors shouldn't have to do anything to counteract the actions of a bot. It is the bot owner's responsibility to ensure that the bot edits along the lines of consensus. Consensus has shown that the article does not belong under that particular WikiProject's purview.
I've seen your responses to some of the editors at
Jon Corzine: basically, "Talk to the WikiProject and have them remove the category from the bot's run." The WikiProject can, in turn, say, "We want to tag the articles in this category; talk to the guy who runs the bot," passing the buck ad infinitum.
It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that the bot no longer tags either of these articles. I'm STUNNED that the WPChi tag is still on Corzine's article -- four months later! Strong objections to the tag have been raised at both articles.
I think the bot does a lot of good for the project, but if the bot can't edit with consensus, I'll have it blocked. —
Music
Maker
5376
02:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Go right ahead and enlighten me as to how The Drowsy Chaperone, Billy Bishop Goes to War, Anne of Green Gables - The Musical and Starmania can be in any way considered not essential topics within Category:Theatre in Canada. Bearcat ( talk) 06:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Good catch. Howzzat? Also, there is a bunch of redlinked stuff in his article under "major works". Is all of it "major"? Does the narrative in his article cover pretty much everything? I'm not a Schwartz person, but the article obviously needed attention, so I gave it some, but it seems to need more research - there are hardly any refs, and it seems to rely very heavily on Schwartz's own site or fan sites. But I bet there is quite a bit out there about his career so far. Oh well, there's only so much we can do, and I've got a big list of stuff I can't even get to. Best regards, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 04:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Over 75 percent of its population lives within the New York metropolitan area.
Good idea, I brought it up. Cheers! -- omtay 38 20:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Baker's Wife.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Done. Let me know if they come back, and I'll give them {{
uw-spam3}}
or {{
uw-spam4}}
.
Happy‑
melon
16:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Going back to theatres, this one's in for FAC. I think it's largely there, but I'd appreciate your comments. cheers. Kbthompson ( talk) 15:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, The Man Who Stepped into Yesterday, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man Who Stepped into Yesterday. Thank you. Mdsummermsw ( talk) 20:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Guys_and_dolls.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF ( talk) 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
On Jesus Christ Superstar, I made a good faith, non-vandal edit with a detailed edit summary, and you reverted it without an edit summary. I restored my edit, requesting an explanation in the edit summary, you reverted again without an edit summary. The way I see it, you are refusing to discuss and intentionally being arrogant (presumably you think that's OK because I'm an IP). I just wanted to make sure I interpret your position correctly before posting on the WP:ANI. -- 91.148.159.4 ( talk) 14:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Thought I'd better explain the reason for changing the flag on Cunningham. Dante has always had dual GB/US citizenship. It seems reasonable that if he's elected to play for the British national basketball team we should put the British flag there. He hasn't suddenly become British, he's always had this option. I can't think of a better way to decide a person's nationality than the country he plays for. Regards - Topcardi ( talk) 17:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Template:ProseTimeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 17:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
could you please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Les_Mis%C3%A9rables_%28musical%29#Why_deleted.3F_if_its_becouse_of_wrong_enlish.2C_please_make_it_good.2C_and_not_delete.3F about a change you have made undone?
Thanks for the message, but I have no idea what you mean. Could you please give me a step-by-step "how to" on what you want me to do? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 15:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
It's TAMS "Copyright 1966, 1969". If anyone has the most recent TAMS version it should list the various years that it was revised (the latest is 1994 i think). This is the first copyright version after it opened on Bway in 1968 and is the version for all the regional prods and the basis for international translations. I got it from a friend who is very close to the show. Can't get too specific .. just that I know a lot of people who were involved in the orig Bway run and other early regional prods and asked around, etc -- Mblaxill ( talk) 17:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Rereading my reponse to you, I think I did come off a little sarcastic and I didn't mean to. I appreciate your input in trying to clarify the need (or lack of need) for a name to describe a unique type of concept album. Because it is so unique, it's hard to find written sources but I will continue to look. It seems to me the value of a reference work like Wiki is to point out the similarities between related items. Anyway, thanks again for trying to keep me on the right path. Rarmin ( talk) 15:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Music Maker. I will try to keep with that policy for now on. The link was bad too on the earlier comment which was really the main reason why I wanted it gone. I don't like changing other people's comments (i.e. fix link) And I didn't want to have people confused by the bad link. Broadweighbabe ( talk) 16:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Somebody moved the article to Drood. Is that right? I'll rely on your article naming expertise. What a crazy couple of days here on Wikipedia. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 22:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
You da boss, but the guy that moved it is new to the article.
The guy that did the work on the article was User:ChrisStansfield, with help, of course, from Jean (Throw a party for Jean if you want to fete someone who is really in the trenches improving the whole project), me, you and a smattering of other folks.
So whether you want to undo the move should be purely up to your notion of what is the right way to do it, which I have never known you to be shy about expressing! :)
Cool. I had forgotten that it was discussed on the talk page, sorry! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, this is great, but let's wait until we finally get an article into FA to celebrate. It is about time that a project with almost 2,000 pages get a real FA. I don't count "Pageant", which sneaked in somehow - Sandy Georgia must have been sleepy that day. -- Ssilvers
Don't get me wrong: I like the article OK. I helped the Pageant guy with a lot of copy editing and pushed him to add references. Hell, I'll even take credit for it finally having a synopsis that wasn't a disjointed list of plot points. But I don't think that the article is a structural gem. -- Ssilvers
Plus, as I said before, Hair is an important musical, and it will be very, very helpful if we can get a major, well-known musical improved to the FA level to serve as a model. Here we have a great chance because Mblaxill is so cooperative and knowledgeable about it, you are knowledgeable, Maria is willing to help out, and, since the musical is fairly old, there is a good amount published on it, and we don't have to contend with too much fancruft. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 22:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the bull by the horn on referencing. I find it very tedious that the FA people concentrate on the formatting of references rather than on whether they are likely to be accurate as to the information cited. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
What do you think of the Hair "Media" section? Please take a look and see if you are satisfied with the organization and flow of the prose. Best regards, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 15:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Good - I think your cleanup/streamlining helped its readability quite a bit. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I saw your note in your edit summary re: the links in "History" to Rado and Ragni; typically interwiki links are used both when something/someone is mentioned in the lead and also when it first appears in the body of the article. Besides, Rado and Ragni are so intregal, they deserve to be linked twice! This article is looking great, btw. You guys are doing an awesome job. Will this be the first musical FA? María ( habla con migo) 18:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I have tagged Image:Mockingbirdfoundation.jpg as {{ no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast ( talk) 14:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I would like your opinion as to the debate going on here: [ [1]] at the Wiki Project Theatre. Smatprt ( talk) 01:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya Musicmaker. We're doing category cleanup, and your userpage was showing up as (among other things) a Wikipedia editing guide because you templated-in WP:WIAFA. I changed that and two other style guidelines to links instead of templates. Hope that's okay. - Dan Dank55 ( talk)( mistakes) 18:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Was the Red Bank photo taken in 2008? It made me smile when I realized that you share your name with a certain NYC opera producer. DYK that you are the first person "acknowledged" in the 40th reunion program? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 15:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The Red Bank production is featured prominently in the documentary that we got at the 40th aniv. reunion, showing some rehearsals from it, and scenes of the cast singing some of the songs while walking in, I think, Wash. Square Park. Can you add the 2006 date to the Image summary to clarify that, although the photo was uploaded in 2008, it was taken in 2006? BTW, the reunion was a surprisingly low key affair, just some singing along with the cast recording, a few nice welcoming/thanking speeches, including a good speech by Rado, who was in good spirits, and a plea by Ben Vereen for people to write to the Tony Awards folks to urge them to recognize O'Horgan for his work. O'Horgan got a big 84th birthday cake, but he didn't seem to be very mobile any more. He didn't speak at all. Broadwaygal got invited to sing into the microphone surrounded by lots of the orig. B'way cast members, who complimented her on her voice (she's got an awesome contemporary musicals sound and is thinking about doing her own cabaret this winter) and sorta got invited to play Sheila again. She was in "Be-In heaven". LOL. MB knew everyone and sang into the microphone too. He's got a really good rock sound - he has a band. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Good day MusicMaker5376. First, my apologies for disturbing anything at the Phish article with my recent edits. I was not aware that the particular words I attempted to correct had any nation-specific spelling. I do however, maintain a rather lengthily list of words that fall into such a category, and normally make every attempt possible to avoid changing them unless there is obvious reasons to do so. The specific words you've questioned, are not on my list... but I'll take your word for it nonetheless. My edit was in no way an attempt to vandalise or disrupt, in fact, I thought it was a rather productive contribution at the time. Have a nice day -- WikHead ( talk) 20:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)