![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
On these NRHP articles National Register of Historic Places listings in Houghton County, Michigan, National Register of Historic Places listings in Keweenaw County, Michigan, and National Register of Historic Places listings in Marquette County, Michigan, there is a link to Commons in the External links section. Could you reprogram BotMultichill to avoid edits like this? Chris857 ( talk) 19:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Multichill. The ErfgoedBot you are running to support the U.S. WLM campaign is working great, in conjunction with all the rest that you set up. I am really glad you got involved in improving the U.S. NRHP list system over the last year or two. It's really paying off now!
I wonder if, when you have time, you could comment at Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 49#bot to bring photos from NRHP list-articles to individual NRHP place articles. I put in a bot request there a couple days ago, not seeing similarity to your ErfgoedBot. It is not an urgent request, is probably something to address after the WLM campaign is over, but your making a brief comment there would be appreciated. Thanks, -- do ncr am 12:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Multichill ... I've come across a disconcerting error in the refnums generated by the BotMultichillT bot. So far, I've found errors in the following New Hampshire county lists: Rockingham, Belknap, Cheshire and Sullivan. I stumbled upon it while I was editing the Cheshire County table when I happened to notice that several refnums were duplicated in that list. This prompted me to check the other New Hampshire lists. Only the aforementioned 4 lists had these errors. The other 5 New Hampshire lists don't have duplicates, but I didn't check each and every listing to confirm that it had the correct refnum. I only looked for duplicates. I spot-checked several Michigan lists since they were modified by BotMultichillT immediately after the New Hampshire lists and didn't find any duplicates in the 4 or 5 that I checked. But I did find another duplicate in the Gallatin County, Montana list. Aside from the fact that our tables have inaccurate information, I'm concerned about the functionality of the tools you've developed for keeping track of which sites have images on Commons. They rely on the refnums, don't they?
If you want to research this problem, you can see the edits that I made this evening to the refnums in the above-mentioned lists. Do you know if there's something unusual about the New Hampshire listings that led to this error? Do you think it's likely that other lists have this same problem? How wide-spread might it be? Is there a way to fix it with a bot? -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 05:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
On Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Unused images, Erfgoedbot keeps readding images that have already been used ( File:Paris Post Idaho.jpeg, File:Church Street Historic District.jpg) or are not buildings ( File:Sunnyside.jpg). Is there any way to stop the bot from stuffing them into the category? Thundersnow 07:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
SarahStierch ( talk) 16:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
ErfgoedBot did not run last night/this morning. Did we break it? Thundersnow 18:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
What about using this template for User:Multichill/Free uploads? This this, files that have been moved to Commons will automatically disappear from the gallery. You may have a look at an example at User:Leyo/Swiss. -- Leyo 16:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
algo = old(7d)
. :-)Is it possible to update this list? It would be more helpful to not have it polluted with files moved to Commons and part of gallery links is red Bulwersator ( talk) 18:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello-
Thank you again for participating in my study of bots and bot operators earlier this year. I wanted to let you know that the completed dissertation is now available on my website. I look forward to any comments you may have, either on the blog or via email.
I felt like I just scratched the surface of the world of bots on WP with this project, so I plan to continue chatting with the bot community once I get through the IRB approval at my new institution (and check with the WMF Research Committee, of course!). Along those lines, if you know of any other members of the bot and semi-automated tool community who may be interested in participating, please do forward my name and email to them. And if you'd like to chat more about this stuff, please let me know!
To possibly save you some time: The manuscript is a bit long (~320 pages) and includes some pro forma dissertation stuff (literature review, methods chapter, etc.). Most data collected from interviews appears in Chapters 5 and 6 (if you want to skip to the good stuff).
Again, thank you so much for your help with this project, and I look forward to seeing you on WP and IRC...
Randall Livingstone UOJComm ( talk) 00:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
I have started tagging images on Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum and have two questions:
Thanks in advance. Thundersnow 03:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Someone reverted National Register of Historic Places listings in Worcester, Massachusetts so that it no longer uses {{ NRHP header}} and {{ NRHP row}}. As a result, none of the entries include the "upload" button included by {{ NRHP row}}. Can you have the bot re-convert this page? It'll be a lot easier and faster than if I try to do it by hand :-) —Tim Pierce ( talk) 12:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
On these NRHP articles National Register of Historic Places listings in Houghton County, Michigan, National Register of Historic Places listings in Keweenaw County, Michigan, and National Register of Historic Places listings in Marquette County, Michigan, there is a link to Commons in the External links section. Could you reprogram BotMultichill to avoid edits like this? Chris857 ( talk) 19:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Multichill. The ErfgoedBot you are running to support the U.S. WLM campaign is working great, in conjunction with all the rest that you set up. I am really glad you got involved in improving the U.S. NRHP list system over the last year or two. It's really paying off now!
I wonder if, when you have time, you could comment at Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 49#bot to bring photos from NRHP list-articles to individual NRHP place articles. I put in a bot request there a couple days ago, not seeing similarity to your ErfgoedBot. It is not an urgent request, is probably something to address after the WLM campaign is over, but your making a brief comment there would be appreciated. Thanks, -- do ncr am 12:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Multichill ... I've come across a disconcerting error in the refnums generated by the BotMultichillT bot. So far, I've found errors in the following New Hampshire county lists: Rockingham, Belknap, Cheshire and Sullivan. I stumbled upon it while I was editing the Cheshire County table when I happened to notice that several refnums were duplicated in that list. This prompted me to check the other New Hampshire lists. Only the aforementioned 4 lists had these errors. The other 5 New Hampshire lists don't have duplicates, but I didn't check each and every listing to confirm that it had the correct refnum. I only looked for duplicates. I spot-checked several Michigan lists since they were modified by BotMultichillT immediately after the New Hampshire lists and didn't find any duplicates in the 4 or 5 that I checked. But I did find another duplicate in the Gallatin County, Montana list. Aside from the fact that our tables have inaccurate information, I'm concerned about the functionality of the tools you've developed for keeping track of which sites have images on Commons. They rely on the refnums, don't they?
If you want to research this problem, you can see the edits that I made this evening to the refnums in the above-mentioned lists. Do you know if there's something unusual about the New Hampshire listings that led to this error? Do you think it's likely that other lists have this same problem? How wide-spread might it be? Is there a way to fix it with a bot? -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 05:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
On Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Unused images, Erfgoedbot keeps readding images that have already been used ( File:Paris Post Idaho.jpeg, File:Church Street Historic District.jpg) or are not buildings ( File:Sunnyside.jpg). Is there any way to stop the bot from stuffing them into the category? Thundersnow 07:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
SarahStierch ( talk) 16:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
ErfgoedBot did not run last night/this morning. Did we break it? Thundersnow 18:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
What about using this template for User:Multichill/Free uploads? This this, files that have been moved to Commons will automatically disappear from the gallery. You may have a look at an example at User:Leyo/Swiss. -- Leyo 16:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
algo = old(7d)
. :-)Is it possible to update this list? It would be more helpful to not have it polluted with files moved to Commons and part of gallery links is red Bulwersator ( talk) 18:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello-
Thank you again for participating in my study of bots and bot operators earlier this year. I wanted to let you know that the completed dissertation is now available on my website. I look forward to any comments you may have, either on the blog or via email.
I felt like I just scratched the surface of the world of bots on WP with this project, so I plan to continue chatting with the bot community once I get through the IRB approval at my new institution (and check with the WMF Research Committee, of course!). Along those lines, if you know of any other members of the bot and semi-automated tool community who may be interested in participating, please do forward my name and email to them. And if you'd like to chat more about this stuff, please let me know!
To possibly save you some time: The manuscript is a bit long (~320 pages) and includes some pro forma dissertation stuff (literature review, methods chapter, etc.). Most data collected from interviews appears in Chapters 5 and 6 (if you want to skip to the good stuff).
Again, thank you so much for your help with this project, and I look forward to seeing you on WP and IRC...
Randall Livingstone UOJComm ( talk) 00:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
I have started tagging images on Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum and have two questions:
Thanks in advance. Thundersnow 03:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Someone reverted National Register of Historic Places listings in Worcester, Massachusetts so that it no longer uses {{ NRHP header}} and {{ NRHP row}}. As a result, none of the entries include the "upload" button included by {{ NRHP row}}. Can you have the bot re-convert this page? It'll be a lot easier and faster than if I try to do it by hand :-) —Tim Pierce ( talk) 12:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)