Hello, Mukhtiarkhokhar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{ edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DMacks ( talk) 05:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anwar Khokhar, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks ( talk) 06:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I am unable to understand, this is biography a person with whom i am more relevant since I am his family member. Mukhtiarkhokhar ( talk) 07:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Nobody really knows who anybody is here. Instead, Wikipedia has a policy that all content must be based on published reliable sources. Personal knowlege is not sufficient. And Wikipedia has a policy of taking a neutral tone and without bias, not writing promotional content, trying to polish an image, or memorialize someone's memory. It's nearly impossible to write that way when the topic is something personal to oneself. These policies apply to every editor, regardless of who they are, writing about any topic, no matter what it is. DMacks ( talk) 09:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Nothing is written extra, nor any promotional stance there, all reliable links are given at the bottom of the page can be verified easily. Thanks; Mukhtiarkhokhar ( talk) 10:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

No, that is incorrect. Drmies ( talk) 15:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

First of all who is there are you from Wikipedia or any user, secondly what specifically was issue with my writeup on Anwar Khokhar, have given all supporting links, but you converted to incomplete information. Why Mukhtiarkhokhar ( talk) 16:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I don't understand what you are saying--the grammar is really confused. You were told what the "issue" was: non-neutral writing. Your writing was not neutral--it was in fact the farthest thing from neutral. No, the "supporting links" were not given--a URL to a really short and unclear article was shoved inside a section heading, and that "article", if we can call it that, did not verify the information you put in the article. Drmies ( talk) 22:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anwar Khokhar. There is a demonstrated conflict of interest and lack of neutral point-of-view in the article text. Wracking  ^talk! 15:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply