![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Hey there, I thought (because of your participation in the conversation here) that you would like to know that I coded a bot to mark CSDed AFDed and PRODed new-pages as patrolled. See the bot's discussion for approval here. I would appreciate your comment. NOTE: I am not trying to canvas you, I just wanted some input. Tim1357 ( talk) 02:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the deletion of those pages a moment ago, I was unsure of what template to use at first. Erwin Springer [ talk] 01:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Back in 2008 you put one of these stupid tags on the Jamboree 2008 (Ireland) page. Frankly if you have time to go around adding these tags, you have the time to go and do some refs like I did. It took me about five minutes all up and it would take even the most anally fixated intellectually challenged admin about the same time. Nobody with a life takes much notice of such tags so why bother?
I would concede that the article which has obviously been mainly compiled by a scouting enthusiast needs a tidy by an experienced editor with some knowledge of the topic (ie. not me) but adding a ref or two is easy and can be done by anyone including yourself. Silent Billy ( talk) 02:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
you're no fun ;) wanted a bit of birthday fun, i would have removed it myself on the 12th. take care. leigh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldastey ( talk • contribs) 22:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
As it has become painfully obvious, my contributions are no longer welcome or needed here. In light of this situation, I am leaving this screwed up bureaucracy for the conceivable future. Good luck, my friend and keep fighting the good fight. ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM Wuh Wuz Dat 02:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I see this user with IP 12.239.87.132 always blanking random pages in the dates of the years pages, the first case I found is february 11 - Holiday and Observances. It seems that you are having a war with him trying to revert the page again and again? I will revert the holiday and observance page back again. Can you deal with this user please? because I have no idea how to report a vandalism... tell me if you replied my comment please -- Rochelimit ( talk) 21:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
-- Delaywire ( talk) 20:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)A CERTAIN BAND PAGE THAT WAS CREATED WAS DELETED BY YOU ( REASON - U DIDN'T SEE THE IMPORTANCE THEN, WHICH IS JUSTIFIED ).. AND NOW, SINCE THE BAND IS SLOWLY GAINING MOMENTUM AND ALL SET TO RELEASE THEIR DEBUT ALBUM THIS YEAR WE WISH TO UPDATE HERE FOR THE GROWING FANS. THEY HAVE BEEN HEADLINING MUSIC FEST ( THAT ARE ENTERED IN HERE ). I AM CONSULTING YOU, BEFORE ENTERING THE DETAILS OF THE BAND AGAIN.
DOUBT :- WHEN ACCORDING TO YOU A BAND/ MUSICIAN/ ARTIST CAN ENTER ITS DETAILS DURING THE JOURNEY ?. THANKS.
````Hi Mufka,We is Band plus the management.Name of the Band is LOW RHYDERZ. And I am not yelling at u - delaywire( LOW RHYDERZ ). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Delaywire ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Delaywire ( talk) 15:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Thanks for the update and time. Much appreciated. After reading the links that were suggested by you, I have understood that WP needs solid links which supports the article content. LOW RHYDERZ were on Rolling Stone ( India ) magazine in NOV 2009. And unfortunately, there is no online version of the same available. Hence how to prove the fact?( A picture of the page can b provided ). However, I got the following links ( is this good enough ? ):- 1) LOW RHYDERZ on NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC website http://photography.nationalgeographic.com/photography/photo-of-the-day/bangalore-hip-hop/ 2) LOW RHYDERZ on Deccan Chronicle http://www.deccanchronicle.com/node/94729/print
Delaywire ( talk) 01:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)ok.. Cool... I shall wait for the Band to meet any of the above mentioned requirements to enter WP. thanks.. Bless up !
Ifore2010 wrote "u cunt" on my userpage because I reversed his edit on recent deaths but I'm not sure what you're meant to say to warn them; however I'm glad to see he has anyhow been blocked. Eugene-elgato ( talk) 13:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka,
Thanks for fixing this. But Evangelisch-reformierte Kirche was supposed to be deleted to redirect from Evangelical Reformed Church to there. Contributors felt that the name "Evangelical Church" is not an adequate translation and not used widely in the English speaking world. See the RfC [[talk:Talk:Evangelische_Kirche_in_Deutschland]]. Mootros ( talk) 12:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Good day, I just logged on this morning, less than 24 hours after I created the entry of the album "STill Holing On" and it was deleted already before I could follow the instructions to request a hold on it. The album exists, I have it, and it should be included due to it being significant to Michael Bormann's career starting as well as for the start of the career for Jurgen Richard Blackmore, son of Ritchie Blackmore. Why wasn't I given a chance to respond? Thanks. Bonfire34 ( talk) 14:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Johnson passed WP:MUSIC, and this article was not eligible for A7 deletion. Please have a second look. Chubbles ( talk) 13:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Yesterday you speedy-deleted and salted the page iHlebis because it was the second time the exact same article has been recreated after being AfD'd. That was a wise decision, but you may need to go further and user-block the creator, User:Hlebz. He just created the exact same page again, this time calling it Hlebis. Someone has nominated it for speedy deletion but apparently they didn't realize it was a third recreation of an AfD'd page. Besides the constant recreation of this page, all the information in it is demonstrably fraudulent, as proven at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IHlebis. The user is actually a 13-year-old middle school student in Canada, inventing a persona for himself. His blog is called Hlebis; his real name appears to be (bleep! I guess I shouldn't post his real name here, but he's posted it all over the internet.) He seems to have some kind of obsession with iJustine; he claims to be married to her, and his article is copied from hers even though it doesn't apply to him at all. The infobox claims he was born in 1980 but the categories indicate he was born in 1996, which is confirmed by his blog and by photos of him posted there [1]. He is clearly trying to make a mockery of Wikipedia and I propose him for a user block. Thanks for looking into this. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Mufka :D -- Rochelimit ( talk) 03:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
hello mufka, you recently deleted my page because it did not show significance. i apologize for this as i accidently saved the page, but just wanted to save my progress. i am still editing the page. can you please help me re-open the page so i can finish working on it? thanks and sorry for the inconvenience.
Robbrowning ( talk) 03:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)robbrowning
thanks for your suggestions. i am working on it and it should be ready in about an hour. also, how do you add photos to the article? thanks for the help again. Robbrowning ( talk) 04:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)robbrowning
Hey there! I actually meant to speedy my user talk archives, not my user talk page. But thanks for helping :) MJ94 ( talk) 23:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka. What's the next step for the deletion of Urethra_gauge? Thanks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Urethra_gauge peterl ( talk) 22:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka, I don't think you should remove Administrative Professional Day. It was listed in April 19 in the sentence "the earliest possible date". If you remove Administrative Professional Day, that means you have to remove other observances e.g. 'earliest day for Easter Sunday' on March 22, written long before my cleanup, and also the Hindi New Year in April 14 and the quartet of vernal equinox, summer solstice, autumn equinox, and winter solstice on the dates of equinoxes/solstices.
I personally think it is okay to put "earliest possible date", because even though they don't have a fixed date, they do have a fixed period. There are many important observances listed as "second Monday" or "first Thursday of November" or "friday preceding wednesday ash" which I think is unfair for this days not to be listed in the observances.
But I do aware that some observances are impossible to include in the Observances Section because they are constantly moving (not static in date OR in period), e.g. Jewish and Islamic observances which constantly moving backward. That's why I won't include these observances.
So eventhough APDay has a nonstatic date, it has a static period, therefore I think it is okay to include in the Observance Section.
What do you think? -- Rochelimit ( talk) 15:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Valleyside show came back with a fairly ambiguous result. You've been looking at this situation longer than me, and I'd like your input.— Kww( talk) 05:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
As interactions with Busty Heart have shifted to OTRS ticket 2010042010001452 handled by JzG, I've taken the liberty of removing your attempts to communicate with her on her talk page and replacing them with a single standard welcome message.
This doesn't reflect on your good faith actions, but was done by me in an effort to smooth further communications with a person whose biography is featured in our encyclopedia. I hope you understand and agree that this is the best way to move forward. Tasty monster (= TS ) 20:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka. My fingers are bleeding about now undoing 205.174.22.77's spam. You wouldn't know if there is a bot that does such a thing automatically, do you? Save me wearing out my keyboard too... :p Best wishes. -- Haruth ( talk) 15:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for that. He has been a little, shall we say, uncommunicative for quite a while. What he did was change the criteria for inclusion in that category, then remove about a hundred articles from that category to fit his new criteria. Basically a driver is included in that category if he's American and took part (at least once) in a Formula One race. That includes the Indy 500, but only during the 1950s, when it was part of the World Drivers Championship. It's a slightly technical point, but it was clear in the category inclusion criteria before he changed it. We'll have a discussion at the Wikiproject, and probably revert him back if the consensus dictates, or take the opportunity to clarify it further. It was just the blatant refusal to communicate that was irritating. Thanks again, Bretonbanquet ( talk) 23:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Where was this made a guideline? YellowMonkey ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I am attempting to get an entry in the site for this concept. What validation do you require to ensure that this is a real concept and may be presented? Thanks! greg@jacobsracing.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobsracing ( talk • contribs) 20:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
tag on your talk page at
User talk:Jacobsracing and ask for input to see if it meets requirements. Not to pile things on, but you should change your username because it doesn't comply with our
username policy. If you don't do it voluntarily, you will be forced to. You can go to
WP:CHU/S to do that. -- Mufka
(u)
(t)
(c)
20:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Dear Mufka, there is a new day on September 30 called Blasphemy day (I know these American days are getting more and more uncontrollably "free"). I'm planning to keep it on September 30 (sort out, regular clean up), but maybe you can give your own comment on the talkpage of the article since you are more experienced. What do you think? I have the feeling that it will be another war on freedom of expression thing around September 30.-- Rochelimit ( talk) 20:45, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Seriously? The pages that I create in my userspace are my own business. And I didn't request deletion. I have a bunch or articles that might never meet notability, but that doesn't mean the they should be deleted. My userspace, my pages, my business. qö₮$@37 ( talk) 17:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have just noticed that the three Judy Roberts albums that I created have been deleted on the basis of being 'non-notable music by artist for which no wikipedia article has been created'. I was planning to create an article for the artist, but didnt realise that this was a prerequisite for creating an article about their albums. Both the artist and their albums are reviewed on Allmusic and I was under the impression that this makes them sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. If I create an article for the artist, can the album articles be re-instated? Thanks. Nostalgic34 ( talk)
So if I do create an article for this artist and for Fourth World, will the 4 album articles be re-instated, or will I have to do them all from scratch? Nostalgic34 ( talk)
Thank you that's great Mufka, I will work on them a bit more and do artist articles for both of them. The fourth one was Nights in Brazil, but I see that is already userified. Thanks. Nostalgic34 ( talk)
Why delete PaudoBode article? I know it's far from complete but I was expecting people to give some contributions.. I Guess It's not worth it to do one about PauDaCeleste... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.136.166.125 ( talk) 22:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka, I was just wondering if you could provide me the rationale for your deletion of that article? (If you speak Czech, that would, of course, make sense.) Just trying to understand the speedy better. Zelse81 ( talk) 21:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Hey there, I thought (because of your participation in the conversation here) that you would like to know that I coded a bot to mark CSDed AFDed and PRODed new-pages as patrolled. See the bot's discussion for approval here. I would appreciate your comment. NOTE: I am not trying to canvas you, I just wanted some input. Tim1357 ( talk) 02:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the deletion of those pages a moment ago, I was unsure of what template to use at first. Erwin Springer [ talk] 01:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Back in 2008 you put one of these stupid tags on the Jamboree 2008 (Ireland) page. Frankly if you have time to go around adding these tags, you have the time to go and do some refs like I did. It took me about five minutes all up and it would take even the most anally fixated intellectually challenged admin about the same time. Nobody with a life takes much notice of such tags so why bother?
I would concede that the article which has obviously been mainly compiled by a scouting enthusiast needs a tidy by an experienced editor with some knowledge of the topic (ie. not me) but adding a ref or two is easy and can be done by anyone including yourself. Silent Billy ( talk) 02:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
you're no fun ;) wanted a bit of birthday fun, i would have removed it myself on the 12th. take care. leigh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldastey ( talk • contribs) 22:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
As it has become painfully obvious, my contributions are no longer welcome or needed here. In light of this situation, I am leaving this screwed up bureaucracy for the conceivable future. Good luck, my friend and keep fighting the good fight. ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM Wuh Wuz Dat 02:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I see this user with IP 12.239.87.132 always blanking random pages in the dates of the years pages, the first case I found is february 11 - Holiday and Observances. It seems that you are having a war with him trying to revert the page again and again? I will revert the holiday and observance page back again. Can you deal with this user please? because I have no idea how to report a vandalism... tell me if you replied my comment please -- Rochelimit ( talk) 21:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
-- Delaywire ( talk) 20:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)A CERTAIN BAND PAGE THAT WAS CREATED WAS DELETED BY YOU ( REASON - U DIDN'T SEE THE IMPORTANCE THEN, WHICH IS JUSTIFIED ).. AND NOW, SINCE THE BAND IS SLOWLY GAINING MOMENTUM AND ALL SET TO RELEASE THEIR DEBUT ALBUM THIS YEAR WE WISH TO UPDATE HERE FOR THE GROWING FANS. THEY HAVE BEEN HEADLINING MUSIC FEST ( THAT ARE ENTERED IN HERE ). I AM CONSULTING YOU, BEFORE ENTERING THE DETAILS OF THE BAND AGAIN.
DOUBT :- WHEN ACCORDING TO YOU A BAND/ MUSICIAN/ ARTIST CAN ENTER ITS DETAILS DURING THE JOURNEY ?. THANKS.
````Hi Mufka,We is Band plus the management.Name of the Band is LOW RHYDERZ. And I am not yelling at u - delaywire( LOW RHYDERZ ). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Delaywire ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Delaywire ( talk) 15:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Thanks for the update and time. Much appreciated. After reading the links that were suggested by you, I have understood that WP needs solid links which supports the article content. LOW RHYDERZ were on Rolling Stone ( India ) magazine in NOV 2009. And unfortunately, there is no online version of the same available. Hence how to prove the fact?( A picture of the page can b provided ). However, I got the following links ( is this good enough ? ):- 1) LOW RHYDERZ on NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC website http://photography.nationalgeographic.com/photography/photo-of-the-day/bangalore-hip-hop/ 2) LOW RHYDERZ on Deccan Chronicle http://www.deccanchronicle.com/node/94729/print
Delaywire ( talk) 01:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)ok.. Cool... I shall wait for the Band to meet any of the above mentioned requirements to enter WP. thanks.. Bless up !
Ifore2010 wrote "u cunt" on my userpage because I reversed his edit on recent deaths but I'm not sure what you're meant to say to warn them; however I'm glad to see he has anyhow been blocked. Eugene-elgato ( talk) 13:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka,
Thanks for fixing this. But Evangelisch-reformierte Kirche was supposed to be deleted to redirect from Evangelical Reformed Church to there. Contributors felt that the name "Evangelical Church" is not an adequate translation and not used widely in the English speaking world. See the RfC [[talk:Talk:Evangelische_Kirche_in_Deutschland]]. Mootros ( talk) 12:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Good day, I just logged on this morning, less than 24 hours after I created the entry of the album "STill Holing On" and it was deleted already before I could follow the instructions to request a hold on it. The album exists, I have it, and it should be included due to it being significant to Michael Bormann's career starting as well as for the start of the career for Jurgen Richard Blackmore, son of Ritchie Blackmore. Why wasn't I given a chance to respond? Thanks. Bonfire34 ( talk) 14:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Johnson passed WP:MUSIC, and this article was not eligible for A7 deletion. Please have a second look. Chubbles ( talk) 13:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Yesterday you speedy-deleted and salted the page iHlebis because it was the second time the exact same article has been recreated after being AfD'd. That was a wise decision, but you may need to go further and user-block the creator, User:Hlebz. He just created the exact same page again, this time calling it Hlebis. Someone has nominated it for speedy deletion but apparently they didn't realize it was a third recreation of an AfD'd page. Besides the constant recreation of this page, all the information in it is demonstrably fraudulent, as proven at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IHlebis. The user is actually a 13-year-old middle school student in Canada, inventing a persona for himself. His blog is called Hlebis; his real name appears to be (bleep! I guess I shouldn't post his real name here, but he's posted it all over the internet.) He seems to have some kind of obsession with iJustine; he claims to be married to her, and his article is copied from hers even though it doesn't apply to him at all. The infobox claims he was born in 1980 but the categories indicate he was born in 1996, which is confirmed by his blog and by photos of him posted there [1]. He is clearly trying to make a mockery of Wikipedia and I propose him for a user block. Thanks for looking into this. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Mufka :D -- Rochelimit ( talk) 03:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
hello mufka, you recently deleted my page because it did not show significance. i apologize for this as i accidently saved the page, but just wanted to save my progress. i am still editing the page. can you please help me re-open the page so i can finish working on it? thanks and sorry for the inconvenience.
Robbrowning ( talk) 03:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)robbrowning
thanks for your suggestions. i am working on it and it should be ready in about an hour. also, how do you add photos to the article? thanks for the help again. Robbrowning ( talk) 04:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)robbrowning
Hey there! I actually meant to speedy my user talk archives, not my user talk page. But thanks for helping :) MJ94 ( talk) 23:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka. What's the next step for the deletion of Urethra_gauge? Thanks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Urethra_gauge peterl ( talk) 22:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka, I don't think you should remove Administrative Professional Day. It was listed in April 19 in the sentence "the earliest possible date". If you remove Administrative Professional Day, that means you have to remove other observances e.g. 'earliest day for Easter Sunday' on March 22, written long before my cleanup, and also the Hindi New Year in April 14 and the quartet of vernal equinox, summer solstice, autumn equinox, and winter solstice on the dates of equinoxes/solstices.
I personally think it is okay to put "earliest possible date", because even though they don't have a fixed date, they do have a fixed period. There are many important observances listed as "second Monday" or "first Thursday of November" or "friday preceding wednesday ash" which I think is unfair for this days not to be listed in the observances.
But I do aware that some observances are impossible to include in the Observances Section because they are constantly moving (not static in date OR in period), e.g. Jewish and Islamic observances which constantly moving backward. That's why I won't include these observances.
So eventhough APDay has a nonstatic date, it has a static period, therefore I think it is okay to include in the Observance Section.
What do you think? -- Rochelimit ( talk) 15:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Valleyside show came back with a fairly ambiguous result. You've been looking at this situation longer than me, and I'd like your input.— Kww( talk) 05:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
As interactions with Busty Heart have shifted to OTRS ticket 2010042010001452 handled by JzG, I've taken the liberty of removing your attempts to communicate with her on her talk page and replacing them with a single standard welcome message.
This doesn't reflect on your good faith actions, but was done by me in an effort to smooth further communications with a person whose biography is featured in our encyclopedia. I hope you understand and agree that this is the best way to move forward. Tasty monster (= TS ) 20:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka. My fingers are bleeding about now undoing 205.174.22.77's spam. You wouldn't know if there is a bot that does such a thing automatically, do you? Save me wearing out my keyboard too... :p Best wishes. -- Haruth ( talk) 15:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for that. He has been a little, shall we say, uncommunicative for quite a while. What he did was change the criteria for inclusion in that category, then remove about a hundred articles from that category to fit his new criteria. Basically a driver is included in that category if he's American and took part (at least once) in a Formula One race. That includes the Indy 500, but only during the 1950s, when it was part of the World Drivers Championship. It's a slightly technical point, but it was clear in the category inclusion criteria before he changed it. We'll have a discussion at the Wikiproject, and probably revert him back if the consensus dictates, or take the opportunity to clarify it further. It was just the blatant refusal to communicate that was irritating. Thanks again, Bretonbanquet ( talk) 23:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Where was this made a guideline? YellowMonkey ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I am attempting to get an entry in the site for this concept. What validation do you require to ensure that this is a real concept and may be presented? Thanks! greg@jacobsracing.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobsracing ( talk • contribs) 20:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
{{
helpme}}
tag on your talk page at
User talk:Jacobsracing and ask for input to see if it meets requirements. Not to pile things on, but you should change your username because it doesn't comply with our
username policy. If you don't do it voluntarily, you will be forced to. You can go to
WP:CHU/S to do that. -- Mufka
(u)
(t)
(c)
20:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Dear Mufka, there is a new day on September 30 called Blasphemy day (I know these American days are getting more and more uncontrollably "free"). I'm planning to keep it on September 30 (sort out, regular clean up), but maybe you can give your own comment on the talkpage of the article since you are more experienced. What do you think? I have the feeling that it will be another war on freedom of expression thing around September 30.-- Rochelimit ( talk) 20:45, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Seriously? The pages that I create in my userspace are my own business. And I didn't request deletion. I have a bunch or articles that might never meet notability, but that doesn't mean the they should be deleted. My userspace, my pages, my business. qö₮$@37 ( talk) 17:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have just noticed that the three Judy Roberts albums that I created have been deleted on the basis of being 'non-notable music by artist for which no wikipedia article has been created'. I was planning to create an article for the artist, but didnt realise that this was a prerequisite for creating an article about their albums. Both the artist and their albums are reviewed on Allmusic and I was under the impression that this makes them sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. If I create an article for the artist, can the album articles be re-instated? Thanks. Nostalgic34 ( talk)
So if I do create an article for this artist and for Fourth World, will the 4 album articles be re-instated, or will I have to do them all from scratch? Nostalgic34 ( talk)
Thank you that's great Mufka, I will work on them a bit more and do artist articles for both of them. The fourth one was Nights in Brazil, but I see that is already userified. Thanks. Nostalgic34 ( talk)
Why delete PaudoBode article? I know it's far from complete but I was expecting people to give some contributions.. I Guess It's not worth it to do one about PauDaCeleste... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.136.166.125 ( talk) 22:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Mufka, I was just wondering if you could provide me the rationale for your deletion of that article? (If you speak Czech, that would, of course, make sense.) Just trying to understand the speedy better. Zelse81 ( talk) 21:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)