![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
What kind of misconceptions?- ( User) WolfKeeper ( Talk) 20:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Something very odd about that article (which I became aware of today) - seems to be a host of SPAs intend on removing any mention of her being on a shortlist. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 17:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey mtd, do you mind discussing what you think is wrong with the intro here? We were trying to come to a consensus what should be added/removed/modified in the intro. -- snowolfD4 ( talk / @ ) 23:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
I received your message in regards to the refernece being their for the source material for the audio and video of the Nestor/Keith incident, but I do not see the website (gordonkeith.com)actually referenced nor is the info under the section for the incident accurate as Keith has discussed this incident at length several times on the radio and directed people to the website to hear/view it. Libel is only considered that if it is not true. I look forward to your response. Jack in Blue Mound ( talk) 19:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
18:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC) has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
I just wanted to say thanks again for all the work you're putting into the South Korea article. And something you said on the talk page a while back just made it onto my list of nice quotes from Wikipedians. Best, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 18:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
...is at it again. Take a look at the recent edit history: repeatedly reverting to some version before we started editing the article, removing references and undoing the ref formatting that we have done, adding questionable information and peacock terms. I had given him/her the benefit of the doubt before, but I'm beginning to suspect that it really is Manmohit/Ziggymaster/Mayamore again. Oh, joy... rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 06:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Re
this edit: do you think it's a good idea to visibly link to stuff in Wikipedia space like that, considering that it's generally supposed to be sort of "in the background" as far as readers are concerned? My usual course of action in these situations is to add a hidden note in the text, such as <!--This naming scheme was decided by [[Wikipedia Naming conventions (Korean): Sea of Japan (East_Sea)]]. Please discuss at the talk page before changing it.-->
But, admittedly, I don't know how effective these hidden notes are. In some cases (one of the big offenders is Spoonerism), people continually ignore the note and make the edits anyway. Then again, there's no guarantee the same thing won't happen with this footnote. Any thoughts? rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 01:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
hello, i aprreciate your contribution. your major delete is not consensed edit. [2] Your removed other users' contributions. you have no right it. Cherry Blossom OK ( talk) 04:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Mtd2006, you were the only one who commented about the changes I proposed to the group Will to Power's article before I went ahead, and I appreciate your addition of the infobox. It turned into a big drama (looks like there's a lot of that going around lately) and I didn't know if you might be interested in comparing what's there now with the way it looked before. If so, any comments or suggestions you have would be appreciated. But if not, no worries. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky ( talk) 05:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
What kind of misconceptions?- ( User) WolfKeeper ( Talk) 20:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Something very odd about that article (which I became aware of today) - seems to be a host of SPAs intend on removing any mention of her being on a shortlist. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 17:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey mtd, do you mind discussing what you think is wrong with the intro here? We were trying to come to a consensus what should be added/removed/modified in the intro. -- snowolfD4 ( talk / @ ) 23:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
I received your message in regards to the refernece being their for the source material for the audio and video of the Nestor/Keith incident, but I do not see the website (gordonkeith.com)actually referenced nor is the info under the section for the incident accurate as Keith has discussed this incident at length several times on the radio and directed people to the website to hear/view it. Libel is only considered that if it is not true. I look forward to your response. Jack in Blue Mound ( talk) 19:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
rʨanaɢ
talk/
contribs
18:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC) has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
I just wanted to say thanks again for all the work you're putting into the South Korea article. And something you said on the talk page a while back just made it onto my list of nice quotes from Wikipedians. Best, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 18:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
...is at it again. Take a look at the recent edit history: repeatedly reverting to some version before we started editing the article, removing references and undoing the ref formatting that we have done, adding questionable information and peacock terms. I had given him/her the benefit of the doubt before, but I'm beginning to suspect that it really is Manmohit/Ziggymaster/Mayamore again. Oh, joy... rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 06:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Re
this edit: do you think it's a good idea to visibly link to stuff in Wikipedia space like that, considering that it's generally supposed to be sort of "in the background" as far as readers are concerned? My usual course of action in these situations is to add a hidden note in the text, such as <!--This naming scheme was decided by [[Wikipedia Naming conventions (Korean): Sea of Japan (East_Sea)]]. Please discuss at the talk page before changing it.-->
But, admittedly, I don't know how effective these hidden notes are. In some cases (one of the big offenders is Spoonerism), people continually ignore the note and make the edits anyway. Then again, there's no guarantee the same thing won't happen with this footnote. Any thoughts? rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 01:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
hello, i aprreciate your contribution. your major delete is not consensed edit. [2] Your removed other users' contributions. you have no right it. Cherry Blossom OK ( talk) 04:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Mtd2006, you were the only one who commented about the changes I proposed to the group Will to Power's article before I went ahead, and I appreciate your addition of the infobox. It turned into a big drama (looks like there's a lot of that going around lately) and I didn't know if you might be interested in comparing what's there now with the way it looked before. If so, any comments or suggestions you have would be appreciated. But if not, no worries. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky ( talk) 05:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)