There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Omar-toons ( talk) 16:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
17:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Template:uw-blockindef -->
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why the hell have I been bloqued?? I have never been blocked for personal attacks against Omar-toons - never!! It's a blatant lie!! This is a non sens!! Ms10vc ( talk) 18:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your block is here which explains why you have been blocked. PhilKnight ( talk) 18:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am neither un troll nor a sock!! It's still a non sens!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 19:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sure. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Here are the sources about Ahmad Al-Tijani being born in Algeria:
{{
citation}}
: Empty citation (
help).I am not trolling!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 19:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Once again, I am neither a troll nor a sock!! Omar-toons said that I have been blocked for personal attacks against him but that's untrue !!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 19:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Once again: I am not gaiming and I am neither a sock nor a troll!! I have provided above plenty of sources that prove that I am not a troll!! Once again, this block is a non sense!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 21:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have also removed well-sourced information as supposed "OR" and introduced blatant anachronisms. Removing mention of the details of the history of Algeria is not beneficial. Huon ( talk) 22:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
So: * I am not a sock * I am not a troll * I am supposed to having removed well-sourced information where in fact I have inserted well sourced information (but it was more urgent de block me indefinitively than to ask me and let me provide these sources. ** For the blatant anachronism about Algeria, I have provided plenty of sources above and it does not seem that Algeria is so anachronic that you pretend -- but feel free to provide a source pretending that Algeria is anachronic at that time ** for well-sourced information - which is not what I have qualified of OR, but the synthesis thar Omar-toons have done, you can read: *** Andrew Mack - Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict - World Politics, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Jan., 1975), pp. 175-200 *** Jacques Frémaux - La France et l'Algérie en guerre - Economica - 2002: 295- «La "victoire" sur le terrain -- Peux-ton considerer pour autant la victoire comme acquise? Cela est très douteux» *** Maurice Vaïsse - Victoire militaire, défaite diplomatique? - 29-46: "Est-on en presence d'une victoire militaire française? Oui si on signifie par là que l'ALN a été tenue en échec par l'armée française. Non et pour deux raisons: ..." On again this block is a non sens!! Ms10vc ( talk) 23:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're disruptive, and that's all that matters. (Revoking talk page access.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ms10vc, one of the many problems with your edits is that this one is your tenth edit on Wikipedia, and it looks eerily like this one, by a known sock. I am interested to see what comes out of the SPI. Drmies ( talk) 20:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
@ Drmies: Thanxs for unblocking my talk page. Would you please show what edit is problematic? I have provided sources to my edits. Best regards. -- Ms10vc ( talk) 12:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Hello, Ms10vc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ms10vc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Omar-toons ( talk) 16:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
17:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Template:uw-blockindef -->
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why the hell have I been bloqued?? I have never been blocked for personal attacks against Omar-toons - never!! It's a blatant lie!! This is a non sens!! Ms10vc ( talk) 18:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your block is here which explains why you have been blocked. PhilKnight ( talk) 18:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am neither un troll nor a sock!! It's still a non sens!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 19:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sure. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Here are the sources about Ahmad Al-Tijani being born in Algeria:
{{
citation}}
: Empty citation (
help).I am not trolling!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 19:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC) Once again, I am neither a troll nor a sock!! Omar-toons said that I have been blocked for personal attacks against him but that's untrue !!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 19:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Once again: I am not gaiming and I am neither a sock nor a troll!! I have provided above plenty of sources that prove that I am not a troll!! Once again, this block is a non sense!! -- Ms10vc ( talk) 21:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have also removed well-sourced information as supposed "OR" and introduced blatant anachronisms. Removing mention of the details of the history of Algeria is not beneficial. Huon ( talk) 22:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Ms10vc ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
So: * I am not a sock * I am not a troll * I am supposed to having removed well-sourced information where in fact I have inserted well sourced information (but it was more urgent de block me indefinitively than to ask me and let me provide these sources. ** For the blatant anachronism about Algeria, I have provided plenty of sources above and it does not seem that Algeria is so anachronic that you pretend -- but feel free to provide a source pretending that Algeria is anachronic at that time ** for well-sourced information - which is not what I have qualified of OR, but the synthesis thar Omar-toons have done, you can read: *** Andrew Mack - Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict - World Politics, Vol. 27, No. 2 (Jan., 1975), pp. 175-200 *** Jacques Frémaux - La France et l'Algérie en guerre - Economica - 2002: 295- «La "victoire" sur le terrain -- Peux-ton considerer pour autant la victoire comme acquise? Cela est très douteux» *** Maurice Vaïsse - Victoire militaire, défaite diplomatique? - 29-46: "Est-on en presence d'une victoire militaire française? Oui si on signifie par là que l'ALN a été tenue en échec par l'armée française. Non et pour deux raisons: ..." On again this block is a non sens!! Ms10vc ( talk) 23:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're disruptive, and that's all that matters. (Revoking talk page access.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ms10vc, one of the many problems with your edits is that this one is your tenth edit on Wikipedia, and it looks eerily like this one, by a known sock. I am interested to see what comes out of the SPI. Drmies ( talk) 20:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
@ Drmies: Thanxs for unblocking my talk page. Would you please show what edit is problematic? I have provided sources to my edits. Best regards. -- Ms10vc ( talk) 12:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Hello, Ms10vc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ms10vc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)