Hello, Mr Johnson SI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —
C.Fred (
talk) 03:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thank you.
C.Fred I hope this help you understand the different between new york state or city police offices vs nys peace officers. Please look up nys criminal Procedure Law it lists all the police departments in new york state. You will not find seagate listed.
here is the criminal procedure law section. 210.46
you can call the new york state department of criminal justice service for further clarification at 518-457-2667 ext # 5.
![]() |
Hi Mr Johnson SI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Do not persist with these edits. The article is not ambiguous and does not portray the organization as a police department. ... discospinster talk 01:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Please remove to title police department. Thank You
and replace it with Public Safety ... which it is. Thank you
The title is misleading and should be removed.
The information that was posted is true and accurate.
My question to you is if they changed their name to the seagate federal police .... would you believe it ??????? I would say no, so its the same thing with this agency using a title from 1899 which has been changed by New York State Assembly via NYS CPL 2.10 sub 46. Seagate is empowered by a private association not a city or state agency. Seagate is no different then Co-op City Public Safety. So please stop correcting my changes.
Hello c.fred .............. please lets not start this seagate edit war again.
You put a message to Vera596 on user:Vera596 which is for Vera596's use. Messeges should go on his talk page: User talk:Vera596. I moved your comment to here: User_talk:Vera596#New_York_Department_of_Corrections. Please remember to sign your comments with four tildes "~~~~" Thank you Jim1138 ( talk) 04:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you :jim1138
MrJohnson....you seem to like making many edits of many law enforcement agencies pages. At least put correct, accurate and proper info. Are you even a member of any law enforcement agency ? I doubt it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.46.163.250 ( talk) 05:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority Police. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Signalizing ( talk) 05:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority Police. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 13:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Johnson SI. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk) 04:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Paul Erik
(talk)
(contribs) 02:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Hello, Mr Johnson SI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —
C.Fred (
talk) 03:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thank you.
C.Fred I hope this help you understand the different between new york state or city police offices vs nys peace officers. Please look up nys criminal Procedure Law it lists all the police departments in new york state. You will not find seagate listed.
here is the criminal procedure law section. 210.46
you can call the new york state department of criminal justice service for further clarification at 518-457-2667 ext # 5.
![]() |
Hi Mr Johnson SI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Do not persist with these edits. The article is not ambiguous and does not portray the organization as a police department. ... discospinster talk 01:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Please remove to title police department. Thank You
and replace it with Public Safety ... which it is. Thank you
The title is misleading and should be removed.
The information that was posted is true and accurate.
My question to you is if they changed their name to the seagate federal police .... would you believe it ??????? I would say no, so its the same thing with this agency using a title from 1899 which has been changed by New York State Assembly via NYS CPL 2.10 sub 46. Seagate is empowered by a private association not a city or state agency. Seagate is no different then Co-op City Public Safety. So please stop correcting my changes.
Hello c.fred .............. please lets not start this seagate edit war again.
You put a message to Vera596 on user:Vera596 which is for Vera596's use. Messeges should go on his talk page: User talk:Vera596. I moved your comment to here: User_talk:Vera596#New_York_Department_of_Corrections. Please remember to sign your comments with four tildes "~~~~" Thank you Jim1138 ( talk) 04:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you :jim1138
MrJohnson....you seem to like making many edits of many law enforcement agencies pages. At least put correct, accurate and proper info. Are you even a member of any law enforcement agency ? I doubt it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.46.163.250 ( talk) 05:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority Police. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Signalizing ( talk) 05:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority Police. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 13:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Johnson SI. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk) 04:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Paul Erik
(talk)
(contribs) 02:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)