Hi MrMkG! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! ❯❯❯ S A H A 09:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Shaan Sengupta
Talk
03:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I finished reading the guidelines and polices. You allege that I'm making "unconstructive" edits and that my edits "appear to be disruptive". Now you need to specific exactly which one of the policies you claim that I have violated because I can not see any reasonable basis for this accusation.
When you say "we allow content that is supported by reliable sources" and in the same breath say "but this page is related to contentious topics". What is this supposed to mean? That it gives you the right to remove these reliable sources? I can not imagine that being one of any reasonable interpretations of "contentious topics".
My sources are as solid as they get since they are academic sources published by the likes of Oxford University Press and Routledge. Whereas you did not even provide a reason for removing them.
Next, there is the curious case of the "notice" ( Template:Editnotices/Page/Bharatiya Janata Party). I did encounter it beforehand as a pop-up so let us assess some facts about it.
1. In your editing summary ( [1]) you claim "It states that any contentious changes are needed to be discussed at talk page first".
1.1. The notice does not say this.
1.2. Fixing a editing glitch that hid a text and adding more reliable sources to support the text is far less "contentious" than removing these reliable sources and the associated text itself.
1.3. You did not apply the claimed discuss first standard on yourself.
2. In the same editing summary, you say "I am aware that we are not supposed to make more than one revert within 24 hours. But it is allowed in limited circumstances."
2.1. The notice does say this.
2.2 The revert is within 24 hours of your previous revert.
2.3. You are claiming the "limited circumstances" exemption. The notice redirects to a page which lists 8 kinds of exemptions of which you have not specified which one you are taking.
2.3.1. The exemptions are "self revert" (not applicable), own userpage (not applicable), banned users (not applicable), obvious vandalism like page blanking and offensive words (not applicable), copyright (not applicable), illegal content like cp or piracy (not applicable), bad content in biographies (not applicable), spam (not applicable). Please specify which one you're taking. None of them are applicable and you can not take such an exemption.
Lastly, let us take a look at two simple facts about what might or might not be counted as "edit warring".
1. I made one revert of your edit. You made two reverts of my edit.
2. I did not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours. You made 2 reverts within 24 hours with full knowledge of the notice.
MrMkG ( talk) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
It seems you are accusing me of serving you "spam notice" and you are taking the spam exemption for not following the page notice of not reverting more than once in 24 hours.
Are you claiming that the "disruption" is that I am a "spammer" and that I am "spamming"? The exemption page ( WP:3RRNO) links to a page detailing what is called spam ( WP:ADS) and none of them can be reasonably applied. It mentions "advertisement masquerading as articles", "external link spamming" and "adding references for promotion" as types of spam. Which one are you accusing me of doing? This is completely untenable and a false accusation. I demand an immediate apology and a full retraction.
Show me the place where it is written that changes in "contentious topics" must be discussed first, I have scoured through the wikipedia pages about contentious topics and have not found it anywhere. The change was also not large scale by any stretch of imagination, it was a minor glitch fix and couple references for a pre-existing text. You yourself did not see the need for discussion first when you removed the pre-existing text afterwards which is a greater change.
The other person had reverted me in the past had either not read the sources or read the wrong source so I quoted the source and it was over there. He or she did not contest it. Even if we consider that as a "revert" for this incident, you yourself have done two reverts ( Revision as of 14:18, 27 September 2023 and Revision as of 03:09, 28 September 2023) and unlike me have not abided by the 24 hour rule.
Your edit was and remains dubious because you did not provide a reason to object to the content. I have started the discussion on the talk page that you demanded but you have still not provided a reason. Please go to the talk page ( Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party) and provide a reason immediately so that the discussion you have been pining for can occur. MrMkG ( talk) 10:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template. El_C 16:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello @
MrMkG. Please be gentle and follow
WP:CIVILITY because I don't want to get into a conflict like last time. Try to keep your reply to the point and short. - Sockpuppet of
EditingGodguru.
You recently made an edit at
Bangladesh genocide in
Revision as of 11:03, 25 October 2023 and said that targetting of Bengali Hindus is nowhere mentioned in the source. I quote your edit summary The source doesn't say this, one can say disproportionate (still many problems, negationist) but not primarily
But I just read 1-3 pages and can see it being mentioned and explained after that too. Can you explain your claims?
Shaan Sengupta
Talk
09:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
2024 Indian general election in Jammu and Kashmir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 19:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
@ MrMkG Can you please make a seat sharing map for LDF Kerala in 2024 Lok Sabha election? XYZ 250706 ( talk) 16:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Patel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 14:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
I have added a reference as a proof
Horace Dendy (
talk)
09:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Srimonbanik2007.
source Paragraph-1: Interpretation. This section handles the definitions of distinct terms applied in laying out the legislation. Paragraph-2: Disqualification on grounds of defection. This section deals with the crux of the legislation, specifying factors on which a member could be disqualified from the Parliament or the State assembly. Provisions in para 2.1(a) provide disqualification of a member if he or she "voluntarily gives up the membership of such political party", whereas paragraph 2.1(b) provisions, addresses a situation when a member votes or abstains from any crucial voting contrary to the directive circulated by his/her respective political party. Paragraph 2.2 states that any member, after being elected as a representative of a certain political party, shall be disqualified if he/she joins any other political party after the election. Paragraph 2.3 states that a nominated member shall be disqualified if he/she joins any political party after six months from the date he/she takes his seat. Laurent Jack ( talk) 21:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Good evening, I was wondering why you felt the sections tag broke up the reading flow on this article? As you can see around Wikipedia, section headings are standard practice. In this case, another editor had specfically requested section headings. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 23:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saira Shah Halim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dialysis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Sanjog Waghere. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and failed WP:NPOL. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 13:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saira Shah Halim (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 21:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ MrMkG I hope you are doing fine. I am currently working on the 1999 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Results by constituency section and I am here to request you to join with me in filling up the data from the [2] in the table. I have already reformatted the constituencies district wise and the table can be found here: User:456legend/Sandbox/Andhra. If you wish to join with me, please continue to edit on User:456legend/Sandbox/Andhra, which can finally be placed on the main article. Thank you. 456legend talk 06:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saira Shah Halim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dialysis.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Madarchod tere baap ka website hai saala bar bar dekh rhe shi edit ko bhi vandalise kr rha hai madarchod. Bihar general election se JDU ko kyu hata rha hai 16 sansad hai unke. Apna kaam se kaam rkho na kyu aukat se zyada uchchl rha hai?
Wicked Sunnnnnyyyyy (
talk)
08:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Atharv Bakshi.
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Mathura Prasad Mahato. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
add the relevant infobox as well
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 10:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Most of the reliable sources continuously publishing about LJP. Everyone knows Chirag Paswan. Then how we can say it's not a major party.
XYZ 91973 (
talk)
16:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanjay Chauhan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Menka Devi Singh. Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
voorts ( talk/ contributions) 03:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Devendra Yadav. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
make sure to add the relevant infobox
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 12:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Janardan Dehury. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
please add the relevant infobox
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 12:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG,
Thank you for creating Awadhesh Prasad.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Good Start!, please add specific categories and you may cite more reliable sources. Cheers!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Dcotos ( talk) 07:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Omkar Markam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dindori (Vidhan Sabha constituency).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG,
Congress party has officially decalred candidates for 14 seats in West Bengal. Please check this links, Link for 13 candidates name : https://twitter.com/INCSandesh/status/1779681346593690112/photo/3 Link for 14th candidate name : https://twitter.com/INCSandesh/status/1781692683372941347
They haven't withdrew their candidate from Ghatal, There is no official announcement of it, If there is any, Please provide me the link for that.
If someone checks for Congress candidates in 2024 Indian general election in West Bengal, they will assume that Congress party is contesting only 12 seats and also they won't find all the 14 candidate names. As a wikipedian we have to add information as it is. We should add all candidates name of the alliance, we should not be selective about it.
As of now i am reverting your edit. If you think my reasons for reverting your edit is not good for you, you can revert my edit. Sachin126 ( talk) 07:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The editing of all the constituency results should be stopped by you. It is a vandalism. If you don't stop such edits, then you might be blocked permanently from editing. VNC200 ( talk) 17:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you revert your move on Shreya Verma back to draft space? It does not pass NPOL or GNG at this point. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 14:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG,
Thank you for creating Laxmikant.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Kindly improve categorisation.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 15:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
There I was simply bringing to light how some pro-party people have hijacked the article and I commented about the same cautioning the admins against such spin-doctors, however the comment immediately got deleted. I am not sure what policy it violated. I am new. I don't intend to be an editor here. Just bringing this to your notice hoping you know better. Thank you. 2409:40E1:0:51F5:9C3F:28FF:FE62:77C5 ( talk) 07:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Angomcha Bimol Akoijam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and a case of WP:BLP1E. Candidates are not notable unless they have been previously elected to an office position or pass GNG. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 18:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjog Waghere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 19:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Sanjana Jatav. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and a case of WP:BLP1E. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 12:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello MrMkG, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pratikur Rahaman, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pratikur Rahaman.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 12:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
You must stop your editing immediately. Your edits are forcing to inform administrator to block you permanently along with your IP address. The edits which are done, should remain until the declaration of results. Then in which constituency, who wins/losses, the candidates would be set up accordingly. VNC200 ( talk) 16:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Bhujabal Majhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
EdmHopLover1995 (
talk)
07:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
@ MrMkG You have removed some content from Election results section of these mentioned loksabha constituencies. Have you done it wrongly? Ritwik Mahata t@lk 15:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Jeraxmoira🐉 (
talk)
15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Why are continuously removing my edits from Lohardaga constituency? Chamra Linda is an important rebel JMM leader contesting from Lohardaga as an independent candidate. He has been contesting from that constituency since 2004 and has always saved his deposit. He is not some random candidate.
Carljohnson237 (
talk)
13:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Wicked Sunnnnnyyyyy.
Your recent edits in
Aam Aadmi Party you have huge changes in ideology and political position. Without citing references. For changing any ideology please consensus on talk page and cite references with proper logic. Disruptive edits may lead to loss in editing privilege.
Thank you.
Raj Pal
Talk
07:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Srimonbanik2007.
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Raj Pal
Talk
07:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Srimonbanik2007.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jai Prakash Verma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinod Singh.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
What is your reasoning for removing electoral maps from state wiki sections barring "pointless". Are visual representation through maps is pointless in Wikipedia? Kalpesh Manna 2002 ( talk) 05:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Have you lost your mind ? Why are you changing my edits repeated times in various constituencies ? The edits are based on last election results, and not on the basis of opinion polls or surveys. Please stop reverting my edits. Change it according to the result, only after when the result is declared. VNC200 ( talk) 06:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jahanabad Lok Sabha constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jahanabad.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey @ MrMkG I have observe some of your recent edits are wrong. candidates of Lok Sabha 2024 in Bihar BSP and AIMIM you are commenting their candidate can you please elaborate the reason why your doing that? or simply stop vandalize? @ Eaglespirit Eaglespirit ( talk) 05:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
MrMkG I am asking you to please revert back the page on Yogender Chandolia that you have moved to Draft because now he is elected as Member of Parliament and there may be certain information added upon the same. Himankshu ( talk) 08:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ MrMkG, This is regarding an edit you have done in 2023-2024 Manipur Violence. You have undone a revision 1228035463 which was well explained that the content lacked relevance to the subsection (#Recurrent Violence). Have you clearly understood edit summary of revision 1228035463? Your action may be considered disruptive editing (WP: DISRUPTIVE) as you have undone/reverted other editor's edit in good faith editing for improving the topic 2023-2024 Manipur Violence without any reason (edit summary). You may see this topic Help: Reverting for better understanding so that you don't go somewhat in the line of Edit Warring. Please explain your edit or self revert. Thank you and happy editing. Okenkhwairakpam ( talk) 04:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, This is concerning your edits on Mohan Charan Majhi. You have been engaging continuously in removing content (Educational information), removing legitimate sources (TOI source) without any due reason, and changing/introducing information (name of parents/caste name not quoted in the source) not backed by any reliable sources. Please stop the disruptive behavior and explain your edits with due reasons. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations ( talk) 05:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, could you please clarify why you removed material (that was reliably source) that I added when I implemented an edit request. Here is a diff of the edit: [5]. P,TO 19104 ( talk) ( contribs) 11:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention --
User4edits (
T)
11:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi MrMkG! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! ❯❯❯ S A H A 09:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Shaan Sengupta
Talk
03:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I finished reading the guidelines and polices. You allege that I'm making "unconstructive" edits and that my edits "appear to be disruptive". Now you need to specific exactly which one of the policies you claim that I have violated because I can not see any reasonable basis for this accusation.
When you say "we allow content that is supported by reliable sources" and in the same breath say "but this page is related to contentious topics". What is this supposed to mean? That it gives you the right to remove these reliable sources? I can not imagine that being one of any reasonable interpretations of "contentious topics".
My sources are as solid as they get since they are academic sources published by the likes of Oxford University Press and Routledge. Whereas you did not even provide a reason for removing them.
Next, there is the curious case of the "notice" ( Template:Editnotices/Page/Bharatiya Janata Party). I did encounter it beforehand as a pop-up so let us assess some facts about it.
1. In your editing summary ( [1]) you claim "It states that any contentious changes are needed to be discussed at talk page first".
1.1. The notice does not say this.
1.2. Fixing a editing glitch that hid a text and adding more reliable sources to support the text is far less "contentious" than removing these reliable sources and the associated text itself.
1.3. You did not apply the claimed discuss first standard on yourself.
2. In the same editing summary, you say "I am aware that we are not supposed to make more than one revert within 24 hours. But it is allowed in limited circumstances."
2.1. The notice does say this.
2.2 The revert is within 24 hours of your previous revert.
2.3. You are claiming the "limited circumstances" exemption. The notice redirects to a page which lists 8 kinds of exemptions of which you have not specified which one you are taking.
2.3.1. The exemptions are "self revert" (not applicable), own userpage (not applicable), banned users (not applicable), obvious vandalism like page blanking and offensive words (not applicable), copyright (not applicable), illegal content like cp or piracy (not applicable), bad content in biographies (not applicable), spam (not applicable). Please specify which one you're taking. None of them are applicable and you can not take such an exemption.
Lastly, let us take a look at two simple facts about what might or might not be counted as "edit warring".
1. I made one revert of your edit. You made two reverts of my edit.
2. I did not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours. You made 2 reverts within 24 hours with full knowledge of the notice.
MrMkG ( talk) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
It seems you are accusing me of serving you "spam notice" and you are taking the spam exemption for not following the page notice of not reverting more than once in 24 hours.
Are you claiming that the "disruption" is that I am a "spammer" and that I am "spamming"? The exemption page ( WP:3RRNO) links to a page detailing what is called spam ( WP:ADS) and none of them can be reasonably applied. It mentions "advertisement masquerading as articles", "external link spamming" and "adding references for promotion" as types of spam. Which one are you accusing me of doing? This is completely untenable and a false accusation. I demand an immediate apology and a full retraction.
Show me the place where it is written that changes in "contentious topics" must be discussed first, I have scoured through the wikipedia pages about contentious topics and have not found it anywhere. The change was also not large scale by any stretch of imagination, it was a minor glitch fix and couple references for a pre-existing text. You yourself did not see the need for discussion first when you removed the pre-existing text afterwards which is a greater change.
The other person had reverted me in the past had either not read the sources or read the wrong source so I quoted the source and it was over there. He or she did not contest it. Even if we consider that as a "revert" for this incident, you yourself have done two reverts ( Revision as of 14:18, 27 September 2023 and Revision as of 03:09, 28 September 2023) and unlike me have not abided by the 24 hour rule.
Your edit was and remains dubious because you did not provide a reason to object to the content. I have started the discussion on the talk page that you demanded but you have still not provided a reason. Please go to the talk page ( Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party) and provide a reason immediately so that the discussion you have been pining for can occur. MrMkG ( talk) 10:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template. El_C 16:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello @
MrMkG. Please be gentle and follow
WP:CIVILITY because I don't want to get into a conflict like last time. Try to keep your reply to the point and short. - Sockpuppet of
EditingGodguru.
You recently made an edit at
Bangladesh genocide in
Revision as of 11:03, 25 October 2023 and said that targetting of Bengali Hindus is nowhere mentioned in the source. I quote your edit summary The source doesn't say this, one can say disproportionate (still many problems, negationist) but not primarily
But I just read 1-3 pages and can see it being mentioned and explained after that too. Can you explain your claims?
Shaan Sengupta
Talk
09:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
2024 Indian general election in Jammu and Kashmir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 19:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
@ MrMkG Can you please make a seat sharing map for LDF Kerala in 2024 Lok Sabha election? XYZ 250706 ( talk) 16:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Patel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 14:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
I have added a reference as a proof
Horace Dendy (
talk)
09:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Srimonbanik2007.
source Paragraph-1: Interpretation. This section handles the definitions of distinct terms applied in laying out the legislation. Paragraph-2: Disqualification on grounds of defection. This section deals with the crux of the legislation, specifying factors on which a member could be disqualified from the Parliament or the State assembly. Provisions in para 2.1(a) provide disqualification of a member if he or she "voluntarily gives up the membership of such political party", whereas paragraph 2.1(b) provisions, addresses a situation when a member votes or abstains from any crucial voting contrary to the directive circulated by his/her respective political party. Paragraph 2.2 states that any member, after being elected as a representative of a certain political party, shall be disqualified if he/she joins any other political party after the election. Paragraph 2.3 states that a nominated member shall be disqualified if he/she joins any political party after six months from the date he/she takes his seat. Laurent Jack ( talk) 21:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Good evening, I was wondering why you felt the sections tag broke up the reading flow on this article? As you can see around Wikipedia, section headings are standard practice. In this case, another editor had specfically requested section headings. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 23:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saira Shah Halim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dialysis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Sanjog Waghere. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and failed WP:NPOL. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 13:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saira Shah Halim (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 21:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ MrMkG I hope you are doing fine. I am currently working on the 1999 Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Results by constituency section and I am here to request you to join with me in filling up the data from the [2] in the table. I have already reformatted the constituencies district wise and the table can be found here: User:456legend/Sandbox/Andhra. If you wish to join with me, please continue to edit on User:456legend/Sandbox/Andhra, which can finally be placed on the main article. Thank you. 456legend talk 06:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saira Shah Halim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dialysis.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Madarchod tere baap ka website hai saala bar bar dekh rhe shi edit ko bhi vandalise kr rha hai madarchod. Bihar general election se JDU ko kyu hata rha hai 16 sansad hai unke. Apna kaam se kaam rkho na kyu aukat se zyada uchchl rha hai?
Wicked Sunnnnnyyyyy (
talk)
08:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Atharv Bakshi.
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Mathura Prasad Mahato. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
add the relevant infobox as well
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 10:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Most of the reliable sources continuously publishing about LJP. Everyone knows Chirag Paswan. Then how we can say it's not a major party.
XYZ 91973 (
talk)
16:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanjay Chauhan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Menka Devi Singh. Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
voorts ( talk/ contributions) 03:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Devendra Yadav. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
make sure to add the relevant infobox
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 12:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG. Thank you for your work on Janardan Dehury. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
please add the relevant infobox
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 12:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG,
Thank you for creating Awadhesh Prasad.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Good Start!, please add specific categories and you may cite more reliable sources. Cheers!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Dcotos ( talk) 07:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Omkar Markam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dindori (Vidhan Sabha constituency).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG,
Congress party has officially decalred candidates for 14 seats in West Bengal. Please check this links, Link for 13 candidates name : https://twitter.com/INCSandesh/status/1779681346593690112/photo/3 Link for 14th candidate name : https://twitter.com/INCSandesh/status/1781692683372941347
They haven't withdrew their candidate from Ghatal, There is no official announcement of it, If there is any, Please provide me the link for that.
If someone checks for Congress candidates in 2024 Indian general election in West Bengal, they will assume that Congress party is contesting only 12 seats and also they won't find all the 14 candidate names. As a wikipedian we have to add information as it is. We should add all candidates name of the alliance, we should not be selective about it.
As of now i am reverting your edit. If you think my reasons for reverting your edit is not good for you, you can revert my edit. Sachin126 ( talk) 07:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The editing of all the constituency results should be stopped by you. It is a vandalism. If you don't stop such edits, then you might be blocked permanently from editing. VNC200 ( talk) 17:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you revert your move on Shreya Verma back to draft space? It does not pass NPOL or GNG at this point. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 14:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, MrMkG,
Thank you for creating Laxmikant.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Kindly improve categorisation.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 15:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
There I was simply bringing to light how some pro-party people have hijacked the article and I commented about the same cautioning the admins against such spin-doctors, however the comment immediately got deleted. I am not sure what policy it violated. I am new. I don't intend to be an editor here. Just bringing this to your notice hoping you know better. Thank you. 2409:40E1:0:51F5:9C3F:28FF:FE62:77C5 ( talk) 07:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Angomcha Bimol Akoijam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and a case of WP:BLP1E. Candidates are not notable unless they have been previously elected to an office position or pass GNG. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 18:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjog Waghere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 19:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Sanjana Jatav. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and a case of WP:BLP1E. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 12:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello MrMkG, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pratikur Rahaman, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pratikur Rahaman.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 12:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
You must stop your editing immediately. Your edits are forcing to inform administrator to block you permanently along with your IP address. The edits which are done, should remain until the declaration of results. Then in which constituency, who wins/losses, the candidates would be set up accordingly. VNC200 ( talk) 16:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Bhujabal Majhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
EdmHopLover1995 (
talk)
07:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
@ MrMkG You have removed some content from Election results section of these mentioned loksabha constituencies. Have you done it wrongly? Ritwik Mahata t@lk 15:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Jeraxmoira🐉 (
talk)
15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Why are continuously removing my edits from Lohardaga constituency? Chamra Linda is an important rebel JMM leader contesting from Lohardaga as an independent candidate. He has been contesting from that constituency since 2004 and has always saved his deposit. He is not some random candidate.
Carljohnson237 (
talk)
13:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Wicked Sunnnnnyyyyy.
Your recent edits in
Aam Aadmi Party you have huge changes in ideology and political position. Without citing references. For changing any ideology please consensus on talk page and cite references with proper logic. Disruptive edits may lead to loss in editing privilege.
Thank you.
Raj Pal
Talk
07:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Srimonbanik2007.
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Raj Pal
Talk
07:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) - Sockpuppet of
Srimonbanik2007.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jai Prakash Verma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinod Singh.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
What is your reasoning for removing electoral maps from state wiki sections barring "pointless". Are visual representation through maps is pointless in Wikipedia? Kalpesh Manna 2002 ( talk) 05:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Have you lost your mind ? Why are you changing my edits repeated times in various constituencies ? The edits are based on last election results, and not on the basis of opinion polls or surveys. Please stop reverting my edits. Change it according to the result, only after when the result is declared. VNC200 ( talk) 06:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jahanabad Lok Sabha constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jahanabad.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey @ MrMkG I have observe some of your recent edits are wrong. candidates of Lok Sabha 2024 in Bihar BSP and AIMIM you are commenting their candidate can you please elaborate the reason why your doing that? or simply stop vandalize? @ Eaglespirit Eaglespirit ( talk) 05:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
MrMkG I am asking you to please revert back the page on Yogender Chandolia that you have moved to Draft because now he is elected as Member of Parliament and there may be certain information added upon the same. Himankshu ( talk) 08:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ MrMkG, This is regarding an edit you have done in 2023-2024 Manipur Violence. You have undone a revision 1228035463 which was well explained that the content lacked relevance to the subsection (#Recurrent Violence). Have you clearly understood edit summary of revision 1228035463? Your action may be considered disruptive editing (WP: DISRUPTIVE) as you have undone/reverted other editor's edit in good faith editing for improving the topic 2023-2024 Manipur Violence without any reason (edit summary). You may see this topic Help: Reverting for better understanding so that you don't go somewhat in the line of Edit Warring. Please explain your edit or self revert. Thank you and happy editing. Okenkhwairakpam ( talk) 04:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, This is concerning your edits on Mohan Charan Majhi. You have been engaging continuously in removing content (Educational information), removing legitimate sources (TOI source) without any due reason, and changing/introducing information (name of parents/caste name not quoted in the source) not backed by any reliable sources. Please stop the disruptive behavior and explain your edits with due reasons. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations ( talk) 05:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, could you please clarify why you removed material (that was reliably source) that I added when I implemented an edit request. Here is a diff of the edit: [5]. P,TO 19104 ( talk) ( contribs) 11:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention --
User4edits (
T)
11:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)