{{unblock-auto}} I have just added this auto unblock so I can access the change username page so I can change my username. Thanks.
There's no need for you to push to get an apology. Let it drop. Thanks. PouponOnToast 16:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Saxonoffice.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rambutan ( talk) 09:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Your account with this username has been blocked indefinitely because the username may be rude or inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization or website, contains the word Wikipedia or the name of any other Wikimedia Foundation project, or is otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information).
You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username. Wikipedia:Username policy provides guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account.
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may appeal on your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you. Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible.
If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions:
The user rename requests page requires me to add my request at the bottom of the page, everytime I try I keep getting told I'm still blocked. How do I go about changing my username?— Preceding unsigned comment added by MrClaxson ( talk • contribs)
SomeGuy0830, thank you very much for doing that for me, I'll give you a proper thank you comment on your own talkpage soon. How long should it take for it to change?-- MrClaxson 17:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Why do you think we are connected? I didn't know I had picked a name similar to another user until you had pointed it out, before that you accused me of being DWrules. What would of happened if I called myself Rambootann, would I get accused of being a sockpuppet of yourself?-- MrClaxson 17:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I must be a ruddy good impersonator, never even knew about Claxson! Well that is only your observation, I hope it is changed soon so I can carry on editing. Shame though I quite liked MrClaxon, similar to Mr Saxon.-- MrClaxson 17:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[2] For your further information.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
What is it exactly that I have done to warrant this abuse from you? Your little dispute with me is pretty pathetic and highly unconstructive. You seemed to be a responsible editor, so why are you persisting with this?-- MrClaxson 17:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
YES, but I'm a newbie to Wikipedia. I haven't made many valuable edits? I have added continuity points to Doctor Who episodes. Okay they are not big contributions but every bit counts. I appreciate you have informed me of your actions towards me but I cannot understand your reasons behind this.-- MrClaxson 18:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I had to change my username because I was blocked. I'm a newbie to image liscening, if you check my history I have only tried adding one image. So the arguement was not "stupid", it was a case of misunderstanding and inexperience. The "squabbling" as you put it is prolonged by you making weak accusation towards me. And your attitude does not help, nor does it help your reputation as wiki editor. Comments such as "I rest my case, m'lud." and "That's why you have little or no value here" are smug and immature. It is not only with me, I have noticed that it is your attitude towards most users.-- MrClaxson 18:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Glad to see you have let it rest, thank you for the advice I'll take those into consideration. RC patrol sounds interesting as it will make me more of an experienced user.-- MrClaxson 18:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve made a proposal here, about fan-cr*p on Doctor Who articles in the wake of a broadcast. Any opinions?-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
It's really about time spent reverting, and the fact that we're just making work for each other. I can't be making valuble contributions to the page if I need to keep my finger on "rv".-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I didn't actually say this was about me. Every minute someone, somewhere spends reverting crap is a minute they can't spend making valuble contributions.-- Rambutan ( talk) 07:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Mr.Clarkson, i have fixed my page.thank for reminding me. User:joewinstonk
I'd just like to say that this gave me a huge laugh! Bearing in mind the number of times you've blanked yours, I mean.-- Rambutan ( talk) 12:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
That wasn't a childish comment, it was a rebuke.-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Actually, users are allowed but discouraged. See WP:USER. If you remove a comment, it's taken as an indication that it's been read.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
What I found funny was that not only were you telling someone off for doing something they're allowed to do, it's also something you've done yourself. It would be like me telling some old lady off for feeding ducks.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I didn't mock you. But my explanation above, combined with the fact that you once said to me, "Don't be a hypocrite Rambutan", describes my feelings of hilarity.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() | MrClaxson is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia on July 9th |
Due to harrassment from an antagonistic user, I have decided to take a break from Wikipedia for a while. Hopefully this will give the user in question time to think about their behaviour.-- MrClaxson 19:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Who is the one that made you take a break? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joewinstonk ( talk • contribs)
This account has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Claxson. --Akhilleus ( talk) 02:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
MrClaxson ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This block has been made from a singular viewpoint and has been insuffiently backed up with evidence. I have made worthy edits and contributions despite harrassment from another Wikipedian. I do not want to edit-war with the user and would like to continue Wikipedia as I was doing so. Thank you.
Decline reason:
By definition, not one of your edits with this account has been productive as you were abusing a sockpuppet to avoid the earlier block on Claxson ( talk · contribs). As an indefinitely blocked vandal, you are not welcome here. — Yamla 15:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
But I'm not User:Claxson. This is a case of mistaken identity. My editorial behaviour is cleaner than this vandal. Other than that there is no possibility of it being proven otherwise. Look at my contributions to Doctor Who articles and my work in RC Patrol, they are productive, you are letting this name cloud your judgement over me as a contributor. If you cannot provide a reason behind the accusation I am this Claxson vandal and I am not unblocked. Then I'll have to make an appeal. This seems to be a clear case of Cyber Bullying.-- MrClaxson 15:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Reply from email: open discussion only please... don't email me, I'll just reply here anyway. If you want to appeal to the ArbCom, then by all means do so, but it won't work, because you haven't got a hope of being unblocked. Plus: your case has nothing to do with my so-called harassment, ******, it's only about you and User:Claxson being the same person.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
With all due respect to the Administrators I do not believe this block has been properly thought through. I have looked at the evidence Rambutan has posted and a number of things strike me:
There's not fault on both sides. He's a sockpuppet. I'm not. That's all he's been blocked for: sockpuppetry. See here, by the way, it might amuse you.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC) I have said all I have to say on the matter, I see no point in continuing this further until an Admin has reviewed the case. Kelpin 17:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for using your name. I didn't reply by email because I don't want you to find out my email address. Now, two admins and myself are convinced that you are all the same person, so that's enough for Wikipedia.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
MrClaxson ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Has this case of a misunderstanding been discreetly swept under the carpet. Where is the evidence that I am a sockpuppet of Claxson? The reasoning behind this block is fundamentally flawed.
Decline reason:
The explanation of why you have been determined to be a sockpuppet further up your talk page. — Spartaz Humbug! 12:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Due to your continued trolling and general abuse of this talkpage, I've requested that an admin protect this page to prevent you editing it.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
{{unblock-auto}} I have just added this auto unblock so I can access the change username page so I can change my username. Thanks.
There's no need for you to push to get an apology. Let it drop. Thanks. PouponOnToast 16:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Saxonoffice.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rambutan ( talk) 09:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Your account with this username has been blocked indefinitely because the username may be rude or inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization or website, contains the word Wikipedia or the name of any other Wikimedia Foundation project, or is otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information).
You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username. Wikipedia:Username policy provides guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account.
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may appeal on your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you. Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible.
If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions:
The user rename requests page requires me to add my request at the bottom of the page, everytime I try I keep getting told I'm still blocked. How do I go about changing my username?— Preceding unsigned comment added by MrClaxson ( talk • contribs)
SomeGuy0830, thank you very much for doing that for me, I'll give you a proper thank you comment on your own talkpage soon. How long should it take for it to change?-- MrClaxson 17:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Why do you think we are connected? I didn't know I had picked a name similar to another user until you had pointed it out, before that you accused me of being DWrules. What would of happened if I called myself Rambootann, would I get accused of being a sockpuppet of yourself?-- MrClaxson 17:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I must be a ruddy good impersonator, never even knew about Claxson! Well that is only your observation, I hope it is changed soon so I can carry on editing. Shame though I quite liked MrClaxon, similar to Mr Saxon.-- MrClaxson 17:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[2] For your further information.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
What is it exactly that I have done to warrant this abuse from you? Your little dispute with me is pretty pathetic and highly unconstructive. You seemed to be a responsible editor, so why are you persisting with this?-- MrClaxson 17:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
YES, but I'm a newbie to Wikipedia. I haven't made many valuable edits? I have added continuity points to Doctor Who episodes. Okay they are not big contributions but every bit counts. I appreciate you have informed me of your actions towards me but I cannot understand your reasons behind this.-- MrClaxson 18:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I had to change my username because I was blocked. I'm a newbie to image liscening, if you check my history I have only tried adding one image. So the arguement was not "stupid", it was a case of misunderstanding and inexperience. The "squabbling" as you put it is prolonged by you making weak accusation towards me. And your attitude does not help, nor does it help your reputation as wiki editor. Comments such as "I rest my case, m'lud." and "That's why you have little or no value here" are smug and immature. It is not only with me, I have noticed that it is your attitude towards most users.-- MrClaxson 18:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Glad to see you have let it rest, thank you for the advice I'll take those into consideration. RC patrol sounds interesting as it will make me more of an experienced user.-- MrClaxson 18:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve made a proposal here, about fan-cr*p on Doctor Who articles in the wake of a broadcast. Any opinions?-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
It's really about time spent reverting, and the fact that we're just making work for each other. I can't be making valuble contributions to the page if I need to keep my finger on "rv".-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I didn't actually say this was about me. Every minute someone, somewhere spends reverting crap is a minute they can't spend making valuble contributions.-- Rambutan ( talk) 07:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Mr.Clarkson, i have fixed my page.thank for reminding me. User:joewinstonk
I'd just like to say that this gave me a huge laugh! Bearing in mind the number of times you've blanked yours, I mean.-- Rambutan ( talk) 12:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
That wasn't a childish comment, it was a rebuke.-- Rambutan ( talk) 15:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Actually, users are allowed but discouraged. See WP:USER. If you remove a comment, it's taken as an indication that it's been read.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
What I found funny was that not only were you telling someone off for doing something they're allowed to do, it's also something you've done yourself. It would be like me telling some old lady off for feeding ducks.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I didn't mock you. But my explanation above, combined with the fact that you once said to me, "Don't be a hypocrite Rambutan", describes my feelings of hilarity.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() | MrClaxson is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia on July 9th |
Due to harrassment from an antagonistic user, I have decided to take a break from Wikipedia for a while. Hopefully this will give the user in question time to think about their behaviour.-- MrClaxson 19:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Who is the one that made you take a break? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joewinstonk ( talk • contribs)
This account has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Claxson. --Akhilleus ( talk) 02:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
MrClaxson ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This block has been made from a singular viewpoint and has been insuffiently backed up with evidence. I have made worthy edits and contributions despite harrassment from another Wikipedian. I do not want to edit-war with the user and would like to continue Wikipedia as I was doing so. Thank you.
Decline reason:
By definition, not one of your edits with this account has been productive as you were abusing a sockpuppet to avoid the earlier block on Claxson ( talk · contribs). As an indefinitely blocked vandal, you are not welcome here. — Yamla 15:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
But I'm not User:Claxson. This is a case of mistaken identity. My editorial behaviour is cleaner than this vandal. Other than that there is no possibility of it being proven otherwise. Look at my contributions to Doctor Who articles and my work in RC Patrol, they are productive, you are letting this name cloud your judgement over me as a contributor. If you cannot provide a reason behind the accusation I am this Claxson vandal and I am not unblocked. Then I'll have to make an appeal. This seems to be a clear case of Cyber Bullying.-- MrClaxson 15:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Reply from email: open discussion only please... don't email me, I'll just reply here anyway. If you want to appeal to the ArbCom, then by all means do so, but it won't work, because you haven't got a hope of being unblocked. Plus: your case has nothing to do with my so-called harassment, ******, it's only about you and User:Claxson being the same person.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
With all due respect to the Administrators I do not believe this block has been properly thought through. I have looked at the evidence Rambutan has posted and a number of things strike me:
There's not fault on both sides. He's a sockpuppet. I'm not. That's all he's been blocked for: sockpuppetry. See here, by the way, it might amuse you.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC) I have said all I have to say on the matter, I see no point in continuing this further until an Admin has reviewed the case. Kelpin 17:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for using your name. I didn't reply by email because I don't want you to find out my email address. Now, two admins and myself are convinced that you are all the same person, so that's enough for Wikipedia.-- Rambutan ( talk) 17:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
MrClaxson ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Has this case of a misunderstanding been discreetly swept under the carpet. Where is the evidence that I am a sockpuppet of Claxson? The reasoning behind this block is fundamentally flawed.
Decline reason:
The explanation of why you have been determined to be a sockpuppet further up your talk page. — Spartaz Humbug! 12:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Due to your continued trolling and general abuse of this talkpage, I've requested that an admin protect this page to prevent you editing it.-- Rambutan ( talk) 16:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)