If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Hello Mr. MacTidy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kanha Raawat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subsequent edits. Please try AFD. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The article has now been deleted for other reasons, but for what it's worth, I agree with you, Mr. MacTidy. Speedy deletion criterion G5 applies if there are "no substantial edits by others" and I don't begin to understand how Ivanvector could view the subsequent edits as "substantial". All of them were quite trivial. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 11:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, you moved the references to an external links section [1], but i think this is not correct. I used the links as references, and although inline references would also be preferred by myself, with information used throughout the article it should be ok to add the references without inline links. The way you did it, it seems that the article uses no references at all. Pieceofmetalwork ( talk) 11:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Mr. MacTidy, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MC SKULE, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: at least one reliable source covers him, which is sufficient for A7. Try WP:PROD or WP:AFD. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why 07:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
My apologies. I mistakenly thought I was on another talkpage. I had just blanked another talk page with the same content by the same author. Thanks for cleaning up. Meters ( talk) 03:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Here Doesn't links to the interwiki article. 190.24.53.137 ( talk) 03:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
|
Thank you for your help Mr. MacTidy on article I wrote on quickshifter! I really appreciate it.
- Navin Singh (navinsingh133) Navinsingh133 ( talk) 16:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Mr. MacTidy. When I looked at the page history of Wingify, I saw the g12 nomination, and determined it was indeed a blatant copyright violation, as tagged. You had removed that tag stating opaquely "Not eligible for db-copyvio", leaving the db-corp in place. Can you advise what made you think this was not G12 eligible? Copyright violations are much more serious than promotion, and should not be removed lightly. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 20:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, my classmates and I have just uploaded the Folliculostellate cell article as part of our course and we do not understand what the edits you have done are. Could you explain what you have done and help us out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szenios ( talk • contribs)
Hello Mr. MacTidy. Thank you so much. We were not aware that that was what happened as it was our first time making a wikipedia page. Thank you for asking the administrator to merge the two histories. Thanks again -- Szenios ( talk) 17:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
You clearly have a very good grasp of how Wikipedia works. Have you previously edited before creating this account? I ask purely out of interest, and of course it's entirely up to you whether you wish to answer or not. (And to avoid any misunderstanding, this is not a veiled accusation of sockpuppetry. I edited as an IP editor before creating an account and, unlike some Wikipedia editors, I have no problem with other people who do the same.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Mr. MacTidy, I removed the spam speedy deletion tag you placed on Project one gallery. It wasn't appropriate as the venue has closed so can't really be promoted. However, I have added another CSD tag as it is actually a duplicate of an existing article. Lineslarge ( talk) 19:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear Mr. MacTidy, before putting any template on a article please check if it is being worked on or not. Jeromeenriquez ( talk) 12:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm - we certainly need all the help we can get. However, as we cannot take into account claimed experienced from previous accounts or your IP edits, and as the bulk of your talk page contains issues regarding your patrolling, I'm asking you to restrict your patrolling to simple maintenance tags and to refrain from tagging for any of the forms of deletion until your account has at least reached qualification standards to obtain access to the New page Reviewer user group. Thank you for your comprehension. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mr. MacTidy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Hello Mr. MacTidy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kanha Raawat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subsequent edits. Please try AFD. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The article has now been deleted for other reasons, but for what it's worth, I agree with you, Mr. MacTidy. Speedy deletion criterion G5 applies if there are "no substantial edits by others" and I don't begin to understand how Ivanvector could view the subsequent edits as "substantial". All of them were quite trivial. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 11:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, you moved the references to an external links section [1], but i think this is not correct. I used the links as references, and although inline references would also be preferred by myself, with information used throughout the article it should be ok to add the references without inline links. The way you did it, it seems that the article uses no references at all. Pieceofmetalwork ( talk) 11:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Mr. MacTidy, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MC SKULE, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: at least one reliable source covers him, which is sufficient for A7. Try WP:PROD or WP:AFD. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why 07:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
My apologies. I mistakenly thought I was on another talkpage. I had just blanked another talk page with the same content by the same author. Thanks for cleaning up. Meters ( talk) 03:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Here Doesn't links to the interwiki article. 190.24.53.137 ( talk) 03:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
|
Thank you for your help Mr. MacTidy on article I wrote on quickshifter! I really appreciate it.
- Navin Singh (navinsingh133) Navinsingh133 ( talk) 16:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Mr. MacTidy. When I looked at the page history of Wingify, I saw the g12 nomination, and determined it was indeed a blatant copyright violation, as tagged. You had removed that tag stating opaquely "Not eligible for db-copyvio", leaving the db-corp in place. Can you advise what made you think this was not G12 eligible? Copyright violations are much more serious than promotion, and should not be removed lightly. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 20:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, my classmates and I have just uploaded the Folliculostellate cell article as part of our course and we do not understand what the edits you have done are. Could you explain what you have done and help us out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szenios ( talk • contribs)
Hello Mr. MacTidy. Thank you so much. We were not aware that that was what happened as it was our first time making a wikipedia page. Thank you for asking the administrator to merge the two histories. Thanks again -- Szenios ( talk) 17:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
You clearly have a very good grasp of how Wikipedia works. Have you previously edited before creating this account? I ask purely out of interest, and of course it's entirely up to you whether you wish to answer or not. (And to avoid any misunderstanding, this is not a veiled accusation of sockpuppetry. I edited as an IP editor before creating an account and, unlike some Wikipedia editors, I have no problem with other people who do the same.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Mr. MacTidy, I removed the spam speedy deletion tag you placed on Project one gallery. It wasn't appropriate as the venue has closed so can't really be promoted. However, I have added another CSD tag as it is actually a duplicate of an existing article. Lineslarge ( talk) 19:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear Mr. MacTidy, before putting any template on a article please check if it is being worked on or not. Jeromeenriquez ( talk) 12:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm - we certainly need all the help we can get. However, as we cannot take into account claimed experienced from previous accounts or your IP edits, and as the bulk of your talk page contains issues regarding your patrolling, I'm asking you to restrict your patrolling to simple maintenance tags and to refrain from tagging for any of the forms of deletion until your account has at least reached qualification standards to obtain access to the New page Reviewer user group. Thank you for your comprehension. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Mr. MacTidy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)