Hello and welcome to my talk page. I'm new to Wikipedia and I like to make contributions. Please feel free to ask me any questions in the "Questions" section or leave comments in the "Comments" section and you are welcome to help me improve on my article titled "Berendo Street and Avenue" which can be found at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Berendo Street and Avenue. You may also start a new section at the bottom of the page if you like. Please read my "Notice about discussions" before beginning a new message. Thanks for visiting!
This is Mr. Cookie 715's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||
purge view |
Low to moderate level of vandalism | 2.05 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 07:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |
Adding one single footnote does not fix the article; it's a great start, but you need to footnote basically all the info to one source or another.
Also, though it's not mandatory, I would suggest you consider signing up for a Wiki account (it's anonymous and free). Please see Wikipedia:Why create an account? MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Please support Wikipedia.
![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – #69 |
![]() |
Golden Wiki Award
Good job! 75.62.131.130 ( talk) 00:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC) |
If you have a dynamic IP address but want to maintain a fixed user talk page, you may want to create an account. Huon ( talk) 06:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
On what? The edit filter? Apparently you tried to remove content from Bonkers The Clown's talk page; you indeed should not do so. Bonkers The Clown will handle the archiving of his own talk page. That's not even a false positive, strictly speaking. Huon ( talk) 19:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I have seen the apology, and I've also seen your involvement with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Banjir which postdates it. Playing Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Huon ( talk) 02:35, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Please don't remove this; I like it.
Some discussions will be moved into the archives section if it has been unresponded or continued for 30 days. Others will stay on my talk page. It is up to me to decide. If you notice that your discussion is not on my talk page, click on "Archives of old discussions can be found here" and follow the instructions on the page. For your convenience, a search bar is provided at the top of this page so you can search for your discussion. Click "Search Archives" to see if it's there. Otherwise it may have been deleted by me or someone. I will monitor that page and see if there's anything to respond.
Notice that I have created two sections labeled "Questions" and the other "Comments". Questions go in the "Questions" section and comments in the "Comments" section. I will check here and respond to them and place a "Talkback" template on your talk page. If you wish to create a new section and ask me something or leave a comment, you may do so. I will respond to them as well. I don't judge. Just click "New section" or "Edit" on the tabs on the top of the page to create a new section. Please put new sections under this text. In the questions and comments section, please number them one after another to avoid confusion. Lastly, thank you for reading this.
Feel free to ask me questions about your articles. If you need help you may ask me. I'll be happy to help. For these type of questions, please create a new section under this text. Do not edit anything above this text (except for "Questions" and "Comments" which is where you can write me questions or comments). Thank you.
![]() |
Hi Mr. Cookie 715! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. Cookie 715. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
02:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC) |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Huon (
talk)
07:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)So much for the "last edit 'till the block expires". And now this. You were warned. Huon ( talk) 07:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Oh, HELL NO! Well 75.62.132.179 admitted that he, not me but he was the cause of my block read his talk page. Wait a minute...I clicked on the " So much" and it took me to Happysailor's. A comment from that I.P. address tells that I'm the culprit. Well I guess you're right. I am a horrible guy. (sigh) WELL. I guess I'm leaving Wikipedia forever. Bye guys. Bye Huon. I know you're mad. Now that i'm blocked forever, we should say, I'm leaving. Last chance to, well, forgive me. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 23:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I think we can pass on that chance. Kuru (talk) 01:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Okay, first of all, what do you meanwith "I think we can pass on that chance. Then, I think we can work this out. Maybe I should be blocked until I can prove that I will no longer vandalize Wikipedia. Like I won't make edits on my account except my talk page, maybe, or with an I.P. address for a month...or six...or twelve...as long as you'd like and I think that will work. If not then well you can decide Kuru. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 02:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Do you want to self-aggrandize or do you want to make a serious unblock request that might be worthy of consideration. In my eyes, you are one more unblock request like this away from losing your talk page access. — Daniel Case ( talk) 14:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am being serious. To you it seems that you can't trust me. I can see why. You think I might still go off and continue doing these things which of course is considered block evasion. But now I am serious about this. You'll see--I won't be doing them anymore. I might actually abandon this account. And you didn't answer the above question: What do you mean with "I think we can pass on that chance"? Please answer that. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 16:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declined for sockpuppetry. As for the "I think we can pass on that chance" comment, my guess is that since you wrote that you were leaving Wikipedia, the other admins there was no real reason to unblock you. Also note that as a blocked user, it doesn't help your case that you try to put pressure on us by "threatening" to leave Wikipedia. I sincerely hope you realize that. Bjelleklang - talk 22:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I don't presume to speak for other admins. However, I think it was self-evident. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Well I wouldn't say "threat". I do realize what you mean now. now I understand that yeah it doesn't help to pressure you. But that's not what I was trying to do. Anyway it doesn't matter. Thanks for claryfing. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 00:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a comment, not an unblock request. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm waiting for a response here. It's taking too long. Not to be rushing you guys but I'm desperate for a response here. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 21:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Nothing new, repeated, abusive unblock request. I will revoke your talk page access. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. Cookie 715. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Rs
chen
7754
19:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC) |
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It has been a long time since I was blocked. During that time, I realized that what I had done was wrong. Now I am sure that I am ready to edit constructively. I sincerely hope that this request is worth of consideration. Let's forget about the past and start fresh. I will contribute to this encyclopedia. Please give me another chance and I can show you that I can edit and help improve Wikipedia. Think about it. Mr. Cookie 715( talk)
Decline reason:
Hmm. Both Mr. Cookie 715 and an anonymous editor using IP addresses in the range 75.62.x.x claimed back in August 2013 that the anonymous user had falsely claimed to be Mr. Cookie 715. Now an anonymous editor using the same IP range claims to be Mr. Cookie 715, and makes an unblock request. There are two possibilities: (1) Mr. Cookie 715 was telling the truth when he said that the IP editor was an imposter, in which case this unblock request is pretty certainly also from an imposter, and obviously should be declined; (2) Mr. Cookie 715 was lying when he said that the IP editor was an imposter, in which case he is now evading the block on talk page access to post this request, and I am very unlikely ever to accept any unblock request which was posted by an editor evading a block. Having said that, I do accept that people can change over time, and giving you a second chance may be reasonable. I am posting a block message with instructions on how to request an unblock when you don't have talk page access. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello and welcome to my talk page. I'm new to Wikipedia and I like to make contributions. Please feel free to ask me any questions in the "Questions" section or leave comments in the "Comments" section and you are welcome to help me improve on my article titled "Berendo Street and Avenue" which can be found at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Berendo Street and Avenue. You may also start a new section at the bottom of the page if you like. Please read my "Notice about discussions" before beginning a new message. Thanks for visiting!
This is Mr. Cookie 715's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||
purge view |
Low to moderate level of vandalism | 2.05 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 07:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |
Adding one single footnote does not fix the article; it's a great start, but you need to footnote basically all the info to one source or another.
Also, though it's not mandatory, I would suggest you consider signing up for a Wiki account (it's anonymous and free). Please see Wikipedia:Why create an account? MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Please support Wikipedia.
![]() | |
Wikipedia ads | file info – #69 |
![]() |
Golden Wiki Award
Good job! 75.62.131.130 ( talk) 00:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC) |
If you have a dynamic IP address but want to maintain a fixed user talk page, you may want to create an account. Huon ( talk) 06:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
On what? The edit filter? Apparently you tried to remove content from Bonkers The Clown's talk page; you indeed should not do so. Bonkers The Clown will handle the archiving of his own talk page. That's not even a false positive, strictly speaking. Huon ( talk) 19:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I have seen the apology, and I've also seen your involvement with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Banjir which postdates it. Playing Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Huon ( talk) 02:35, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Please don't remove this; I like it.
Some discussions will be moved into the archives section if it has been unresponded or continued for 30 days. Others will stay on my talk page. It is up to me to decide. If you notice that your discussion is not on my talk page, click on "Archives of old discussions can be found here" and follow the instructions on the page. For your convenience, a search bar is provided at the top of this page so you can search for your discussion. Click "Search Archives" to see if it's there. Otherwise it may have been deleted by me or someone. I will monitor that page and see if there's anything to respond.
Notice that I have created two sections labeled "Questions" and the other "Comments". Questions go in the "Questions" section and comments in the "Comments" section. I will check here and respond to them and place a "Talkback" template on your talk page. If you wish to create a new section and ask me something or leave a comment, you may do so. I will respond to them as well. I don't judge. Just click "New section" or "Edit" on the tabs on the top of the page to create a new section. Please put new sections under this text. In the questions and comments section, please number them one after another to avoid confusion. Lastly, thank you for reading this.
Feel free to ask me questions about your articles. If you need help you may ask me. I'll be happy to help. For these type of questions, please create a new section under this text. Do not edit anything above this text (except for "Questions" and "Comments" which is where you can write me questions or comments). Thank you.
![]() |
Hi Mr. Cookie 715! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. Cookie 715. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
02:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC) |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Huon (
talk)
07:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)So much for the "last edit 'till the block expires". And now this. You were warned. Huon ( talk) 07:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Oh, HELL NO! Well 75.62.132.179 admitted that he, not me but he was the cause of my block read his talk page. Wait a minute...I clicked on the " So much" and it took me to Happysailor's. A comment from that I.P. address tells that I'm the culprit. Well I guess you're right. I am a horrible guy. (sigh) WELL. I guess I'm leaving Wikipedia forever. Bye guys. Bye Huon. I know you're mad. Now that i'm blocked forever, we should say, I'm leaving. Last chance to, well, forgive me. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 23:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I think we can pass on that chance. Kuru (talk) 01:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Okay, first of all, what do you meanwith "I think we can pass on that chance. Then, I think we can work this out. Maybe I should be blocked until I can prove that I will no longer vandalize Wikipedia. Like I won't make edits on my account except my talk page, maybe, or with an I.P. address for a month...or six...or twelve...as long as you'd like and I think that will work. If not then well you can decide Kuru. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 02:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Do you want to self-aggrandize or do you want to make a serious unblock request that might be worthy of consideration. In my eyes, you are one more unblock request like this away from losing your talk page access. — Daniel Case ( talk) 14:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am being serious. To you it seems that you can't trust me. I can see why. You think I might still go off and continue doing these things which of course is considered block evasion. But now I am serious about this. You'll see--I won't be doing them anymore. I might actually abandon this account. And you didn't answer the above question: What do you mean with "I think we can pass on that chance"? Please answer that. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 16:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declined for sockpuppetry. As for the "I think we can pass on that chance" comment, my guess is that since you wrote that you were leaving Wikipedia, the other admins there was no real reason to unblock you. Also note that as a blocked user, it doesn't help your case that you try to put pressure on us by "threatening" to leave Wikipedia. I sincerely hope you realize that. Bjelleklang - talk 22:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I don't presume to speak for other admins. However, I think it was self-evident. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Well I wouldn't say "threat". I do realize what you mean now. now I understand that yeah it doesn't help to pressure you. But that's not what I was trying to do. Anyway it doesn't matter. Thanks for claryfing. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 00:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a comment, not an unblock request. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm waiting for a response here. It's taking too long. Not to be rushing you guys but I'm desperate for a response here. Mr. Cookie 715 ( talk) 21:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Nothing new, repeated, abusive unblock request. I will revoke your talk page access. Bbb23 ( talk) 22:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr. Cookie 715. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Rs
chen
7754
19:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC) |
Mr. Cookie 715 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It has been a long time since I was blocked. During that time, I realized that what I had done was wrong. Now I am sure that I am ready to edit constructively. I sincerely hope that this request is worth of consideration. Let's forget about the past and start fresh. I will contribute to this encyclopedia. Please give me another chance and I can show you that I can edit and help improve Wikipedia. Think about it. Mr. Cookie 715( talk)
Decline reason:
Hmm. Both Mr. Cookie 715 and an anonymous editor using IP addresses in the range 75.62.x.x claimed back in August 2013 that the anonymous user had falsely claimed to be Mr. Cookie 715. Now an anonymous editor using the same IP range claims to be Mr. Cookie 715, and makes an unblock request. There are two possibilities: (1) Mr. Cookie 715 was telling the truth when he said that the IP editor was an imposter, in which case this unblock request is pretty certainly also from an imposter, and obviously should be declined; (2) Mr. Cookie 715 was lying when he said that the IP editor was an imposter, in which case he is now evading the block on talk page access to post this request, and I am very unlikely ever to accept any unblock request which was posted by an editor evading a block. Having said that, I do accept that people can change over time, and giving you a second chance may be reasonable. I am posting a block message with instructions on how to request an unblock when you don't have talk page access. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.