![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
user:Hetoum I second time uses incivil comments on page Church of Kish. He used anons to edit war on page and insulted two contributors [1], [2]-- Dacy69 02:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Please can you justify how issues regarding the trademark is relavant to the Royal Bengal Airline article? You have put protection on the article for no reason and have not seen the reason why it was blanked out. Trademark issues are not conclusive of the company in question. Please could you very kindly review this again and cut this out? Thank you.
With regards to the protection of that article I would like to explain that no vandalism took place. What happened as you noticed was a dispute over sources. One user kept sourcing to blogs and the other kept deleting it. I have the original sources from newspaper articles and I would like to add them to avoid a repeat of the dispute. I don't contribute here very often so I'm afraid that in 4 days I will forget about this and the dispute will continue. -- BarryGoldwater 19:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
... for reverting vandalism on my talk page. - Two Oars 19:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Mr. Z-man. I don't understand why you protected Jeffree Star when you unsalted Jeffree Star (singer) and made it a redirect. Powers T 01:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
With all do respect, I have to disagree with you assessment. All the edits made by myself are sourced and relevant and User:Kmsiever has deemed them otherwise without offering a reasonable explanation. Then reverts my edits, which are reasonable, without discussion. Yet, I open discussion and ask for input receiving none and get threatened with a block. Does this seem reasonable or just ?-- 207.6.12.137 01:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't think that I ever called that user, or any, a troll, please show me where. Iask again with respect, Does this seem reasonable or just ?-- 207.6.12.137 03:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
As long as you'll try to help clean up the inevitable mess that comes with this. If you, or someone you know could write a bot to clean up all the remaining /Comments pages that will remain after this it would be greatly appreciated. Anyways, you can go right ahead if you're ready. Oh, and you forgot to sign your comment there ;) -- Psy c h less 23:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand why you deleted this page ?
While I agree with your assesment, the timing is a bit off. User:Eep², who constituted one side of the argument, is currently blocked. Taemyr 01:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you please protect User talk:That Dude 07? He is abusing the unblock template to get unblocked. Momusufan 19:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Vorlin. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 85.181.39.131 13:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I started a review for the following reasons:
All in all, this mode (Notability tag - contested! PROD - contested! OK, so I make an AfD in the holiday time - Joy, joy, it worked!) seems to me a case of bullying by the Proponent. If you want to know whether Vorlin is notable or original research, why don't you ask in the ConLang articles AND wait for the end of the summer holidays AND allow at least one month between contested tags before setting a new one? -- 85.181.39.131 13:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
What was wrong with the prince's of the universe? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you just haven't seen my question yet. Haelstrom 13:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
You are very lenient giving him only 48 hours block, it is a vandalism only account and he called me a "paedofile"[sic] and a fag, because I reverted his vandalism [3] Jackaranga 21:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, that was my bad. I didn't mean to take off the hangon from Media buster. Ten Pound Hammer • ((( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, I apologize for not giving my reasons of deleting the "Humanoid Animals" category. It's just that I believe that category is just useless by looking through it. " Danucciguzman 07:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)"
You missed the page list of environment-theme lists of topics: S, when you deleted the others. -- Wavelength 14:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Looks like we protected this one at the same time. Please do set an expiry time when protecting talkpages of blocked users though- otherwise someone has to go through and clear out all the old protections periodically. I had to do about 100 last month (some of those talkpage had been protected over a year!) ... WjB scribe 04:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Is that needed? There is no legit dispute IMO. They have been using "Bodies" as the them song ever since ECW started in June 2006. The IP's and the one user has not provide ANY evidence to suggest a change in them songs. TJ Spyke 03:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
I looked at this page of Lawrence Dimick, and I think it needs to get deleted. What do you think? I gave my reason though on the talk page. Thanks. HoneyBee 17:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to ask about your deletion of the Mustard Seed School article. Begun by children from a rival school, the article when it was brought to my attention was insulting, biased, and worst of all, illiterate. Rather than deleting the kids' work (they created pages for nearly every school in Hoboken, NJ) I did the wiki thing and improved it. Now you have deleted it as advertising, and as non-notable. I believe you are in error on both counts, but it's the last charge that I would like to take up with you in light of your authoring an article about your high school in Michigan. As it happens, Mustard Seed School is a model school, a leader in Christian urban education. People come from literally all over the world to visit Mustard Seed and learn from them. There is a nation-wide group of leaders in Christian urban education know as The Hoboken Group because the group gathered around Mustard Seed, the recognized leader. In fact, Mustard Seed **is** notable, at least as notable as your high school, but since the article is deleted, we'll never see it in wikipedia. Why not do the wiki thing and improve it? Please email me privately at margaret(at)mrlukens(dot)com. All the best, Margaret Mrlukens 01:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Could you please unblock this article? There is no longer a need to keep it blocked, as the move was finalized right today [4]. Thanks in advance. -- Angelo 20:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Re your note on user talk page at User talk:TcKnd that this was to be deleted...I am preparing for disambiguation on Chris Edwards to include an Oregon Representative, so wound up merging Chris Edwards (Kasabian) with its duplicate, Chris Edwards (musician) as part of that process, which will ultimately find the musician on the disamb page. Thus I corrected the links there so as to avoid double redirects, and you can take it from there later. I was working through the what links here, when I found your note on the talk page referenced. No such tag was evident there when I just did the merge. I left a note there at the talk page you noted too...don't know how you want to proceed with it. There's still not much to the musician's page, but perhaps he is notable. I worked it over just a little and moved on to my main goal. FYI. - Duff 05:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Just wanted to let you know that I had put a msg on the article's talk page about 2 weeks ago. Are you still dealing with this? (I've mostly been on wiki break.) Have you been in contact with the 2 parties? Take care HG | Talk 04:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
In accordance with David Levy's instructions, I have reverted your merge of section-specific templates. I am not opposed in principle, but I think the execution was poor. My reasons are as follows:
Don't you think it would be better to make all those templates work with parameters like {{ unreferenced}} does? BenB4 13:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello Mr.Z-man, thank you for supporting
my RfA!
I was promoted with a final tally of 68/12/0.
Also, please wish a Happy Birthday to
Her Majesty the Queen.
Vivat Regina!
In connection with your block of Fafarman, would you consider having a look at User:67.110.32.82's edits - s/he is acting as Fafarman's meatpuppet per the request referenced on ANI. I was wondering if you thought a block of that account might be in order. In addition, I was wondering if you might consider semi-protecting the Cheri Yecke article - after all, Fafarman's blog may continue to attract meatpuppets (hard to tell how many people actually read his blog). Thanks. Guettarda 21:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
How did you come up with your name, Mr. Z-man? Nice username, though! :-)-- PNiddy Go! 0 01:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking User:124.227.193.2. Angel Of Sadness T/ C 20:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
How are things with Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-05-03 Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture? Should the case be closed? Are you still active with this case? Thanks! Vassyana 05:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I believe that user:pascack is back as another sockpuppet. A brand new user (jjj222) has made edits on a pascack pet project, discrediting Joe Girardi as a yankee. and 192.234.99.1 is not blocked, which is his ip. Mghabmw 17:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I did not make the change to the info box colors that he refers to. That change was made by Soxrockprojects who was attempting to split the colors between Cubs and Yankees, which I had no issue with. I even added a comment that Girardi still works for the YES Network. I did nothing out of line.
Jjj222
17:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
(Sorry for arguing on your talk page) Mghabmw 17:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Just those 2 edits, especially because he didn't actually change the colors (Even I thought he did for a minute there) is not enough to block Jjj222 or extend Pascack's block. Nor is it enough to get a checkuser. Mr.Z-man talk ¢ 18:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
all right. Mghabmw 19:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
User_talk:Metsfann34
I found this interesting though. Pascack was a notorious Mets fan.
I know it's not hard evidence, but it does seem fishy that this user (jjj222) just came up while Pascack is blocked, his IP just got unblocked, the first thing he does is change
Joe Girardi's team colors, and is now worried about Mets colors.
Mghabmw
22:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm starting to suspect User:Gmh224 for the same reasons. Brand new user taking on Pascack's pet projects. editing history Mghabmw 22:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Why shorten User:Pascack block, he has been involved in the craziest sockpupperting edit warning I have ever seen in my two years in wikipedia. See the history of Reggie Jackson. I will extend the block to indef again, as seriously Pascack never had any useful edits and all he did was revert was and sockpupperty. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 02:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William Bain. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talkshowbob ( talk • contribs)
I added the "imagewidth" parameter to {{ Infobox Christian denomination}} davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I was trying to figure out where the actual page went to, all the ones I could find were cut and pasted. Now I see you have found the right one. The talk page that should be associated with it is at Talk:Hermetic Order the Golden Dawn (A+O) in case you'd like to put them back together. Thanks for helping! GlassFET 22:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! (rather amusing that the reason it was moved in the first place got speedied 3x in 24 hours...) -- SarekOfVulcan 17:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I had put a sock puppeteer template on your userpage by accident! Sorry, man! When I saw the block log you had blocked a puppeteer but I thought it was the other way around, any way srry about that. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 00:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Would be considered libel? - WarthogDemon 04:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Just any FYI, this user is back with Detinspection ( talk · contribs) and China Det Inspection ( talk · contribs). I blocked the first one for spamming and the second for sockpuppetting, but then I vaguely remembered that I had since this before. Do you recall if Deyitest ( talk · contribs) was the first account or another sockpuppet account? -- Gogo Dodo 08:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
I am disappointed that you have felt it necessary to protect the article. The Northern Irish flag dispute is ongoing (see talk:Northern Ireland) but will hopefully be resolved soon in which case I hope you will deprotect it? In the mean time could you please make clear on the article and/or talk page that it has been protected? I cannot see one. Thank you. Biofoundationsoflanguage 10:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the unblock, I couldn't unblock myself before because someone had protected my user talk page. Jobe6 03:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for creating me an account. Now I do not need to be in chaos and being disabled from editing.-- Slayerdylan 06:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
what is the exact reason that the article 'thompsonfilm' was deleted?
please explain, as it was said that the article was deleted because; article about a company that does not assert significance.
significance to what???
please tell me how i can change the page so that it is 'legal'
thanks
Why post another one when my first one is being ignored? I didn't ask anyone to read my mind. KP Botany 19:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
hi,Mr.Z-man Why my article was deleted? Plz.. give me reply
Thank you for your intervention in this matter. I considered restoring the article myself, but the last time I did that I got jumped on for having a COI. I have spent some time recently clearing out the CSD backlogs and have become frustrated by the number of admins who seem not to understand the speedy criteria. It is gratifying to know that I am not alone in my interpretation of the criteria. Dsmdgold 23:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm watching it but I am not always on. Take it easy. -- Y not? 00:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I want my page to be protected. Holmes.sherlock 10:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Can you please take another look at the situation involving Jeeny based upon some additional information I have brought forward? I have posted at the appropriate ANI section. I'm really concerned about that situation, though I don't blame you at all because of the "quiet" nature of the trolling. Many thanks, The Behnam 05:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I am User:24.168.46.238 who was recently blocked from Wikipedia for six months by a Wikipedia administrator named "Georgewilliamherbert".
Since my user talk page was protected by "Mr.Z-man" only 4 minutes after the block was issued by "Georgewilliamherbert", I was denied the opportunity to post an unblock request. I'd like to request that I be give the opportunity to do so now:
I know that I was wrong for threatening legal action against "CyberGhostface", but I had asked him to stop bothering me by posting repeated warnings on my user talk page for minor violations of Wikipedia's rules, and he refused. I believe that he had a vendetta against me, as he seemed to be tracking my every edit, just waiting for me to do something in violation of Wikipedia' s rules so he could post another warning on my user talk page, which he knew would aggravate me and cause me to lose my temper. "CyberGhostface" had previously gotten me blocked for personal attacks, and I was stupid enough to fall for his ploy to get me blocked again. I lost my cool, and posted things on my user talk page that I shouldn't have. I know that there was no excuse for my behavior, and for that, I am very sorry.
I'd like to respectfully ask that you shorten the duration of by block, as I feel that six months is far too harsh of a punishment. I was initially issued a 48 hour block by one administrator, but 7 hours later (without me making any additional offensive edits or postings on Wikipedia), it was arbitrarily extended to 6 months by another administrator.
I promise that once my editing priviliges are reinstated, I will no longer engage in the kind of conduct (personal attacks, threats of legal action) that got me blocked. After reinstatement, I intend on creating an account on Wikipedia, and I will make constructive additions to the project. I invite you to check up on me periodically to see that I am keeping my word to you!
I also promise to you that will have no further contact with "CyberGhostface", and since I have no intention of violation Wikipedia's rules in the future, he has no valid reason whatsoever to contact me or to post warnings on my user talk page.
I feel that a reduction in the duration of my block is warranted, considering the questionable circumstances of how my block was arbitrarily increased from 48 hours to 4320 hours.
Again, please accept my sincere apology for my past behavior on Wikipedia, and thank you for your consideration!
Note: I am using a friend's computer (IP Address: 64.38.198.61) simply to post this notice on the user talk page of the administrator who increased my block from 48 hours to 6 months. I am not a "sockpuppet", and I have no intention of using my friend's computer again.
64.38.198.61 14:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I see you were the one to lock the template. The wrong version has been locked and it currently contains some additions that are hottly disputed not only in content but in presentation. I have posted this under an edit protected tag on the article talk page, but another user did not feel this was apporpriate and suggested that I contact you directly. I can either point you to the specific examples of a) what needs to be removed and b) where it is being addressed. Alternatively, i can just explain it to you here. I've marked this for watching so just let me know. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 20:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Indirectly, an AFD closure of yours is being reviewed currently at DRV. You closed the AFD on The Duttons as "No Consensous". The article has now been speedy deleted. It is this speedy deletion that is actually under review. The deleting admin, as part of his arguments justifying the speedy, is challenging your AFD close as invalid. I felt that you might want to come defend your closure descision. - TexasAndroid 11:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your flawless move of the Al Rashid-article! Finally, I found the talk-page again ;-) Regards, Huldra 16:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I am writing this letter in regards to the deletion of Discount Tire's wikipedia article today, August 22nd. I would like to know how you came to the decision of deleting this article. There wasn't to much detail given except for blatant advertising. I, of course, want to meet Wikipedia's standards and I just want to know what sections of the article were more of an advertisement then factual information. If you can provide the answer to this question it would be very much appreciated. The last thing I want to do is make the same mistakes when I decide to post a new article for Discount Tire. Thank you very much!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlsathomas 15:20, 22 August 2007
Suggest WP:CBLANK. Dbromage [Talk] 04:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
user:Vonones who is in a pure anti-turkic personality attack many "turkic history" pages of wikipedia, (see the Huns page), he is an armenian user and hate all the turkish people(he always edit with no written source). he uses 3RR rule throug to his nationalist and racist ideals. how can i stop him? thanks.-- hakozen 03:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
im Turkish, and Huns were one of the biggest Turkic empires, i was educated about them in elemantry school becouse im Turkish, but a vandalist called Vonones (who is in a big campaing) edits what i did (you may see it in my history) he is probably have a problem about turkish users (i dont care about your nationality) but afterwards you gave me a ban(that cant unerstand why, cos i only want to defend myself) thats what i can say. -- hakozen 16:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I am MrZ-man on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/MrZ-man. Thanks. -- Mr.Z-man talk ¢ 15:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to report David Shankbone for WP:STALK after he disregarded my request on his talk page. THF 19:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Might want to see the latest edits: [10] -- Vonones 19:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
hi - Not sure but I guess I address this query to you - Why on earth was the Rhodesrunprofile image removed? The image definitely belongs to Rhodes Run, was created by Rhodes Run, and appears on the Adventure Racing site as it is placed there, from the Rhodes Run home page, by the Rhodes Run event operators. In addition, why was there no response (or verification made) to the points I placed in response to the initial query as to ownership on the image? Gold Pen 05:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
hi - Not sure but I guess I address this query to you - Why on earth was the Rhodesrunprofile image removed? The image definitely belongs to Rhodes Run, was created by Rhodes Run, and appears on the Adventure Racing site as it is placed there, from the Rhodes Run home page, by the Rhodes Run event operators. In addition, why was there no response (or verification made) to the points I placed in response to the initial query as to ownership on the image before the image was removed? Gold Pen 05:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Apologies for the duplicate posting Gold Pen 05:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mr.Z-man"
Aaah - that part I understand, what I dont understand is why the image was removed prior to this chat; as clearly whoever put in the protest had no understanding of how that Adventure Racing website works, ie that Rhodes Run is one of the 'operators'; anyway would really appreciate your guidance as how to correctly phrase it to get the image back up; would it be simpler to show that Rhodes Run website owns the copyright instead of me ? Also, I hope it's ok to respond here Gold Pen 19:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I do appreciate that the checks & balances protect me, and any material I submit and of course protecting the integrity of Wikipedia Gold Pen 19:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I sent in a report to ANI yesterday which you dealt with concerning this user, User talk:81.0.68.145. You gave him a final warning for his off-topic use of discussion pages. He has made one (two if you count him removing his own signiture to stay "invisible"...) more off-topic addition to article discussion pages since the warning [12]. - Just thought I'd tell you. Scarian Talk 21:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
why did you delete my Demonica Tales page, its not like i was using the page to make money, i just wanted people and my friends to be able to see it.
Mr. Z-Man. I feel that it is wrong that you deleted my posting on Germaine Guerin as blatant advertising. I find it notable, as do articles by Voque magazine, that Germaine Guerin is one of the most important and forgotten handbag designers of our time. 69.180.80.159 13:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
If you think it is appropriate, would you delete Talk:Norfolk punch the page only contains my single comment supporting deletion of the article itself. I would do it myself but am not trusted with the keys to the broom closet. Thanks for your service!! User:Pedant 18:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I had no idea how to even go about sorting out the mess he caused. Thanks for fixing everything so fast. -- Bfigura ( talk) 02:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I just edit conflicted with you at WP:SPLICE over the lastest request. For the record, my response was going to be:
Some of these pages can be deleted but I'm not sure a history merge is needed. ZipCode may spread his contribs all over the place if he wants - seems to me all edits by other editors are in the same place - we just have some pointless redirects.
Aside from a messy contrib history I don't see what the merge gained us - wouldn't it have been easier just to nominate the surplus redirects for deletion? WjB scribe 04:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
has obviously been an utterly worthless "editor", and in any normal enterprise he would of course be irreversibly thrown out. Further, his plea for his block to be lifted is vacuous. But the trouble with permablocking him in WP is that he's likely just to sprout a new username. For this reason (and not because of any sympathy), I'd be inclined to shorten his block to a week or so this time around (his first time). -- Hoary 04:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks, sorry for my contribution in what turned into edit warring. I would welcome any contribution you can make to the talk page, regarding the disputes of:
Thanks for considering. — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I wanted to make the may it sound strange proposal to remove the Muslim and Osama references from the page. The official story does not connect Osama to the 11 September attack. Rex Tomb, chief of investigative publicity for the FBI explains, The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.. I'm not a Muslim but I find the words Muslim extremist extremely inappropriate in contrast with the facts. I don't want the page unlocked or anything. It just cant make false accusations. There are millions and millions of Muslims on the world, I figure we should at least see some evidence before we slander them as terrorists? Thanks for your time anyway, drop me a line.( Gaby de wilde 20:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
hey good call, i forgot about that. i've done only one "move" before, and i forgot that i'd need calvary holiness church to be calvary holiness church (disambiguation). i'd love it if you'd help out! can you fix it? Aepoutre 17:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
okay. i put the request in. should i remove it? Aepoutre 17:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that, and for fixing it. I appreciate it. I didn't even realise it had an effect on the history, but that makes sense. Thanks again. Aepoutre 17:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Poaching Entity,
I read that article entitled "Crygar," and thought it was an informative description of a nearly-extinct animal. To be sure, only one is known to be roaming, and scientists have determined that she is sterile. Thus, indeed, this animal, a delight to some, an annoyance to some more, will go the way of the beloved dodo bird. What futher tragedies await us in the animal kingdom?
The paragraph itself is a masterful homage to Lewis Carroll. Where is the sense of (literary) history and humor? Shall we delete "Snark" (as in "The Hunting of the Snark") as well?
BTW, "incoherent," as in "the text is unsalvageably incoherent" would seem to suggest that the text is disjointed or confused. Were you possibly reading from right to left? Was a cryger sitting in front of your computer screen, obscuring the text with its abundant fur?
Signed,
H. I. Dudgeon
You protected Ethnic minorities in Azerbaijan in June, its now September. When will it be unprotected? Hajji Piruz 23:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
If I were you, I would just leave them alone for now. (That's what I'm trying to do now anyway.) WP:RBI and WP:DFT come to mind. If they want to contribute constructively after the block expires they are more than welcome to do so. If they would rather not contribute, I don't think I'd be bothered and if they plan to contribute non-constructively, then a longer term solution might be needed, but that can be dealt with as it unfolds. Mr. Z-man 04:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you protected the page of Ordu. Seems Oguzes problems is the blog. If you unblock it, I will rewrite it with a wealth of published book sources and clean the article up. THe sooner, the better no? Hetoum I 03:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Mr.Z-man, do you have the ability to show what the article about "Liz Cohen" said, before it was deleted (for a second time)? I am curious if this is about the performance artist Liz Cohen or the autism author Liz Cohen (BBB AUTISM GUIDES: Strategies for Parents by Parents). -- Form990 13:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Cool I understand how wikipedia works now. It makes sense as people need to back up the article otherwise random nuts can just write rubbish for fun :) "Arf1" xx
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
user:Hetoum I second time uses incivil comments on page Church of Kish. He used anons to edit war on page and insulted two contributors [1], [2]-- Dacy69 02:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Please can you justify how issues regarding the trademark is relavant to the Royal Bengal Airline article? You have put protection on the article for no reason and have not seen the reason why it was blanked out. Trademark issues are not conclusive of the company in question. Please could you very kindly review this again and cut this out? Thank you.
With regards to the protection of that article I would like to explain that no vandalism took place. What happened as you noticed was a dispute over sources. One user kept sourcing to blogs and the other kept deleting it. I have the original sources from newspaper articles and I would like to add them to avoid a repeat of the dispute. I don't contribute here very often so I'm afraid that in 4 days I will forget about this and the dispute will continue. -- BarryGoldwater 19:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
... for reverting vandalism on my talk page. - Two Oars 19:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Mr. Z-man. I don't understand why you protected Jeffree Star when you unsalted Jeffree Star (singer) and made it a redirect. Powers T 01:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
With all do respect, I have to disagree with you assessment. All the edits made by myself are sourced and relevant and User:Kmsiever has deemed them otherwise without offering a reasonable explanation. Then reverts my edits, which are reasonable, without discussion. Yet, I open discussion and ask for input receiving none and get threatened with a block. Does this seem reasonable or just ?-- 207.6.12.137 01:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't think that I ever called that user, or any, a troll, please show me where. Iask again with respect, Does this seem reasonable or just ?-- 207.6.12.137 03:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
As long as you'll try to help clean up the inevitable mess that comes with this. If you, or someone you know could write a bot to clean up all the remaining /Comments pages that will remain after this it would be greatly appreciated. Anyways, you can go right ahead if you're ready. Oh, and you forgot to sign your comment there ;) -- Psy c h less 23:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand why you deleted this page ?
While I agree with your assesment, the timing is a bit off. User:Eep², who constituted one side of the argument, is currently blocked. Taemyr 01:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you please protect User talk:That Dude 07? He is abusing the unblock template to get unblocked. Momusufan 19:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Vorlin. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 85.181.39.131 13:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I started a review for the following reasons:
All in all, this mode (Notability tag - contested! PROD - contested! OK, so I make an AfD in the holiday time - Joy, joy, it worked!) seems to me a case of bullying by the Proponent. If you want to know whether Vorlin is notable or original research, why don't you ask in the ConLang articles AND wait for the end of the summer holidays AND allow at least one month between contested tags before setting a new one? -- 85.181.39.131 13:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
What was wrong with the prince's of the universe? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you just haven't seen my question yet. Haelstrom 13:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
You are very lenient giving him only 48 hours block, it is a vandalism only account and he called me a "paedofile"[sic] and a fag, because I reverted his vandalism [3] Jackaranga 21:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, that was my bad. I didn't mean to take off the hangon from Media buster. Ten Pound Hammer • ((( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, I apologize for not giving my reasons of deleting the "Humanoid Animals" category. It's just that I believe that category is just useless by looking through it. " Danucciguzman 07:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)"
You missed the page list of environment-theme lists of topics: S, when you deleted the others. -- Wavelength 14:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Looks like we protected this one at the same time. Please do set an expiry time when protecting talkpages of blocked users though- otherwise someone has to go through and clear out all the old protections periodically. I had to do about 100 last month (some of those talkpage had been protected over a year!) ... WjB scribe 04:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Is that needed? There is no legit dispute IMO. They have been using "Bodies" as the them song ever since ECW started in June 2006. The IP's and the one user has not provide ANY evidence to suggest a change in them songs. TJ Spyke 03:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
I looked at this page of Lawrence Dimick, and I think it needs to get deleted. What do you think? I gave my reason though on the talk page. Thanks. HoneyBee 17:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to ask about your deletion of the Mustard Seed School article. Begun by children from a rival school, the article when it was brought to my attention was insulting, biased, and worst of all, illiterate. Rather than deleting the kids' work (they created pages for nearly every school in Hoboken, NJ) I did the wiki thing and improved it. Now you have deleted it as advertising, and as non-notable. I believe you are in error on both counts, but it's the last charge that I would like to take up with you in light of your authoring an article about your high school in Michigan. As it happens, Mustard Seed School is a model school, a leader in Christian urban education. People come from literally all over the world to visit Mustard Seed and learn from them. There is a nation-wide group of leaders in Christian urban education know as The Hoboken Group because the group gathered around Mustard Seed, the recognized leader. In fact, Mustard Seed **is** notable, at least as notable as your high school, but since the article is deleted, we'll never see it in wikipedia. Why not do the wiki thing and improve it? Please email me privately at margaret(at)mrlukens(dot)com. All the best, Margaret Mrlukens 01:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Could you please unblock this article? There is no longer a need to keep it blocked, as the move was finalized right today [4]. Thanks in advance. -- Angelo 20:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Re your note on user talk page at User talk:TcKnd that this was to be deleted...I am preparing for disambiguation on Chris Edwards to include an Oregon Representative, so wound up merging Chris Edwards (Kasabian) with its duplicate, Chris Edwards (musician) as part of that process, which will ultimately find the musician on the disamb page. Thus I corrected the links there so as to avoid double redirects, and you can take it from there later. I was working through the what links here, when I found your note on the talk page referenced. No such tag was evident there when I just did the merge. I left a note there at the talk page you noted too...don't know how you want to proceed with it. There's still not much to the musician's page, but perhaps he is notable. I worked it over just a little and moved on to my main goal. FYI. - Duff 05:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Just wanted to let you know that I had put a msg on the article's talk page about 2 weeks ago. Are you still dealing with this? (I've mostly been on wiki break.) Have you been in contact with the 2 parties? Take care HG | Talk 04:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
In accordance with David Levy's instructions, I have reverted your merge of section-specific templates. I am not opposed in principle, but I think the execution was poor. My reasons are as follows:
Don't you think it would be better to make all those templates work with parameters like {{ unreferenced}} does? BenB4 13:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello Mr.Z-man, thank you for supporting
my RfA!
I was promoted with a final tally of 68/12/0.
Also, please wish a Happy Birthday to
Her Majesty the Queen.
Vivat Regina!
In connection with your block of Fafarman, would you consider having a look at User:67.110.32.82's edits - s/he is acting as Fafarman's meatpuppet per the request referenced on ANI. I was wondering if you thought a block of that account might be in order. In addition, I was wondering if you might consider semi-protecting the Cheri Yecke article - after all, Fafarman's blog may continue to attract meatpuppets (hard to tell how many people actually read his blog). Thanks. Guettarda 21:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
How did you come up with your name, Mr. Z-man? Nice username, though! :-)-- PNiddy Go! 0 01:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking User:124.227.193.2. Angel Of Sadness T/ C 20:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
How are things with Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-05-03 Cults and new religious movements in literature and popular culture? Should the case be closed? Are you still active with this case? Thanks! Vassyana 05:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I believe that user:pascack is back as another sockpuppet. A brand new user (jjj222) has made edits on a pascack pet project, discrediting Joe Girardi as a yankee. and 192.234.99.1 is not blocked, which is his ip. Mghabmw 17:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I did not make the change to the info box colors that he refers to. That change was made by Soxrockprojects who was attempting to split the colors between Cubs and Yankees, which I had no issue with. I even added a comment that Girardi still works for the YES Network. I did nothing out of line.
Jjj222
17:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
(Sorry for arguing on your talk page) Mghabmw 17:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Just those 2 edits, especially because he didn't actually change the colors (Even I thought he did for a minute there) is not enough to block Jjj222 or extend Pascack's block. Nor is it enough to get a checkuser. Mr.Z-man talk ¢ 18:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
all right. Mghabmw 19:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
User_talk:Metsfann34
I found this interesting though. Pascack was a notorious Mets fan.
I know it's not hard evidence, but it does seem fishy that this user (jjj222) just came up while Pascack is blocked, his IP just got unblocked, the first thing he does is change
Joe Girardi's team colors, and is now worried about Mets colors.
Mghabmw
22:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm starting to suspect User:Gmh224 for the same reasons. Brand new user taking on Pascack's pet projects. editing history Mghabmw 22:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Why shorten User:Pascack block, he has been involved in the craziest sockpupperting edit warning I have ever seen in my two years in wikipedia. See the history of Reggie Jackson. I will extend the block to indef again, as seriously Pascack never had any useful edits and all he did was revert was and sockpupperty. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 02:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William Bain. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talkshowbob ( talk • contribs)
I added the "imagewidth" parameter to {{ Infobox Christian denomination}} davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I was trying to figure out where the actual page went to, all the ones I could find were cut and pasted. Now I see you have found the right one. The talk page that should be associated with it is at Talk:Hermetic Order the Golden Dawn (A+O) in case you'd like to put them back together. Thanks for helping! GlassFET 22:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! (rather amusing that the reason it was moved in the first place got speedied 3x in 24 hours...) -- SarekOfVulcan 17:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I had put a sock puppeteer template on your userpage by accident! Sorry, man! When I saw the block log you had blocked a puppeteer but I thought it was the other way around, any way srry about that. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 00:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Would be considered libel? - WarthogDemon 04:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Just any FYI, this user is back with Detinspection ( talk · contribs) and China Det Inspection ( talk · contribs). I blocked the first one for spamming and the second for sockpuppetting, but then I vaguely remembered that I had since this before. Do you recall if Deyitest ( talk · contribs) was the first account or another sockpuppet account? -- Gogo Dodo 08:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
I am disappointed that you have felt it necessary to protect the article. The Northern Irish flag dispute is ongoing (see talk:Northern Ireland) but will hopefully be resolved soon in which case I hope you will deprotect it? In the mean time could you please make clear on the article and/or talk page that it has been protected? I cannot see one. Thank you. Biofoundationsoflanguage 10:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the unblock, I couldn't unblock myself before because someone had protected my user talk page. Jobe6 03:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for creating me an account. Now I do not need to be in chaos and being disabled from editing.-- Slayerdylan 06:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
what is the exact reason that the article 'thompsonfilm' was deleted?
please explain, as it was said that the article was deleted because; article about a company that does not assert significance.
significance to what???
please tell me how i can change the page so that it is 'legal'
thanks
Why post another one when my first one is being ignored? I didn't ask anyone to read my mind. KP Botany 19:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
hi,Mr.Z-man Why my article was deleted? Plz.. give me reply
Thank you for your intervention in this matter. I considered restoring the article myself, but the last time I did that I got jumped on for having a COI. I have spent some time recently clearing out the CSD backlogs and have become frustrated by the number of admins who seem not to understand the speedy criteria. It is gratifying to know that I am not alone in my interpretation of the criteria. Dsmdgold 23:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm watching it but I am not always on. Take it easy. -- Y not? 00:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I want my page to be protected. Holmes.sherlock 10:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Can you please take another look at the situation involving Jeeny based upon some additional information I have brought forward? I have posted at the appropriate ANI section. I'm really concerned about that situation, though I don't blame you at all because of the "quiet" nature of the trolling. Many thanks, The Behnam 05:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
I am User:24.168.46.238 who was recently blocked from Wikipedia for six months by a Wikipedia administrator named "Georgewilliamherbert".
Since my user talk page was protected by "Mr.Z-man" only 4 minutes after the block was issued by "Georgewilliamherbert", I was denied the opportunity to post an unblock request. I'd like to request that I be give the opportunity to do so now:
I know that I was wrong for threatening legal action against "CyberGhostface", but I had asked him to stop bothering me by posting repeated warnings on my user talk page for minor violations of Wikipedia's rules, and he refused. I believe that he had a vendetta against me, as he seemed to be tracking my every edit, just waiting for me to do something in violation of Wikipedia' s rules so he could post another warning on my user talk page, which he knew would aggravate me and cause me to lose my temper. "CyberGhostface" had previously gotten me blocked for personal attacks, and I was stupid enough to fall for his ploy to get me blocked again. I lost my cool, and posted things on my user talk page that I shouldn't have. I know that there was no excuse for my behavior, and for that, I am very sorry.
I'd like to respectfully ask that you shorten the duration of by block, as I feel that six months is far too harsh of a punishment. I was initially issued a 48 hour block by one administrator, but 7 hours later (without me making any additional offensive edits or postings on Wikipedia), it was arbitrarily extended to 6 months by another administrator.
I promise that once my editing priviliges are reinstated, I will no longer engage in the kind of conduct (personal attacks, threats of legal action) that got me blocked. After reinstatement, I intend on creating an account on Wikipedia, and I will make constructive additions to the project. I invite you to check up on me periodically to see that I am keeping my word to you!
I also promise to you that will have no further contact with "CyberGhostface", and since I have no intention of violation Wikipedia's rules in the future, he has no valid reason whatsoever to contact me or to post warnings on my user talk page.
I feel that a reduction in the duration of my block is warranted, considering the questionable circumstances of how my block was arbitrarily increased from 48 hours to 4320 hours.
Again, please accept my sincere apology for my past behavior on Wikipedia, and thank you for your consideration!
Note: I am using a friend's computer (IP Address: 64.38.198.61) simply to post this notice on the user talk page of the administrator who increased my block from 48 hours to 6 months. I am not a "sockpuppet", and I have no intention of using my friend's computer again.
64.38.198.61 14:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I see you were the one to lock the template. The wrong version has been locked and it currently contains some additions that are hottly disputed not only in content but in presentation. I have posted this under an edit protected tag on the article talk page, but another user did not feel this was apporpriate and suggested that I contact you directly. I can either point you to the specific examples of a) what needs to be removed and b) where it is being addressed. Alternatively, i can just explain it to you here. I've marked this for watching so just let me know. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 20:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Indirectly, an AFD closure of yours is being reviewed currently at DRV. You closed the AFD on The Duttons as "No Consensous". The article has now been speedy deleted. It is this speedy deletion that is actually under review. The deleting admin, as part of his arguments justifying the speedy, is challenging your AFD close as invalid. I felt that you might want to come defend your closure descision. - TexasAndroid 11:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your flawless move of the Al Rashid-article! Finally, I found the talk-page again ;-) Regards, Huldra 16:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I am writing this letter in regards to the deletion of Discount Tire's wikipedia article today, August 22nd. I would like to know how you came to the decision of deleting this article. There wasn't to much detail given except for blatant advertising. I, of course, want to meet Wikipedia's standards and I just want to know what sections of the article were more of an advertisement then factual information. If you can provide the answer to this question it would be very much appreciated. The last thing I want to do is make the same mistakes when I decide to post a new article for Discount Tire. Thank you very much!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlsathomas 15:20, 22 August 2007
Suggest WP:CBLANK. Dbromage [Talk] 04:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
user:Vonones who is in a pure anti-turkic personality attack many "turkic history" pages of wikipedia, (see the Huns page), he is an armenian user and hate all the turkish people(he always edit with no written source). he uses 3RR rule throug to his nationalist and racist ideals. how can i stop him? thanks.-- hakozen 03:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
im Turkish, and Huns were one of the biggest Turkic empires, i was educated about them in elemantry school becouse im Turkish, but a vandalist called Vonones (who is in a big campaing) edits what i did (you may see it in my history) he is probably have a problem about turkish users (i dont care about your nationality) but afterwards you gave me a ban(that cant unerstand why, cos i only want to defend myself) thats what i can say. -- hakozen 16:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I am MrZ-man on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/MrZ-man. Thanks. -- Mr.Z-man talk ¢ 15:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to report David Shankbone for WP:STALK after he disregarded my request on his talk page. THF 19:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Might want to see the latest edits: [10] -- Vonones 19:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
hi - Not sure but I guess I address this query to you - Why on earth was the Rhodesrunprofile image removed? The image definitely belongs to Rhodes Run, was created by Rhodes Run, and appears on the Adventure Racing site as it is placed there, from the Rhodes Run home page, by the Rhodes Run event operators. In addition, why was there no response (or verification made) to the points I placed in response to the initial query as to ownership on the image? Gold Pen 05:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
hi - Not sure but I guess I address this query to you - Why on earth was the Rhodesrunprofile image removed? The image definitely belongs to Rhodes Run, was created by Rhodes Run, and appears on the Adventure Racing site as it is placed there, from the Rhodes Run home page, by the Rhodes Run event operators. In addition, why was there no response (or verification made) to the points I placed in response to the initial query as to ownership on the image before the image was removed? Gold Pen 05:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC) Apologies for the duplicate posting Gold Pen 05:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mr.Z-man"
Aaah - that part I understand, what I dont understand is why the image was removed prior to this chat; as clearly whoever put in the protest had no understanding of how that Adventure Racing website works, ie that Rhodes Run is one of the 'operators'; anyway would really appreciate your guidance as how to correctly phrase it to get the image back up; would it be simpler to show that Rhodes Run website owns the copyright instead of me ? Also, I hope it's ok to respond here Gold Pen 19:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I do appreciate that the checks & balances protect me, and any material I submit and of course protecting the integrity of Wikipedia Gold Pen 19:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
I sent in a report to ANI yesterday which you dealt with concerning this user, User talk:81.0.68.145. You gave him a final warning for his off-topic use of discussion pages. He has made one (two if you count him removing his own signiture to stay "invisible"...) more off-topic addition to article discussion pages since the warning [12]. - Just thought I'd tell you. Scarian Talk 21:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
why did you delete my Demonica Tales page, its not like i was using the page to make money, i just wanted people and my friends to be able to see it.
Mr. Z-Man. I feel that it is wrong that you deleted my posting on Germaine Guerin as blatant advertising. I find it notable, as do articles by Voque magazine, that Germaine Guerin is one of the most important and forgotten handbag designers of our time. 69.180.80.159 13:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
If you think it is appropriate, would you delete Talk:Norfolk punch the page only contains my single comment supporting deletion of the article itself. I would do it myself but am not trusted with the keys to the broom closet. Thanks for your service!! User:Pedant 18:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I had no idea how to even go about sorting out the mess he caused. Thanks for fixing everything so fast. -- Bfigura ( talk) 02:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I just edit conflicted with you at WP:SPLICE over the lastest request. For the record, my response was going to be:
Some of these pages can be deleted but I'm not sure a history merge is needed. ZipCode may spread his contribs all over the place if he wants - seems to me all edits by other editors are in the same place - we just have some pointless redirects.
Aside from a messy contrib history I don't see what the merge gained us - wouldn't it have been easier just to nominate the surplus redirects for deletion? WjB scribe 04:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
has obviously been an utterly worthless "editor", and in any normal enterprise he would of course be irreversibly thrown out. Further, his plea for his block to be lifted is vacuous. But the trouble with permablocking him in WP is that he's likely just to sprout a new username. For this reason (and not because of any sympathy), I'd be inclined to shorten his block to a week or so this time around (his first time). -- Hoary 04:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks, sorry for my contribution in what turned into edit warring. I would welcome any contribution you can make to the talk page, regarding the disputes of:
Thanks for considering. — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I wanted to make the may it sound strange proposal to remove the Muslim and Osama references from the page. The official story does not connect Osama to the 11 September attack. Rex Tomb, chief of investigative publicity for the FBI explains, The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.. I'm not a Muslim but I find the words Muslim extremist extremely inappropriate in contrast with the facts. I don't want the page unlocked or anything. It just cant make false accusations. There are millions and millions of Muslims on the world, I figure we should at least see some evidence before we slander them as terrorists? Thanks for your time anyway, drop me a line.( Gaby de wilde 20:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
hey good call, i forgot about that. i've done only one "move" before, and i forgot that i'd need calvary holiness church to be calvary holiness church (disambiguation). i'd love it if you'd help out! can you fix it? Aepoutre 17:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
okay. i put the request in. should i remove it? Aepoutre 17:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that, and for fixing it. I appreciate it. I didn't even realise it had an effect on the history, but that makes sense. Thanks again. Aepoutre 17:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Poaching Entity,
I read that article entitled "Crygar," and thought it was an informative description of a nearly-extinct animal. To be sure, only one is known to be roaming, and scientists have determined that she is sterile. Thus, indeed, this animal, a delight to some, an annoyance to some more, will go the way of the beloved dodo bird. What futher tragedies await us in the animal kingdom?
The paragraph itself is a masterful homage to Lewis Carroll. Where is the sense of (literary) history and humor? Shall we delete "Snark" (as in "The Hunting of the Snark") as well?
BTW, "incoherent," as in "the text is unsalvageably incoherent" would seem to suggest that the text is disjointed or confused. Were you possibly reading from right to left? Was a cryger sitting in front of your computer screen, obscuring the text with its abundant fur?
Signed,
H. I. Dudgeon
You protected Ethnic minorities in Azerbaijan in June, its now September. When will it be unprotected? Hajji Piruz 23:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
If I were you, I would just leave them alone for now. (That's what I'm trying to do now anyway.) WP:RBI and WP:DFT come to mind. If they want to contribute constructively after the block expires they are more than welcome to do so. If they would rather not contribute, I don't think I'd be bothered and if they plan to contribute non-constructively, then a longer term solution might be needed, but that can be dealt with as it unfolds. Mr. Z-man 04:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you protected the page of Ordu. Seems Oguzes problems is the blog. If you unblock it, I will rewrite it with a wealth of published book sources and clean the article up. THe sooner, the better no? Hetoum I 03:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Mr.Z-man, do you have the ability to show what the article about "Liz Cohen" said, before it was deleted (for a second time)? I am curious if this is about the performance artist Liz Cohen or the autism author Liz Cohen (BBB AUTISM GUIDES: Strategies for Parents by Parents). -- Form990 13:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Cool I understand how wikipedia works now. It makes sense as people need to back up the article otherwise random nuts can just write rubbish for fun :) "Arf1" xx