From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@ JMGuyon: here is the initial draft of the translation. I copy edited the text, where necessary, in order to improve readability. Requesting your feedback. Mosesheron ( talk) 14:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Some passages are in need of inline citations. I inserted a citation needed tag in one place. Could you please provide that? It's in the draft, if you're interested. Mosesheron ( talk) 15:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Also I couldn't find citation for reference no 7. It is maybe because I am not familiar with French wiki reference style. I had to convert every reference manually as translation tools are disabled here. Mosesheron ( talk) 15:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Found it. That passage is in fact supported by by ref 1. They are perhaps one and the same. Mosesheron ( talk) 15:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
I found the message ! the notification did't work.-- JMGuyon ( talk) 20:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
my feedback is: well done ! :)
Perhaps I would remove the metonymic and proleptic reason; These notions do not seem very clear to me.
I really like the "indolent reason", the "epistemicid" and the whole article-- JMGuyon ( talk) 20:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
@ JMGuyon: Published the text. You are requested to make necessary changes, where so required. I will also think some alternatives to those two words. Thank you for your comment. Mosesheron ( talk) 21:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@ JMGuyon: here is the initial draft of the translation. I copy edited the text, where necessary, in order to improve readability. Requesting your feedback. Mosesheron ( talk) 14:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Some passages are in need of inline citations. I inserted a citation needed tag in one place. Could you please provide that? It's in the draft, if you're interested. Mosesheron ( talk) 15:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Also I couldn't find citation for reference no 7. It is maybe because I am not familiar with French wiki reference style. I had to convert every reference manually as translation tools are disabled here. Mosesheron ( talk) 15:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
Found it. That passage is in fact supported by by ref 1. They are perhaps one and the same. Mosesheron ( talk) 15:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
I found the message ! the notification did't work.-- JMGuyon ( talk) 20:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
my feedback is: well done ! :)
Perhaps I would remove the metonymic and proleptic reason; These notions do not seem very clear to me.
I really like the "indolent reason", the "epistemicid" and the whole article-- JMGuyon ( talk) 20:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply
@ JMGuyon: Published the text. You are requested to make necessary changes, where so required. I will also think some alternatives to those two words. Thank you for your comment. Mosesheron ( talk) 21:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook