|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Merlin (TV series) has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
unwanted links and
spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following
regex rule(s): \bwikia\.com\b (links:
http://merlin.wikia.com/wiki/merlin_wiki,
http://merlin.wikia.com/wiki/Merlin_wiki (redirect from
http://merlin.wikia.com/wiki/merlin_wiki)).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
21:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I've seen you seem to create the pages as well. Great...... (I just liked to do the pages myself, thats all). I just have a few things however.
1. Never create a page without the actual episode title. Before you moved the page from Uther and the Troll to Beauty and the Beast, I saw you created the page with a false title. Please do not do this, as it may make visitors off guard. Never input a title without a reference. 2. Although Beauty and the Beast is a two parter, for all we know episode 6 could have a title title, like in Doctor Who, so please keep them seperate. 3. Great... competition...
lol
Just take those into account. I've done a lot for the show's pages, and I really hate it when people don't stick by the rules of Wiki. No offence.
Thanks
Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 18:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
OK. The website I go on says its is also Beauty and the Beast: Part One. I applogise. It's just its best when more than one website refferences it. You can put the page back to what it was now. But just to make it fun, I suppose we would have two seperate articles, just to widen Merlin ;) Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 06:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Damnit. You beat me to making the page Sweet Dreams. CURSE YOOOOOOOOOU :) lol Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Mortrainey, I've reverted the poster back to the one that was replaced. Fair use guidelines state that one side of the image has to be 300 pixels or less. Cheers... Quentin X ( talk) 12:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sherlock Holmes Theatrical Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 06:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Rob Stefaniuk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer,
his otters and a clue-bat • (
Otters want attention)
23:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Merlin (TV series) has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
unwanted links and
spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following
regex rule(s): \bwikia\.com\b (links:
http://merlin.wikia.com/wiki/merlin_wiki,
http://merlin.wikia.com/wiki/Merlin_wiki (redirect from
http://merlin.wikia.com/wiki/merlin_wiki)).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
21:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
I've seen you seem to create the pages as well. Great...... (I just liked to do the pages myself, thats all). I just have a few things however.
1. Never create a page without the actual episode title. Before you moved the page from Uther and the Troll to Beauty and the Beast, I saw you created the page with a false title. Please do not do this, as it may make visitors off guard. Never input a title without a reference. 2. Although Beauty and the Beast is a two parter, for all we know episode 6 could have a title title, like in Doctor Who, so please keep them seperate. 3. Great... competition...
lol
Just take those into account. I've done a lot for the show's pages, and I really hate it when people don't stick by the rules of Wiki. No offence.
Thanks
Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 18:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
OK. The website I go on says its is also Beauty and the Beast: Part One. I applogise. It's just its best when more than one website refferences it. You can put the page back to what it was now. But just to make it fun, I suppose we would have two seperate articles, just to widen Merlin ;) Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 06:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Damnit. You beat me to making the page Sweet Dreams. CURSE YOOOOOOOOOU :) lol Goku1st ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Mortrainey, I've reverted the poster back to the one that was replaced. Fair use guidelines state that one side of the image has to be 300 pixels or less. Cheers... Quentin X ( talk) 12:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sherlock Holmes Theatrical Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 06:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Rob Stefaniuk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer,
his otters and a clue-bat • (
Otters want attention)
23:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)