|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
A Very British Coup has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
A Very British Coup was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://chrishallamworldview.wordpress.com/2012/11/20/thirty-years-of-a-very-british-coup/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page
Secret State (TV miniseries), because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links. Thank you.
Your edit
here to
Secret State (TV miniseries) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://chrishallamworldview.wordpress.com/2012/11/20/thirty-years-of-a-very-british-coup/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page
House of Cards (UK TV series), because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
House of Cards (UK TV series) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://chrishallamworldview.wordpress.com/2013/03/10/house-of-cards-revisited/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Whizzer and Chips with
this edit.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate may links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
T4B (
talk)
11:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
The Ballad of Halo Jones may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Every single edit of yours on Wikipedia has consisted of adding links to your own blog - linkspam. I have reverted those few that were not undone immediately. Consider this a warning: If you persist in spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked and your blog blacklisted. Driving traffic to your blog is not what Wikipedia is for. Huon ( talk) 17:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you,
I would like to contest this decision.
1. You are factually incorrect in stating that every single edit I made was to add a link to my blog. I have corrected errors on other articles written on here by most other people too, for example. Perhaps you feel I am being pedantic here but where Wikipedia is concerned it is important to be accurate. And your statement was inaccurate.
2. Yes, most of the links I added were links to my blog. I would argue that all of the links I added were of a high quality and of genuine interest to the readership of the features in question.
I agree that "driving traffic to (my) blog is not what Wikipedia is for".
However, whereas before somebody looking up The Ballad of Halo Jones or George Brown MP or House of Cards under "external links" would have been directed to a useful and interesting article about these subjects, now they cannot. You have removed them and made the site weaker as a result.
Please look at these links again.
1. Are they irrelevant?
2. Are the articles of a poor quality?
If you can look at them and feel they are either of these things, you are justified in removing the links.
If you can't, then perhaps you should restore the links?
Adding links to relevant high quality articles is not spamming!
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Chris Hallam.
Putting aside the numerous bot notices, since you've continued to add them after the message above from Huon, and after all those prior, independent reverts, this is a final warning. Do not add any more linkspam to Wikipedia, which will subject you to an indefinite block. Since you are capable of writing the entries at your blog, you are quite capable of editing Wikipedia in a constructive manner. I doubt after reading this message that you are well disposed toward me, but regardless, that's a compliment. Your writing ability, exercised for a proper purpose, is more than welcome.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 22:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (
Stewart Jackson), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a
reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
12:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Moonbeam1812!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
11:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello, Moonbeam1812. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox/Chris Hallam".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Techie3 ( talk) 09:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
A Very British Coup has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
A Very British Coup was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://chrishallamworldview.wordpress.com/2012/11/20/thirty-years-of-a-very-british-coup/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page
Secret State (TV miniseries), because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links. Thank you.
Your edit
here to
Secret State (TV miniseries) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://chrishallamworldview.wordpress.com/2012/11/20/thirty-years-of-a-very-british-coup/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page
House of Cards (UK TV series), because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
House of Cards (UK TV series) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://chrishallamworldview.wordpress.com/2013/03/10/house-of-cards-revisited/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Whizzer and Chips with
this edit.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate may links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
T4B (
talk)
11:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
The Ballad of Halo Jones may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 10:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Every single edit of yours on Wikipedia has consisted of adding links to your own blog - linkspam. I have reverted those few that were not undone immediately. Consider this a warning: If you persist in spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked and your blog blacklisted. Driving traffic to your blog is not what Wikipedia is for. Huon ( talk) 17:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you,
I would like to contest this decision.
1. You are factually incorrect in stating that every single edit I made was to add a link to my blog. I have corrected errors on other articles written on here by most other people too, for example. Perhaps you feel I am being pedantic here but where Wikipedia is concerned it is important to be accurate. And your statement was inaccurate.
2. Yes, most of the links I added were links to my blog. I would argue that all of the links I added were of a high quality and of genuine interest to the readership of the features in question.
I agree that "driving traffic to (my) blog is not what Wikipedia is for".
However, whereas before somebody looking up The Ballad of Halo Jones or George Brown MP or House of Cards under "external links" would have been directed to a useful and interesting article about these subjects, now they cannot. You have removed them and made the site weaker as a result.
Please look at these links again.
1. Are they irrelevant?
2. Are the articles of a poor quality?
If you can look at them and feel they are either of these things, you are justified in removing the links.
If you can't, then perhaps you should restore the links?
Adding links to relevant high quality articles is not spamming!
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Chris Hallam.
Putting aside the numerous bot notices, since you've continued to add them after the message above from Huon, and after all those prior, independent reverts, this is a final warning. Do not add any more linkspam to Wikipedia, which will subject you to an indefinite block. Since you are capable of writing the entries at your blog, you are quite capable of editing Wikipedia in a constructive manner. I doubt after reading this message that you are well disposed toward me, but regardless, that's a compliment. Your writing ability, exercised for a proper purpose, is more than welcome.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 22:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (
Stewart Jackson), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a
reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
12:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Moonbeam1812!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
11:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello, Moonbeam1812. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox/Chris Hallam".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Techie3 ( talk) 09:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)