This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
Could you pin this? Don't know why the other one got arch. Best, Signed, The4lines |||| ( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.) 17:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Moneytrees. I have created a draft for Bahrain National space agency, I have copied content from nssa.gov.bh and have added references for all the content. Why has it been removed? Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ralamad ( talk • contribs)
~~~~
. Or, you can use the
[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) — Yours,
Berrely •
Talk∕
Contribs
07:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | ||
Thank you for tackling the CCIs over the years. I've seen you around a lot with this ongoing cleanup and thought I give you a barnstar in appreciation of your hard work :) Keep up the good work! MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 21:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC) |
Recently You undid me edit on Dholera Airport page. IF you look yourself, the edit was proper with refrences. At least you should Put This on my talk page rather than permanently reversing the edits. How am I supposed to edit the article all over again. If there is phrasing issue, let me correct it. But I can't access my old edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeevsingh007 ( talk • contribs) 18:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
~~~~
. Or, you can use the
[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) — Yours,
Berrely •
Talk∕
Contribs
19:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)The copyvio on Draft:Fadda Dickson was mostly resolved by the time I handled your G12 nom. The score had been whittled down to 10ish percent in a piecemeal manner. I felt it was best served by removing the G12 and, since it lacked a clear divide between copyvio and clear copies, revdeleting the entire history. Please let me know if there's any of that you have a problem with. Cabayi ( talk) 09:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I was looking through the child marriage articles that were already checked at Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/BrugesFR. To my surprise, some still had infringing copyvio text. The worst one was Child marriage in Mali that I requested a RD1 for, (it was from an archived copy of the Girls not bride website that predated the Wikipedia article). I also stumbled across copyvios by another user at Child marriage in Nigeria that was there since the article creation. So, I think the child marriage articles in the CCI should be rechecked just in case. I've done Mali, Togo, Mauritania and working on Nigeria. I haven't looked through the ones that have no check or X next to them. Let me know what you think. Thanks! -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 23:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, I've got another copyvio question. Take a look at Complex of Sultan Bayezid II Health Museum. Earwig is telling me that it's an exact match for content here and here. I was going to G12 it, but it's written by a fairly well-established account, and one whose talkpage isn't plastered with COPYVIO warnings, so I wondered if it might be a case of these pages copying our content. Internet Archive doesn't have anything on either of those sites - is there another way to check? GirthSummit (blether) 11:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
I wanted to compliment you on the close to the SashiRolls ban review at AN. It was going to be a mess and your close I think handled it the best it could be done. It's a thankless task, but I wanted to let you know it's appreciated (regardless of how you saw it, just glad you explained it as you did.) RickinBaltimore ( talk) 16:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. Was attempting to clean up some of the old copyright problems and came across Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 January 18, where I can't tell if there's a copyvio or if it's a backwards copy. Normally gossip sites just pull information so I was ready to tag it as a backwards copy until I saw the writer. Given that it's part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Dr. Blofeld 16, I'm wonder if it should be stubbified (as the copypaste was very blatant) or if it was in fact a backwards pull and can be tagged as such. Thoughts? (p.s. also saw your note on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 June 16, and I actually uncovered that edit from a follow-up check on Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20101122, so yeah, definitely should be indeffed if there's another copyvio). Wizardman 21:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at W. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Moneytrees🌴 Talk🌲 Help out at CCI! 14:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Moneytrees has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. —— Serial 14:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Getting Warnings about Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Moneytrees has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake which I did not, or if you want more warnings, you may leave a message on my talk page. Signed, The4lines |||| ( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.) 15:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thanks for the helpful edits to my drafts - nice to see that kind of support for a rookie editor like me ;)
Wellohorldhelloworld (
talk)
02:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
here. As the closer of one of the many community discussion on this issue, I'm letting you know. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
LOL, I almost reverted you based on habit from an LTA but congrats! HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 03:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Fair enough if you dislike the direct copying of material from the Spaceref site.
But I fail to see the need for totally erasing my article update without warning, which means (as opposed to a mere "revert" which would have given me the chance to correct) I cannot rewrite / reformulate the information that I added!
Now I have to waste another hour trying to remember from scratch the important missing details regarding life support, propulsion, ECLSS for that space station module.
What exactly is your point?
Mlindroo ( talk) 15:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Any chance you can take a look at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems/Clerks#DannyS712? Its been open since last July. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 21:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, hope you've recovered from the baptism of fire that was your RfA .... anyway, can you quickly take a look at this newly created article. It looks like a copyvio, but earwig gives a very low score of 1% on it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I am aware of copyright laws. To remind you of the Fair Use Doctrine, here is what Wikipedia says about it.
"Fair use is a doctrine in the law of the United States that permits limited use of copyrighted material without having to first acquire permission from the copyright holder. Fair use is one of the limitations to copyright intended to balance the interests of copyright holders with the public interest in the wider distribution and use of creative works by allowing as a defense to copyright infringement claims certain limited uses that might otherwise be considered infringement.[1] Like "fair dealing" rights that exist in most countries with a British legal history, the fair use right is a general exception that applies to all different kinds of uses with all types of works and turns on a flexible proportionality test that examines the purpose of the use, the amount used, and the impact on the market of the original work. The innovation of the fair use right in US law is that it applies to a list of purposes that is preceded by the opening clause "such as." This has allowed courts to apply it to technologies never envisioned in the original statute including Internet search, the VCR, and the reverse engineering of software." [1]
Since I did not use most or all of the copywritten material and cited it using the APA method of citation, I believe, the information can be added to the profile of Sylvia Allen. I am not claiming to be the author, nor am I seeking to gain financial benefit from the content, therefore I should be able to post it and still be within the Fair Use Doctrine. I will be sure to add quotation marks in the future.
Since I used and cited information that is readily available to the public already, I do not feel your removal of the information is valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SterlingSpots ( talk • contribs) 03:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, you said that you deleted something for a cause of copyvio, but the article in question is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Please see https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-include-a-work-licensed-with-cc-by-in-a-wikipedia-article-even-though-they-use-a-cc-by-sa-license Thanks Huhiop ( talk) 14:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
User:Moneytrees Revert Kerala Police, else kerala police take legal action against you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nodesec ( talk • contribs)
The following three diffs all involved them marking plot summaries as basic prose:
I'm afraid they're getting a lot wrong and probably everything has to be redone. Please counsel the editor appropriately - I don't have the time or patience today. MER-C 19:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
By the way, can you remove the lyrics from Talk:This Is Me (Demi Lovato song) as well. Thanks. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-3). 22:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, thanks for cleaning up the copyvio here. Given that the editor who added it has 6000 edits and 14 years tenure, though, I do wonder if the newbie warning you gave them is quite enough. They've been here longer than the two of us combined; they ought to know what they're doing. Vanamonde ( Talk) 16:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
Could you pin this? Don't know why the other one got arch. Best, Signed, The4lines |||| ( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.) 17:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Moneytrees. I have created a draft for Bahrain National space agency, I have copied content from nssa.gov.bh and have added references for all the content. Why has it been removed? Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ralamad ( talk • contribs)
~~~~
. Or, you can use the
[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) — Yours,
Berrely •
Talk∕
Contribs
07:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | ||
Thank you for tackling the CCIs over the years. I've seen you around a lot with this ongoing cleanup and thought I give you a barnstar in appreciation of your hard work :) Keep up the good work! MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 21:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC) |
Recently You undid me edit on Dholera Airport page. IF you look yourself, the edit was proper with refrences. At least you should Put This on my talk page rather than permanently reversing the edits. How am I supposed to edit the article all over again. If there is phrasing issue, let me correct it. But I can't access my old edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeevsingh007 ( talk • contribs) 18:24, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
~~~~
. Or, you can use the
[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) — Yours,
Berrely •
Talk∕
Contribs
19:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)The copyvio on Draft:Fadda Dickson was mostly resolved by the time I handled your G12 nom. The score had been whittled down to 10ish percent in a piecemeal manner. I felt it was best served by removing the G12 and, since it lacked a clear divide between copyvio and clear copies, revdeleting the entire history. Please let me know if there's any of that you have a problem with. Cabayi ( talk) 09:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I was looking through the child marriage articles that were already checked at Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/BrugesFR. To my surprise, some still had infringing copyvio text. The worst one was Child marriage in Mali that I requested a RD1 for, (it was from an archived copy of the Girls not bride website that predated the Wikipedia article). I also stumbled across copyvios by another user at Child marriage in Nigeria that was there since the article creation. So, I think the child marriage articles in the CCI should be rechecked just in case. I've done Mali, Togo, Mauritania and working on Nigeria. I haven't looked through the ones that have no check or X next to them. Let me know what you think. Thanks! -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 23:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, I've got another copyvio question. Take a look at Complex of Sultan Bayezid II Health Museum. Earwig is telling me that it's an exact match for content here and here. I was going to G12 it, but it's written by a fairly well-established account, and one whose talkpage isn't plastered with COPYVIO warnings, so I wondered if it might be a case of these pages copying our content. Internet Archive doesn't have anything on either of those sites - is there another way to check? GirthSummit (blether) 11:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
I wanted to compliment you on the close to the SashiRolls ban review at AN. It was going to be a mess and your close I think handled it the best it could be done. It's a thankless task, but I wanted to let you know it's appreciated (regardless of how you saw it, just glad you explained it as you did.) RickinBaltimore ( talk) 16:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. Was attempting to clean up some of the old copyright problems and came across Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 January 18, where I can't tell if there's a copyvio or if it's a backwards copy. Normally gossip sites just pull information so I was ready to tag it as a backwards copy until I saw the writer. Given that it's part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Dr. Blofeld 16, I'm wonder if it should be stubbified (as the copypaste was very blatant) or if it was in fact a backwards pull and can be tagged as such. Thoughts? (p.s. also saw your note on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 June 16, and I actually uncovered that edit from a follow-up check on Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20101122, so yeah, definitely should be indeffed if there's another copyvio). Wizardman 21:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have inserted Creative Commons licensed text into Wikipedia, as you did at W. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly-licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Moneytrees🌴 Talk🌲 Help out at CCI! 14:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Moneytrees has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. —— Serial 14:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Getting Warnings about Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Moneytrees has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake which I did not, or if you want more warnings, you may leave a message on my talk page. Signed, The4lines |||| ( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.) 15:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thanks for the helpful edits to my drafts - nice to see that kind of support for a rookie editor like me ;)
Wellohorldhelloworld (
talk)
02:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
here. As the closer of one of the many community discussion on this issue, I'm letting you know. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
LOL, I almost reverted you based on habit from an LTA but congrats! HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 03:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Fair enough if you dislike the direct copying of material from the Spaceref site.
But I fail to see the need for totally erasing my article update without warning, which means (as opposed to a mere "revert" which would have given me the chance to correct) I cannot rewrite / reformulate the information that I added!
Now I have to waste another hour trying to remember from scratch the important missing details regarding life support, propulsion, ECLSS for that space station module.
What exactly is your point?
Mlindroo ( talk) 15:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Any chance you can take a look at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems/Clerks#DannyS712? Its been open since last July. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 21:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, hope you've recovered from the baptism of fire that was your RfA .... anyway, can you quickly take a look at this newly created article. It looks like a copyvio, but earwig gives a very low score of 1% on it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I am aware of copyright laws. To remind you of the Fair Use Doctrine, here is what Wikipedia says about it.
"Fair use is a doctrine in the law of the United States that permits limited use of copyrighted material without having to first acquire permission from the copyright holder. Fair use is one of the limitations to copyright intended to balance the interests of copyright holders with the public interest in the wider distribution and use of creative works by allowing as a defense to copyright infringement claims certain limited uses that might otherwise be considered infringement.[1] Like "fair dealing" rights that exist in most countries with a British legal history, the fair use right is a general exception that applies to all different kinds of uses with all types of works and turns on a flexible proportionality test that examines the purpose of the use, the amount used, and the impact on the market of the original work. The innovation of the fair use right in US law is that it applies to a list of purposes that is preceded by the opening clause "such as." This has allowed courts to apply it to technologies never envisioned in the original statute including Internet search, the VCR, and the reverse engineering of software." [1]
Since I did not use most or all of the copywritten material and cited it using the APA method of citation, I believe, the information can be added to the profile of Sylvia Allen. I am not claiming to be the author, nor am I seeking to gain financial benefit from the content, therefore I should be able to post it and still be within the Fair Use Doctrine. I will be sure to add quotation marks in the future.
Since I used and cited information that is readily available to the public already, I do not feel your removal of the information is valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SterlingSpots ( talk • contribs) 03:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, you said that you deleted something for a cause of copyvio, but the article in question is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Please see https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-include-a-work-licensed-with-cc-by-in-a-wikipedia-article-even-though-they-use-a-cc-by-sa-license Thanks Huhiop ( talk) 14:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
User:Moneytrees Revert Kerala Police, else kerala police take legal action against you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nodesec ( talk • contribs)
The following three diffs all involved them marking plot summaries as basic prose:
I'm afraid they're getting a lot wrong and probably everything has to be redone. Please counsel the editor appropriately - I don't have the time or patience today. MER-C 19:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
By the way, can you remove the lyrics from Talk:This Is Me (Demi Lovato song) as well. Thanks. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-3). 22:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi Moneytrees, thanks for cleaning up the copyvio here. Given that the editor who added it has 6000 edits and 14 years tenure, though, I do wonder if the newbie warning you gave them is quite enough. They've been here longer than the two of us combined; they ought to know what they're doing. Vanamonde ( Talk) 16:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)