This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello. Could you help me understand your reasoning for edits like this to IP talk pages? The layout used appears to be at odds with the standardized format recommended at WP:UTM and WP:UW. Thank you for your time, — Kralizec! ( talk) 21:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for requesting a full protection as it was needed at the moment. I am not sure how long the dispute may continue, but it looks like we have lots of Jackson fans who regardless what his true sales represents want to see their favorite artist at the top of the list.-- Harout72 ( talk) 23:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Momusufan. Do you know of any Disney-related articles that were vandalized other than Scooby Doo? I was looking at WP:Long term abuse/Bambifan101 and trying to see if this is the same guy. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out in reverting Nangparbat. :) Elockid ( Talk· Contribs) 19:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on helping control vandalism. Ford Power Stroke engine is now cleaner.-- Dana60Cummins ( talk) 22:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to know why did you undo the Location of Atlantis back to BOLT machine. the changes made by me were aproved by the moderator and are legit. thanks -- Xellas ( talk) 23:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Why do you think I have committed a 3RR? I have made changes with references. yes it was undo by the automatic clueBot and then Dougweller undo it to my changes and telling me that sometimes the machine does that. I can't find that message but it was around 1-3 a clock 8/22/09.
My input was all referenced and no one commented on it. I am sorry but you have violated the WP rules. bc you didn't explain to me where did I committed a 3RR? I deleted a huge junk of Sarmast passage bc it was to long and to detailed and to technical, while other theories are short and mostly use one paragraph. Also I divided the Malta Sicily section as they belong to 2 different groups. They have nothing in common. Furthermore, I delted the sentence where it suggest that Maltese people originated from Iberia. Also, the introduction paragraph was formulated in such away that suggested that Spain is the Location of Atlantis. It wasn't referenced. Plato stated ATLANTIS PELAGOS (Atlantis Sea!!!) Now, if he was referring to Atlantic Ocean or not we don't know but we can't put that on the intro, BC it becomes a conflict of interest. I also entered the people that helped bring the story down to us, Solon, Dropides, Critias and Plato. And everything was referenced. You guys didn't even read the stuff. you have the right to question everything that an WP editor does but you can't undo them only bc you CAN!!
I am waiting for an answer Xellas ( talk) 23:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
No I am not in dispute, bc the other person is not talking, just playin around and anduing things without explaning. I supsect you're the person, nevertheless, I am not sure so I am not going to accuse you of something that I have no facts. Nevertheless, You undued my work without explanations!!! That's the proof. I am an editor and I have the right to change things if I feel they are not cited or referenced, as well I have something to add. Now, bc you guys have a conflict of interest, bc you want to suport a certain theory that's in vialotion of the rules. The WP rules state that you can;t undue someone work without reasons and without comenting on it, you have to give details and prove that I commited a 3RR. -- Xellas ( talk) 00:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I am going to undue the article to it's previews version and I would like from you to check it out and I will be happy for you to comment on each particular changes. If you reason with me and pinpoint where exactly things don't fit or there is not enough evidence I will be more than happy to solve the problem and end the dispute. -- Xellas ( talk) 00:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
In AIV you said it traced back to Phoenix instead of Atlanta [1], but when I do a Whois, it comes to the same Cox Atlanta as the rest [2]. His usual 68 is 68.220.x rather than 68.230.x, but if its going back to Phoenix instead of Atlanta, then it may be a false positive. I was triggered by the Whois I did saying Atlanta and his posted here [3], when he supposedly has never been blocked or had an account. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 16:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I reverted a change on this topic. All hail, fellow vandal fighter, and greetings! The PTR for the IP in question is not shared. It also (IMO) does fit the category of IPs used for vandalism. Pardon if you disagree, please let me know if you do, and apologies in advance. Best regards, -- 4wajzkd02 ( talk) 00:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out with User:Tilliego. I should've just blocked her as a sock, but I was being AGFish and filed the SPI instead. tedder ( talk) 23:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the 6th time I have tried to clean up the Flip tricks section and cite references only to have it be reversed. 69.171.163.36 ( talk) 04:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
[4] I'd be interested to know the source of the evidence for this, thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
I am not sure that is an "open proxy". It may be a proxy (by my findings, confirmed by others) but not an open one. We try to indef block all the open proxies we can find, so that's why I wanted to check. Thanks for your work, and happy editing! Killiondude ( talk) 06:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Wasn't the by 70.146.227.107 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) fundamentally a spelling correction? Even if he is a sock, that wasn't really worth reverting.... TheFeds 02:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know I reported that user as being a suspected sockpuppet of Bambifan01 ( Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bambifan101) -- 5 albert square ( talk) 03:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I just left word with J. Delanoy regarding that third, unblocked BellSouth range. I believe I may have successfully blocked the range, but I don't have checkuser privileges and so it may not actually be blocked. I'm hoping that he'll double-check and properly block the range if necessary and that ought to do it for Bambifan101 once and for all. That evil little freak has been more trouble than he's worth. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 06:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
for your help in my request for protection. don't know why, but i was finding it a little tricky, then my computer froze. when i came back to fix it, you had already taken care of the issue! -- 216.244.65.118 ( talk) 17:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
The the number should appear as two dashes until it is revealed by the Yankees. Girardi had stated during the 2009 World Series Game 6 post game he would consider a switch to # 28 for himself.-- Subman758 ( talk) 21:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
For your work with IP talk pages. Enigma msg 21:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC) |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello. Could you help me understand your reasoning for edits like this to IP talk pages? The layout used appears to be at odds with the standardized format recommended at WP:UTM and WP:UW. Thank you for your time, — Kralizec! ( talk) 21:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for requesting a full protection as it was needed at the moment. I am not sure how long the dispute may continue, but it looks like we have lots of Jackson fans who regardless what his true sales represents want to see their favorite artist at the top of the list.-- Harout72 ( talk) 23:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Momusufan. Do you know of any Disney-related articles that were vandalized other than Scooby Doo? I was looking at WP:Long term abuse/Bambifan101 and trying to see if this is the same guy. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out in reverting Nangparbat. :) Elockid ( Talk· Contribs) 19:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on helping control vandalism. Ford Power Stroke engine is now cleaner.-- Dana60Cummins ( talk) 22:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to know why did you undo the Location of Atlantis back to BOLT machine. the changes made by me were aproved by the moderator and are legit. thanks -- Xellas ( talk) 23:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Why do you think I have committed a 3RR? I have made changes with references. yes it was undo by the automatic clueBot and then Dougweller undo it to my changes and telling me that sometimes the machine does that. I can't find that message but it was around 1-3 a clock 8/22/09.
My input was all referenced and no one commented on it. I am sorry but you have violated the WP rules. bc you didn't explain to me where did I committed a 3RR? I deleted a huge junk of Sarmast passage bc it was to long and to detailed and to technical, while other theories are short and mostly use one paragraph. Also I divided the Malta Sicily section as they belong to 2 different groups. They have nothing in common. Furthermore, I delted the sentence where it suggest that Maltese people originated from Iberia. Also, the introduction paragraph was formulated in such away that suggested that Spain is the Location of Atlantis. It wasn't referenced. Plato stated ATLANTIS PELAGOS (Atlantis Sea!!!) Now, if he was referring to Atlantic Ocean or not we don't know but we can't put that on the intro, BC it becomes a conflict of interest. I also entered the people that helped bring the story down to us, Solon, Dropides, Critias and Plato. And everything was referenced. You guys didn't even read the stuff. you have the right to question everything that an WP editor does but you can't undo them only bc you CAN!!
I am waiting for an answer Xellas ( talk) 23:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
No I am not in dispute, bc the other person is not talking, just playin around and anduing things without explaning. I supsect you're the person, nevertheless, I am not sure so I am not going to accuse you of something that I have no facts. Nevertheless, You undued my work without explanations!!! That's the proof. I am an editor and I have the right to change things if I feel they are not cited or referenced, as well I have something to add. Now, bc you guys have a conflict of interest, bc you want to suport a certain theory that's in vialotion of the rules. The WP rules state that you can;t undue someone work without reasons and without comenting on it, you have to give details and prove that I commited a 3RR. -- Xellas ( talk) 00:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I am going to undue the article to it's previews version and I would like from you to check it out and I will be happy for you to comment on each particular changes. If you reason with me and pinpoint where exactly things don't fit or there is not enough evidence I will be more than happy to solve the problem and end the dispute. -- Xellas ( talk) 00:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
In AIV you said it traced back to Phoenix instead of Atlanta [1], but when I do a Whois, it comes to the same Cox Atlanta as the rest [2]. His usual 68 is 68.220.x rather than 68.230.x, but if its going back to Phoenix instead of Atlanta, then it may be a false positive. I was triggered by the Whois I did saying Atlanta and his posted here [3], when he supposedly has never been blocked or had an account. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 16:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I reverted a change on this topic. All hail, fellow vandal fighter, and greetings! The PTR for the IP in question is not shared. It also (IMO) does fit the category of IPs used for vandalism. Pardon if you disagree, please let me know if you do, and apologies in advance. Best regards, -- 4wajzkd02 ( talk) 00:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out with User:Tilliego. I should've just blocked her as a sock, but I was being AGFish and filed the SPI instead. tedder ( talk) 23:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
This is the 6th time I have tried to clean up the Flip tricks section and cite references only to have it be reversed. 69.171.163.36 ( talk) 04:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
[4] I'd be interested to know the source of the evidence for this, thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
I am not sure that is an "open proxy". It may be a proxy (by my findings, confirmed by others) but not an open one. We try to indef block all the open proxies we can find, so that's why I wanted to check. Thanks for your work, and happy editing! Killiondude ( talk) 06:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Wasn't the by 70.146.227.107 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) fundamentally a spelling correction? Even if he is a sock, that wasn't really worth reverting.... TheFeds 02:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know I reported that user as being a suspected sockpuppet of Bambifan01 ( Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bambifan101) -- 5 albert square ( talk) 03:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I just left word with J. Delanoy regarding that third, unblocked BellSouth range. I believe I may have successfully blocked the range, but I don't have checkuser privileges and so it may not actually be blocked. I'm hoping that he'll double-check and properly block the range if necessary and that ought to do it for Bambifan101 once and for all. That evil little freak has been more trouble than he's worth. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 06:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
for your help in my request for protection. don't know why, but i was finding it a little tricky, then my computer froze. when i came back to fix it, you had already taken care of the issue! -- 216.244.65.118 ( talk) 17:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
The the number should appear as two dashes until it is revealed by the Yankees. Girardi had stated during the 2009 World Series Game 6 post game he would consider a switch to # 28 for himself.-- Subman758 ( talk) 21:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
For your work with IP talk pages. Enigma msg 21:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC) |