Your thoughts on the research outputs of universities were brilliant. My2Vice ( talk) 09:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Nano Energy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
– robertsky (
talk)
12:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, MojoDiJi!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Gusfriend (
talk)
03:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nano Energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Fade258 ( talk) 13:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lancet Oncology Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
You're create several stubs in a rather poor state. WP:JWG has good advice on how to write these. I suggest using Immunology Letters as a model. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
BTW, instead of adding those manually, you can just run citation bot on the articles. It'll do a lot more than just add a PMID. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 05:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for creating articles on notable journals, we always can use more editors in this area. However, instead of creating tiny stubs, taking 15 min extra and following the tips in our journal article writing guide you'll get more meatier articles (and reduce the risk that someone not specializing in this area takes your articles to AfD). I've tweaked and corrected some of your articles, but you are going too fast and I'm losing track. All those articles can easily be expanded, so why not go for quality instead of quantity. Thanks for listening. -- Randykitty ( talk) 14:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi MojoDiJi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hi MojoDiJi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hi MojoDiJi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your thoughts on the research outputs of universities were brilliant. My2Vice ( talk) 09:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Nano Energy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
– robertsky (
talk)
12:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, MojoDiJi!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Gusfriend (
talk)
03:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nano Energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Fade258 ( talk) 13:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lancet Oncology Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
You're create several stubs in a rather poor state. WP:JWG has good advice on how to write these. I suggest using Immunology Letters as a model. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
BTW, instead of adding those manually, you can just run citation bot on the articles. It'll do a lot more than just add a PMID. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 05:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for creating articles on notable journals, we always can use more editors in this area. However, instead of creating tiny stubs, taking 15 min extra and following the tips in our journal article writing guide you'll get more meatier articles (and reduce the risk that someone not specializing in this area takes your articles to AfD). I've tweaked and corrected some of your articles, but you are going too fast and I'm losing track. All those articles can easily be expanded, so why not go for quality instead of quantity. Thanks for listening. -- Randykitty ( talk) 14:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi MojoDiJi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hi MojoDiJi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hi MojoDiJi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)